Review ArticleReview

Human epidermal growth factor receptor targeted inhibitors for the treatment of ovarian cancer

Maria Bonello, Andrew Harvey Sims and Simon Peter Langdon
Cancer Biology & Medicine November 2018, 15 (4) 375-388; DOI: https://doi.org/10.20892/j.issn.2095-3941.2018.0062

Abstract

Ovarian cancer is the second most lethal gynecological cancer worldwide and while most patients respond to initial therapy, they often relapse with resistant disease. Human epidermal growth factor receptors (especially HER1/EGFR and HER2/ERBB2) are involved in disease progression; hence, strategies to inhibit their action could prove advantageous in ovarian cancer patients, especially in patients resistant to first line therapy. Monoclonal antibodies and tyrosine kinase inhibitors are two classes of drugs that act on these receptors. They have demonstrated valuable antitumor activity in multiple cancers and their possible use in ovarian cancer continues to be studied. In this review, we discuss the human epidermal growth factor receptor family; review emerging clinical studies on monoclonal antibodies and tyrosine kinase inhibitors targeting these receptors in ovarian cancer patients; and propose future research possibilities in this area.

keywords

Introduction

Ovarian cancer is the eighth most lethal type of cancer in women worldwide, with over 184,000 fatalities reported in 20181. It has a poor prognosis and is usually diagnosed at late stage, due to lack of specific diagnostic biomarkers and relatively non-specific symptoms. Current diagnostic tests for ovarian cancer include the CA-125 blood test coupled with abdominal/pelvic ultrasound and computerized tomography (CT) scan. First line treatment of ovarian cancer is optimal debulking of macroscopic disease, generally followed by chemotherapy with carboplatin alone or in combination with paclitaxel2,3.

The most common type of ovarian cancer is epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC), which is divided into 5 main subtypes, with differing histological, molecular, and genetic characteristics3,4. The most common subtype is high grade serous ovarian cancer (HGSOC) which accounts for approximately 70% of the cases, with clear cell (10%), endometrioid (10%), mucinous (< 5%), and low grade serous cancer (< 5%) comprising the other significant subtypes3,4. Recent investigations into the pathogenesis of ovarian cancer showed that it primarily originates from different parts of the female reproductive system and involves cellular migration to the ovaries. HGSOC is identified to originate from the distal fallopian tube, endometrioid and clear cell cancers arise from the endometrium, while low grade serous cancer might progress from serous cystadenoma and serous borderline tumors5.

Multiple drugs have been tested and approved for ovarian cancer although the response rate for second line therapy is only 10%–35% and different ovarian cancer subtypes respond differently to drug treatment. HGSOC patients usually respond well to initial platinum-based therapy, given their BRCA and p53 mutations7. However, these patients often present with resistance to initial therapy after a few months.

There is increasing interest in the potential use of targeted inhibitors for the treatment of ovarian cancer. This review seeks to overview the current clinical and preclinical status of human epidermal growth factor receptor (HER) targeted therapy in ovarian cancer, with special emphasis on tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs).

Human epidermal growth factor receptors (HERs)

The HER family has been associated with the progression of several cancers including breast, lung and colon cancer8. In ovarian cancer, amplification, and/or high expression of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), HER2 and HER3 receptors have been implicated in the progression and prognosis of the disease9-12.

The HER family of receptors [also known as erythroblastic leukemia viral oncogene (erbB) family] are present on the cell surface as monomers, in the absence of ligand activation. There are four members in this family, EGFR (HER1/erbB1), HER2 (neu/erbB2), HER3 (erbB3) and HER4 (erbB4) (Figure 1). With the exception of HER2, ligands bind to their extracellular domain and form homo- or heterodimers with other members of the family, preferentially with HER2, since it has the most favorable kinase activity and exists in an activated form13. HER ligands are divided into three groups; those which bind specifically to EGFR (epidermal growth factor, amphiregulin and transforming growth factor-α), those conferring dual specificity to EGFR and HER4 (betacellulin, heparin-binding EGF, and epiregulin), and those which bind to HER3 and HER4 (neuregulins/heregulins)14.

1
1

Scheme illustrating the downstream signaling of the HER pathway, chiefly the mitogen activated protein kinase (MAPK)/ERK pathway, the phospholipase Cγ (PLCγ) pathway, the signal transducer and activation of transcription (STAT) pathway, and the phosphoinosidyl-3-kinase (PI3K)/protein kinase B (AKT)/mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) pathway; where ER=Endoplasmic Reticulum, Ca2+=Calcium ions

Upon receptor dimerization, multiple downstream pathways are activated, which regulate cell proliferation, differentiation, angiogenesis, survival, and cellular metabolism amongst other functions. Heterodimerization allows for a myriad of phosphotyrosine residues to bind, which in turn increases the possibilities for signaling pathways15. These pathways (Figure 1) include the mitogen activated protein kinase (MAPK)/ERK pathway, which regulates the growth and development of cells, the signal transducer and activation of transcription (STAT) pathway, which governs cell proliferation and differentiation, the phosphoinosidyl-3-kinase (PI3K)/protein kinase B (AKT)/mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) pathway, which regulates cell survival and metabolism, and the phospholipase Cγ (PLCγ) pathway, which controls calcium-dependent actions13,16,17. In tumorigenesis, mutations within the components of these pathways can cause cancer cells to acquire certain aptitudes, including impartiality to proliferation signals, circumvention of apoptosis, insensitivity to growth inhibitory signals, augmented replicative potential and the capability to metastasize18.

EGFR (HER1) is a receptor tyrosine kinase comprising an extracellular ligand-binding domain of 622 residues, a 23 residue transmembrane domain, and a large, 522-residue intracellular domain15. EGFR is normally weakly expressed in the ovaries, however, several studies have found that EGFR is highly expressed in ovarian cancer. Immunohistochemical studies have indicated that 30%–70% of ovarian cancers have increased EGFR expression19-21. High expression of EGFR is associated with poor, progression-free survival (PFS), advanced tumor grade, greater residual tumor mass and rapid proliferation9,10,12. It has also been suggested that high EGFR expression in the tumor stroma is associated with aggressive clinical conditions and outcome and EGFR upregulation in fibroblasts is associated with growth and migratory abilities of ovarian cancer cells22.

HER2 is overexpressed in approximately 6%–30% of ovarian cancer patients10,23 and is initially associated with DNA amplification and poor prognosis24. Overexpression is often detected in the mucinous (19%)25 and clear cell (14%)26 subtypes. However, even some serous (3%) and endometrioid ovarian cancers (2%) have HER2 overexpression27. Several studies have associated overexpression of HER2 with poor prognosis10,28.

HER3 is expressed as a full-length receptor on the cell surface, in parallel with truncated intracellular isoforms. However, the activity of the latter is not well defined29,30. HER3 lacks tyrosine kinase activity, hence it has to be transphosphorylated by other HER members to promote cell signaling15. HER3 is more frequently expressed in ovarian cancer (30%–80%) than EGFR and HER231 and is more common amongst borderline and early-stage lesions32. Among the dimerization possibilities between these proteins, the most potent signaling complex is generated when HER3 heterodimerizes with HER233. Increased HER3 expression has been associated with poor clinical outcome and the average survival time for patients with low HER3 expression was 3.3 years, in contrast to 1.8 years for patients with high HER3 expression11. Studies in various cancers have shown that when HER3 and MET are co-expressed, they are often associated with either response or resistance to therapy34-36. Other studies have shown that high expression of HER3 might lead to HER3-PI3K-Akt signaling cascade in doxorubicin and cisplatin treated ovarian cancer, which often results in resistance to therapy37,38.

HER4 is the least understood receptor of the HER family. It occurs as a spliced isoform, often being processed further by enzymes into a soluble intracellular domain, which can disperse to the cell cytoplasm or nucleus39. In breast cancer, nuclear localization of the intracellular domain in combination with estrogen expression predicted worse clinical outcomes compared to membrane HER4 and estrogen40. There are conflicting views about the expression of HER4 in ovarian cancer, with earlier reports suggesting either decreased or lack of expression of the receptor41, while more recent studies suggest an increased expression of HER4 in malignant tissues compared to normal tissues31,42,43. Although the implication of HER4 expression in ovarian cancer is unclear, two studies found a possible correlation between HER4 expression and resistance of serous ovarian cancer to chemotherapy42,44.

Monoclonal antibodies

HER-targeted monoclonal antibodies (mABs), such as trastuzumab (Herceptin®) and pertuzumab (Perjeta®) are recombinant humanized mABs, inhibiting HER2 extracellularly with differing modes of action (Figure 2). These agents have shown favorable results in HER2 positive cancers, especially HER2-positive breast cancer, where they are well established as standard therapy. More recently, trastuzumab-emtansine antibody-drug conjugate has been developed as another option for trastuzumab-resistant disease. Preclinical in vitro and in vivo studies and clinical trials have been focusing on the activity of these mABs in ovarian cancer, especially in selective subtypes, particularly mucinous cancers, which have HER2 amplification and overexpression45,46.

2
2

Site of action of the various TKIs and the relative potency towards the receptor; where +++ is very potent, ++ is potent, + is mildly potent and – is generally not active.

Trastuzumab

Trastuzumab binds to the juxtamembrane region of the extracellular domain of HER2, inhibiting cleavage of the extracellular domain, obstructing HER2 homodimerization as well as inducing antibody dependent cell-mediated cytotoxicity47,48. Trastuzumab requires HER2 overexpression for it to be effective48,49. The success of trastuzumab in clinical trials49-51 has led to its clinical approval in metastatic breast cancer overexpressing HER2, as monotherapy or in combination with paclitaxel depending on whether the patients previously received chemotherapy regimens for their metastatic disease52. A phase II clinical trial of trastuzumab involving 41 eligible ovarian cancer patients with HER2 overexpression demonstrated an overall response rate (ORR) of 7.3%, which included one complete and two partial responses. The median PFS was two months53.

Pertuzumab

Pertuzumab acts by blocking the dimerization domain of HER2, thus inhibiting HER2 heterodimerization48. Unlike trastuzumab, it does not require HER2 overexpression to confer its inhibitory effects54. Pertuzumab is used to treat HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer patients who have not been previously exposed to anti-HER2 therapy or chemotherapy for metastatic disease and is also used for the neoadjuvant treatment of HER2-positive early stage breast cancer55. In a phase III clinical trial for breast cancer (CLEOPATRA), the combination of trastuzumab and pertuzumab along with docletaxel, showed additional benefit compared to monotherapy, which has subsequently led to the approval of this combination for HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer56. A randomized phase II clinical trial with pertuzumab showed better PFS (5.3 months) in low HER3 expressed, platinum-resistant ovarian cancer patients and hence it was assessed in a phase III clinical trial (PENELOPE) in platinum-resistant ovarian cancer patients with low expression of HER357,58. In the PENELOPE trial, patients who received pertuzumab with chemotherapy showed a PFS of 4.3 months and an ORR of 13.1%, when compared to the PFS of 2.6 months and ORR of 8.7% in patients who received placebo with chemotherapy58. In an in vivo setting using ovarian cancer xenograft mouse models, our group has demonstrated that the combination of pertuzumab and trastuzumab produces prolonged growth inhibition, when compared to either antibody used as a single agent59. Furthermore, another preclinical study has suggested that trastuzumab could also augment sensitivity to endocrine therapy in ERα-positive ovarian cancer60.

Trastuzumab-emtansine

Trastuzumab-emtansine (T-DM1, Kadcyla®), is a HER2 targeted mAB conjugated to a microtubule inhibitor (emtansine). T-DM1 acts by binding to HER2, triggering the endocytosis of the HER2-T-DM1 complex. Once in the cytoplasm, DM1 is released from the complex, which inhibits microtubule assembly, leading to cell death61. In a phase III clinical trial for breast cancer, T-DM1 treated cohort showed a superior clinical outcome (PFS 9.6 months) compared to patients who received lapatinib with capecitabine (6.4 months)62. It was later approved as monotherapy for HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer, which is resistant to trastuzumab treatment63. In a recent in vivo study by Menderes et al.64, T-DM1 demonstrated significant tumor growth inhibition against HER2 overexpressing ovarian cancer primary cell lines compared to either pertuzumab or trastuzumab alone or a combination of both. It also reduced tumor growth and improved survival in xenograft models64-66. This agent was also shown to have similar antibody-dependent, cell-mediated cytotoxicity as pertuzumab, trastuzumab and their combination64. Another study demonstrated their excellent inhibitory activity against both subcutaneous and intraperitoneal growth of the SKOV3 in an ovarian cancer xenograft model67.

TKIs

TKIs are small drug molecules that inhibit tyrosine kinases. Tyrosine kinases include the HER family, vascular endothelial growth factor receptors (VEGF), platelet-derived growth factor receptors (PDGFR), and also non-receptor tyrosine kinases BCR-ABL and KIT68,69. Tyrosine kinases are enzymes that catalyze the transfer of phosphate from adenosine triphosphate (ATP) onto target proteins to elicit a response. There are three types of TKIs. Most small molecule TKIs are type I, which compete with ATP by binding to ATP binding sites on the active conformation of the receptors, thereby interfering with the action of tyrosine kinases69. Type II TKIs bind to the inactive conformation of a kinase, while type III allosteric inhibitors bind to sites distant from the active site70. To date, a few TKIs have been evaluated in ovarian cancer patients that are described below (Table 1, Figure 2). These include the first generation EGFR inhibitors, gefitinib and erlotinib, which have shown clinical efficacy against mutant EGFR lung cancer. Since, a resistance mutation develops frequently at T790M upon treatment, covalent irreversible second generation TKIs were developed. These consist of afatinib and neratinib that are active against this mutation. Other HER inhibitors were developed with broader inhibitory activity across multiple HER family members (pan-inhibitors) and these include lapatinib and canertinib as early developed inhibitors, followed by neratinib, sapitinib, and dacomitinib. Finally, multi-targeted TKIs that target the HER family among other targets (e.g., PDGFR, VEGFR, etc.) include vandetanib and leflunomide.

View this table:
1

HER-targeted TKIs evaluated in preclinical models of ovarian cancer

Reversible inhibitors

Gefitinib

Gefitinib (Iressa®, ZD-1839) is a type I quinazoline derivative TKI, reversibly selective for EGFR. Gefitinib is marketed for monotherapy of locally advanced or metastatic NSCLC and is most effective in cancers with mutation or increased EGFR copy number81. When evaluated in an ovarian cancer phase II trial, gefitinib showed a limited response rate in platinum pre-treated ovarian cancer patients, with only one out of twenty-seven patients having an ORR of 4%82. However, this cancer was the one in this cohort harboring a mutation in the catalytic region of EGFR, consistent with data for NSCLC. Another phase II clinical trial combining gefitinib with tamoxifen in refractory or resistant ovarian cancer patients, did not demonstrate any advantageous tumor responses with median time-to-progression being 58 days83. Preclinical studies in ovarian cancer demonstrate that combining gefitinib with cisplatin, increases the efficacy of cisplatin, mainly due to the inhibition of downstream EGFR signaling and blocking DNA repair mechanisms84.

Erlotinib

Erlotinib (Tarceva®, OSI-774) is a quinazoline derivative, which reversibly inhibits EGFR. It is indicated as a first line therapy for NSCLC and in combination with gemcitabine for pancreatic cancer. Erlotinib has shown enhancement of PFS compared to chemotherapy (13.1 months vs. 4.6 months, respectively) in chemotherapy-naive NSCLC patients, harboring EGFR mutations85. An in vivo study in ovarian cancer expressing high EGFR demonstrated that a combination of erlotinib with olaparib, a PARP inhibitor, had a greater tumor suppressive effect than monotherapy86. A phase II study combining erlotinib with carboplatin showed that this combination was more effective in ovarian cancer patients with platinum-sensitive disease compared to platinum-resistant disease with 57% and 7% objective response rates, respectively. However, the contribution of erlotinib in this combination is unclear87. Another phase II study assessing the pathologic complete response (pCR) of ovarian cancer patients administered with a combination of carboplatin, paclitaxel, and erlotinib, resulted in pCR of around 30%, which was not an improvement when compared to previous results88. Continuous infusion of topotecan with erlotinib was studied in a phase II trial, where only 1 out of 6 patients showed a satisfactory partial response89. An exploratory phase II clinical trial involving bevacizumab and erlotinib determined that high levels of VEGF-A caused bevacizumab resistance, while erlotinib did not seem to contribute to the efficacy of the combination90. A randomized phase III study evaluated the efficacy of administering erlotinib to patients with ovarian cancer after first line chemotherapy. The median PFS in patients receiving erlotinib and placebo was 12.7 and 12.4 months, respectively, concluding that erlotinib does not render pre-treated ovarian cancer patients with additional benefits91. In extension to this phase III clinical trial, a tissue biomarker study concluded that increased EGFR gene copy number led to worse overall survival and PFS92.

Lapatinib

Lapatinib (Tyverb®, GW-572016) is an oral competitive TKI inhibitor selective for EGFR and HER2. It is recommended in HER2 overexpressing breast cancer. Preclinical data indicates that lapatinib is effective when HER2 is overexpressed and most likely homodimerized78. In breast cancer clinical trials, lapatinib has shown better inhibition of tumors expressing HER2 instead of EGFR78,93. In a phase I study in ovarian cancer, while assessing lapatinib in combination with carboplatin many non-dose limiting toxicities were noticed and 6 out of 11 patients had PR or stable disease94, while in a phase II trial (LapTop) assessing lapatinib with topotecan, only 20% of patients experienced benefit. However, considerable hematologic adverse effects were observed in this trial95,96. In another phase II study in recurrent ovarian cancer, the median PFS was 1.8 months, OS was 10.5 months, and only 2 out of 25 patients had PFS at 6 months, while there was no ORR, which might be due to low EGFR and HER2 expression97.

Sapitinib

Sapitinib (AZD 8931) is a type I, reversible, equipotent inhibitor of EGFR, HER2 and HER3 receptor signaling, especially when EGFR is highly expressed and there is no HER2 overexpression78,98. In fact, sapitinib has shown enhanced tumor growth inhibition against EGFR-driven xenograft tumors when compared to lapatinib78. Preclinical studies suggest that sapitinib favors HRG-induced HER2/HER3 heterodimers78. It has also demonstrated its ability to inhibit proliferation through pERK and pAkt pathways, and induce apoptosis through M30 and cleaved caspase-378. In xenograft models of inflammatory breast cancer, sapitinib alone significantly inhibited tumor growth, however, the combination of paclitaxel and sapitinib was more effective than either agent alone98. Sapitinib has been tested in 8 ovarian cancer patients amongst others, in a phase I clinical trial, to assess the maximum tolerated dose, which was established to be 240 mg twice, daily99.

Irreversible inhibitors

Afatinib

Afatinib (Gilotrif®, Giotrif®, BIBW-2992) is a type I anilinoquinazoline derivative TKI inhibitor, which irreversibly binds to EGFR, HER2 and HER4100. It is currently approved for the treatment of mutated EGFR non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Afatinib has not been extensively tested in ovarian cancer clinical trials. A phase I dose escalation study, which included four ovarian cancer patients, showed promise clinically as indicated by stable disease101,102. In breast cancer, afatinib treatment was effective, however, it produced many unwanted side effects in patients103,104. In an ovarian cancer preclinical study, afatinib reversed the ATP binding cassette (ABC) mediated multidrug resistance to paclitaxel and adriamycin and also increased the apoptotic efficacy of paclitaxel in ABCB1 overexpressing tumors105. In breast cancer, it was also found that afatinib overcomes HERT798I-mediated neratinib resistance106. In vivo, afatinib with docetaxel showed better response in tumor size reduction, than either drug as a single agent107. In vitro studies using ovarian cancer cell line models showed that afatinib is effective in inhibiting migration and proliferation108. It was also found to be effective in inhibiting basal and heregulin-induced EGFR, HER2, Akt and ERK phosphorylation108.

Canertinib

Canertinib (CI-1033, PD-183805) is a 4-anilinoquinazoline, irreversible, pan-HER TKI, which reached phase II clinical trials. However, it was recently withdrawn109. In vivo, canertinib showed potent inhibitory effects in ovarian cancer cell lines, especially when combined with a c-MET inhibitor (PHA665752), which further reduced phosphorylation and total expression of signaling proteins108,110,111. A randomized phase II clinical trial in platinum resistant or refractory ovarian cancer patients resulted in disease stability in about 30% of the patients and a one-year survival rate of around 37%. However, there were no complete or partial responses112. Studies suggest that high levels of HER and low levels of HER autocrine ligands lead to canertinib resistance113.

Neratinib

Neratinib (Nerlynx®, HKI-272) is an oral, irreversible pan-HER inhibitor, which has been recently approved for the adjuvant treatment of early stage HER2-positive breast cancer114, after a phase III study indicated a 2-year, invasive, disease-free survival rate of 94%, when administered after chemotherapy and trastuzumab adjuvant therapy115. In a phase II study assessing neratinib in advanced NSCLC, patients with T790M EGFR mutation did not respond to therapy, however, partial response or disease stabilization was seen in patients with G719X mutated EGFR116. Overall, previously treated patients or TKI-naïve patients did not benefit notably from neratinib treatment. One of the reasons for this could be low bioavailability due to dose reductions prompted by toxicity116. In HER2-positive breast cancer, neratinib as a single agent was well tolerated and has shown substantial clinical activity in trastuzumab-naïve patients, with a 16-week PFS rate of 78% and median PFS of 39.6 weeks versus 16-week PFS rate of 59% and median PFS of 22.3 weeks in trastuzumab pre-treated patients79. Other clinical trials in breast cancer assessed neratinib in combination with temsirolimus, vinorelbine, paclitaxel with or without trastuzumab and capecitabine, all of which were well tolerated by patients and had anti-tumor properties117-121. Neratinib has demonstrated pre-clinical efficacy in ovarian cancer, especially in HER2-amplified carcinosarcoma, where it inhibits proliferation and tumor growth122, as well as decreases phosphorylation of transcription factor S6 and causes cell cycle arrest in the G0/G1 phase123. There is currently a phase II clinical trial assessing neratinib efficacy in HER2-positive solid tumors (SUMMIT Trial) with mutations in EGFR, HER2 or HER3, including ovarian cancer (NCT01953926). This trial included four evaluable ovarian cancer patients of whom one had stable disease, while three had disease progression124.

Other HER-targeted TKIs investigated in clinical trials

Dacomitinib (PF00299804), a recently developed irreversible pan-HER receptor inhibitor, has demonstrated interesting anti-proliferative activity against chemoresistant ovarian cancer cell lines125. One ovarian cancer patient showed response in a phase I clinical trial of dacomitinib in combination with anti-IGFIR antibody figitumumab126. Several multi-targeted TKIs with broad-spectrum activity including the HER family are undergoing evaluation. Vandetanib (ZD6474) is a drug that inhibits EGFR, VEGF receptor and Ret signaling and has been tested as monotherapy in an ovarian cancer trial where, despite decreasing EGFR phosphorylation, it demonstrated little efficacy127. Leflunomide is an inhibitor of EGFR, PDGFR, and FGFR and in two phase II trials, 1 out of 8 (12.5%) and 1 out of 15 (7%) ovarian cancer patients demonstrated partial response128,129.

Biomarkers of sensitivity and resistance to TKIs in ovarian cancer

In breast and lung cancers, informative biomarkers of sensitivity to HER TKIs include overexpression of HER2 and mutation of EGFR. In breast cancer, HER2 overexpression is an effective biomarker of sensitivity to HER2-targeted TKIs, such as lapatinib. Preclinical studies of T-DM1 in ovarian cancers suggest that minimal expression of HER2 was essential for anti-tumorigenic properties of T-DM1 in model systems66. Analysis of a series of ovarian cancer xenograft models demonstrated the curative potential of trastuzumab/pertuzumab combination in cancers with amplification and overexpression of HER2. Currently there is less information available regarding the association of HER2 expression levels and TKIs, in ovarian cancer59,60. Interestingly, there is one case report of dramatic remission of a chemotherapy-resistant ovarian cancer to trastuzumab, which was HER2-negative suggesting that, the factors governing responsiveness in ovarian cancer might differ from those in breast cancer130. The mutated form of EGFR with deletions in exon 19 indicates sensitivity to TKIs such as erlotinib and gefitinib, in NSCLC131. However, the importance of EGFR mutations in ovarian cancer is still not well researched since the occurrence of these mutations is much lower. As mentioned above, in a phase II trial of gefitinib in 27 ovarian cancer patients, the single patient showing response did contain an EGFR mutation (2235del15; E746-A750del) in the catalytic domain consistent with this molecular feature being an indicator of sensitivity82. This requires further validation in future studies.

The importance of mutations in HER2 and HER3 for sensitivity to pan-HER inhibitors, is under clinical investigation at present and a basket trial (SUMMIT) investigating neratinib treatment in multiple cancers with mutations, has been reported124.

As observed with other chemotherapeutic drugs, resistance to TKIs is inevitable132. Mechanisms of resistance to EGFR-specific TKIs can include abnormalities in HERs, such as HER2 overexpression and mutations like EGFRvIII and HER2L869R106,133 and secondary EGFR mutations in T790M134, L747S, D761Y, and T854A135. Downstream signaling pathways that are frequently modified include mutations in KRAS, BRAF, PIK3CA, and PTEN136-138. Alternative pathways that can bypass control include aberrant activation of MET and HGF139,140, modifications in VEGF receptors which trigger vascular permeability, in platelet-derived growth factors that regulate angiogenesis and in interleukin-6 that controls inflammatory processes132-134. For other TKIs, overexpression of ABC resulting in low drug concentration in cells due to decreased uptake and increased efflux of the drug141 also contribute in resistance to therapy.

Future research

Combination therapy

Research in various cancers show that the combination of TKIs with chemotherapy, radiation, or mABs significantly inhibits tumor growth, without additional toxic effects, since they have different inhibitory profiles. For instance, lapatinib is administered in combination with either capecitabine/trastuzumab/aromatase inhibitor in HER2-positive breast cancers. Synergistic drug combinations can be achieved in two ways: vertically, which involves similar doses as monotherapy, and horizontally, in which the concentration of the dose is decreased downwards142. To date, in ovarian cancer, there are no established combination strategies involving TKIs. In ovarian cancer, only the mAB bevacizumab is approved to be used in combination with paclitaxel and carboplatin. In a phase II ovarian cancer study, the combination of pertuzumab and gemcitabine showed improved overall PFS when compared to gemcitabine and placebo57. In breast cancer, the combination of pertuzumab and trastuzumab has shown significant advantages over monotherapy. However, the combination of these mABs in ovarian cancer has only been studied in vivo, which has shown promising results59, and thus might be worth looking at clinically. Additionally, the combination of mABs and TKIs has not been clinically studied so far, in ovarian cancer. The combination of HER-targeted inhibitors with Poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors might prove useful in the treatment of ovarian cancer, since, recent in vitro studies combining a TKI with a PARPi showed synergistic growth inhibitory effects143. Computational biology has developed in recent years and offers the potential of precision medicine. Molecular anomalies can now be detected when screening through molecular information, which could identify individual patient appropriate medication . Hence, more pre-clinical bioinformatics studies need be conducted to investigate the effects of therapy on a molecular basis.

Chemosensitive versus chemoresistant phenotypes

HGSOC usually responds well to initial ovarian cancer therapy, with response rates as high as 85%7. This is frequently due to the fact that HGSOC has BRCA mutations. First-line chemotherapy acts by damaging DNA strands; BRCA acts to repair DNA, however, given that HGSOC frequently lacks BRCA function, DNA strands cannot be repaired, which consequently leads to the efficacy of primary chemotherapy in HGSOC. However, HGSOC cells through further mutation can restore BRCA function, which is one of the leading causes of resistance to initial chemotherapy144.

It is often acknowledged that ABC transporters play a pivotal role in resistance to first line chemotherapy. In fact, ABCB1, ABCB4, and ABCG2 were significantly up-regulated in cisplatin and paclitaxel resistant ovarian cancer cells145. Pertuzumab in a clinical trial of chemoresistant disease showed that the mAB demonstrated possible anti-tumor activity when combined with either gemcitabine or paclitaxel57,58, while novel TKIs that target multiple sites often demonstrate their ability to reverse ABC-mediated drug resistance105,146-148. Hence, mABs and TKIs might be more active in chemoresistant ovarian cancer than in the chemosensitive type.

Conclusions

Ovarian cancer is a complex disease, with multiple molecular profiles. It frequently becomes resistant after initial therapy necessitating the development of new strategies.

The use of HER-targeted therapy continues to be assessed in this disease, since it might have value for selective patients and pre-clinical data supports the potential of this approach. Only a limited number of phase II trials have been completed in ovarian cancer and while response rates are low, there are frequent good percentages of stable disease. The pan-HER TKIs may have broader efficacy and utility than the early EGFR-targeted TKIs, which are dependent on the presence of mutations (are uncommon in ovarian cancer). Further biomarker studies are now required to help identify the most sensitive ovarian cancers and combination strategies require further development.

Acknowledgements

The work disclosed in this publication is partially funded by the Endeavour Scholarship Scheme (Malta). Scholarships are part-financed by the European Union–European Social Fund (ESF)–Operational Program II–Cohesion Policy 2014–2020 “Investing in human capital to create more opportunities and promote the well-being of society”.

Footnotes

  • Conflict of interest statement No potential conflicts of interest are disclosed.

  • Received April 6, 2018.
  • Accepted October 26, 2018.
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY) 4.0, which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

References

  1. 1.↵
    2. Bray F,
    3. Ferlay J,
    4. Soerjomataram I,
    5. Siegel RL,
    6. Torre LA,
    7. Jemal A.
    Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2018;
  2. 2.↵
    2. Bast RC,
    3. Hennessy B,
    4. Mills GB.
    The biology of ovarian cancer: new opportunities for translation. Nat Rev Cancer. 2009; 9: 415.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  3. 3.↵
    2. Hollis RL,
    3. Gourley C.
    Genetic and molecular changes in ovarian cancer. Cancer Biol Med. 2016; 13: 236–47.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  4. 4.↵
    2. Prat J.
    Staging classification for cancer of the ovary, fallopian tube, and peritoneum. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2014; 124: 1–5.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  5. 5.↵
    2. Prat J.
    Ovarian carcinomas: five distinct diseases with different origins, genetic alterations, and clinicopathological features. Virchows Arch. 2012; 460: 237–49.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  6. 6.
    2. Markman M,
    3. Bookman MA.
    Second-line treatment of ovarian cancer. Oncologist. 2000; 5: 26–35.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  7. 7.↵
    2. Cooke SL,
    3. Brenton JD.
    Evolution of platinum resistance in high-grade serous ovarian cancer. Lancet Oncol. 2011; 12: 1169–74.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  8. 8.↵
    2. Hynes NE,
    3. MacDonald G.
    ErbB receptors and signaling pathways in cancer. Curr Opin Cell Biol. 2009; 21: 177–84.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  9. 9.↵
    2. Brustmann H.
    Epidermal growth factor receptor expression in serous ovarian carcinoma: an immunohistochemical study with galectin-3 and cyclin D1 and outcome. Int J Gynecol Pathol. 2008; 27: 380–9.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  10. 10.↵
    2. Verri E,
    3. Guglielmini P,
    4. Puntoni M,
    5. Perdelli L,
    6. Papadia A,
    7. Lorenzi P, et al.
    HER2/neu oncoprotein overexpression in epithelial ovarian cancer: evaluation of its prevalence and prognostic significance. Clinical study. Oncology. 2005; 68: 154–61.
    OpenUrl
  11. 11.↵
    2. Tanner B,
    3. Hasenclever D,
    4. Stern K,
    5. Schormann W,
    6. Bezler M,
    7. Hermes M, et al.
    ErbB-3 predicts survival in ovarian cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2006; 24: 4317–23.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  12. 12.↵
    2. Lassus H,
    3. Sihto H,
    4. Leminen A,
    5. Joensuu H,
    6. Isola J,
    7. Nupponen NN, et al.
    Gene amplification, mutation, and protein expression of EGFR and mutations of ERBB2 in serous ovarian carcinoma. J Mol Med. 2006; 84: 671–81.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  13. 13.↵
    2. Marmor MD,
    3. Skaria KB,
    4. Yarden Y.
    Signal transduction and oncogenesis by ErbB/HER receptors. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2004; 58: 903–13.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  14. 14.↵
    2. Casalini P,
    3. Iorio MV,
    4. Galmozzi E,
    5. Ménard S.
    Role of HER receptors family in development and differentiation. J Cell Physiol. 2004; 200: 343–50.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  15. 15.↵
    2. Roskoski R Jr..
    The ErbB/HER receptor protein-tyrosine kinases and cancer. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2004; 319: 1–11.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  16. 16.↵
    2. Wee P,
    3. Wang Z.
    Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Cell Proliferation Signaling Pathways. Cancers. 2017; 9: 52.
    OpenUrl
  17. 17.↵
    2. Teplinsky E,
    3. Muggia F.
    EGFR and HER2: is there a role in ovarian cancer? Transl Cancer Res. 2015; 4: 107–17.
    OpenUrl
  18. 18.↵
    2. Dhillon AS,
    3. Hagan S,
    4. Rath O,
    5. Kolch W.
    MAP kinase signalling pathways in cancer. Oncogene. 2007; 26: 3279–90.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  19. 19.↵
    2. Cloven NG,
    3. Kyshtoobayeva A,
    4. Burger RA,
    5. Yu I-R,
    6. Fruehauf JP.
    In vitro chemoresistance and biomarker profiles are unique for histologic subtypes of epithelial ovarian cancer. Gynecol Oncol. 2004; 92: 160–66.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  20. 20.
    2. Nielsen JS,
    3. Jakobsen E,
    4. HØlund B,
    5. Bertelsen K,
    6. Jakobsen A.
    Prognostic significance of p53, Her-2, and EGFR overexpression in borderline and epithelial ovarian cancer. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2004; 14: 1086–96.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  21. 21.↵
    2. Bartlett JM,
    3. Langdon SP,
    4. Simpson BJ,
    5. Stewart M,
    6. Katsaros D,
    7. Sismondi P, et al.
    The prognostic value of epidermal growth factor receptor mRNA expression in primary ovarian cancer. Br J Cancer. 1996; 73: 301–06.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  22. 22.↵
    2. Wang K,
    3. Li D,
    4. Sun L.
    High levels of EGFR expression in tumor stroma are associated with aggressive clinical features in epithelial ovarian cancer. Onco Targets Ther. 2016; 9: 377–86.
    OpenUrl
  23. 23.↵
    2. Farley J,
    3. Fuchiuji S,
    4. Darcy KM,
    5. Tian C,
    6. Hoskins WJ,
    7. McGuire WP, et al.
    Associations between ERBB2 amplification and progression-free survival and overall survival in advanced stage, suboptimally-resected epithelial ovarian cancers: a Gynecologic Oncology Group Study. Gynecol Oncol. 2009; 113: 341–7.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  24. 24.↵
    2. Slamon DJ,
    3. Godolphin W,
    4. Jones LA,
    5. Holt JA,
    6. Wong SG,
    7. Keith DE, et al.
    Studies of the HER-2/neu proto-oncogene in human breast and ovarian cancer. Science. 1989; 244: 707–12.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  25. 25.↵
    2. Anglesio MS,
    3. Kommoss S,
    4. Tolcher MC,
    5. Clarke B,
    6. Galletta L,
    7. Porter H, et al.
    Molecular characterization of mucinous ovarian tumours supports a stratified treatment approach with HER2 targeting in 19% of carcinomas. J Pathol. 2013; 229: 111–20.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  26. 26.↵
    2. Tan DS,
    3. Iravani M,
    4. McCluggage WG,
    5. Lambros MB,
    6. Milanezi F,
    7. Mackay A, et al.
    Genomic analysis reveals the molecular heterogeneity of ovarian clear cell carcinomas. Clin Cancer Res. 2011; 17: 1521–34.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  27. 27.↵
    2. McCaughan H,
    3. Um I,
    4. Langdon SP,
    5. Harrison DJ,
    6. Faratian D.
    HER2 expression in ovarian carcinoma: caution and complexity in biomarker analysis. J Clin Pathol. Published online first: March 12, 2012. DOI: 10.1136/jclinpath-2011-200616.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  28. 28.↵
    2. Shang A-Q,
    3. Wu J,
    4. Bi F,
    5. Zhang Y-J,
    6. Xu L-R,
    7. Li L-L, et al.
    Relationship between HER2 and JAK/STAT-SOCS3 signaling pathway and clinicopathological features and prognosis of ovarian cancer. Cancer Biol Ther. 2017; 18: 314–22.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  29. 29.↵
    2. Lee H,
    3. Maihle NJ.
    Isolation and characterization of four alternate c-erbB3 transcripts expressed in ovarian carcinoma-derived cell lines and normal human tissues. Oncogene. 1998; 16: 3243–52.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  30. 30.↵
    2. Srinivasan R,
    3. Leverton KE,
    4. Sheldon H,
    5. Hurst HC,
    6. Sarraf C,
    7. Gullick WJ.
    Intracellular expression of the truncated extracellular domain of c-erbB-3/HER3. Cell Signal. 2001; 13: 321–30.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  31. 31.↵
    2. Davies S,
    3. Holmes A,
    4. Lomo L,
    5. Steinkamp MP,
    6. Kang H,
    7. Muller CY, et al.
    High incidence of ErbB3, ErbB4, and MET expression in ovarian cancer. Int J Gynecol Pathol. 2014; 33: 402–10.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  32. 32.↵
    2. Simpson BJ,
    3. Weatherill J,
    4. Miller EP,
    5. Lessells AM,
    6. Langdon SP,
    7. Miller WR.
    c-erbB-3 protein expression in ovarian tumours. Br J Cancer. 1995; 71: 758–62.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  33. 33.↵
    2. Roskoski R.
    The ErbB/HER family of protein-tyrosine kinases and cancer. Pharmacol Res. 2014; 79: 34–74.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  34. 34.↵
    2. Engelman JA,
    3. Zejnullahu K,
    4. Mitsudomi T,
    5. Song Y,
    6. Hyland C,
    7. Park JO, et al.
    MET amplification leads to gefitinib resistance in lung cancer by activating ERBB3 signaling. Science. 2007; 316: 1039–43.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  35. 35.
    2. Krumbach R,
    3. Schuler J,
    4. Hofmann M,
    5. Giesemann T,
    6. Fiebig HH,
    7. Beckers T.
    Primary resistance to cetuximab in a panel of patient-derived tumour xenograft models: activation of MET as one mechanism for drug resistance. Eur J Cancer. 2011; 47: 1231–43.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  36. 36.↵
    2. Grovdal LM,
    3. Kim J,
    4. Holst MR,
    5. Knudsen SL,
    6. Grandal MV,
    7. van Deurs B.
    EGF receptor inhibitors increase ErbB3 mRNA and protein levels in breast cancer cells. Cell Signal. 2012; 24: 296–301.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  37. 37.↵
    2. Bezler M,
    3. Hengstler JG,
    4. Ullrich A.
    Inhibition of doxorubicin-induced HER3-PI3K-AKT signalling enhances apoptosis of ovarian cancer cells. Mol Oncol. 2012; 6: 516–29.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  38. 38.↵
    2. Chandarlapaty S,
    3. Sawai A,
    4. Scaltriti M,
    5. Rodrik-Outmezguine V,
    6. Grbovic-Huezo O,
    7. Serra V, et al.
    AKT Inhibition Relieves Feedback Suppression of Receptor Tyrosine Kinase Expression and Activity. Cancer Cell. 2011; 19: 58–71.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  39. 39.↵
    2. Sheng Q,
    3. Liu J.
    The therapeutic potential of targeting the EGFR family in epithelial ovarian cancer. Br J Cancer. 2011; 104: 1241–45.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  40. 40.↵
    2. Jones FE.
    HER4 intracellular domain (4ICD) activity in the developing mammary gland and breast cancer. J Mammary Gland Biol Neoplasia. 2008; 13: 247–58.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  41. 41.↵
    2. Scoccia B,
    3. Lee YM,
    4. Niederberger C,
    5. Ilekis JV.
    Expression of the ErbB family of receptors in ovarian cancer. J Soc Gynecol Investig. 1998; 5: 161–65.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  42. 42.↵
    2. Saglam O,
    3. Xiong Y,
    4. Marchion DC,
    5. Strosberg C,
    6. Wenham RM,
    7. Johnson JJ, et al.
    ERBB4 Expression in Ovarian Serous Carcinoma Resistant to Platinum-Based Therapy. Cancer Control. 2017; 24: 89–95.
    OpenUrl
  43. 43.↵
    2. Steffensen KD,
    3. Waldstrom M,
    4. Andersen RF,
    5. Olsen DA,
    6. Jeppesen U,
    7. Knudsen HJ, et al.
    Protein levels and gene expressions of the epidermal growth factor receptors, HER1, HER2, HER3 and HER4 in benign and malignant ovarian tumors. Int J Oncol. 2008; 33: 195–204.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  44. 44.↵
    2. Gilmour LM,
    3. Macleod KG,
    4. McCaig A,
    5. Gullick WJ,
    6. Smyth JF,
    7. Langdon SP.
    Expression of erbB-4/HER-4 growth factor receptor isoforms in ovarian cancer. Cancer Res. 2001; 61: 2169–76.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  45. 45.↵
    2. McAlpine JN,
    3. Wiegand KC,
    4. Vang R,
    5. Ronnett BM,
    6. Adamiak A,
    7. Kobel M, et al.
    HER2 overexpression and amplification is present in a subset of ovarian mucinous carcinomas and can be targeted with trastuzumab therapy. BMC Cancer. 2009; 9: 433.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  46. 46.↵
    2. Chao WR,
    3. Lee MY,
    4. Lin WL,
    5. Chen CK,
    6. Lin JC,
    7. Koo CL, et al.
    HER2 amplification and overexpression are significantly correlated in mucinous epithelial ovarian cancer. Hum Pathol. 2014; 45: 810–16.
    OpenUrl
  47. 47.↵
    2. Hudis CA.
    Trastuzumab—mechanism of action and use in clinical practice. N Engl J Med. 2007; 357: 39–51.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  48. 48.↵
    2. Badache A,
    3. Hynes NE.
    A new therapeutic antibody masks ErbB2 to its partners. Cancer Cell. 2004; 5: 299–301.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  49. 49.↵
    2. Baselga J,
    3. Norton L,
    4. Albanell J,
    5. Kim YM,
    6. Mendelsohn J.
    Recombinant humanized anti-HER2 antibody (Herceptin) enhances the antitumor activity of paclitaxel and doxorubicin against HER2/neu overexpressing human breast cancer xenografts. Cancer Res. 1998; 58: 2825–31.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  50. 50.
    2. Vogel CL,
    3. Cobleigh MA,
    4. Tripathy D,
    5. Gutheil JC,
    6. Harris LN,
    7. Fehrenbacher L, et al.
    Efficacy and safety of trastuzumab as a single agent in first-line treatment of HER2-overexpressing metastatic breast cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2002; 20: 719–26.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  51. 51.↵
    2. Buzdar AU,
    3. Ibrahim NK,
    4. Francis D,
    5. Booser DJ,
    6. Thomas ES,
    7. Theriault RL, et al.
    Significantly higher pathologic complete remission rate after neoadjuvant therapy with trastuzumab, paclitaxel, and epirubicin chemotherapy: results of a randomized trial in human epidermal growth factor receptor 2–positive operable breast cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2005; 23: 3676–85.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  52. 52.↵
    2. McGahan L.
    Herceptin®: monoclonal antibody therapy for metastatic breast cancer. Issues Emerg Health Technol. 1998:1–4.
  53. 53.↵
    2. Bookman MA,
    3. Darcy KM,
    4. Clarke-Pearson D,
    5. Boothby RA,
    6. Horowitz IR.
    Evaluation of Monoclonal Humanized Anti-HER2 Antibody, Trastuzumab, in Patients With Recurrent or Refractory Ovarian or Primary Peritoneal Carcinoma With Overexpression of HER2: A Phase II Trial of the Gynecologic Oncology Group. J Clin Oncol. 2003; 21: 283–90.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  54. 54.↵
    2. Agus DB,
    3. Akita RW,
    4. Fox WD,
    5. Lewis GD,
    6. Higgins B,
    7. Pisacane PI, et al.
    Targeting ligand-activated ErbB2 signaling inhibits breast and prostate tumor growth. Cancer Cell. 2002; 2: 127–37.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  55. 55.↵
    2. DiGiulio S.
    FDA Approves Perjeta (Pertuzumab) for Neoadjuvant Breast Cancer. Oncol Times. 2013;
  56. 56.↵
    2. Baselga J,
    3. Cortes J,
    4. Kim SB,
    5. Im SA,
    6. Hegg R,
    7. Im YH, et al.
    Pertuzumab plus trastuzumab plus docetaxel for metastatic breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 2012; 366: 109–19.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  57. 57.↵
    2. Makhija S,
    3. Amler LC,
    4. Glenn D,
    5. Ueland FR,
    6. Gold MA,
    7. Dizon DS, et al.
    Clinical activity of gemcitabine plus pertuzumab in platinum-resistant ovarian cancer, fallopian tube cancer, or primary peritoneal cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2010; 28: 1215–23.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  58. 58.↵
    2. Kurzeder C,
    3. Bover I,
    4. Marme F,
    5. Rau J,
    6. Pautier P,
    7. Colombo N, et al.
    Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Randomized Phase III Trial Evaluating Pertuzumab Combined With Chemotherapy for Low Tumor Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 3 mRNA-Expressing Platinum-Resistant Ovarian Cancer (PENELOPE). J Clin Oncol. 2016; 34: 2516–25.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  59. 59.↵
    2. Sims A,
    3. Zweemer AJ,
    4. Nagumo Y,
    5. Faratian D,
    6. Muir M,
    7. Dodds M, et al.
    Defining the olecular response to trastuzumab, pertuzumab and combination therapy in ovarian cancer. Br J Cancer. 2012; 106: 1779–89.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  60. 60.↵
    2. Faratian D,
    3. Zweemer AJ,
    4. Nagumo Y,
    5. Sims AH,
    6. Muir M,
    7. Dodds M, et al.
    Trastuzumab and pertuzumab produce changes in morphology and estrogen receptor signaling in ovarian cancer xenografts revealing new treatment strategies. Clin Cancer Res. 2011; 17: 4451–61.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  61. 61.↵
    2. Barok M,
    3. Joensuu H,
    4. Isola J.
    Trastuzumab emtansine: mechanisms of action and drug resistance. Br J Cancer. 2014; 16: 209.
    OpenUrl
  62. 62.↵
    2. Verma S,
    3. Miles D,
    4. Gianni L,
    5. Krop IE,
    6. Welslau M,
    7. Baselga J, et al.
    Trastuzumab Emtansine for HER2-Positive Advanced Breast Cancer. N Engl J Med. 2012; 367: 1783–91.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  63. 63.↵
    2. Guerin M,
    3. Sabatier R,
    4. Goncalves A.
    Trastuzumab emtansine (Kadcyla®) approval in HER2-positive metastatic breast cancers. Bull Cancer. 2015; 102: 390–7.
    OpenUrl
  64. 64.↵
    2. Menderes G,
    3. Bonazzoli E,
    4. Bellone S,
    5. Altwerger G,
    6. Black JD,
    7. Dugan K, et al.
    Superior in vitro and in vivo activity of trastuzumab-emtansine (T-DM1) in comparison to trastuzumab, pertuzumab and their combination in epithelial ovarian carcinoma with high HER2/neu expression. Gynecol Oncol. 2017; 147: 145–52.
    OpenUrl
  65. 65.
    2. Nicoletti R,
    3. Lopez S,
    4. Bellone S,
    5. Cocco E,
    6. Schwab CL,
    7. Black JD, et al.
    T-DM1, a novel antibody-drug conjugate, is highly effective against uterine and ovarian carcinosarcomas overexpressing HER2. Clin Exp Metastasis. 2015; 32: 29–38.
    OpenUrl
  66. 66.↵
    2. Montero JC,
    3. Garcia-Alonso S,
    4. Ocana A,
    5. Pandiella A.
    Identification of therapeutic targets in ovarian cancer through active tyrosine kinase profiling. Oncotarget. 2015; 6: 30057–71.
    OpenUrl
  67. 67.↵
    2. Yu L,
    3. Wang Y,
    4. Yao Y,
    5. Li W,
    6. Lai Q,
    7. Li J, et al.
    Eradication of growth of HER2-positive ovarian cancer with trastuzumab-DM1, an antibody-cytotoxic drug conjugate in mouse xenograft model. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2014; 24: 1158–64.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  68. 68.↵
    2. Arora A,
    3. Scholar EM.
    Role of tyrosine kinase inhibitors in cancer therapy. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 2005; 315: 971–79.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  69. 69.↵
    2. Gupta S,
    3. El-Rayes BF.
    Small molecule tyrosine kinase inhibitors in pancreatic cancer. Biologics. 2008; 2: 707–15.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  70. 70.↵
    2. Roskoski R.
    Classification of small molecule protein kinase inhibitors based upon the structures of their drug-enzyme complexes. Pharmacol Res. 2016; 103: 26–48.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  71. 71.
    2. Yan M,
    3. Parker BA,
    4. Schwab R,
    5. Kurzrock R.
    HER2 aberrations in cancer: Implications for therapy. Cancer Treat Rev. 2014; 40: 770–80.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  72. 72.
    2. Wind S,
    3. Schmid M,
    4. Erhardt J,
    5. Goeldner R-G,
    6. Stopfer P.
    Pharmacokinetics of Afatinib, a Selective Irreversible ErbB Family Blocker, in Patients with Advanced Solid Tumours. Clin Pharmacokinet. 2013; 52: 1101–09.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  73. 73.
    2. Metro G,
    3. Crino L.
    The LUX-Lung clinical trial program of afatinib for non-small-cell lung cancer. Expert Rev Anticancer Ther. 2011; 11: 673–82.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  74. 74.
    2. Van Vuurden D,
    3. Shukla S,
    4. Wedekind L,
    5. Kuipers G,
    6. Noske D.
    Cytotoxicity and Radiosensitization of High Grade Glioma Cells by CI-1033, an Irreversible Pan-ErbB Inhibitor. J Cancer Sci Ther. 2013; 5: 249–55.
    OpenUrl
  75. 75.
    2. Engelman JA,
    3. Zejnullahu K,
    4. Gale CM,
    5. Lifshits E,
    6. Gonzales AJ,
    7. Shimamura T, et al.
    PF00299804, an Irreversible Pan-ERBB Inhibitor, Is Effective in Lung Cancer Models with EGFR and ERBB2 Mutations that Are Resistant to Gefitinib. Cancer Res. 2007; 67: 11924–32.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  76. 76.
    2. Nelson MH,
    3. Dolder CR.
    Lapatinib: a novel dual tyrosine kinase inhibitor with activity in solid tumors. Ann Pharmacother. 2006; 40: 261–69.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  77. 77.
    2. Canfield K,
    3. Li J,
    4. Wilkins OM,
    5. Morrison MM,
    6. Ung M,
    7. Wells W, et al.
    Receptor tyrosine kinase ERBB4 mediates acquired resistance to ERBB2 inhibitors in breast cancer cells. Cell Cycle. 2015; 14: 648–55.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  78. 78.↵
    2. Hickinson DM,
    3. Klinowska T,
    4. Speake G,
    5. Vincent J,
    6. Trigwell C,
    7. Anderton J, et al.
    AZD8931, an equipotent, reversible inhibitor of signaling by epidermal growth factor receptor, ERBB2 (HER2), and ERBB3: a unique agent for simultaneous ERBB receptor blockade in cancer. Clin Cancer Res. 2010; 16: 1159–69.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  79. 79.↵
    2. Burstein HJ,
    3. Sun Y,
    4. Dirix LY,
    5. Jiang Z,
    6. Paridaens R,
    7. Tan AR, et al.
    Neratinib, an Irreversible ErbB Receptor Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor, in Patients With Advanced ErbB2-Positive Breast Cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2010; 28: 1301–7.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  80. 80.
    2. Rabindran SK,
    3. Discafani CM,
    4. Rosfjord EC,
    5. Baxter M,
    6. Floyd MB,
    7. Golas J, et al.
    Antitumor Activity of HKI-272, an Orally Active, Irreversible Inhibitor of the HER-2 Tyrosine Kinase. Cancer Res. 2004; 64: 3958–65.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  81. 81.↵
    2. Murphy M,
    3. Stordal B.
    Erlotinib or gefitinib for the treatment of relapsed platinum pretreated non-small cell lung cancer and ovarian cancer: a systematic review. Drug Resist Updat. 2011; 14: 177–90.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  82. 82.↵
    2. Schilder RJ,
    3. Sill MW,
    4. Chen X,
    5. Darcy KM,
    6. Decesare SL,
    7. Lewandowski G, et al.
    Phase II study of gefitinib in patients with relapsed or persistent ovarian or primary peritoneal carcinoma and evaluation of epidermal growth factor receptor mutations and immunohistochemical expression: a Gynecologic Oncology Group Study. Clin Cancer Res. 2005; 11: 5539–48.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  83. 83.↵
    2. Wagner U,
    3. du Bois A,
    4. Pfisterer J,
    5. Huober J,
    6. Loibl S,
    7. Luck HJ, et al.
    Gefitinib in combination with tamoxifen in patients with ovarian cancer refractory or resistant to platinum-taxane based therapy--a phase II trial of the AGO Ovarian Cancer Study Group (AGO-OVAR 2.6). Gynecol Oncol. 2007; 105: 132–37.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  84. 84.↵
    2. Ohta T,
    3. Ohmichi M,
    4. Shibuya T,
    5. Takahashi T,
    6. Tsutsumi S,
    7. Takahashi K, et al.
    Gefitinib (ZD1839) increases the efficacy of cisplatin in ovarian cancer cells. Cancer Biol Ther. 2012; 13: 408–16.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  85. 85.↵
    2. Zhou C,
    3. Wu YL,
    4. Chen G,
    5. Feng J,
    6. Liu XQ,
    7. Wang C, et al.
    Erlotinib versus chemotherapy as first-line treatment for patients with advanced EGFR mutation-positive non-small-cell lung cancer (OPTIMAL, CTONG-0802): a multicentre, open-label, randomised, phase III study. Lancet Oncol. 2011; 12: 735–42.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  86. 86.↵
    2. Sui H,
    3. Shi C,
    4. Yan Z,
    5. Li H.
    Combination of erlotinib and a PARP inhibitor inhibits growth of A2780 tumor xenografts due to increased autophagy. Drug Des Devel Ther. 2015; 9: 3183–90.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  87. 87.↵
    2. Hirte H,
    3. Oza A,
    4. Swenerton K,
    5. Ellard SL,
    6. Grimshaw R,
    7. Fisher B, et al.
    A phase II study of erlotinib (OSI-774) given in combination with carboplatin in patients with recurrent epithelial ovarian cancer (NCIC CTG IND.149). Gynecol Oncol. 2010; 118: 308–12.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  88. 88.↵
    2. Blank SV,
    3. Christos P,
    4. Curtin JP,
    5. Goldman N,
    6. Runowicz CD,
    7. Sparano JA, et al.
    Erlotinib added to carboplatin and paclitaxel as first-line treatment of ovarian cancer: a phase II study based on surgical reassessment. Gynecol Oncol. 2010; 119: 451–56.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  89. 89.↵
    2. Warner E,
    3. Liebes L,
    4. Levinson B,
    5. Downey A,
    6. Tiersten A,
    7. Muggia F.
    Continuous-infusion topotecan and erlotinib: a study in topotecan-pretreated ovarian cancer assessing shed collagen epitopes as a marker of invasiveness. Oncologist. 2014; 19: 250.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  90. 90.↵
    2. Chambers SK,
    3. Clouser MC,
    4. Baker AF,
    5. Roe DJ,
    6. Cui H,
    7. Brewer MA, et al.
    Overexpression of tumor vascular endothelial growth factor A may portend an increased likelihood of progression in a phase II trial of bevacizumab and erlotinib in resistant ovarian cancer. Clin Cancer Res. 2010; 16: 5320–8.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  91. 91.↵
    2. Vergote IB,
    3. Jimeno A,
    4. Joly F,
    5. Katsaros D,
    6. Coens C,
    7. Despierre E, et al.
    Randomized Phase III Study of Erlotinib Versus Observation in Patients With No Evidence of Disease Progression After First-Line Platin-Based Chemotherapy for Ovarian Carcinoma: A European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer-Gynaecological Cancer Group, and Gynecologic Cancer Intergroup Study. J Clin Oncol. 2014; 32: 320–26.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  92. 92.↵
    2. Despierre E,
    3. Vergote I,
    4. Anderson R,
    5. Coens C,
    6. Katsaros D,
    7. Hirsch FR, et al.
    Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor (EGFR) Pathway Biomarkers in the Randomized Phase III Trial of Erlotinib Versus Observation in Ovarian Cancer Patients with No Evidence of Disease Progression after First-Line Platinum-Based Chemotherapy. Target Oncol. 2015; 10: 583–96.
    OpenUrl
  93. 93.↵
    2. Burstein HJ,
    3. Storniolo AM,
    4. Franco S,
    5. Forster J,
    6. Stein S,
    7. Rubin S, et al.
    A phase II study of lapatinib monotherapy in chemotherapy-refractory HER2-positive and HER2-negative advanced or metastatic breast cancer. Ann Oncol. 2008; 19: 1068–74.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  94. 94.↵
    2. Kimball KJ,
    3. Numnum TM,
    4. Kirby TO,
    5. Zamboni WC,
    6. Estes JM,
    7. Barnes MN, et al.
    A phase I study of lapatinib in combination with carboplatin in women with platinum sensitive recurrent ovarian carcinoma. Gynecol Oncol. 2008; 111: 95–101.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  95. 95.↵
    2. Lheureux S,
    3. Krieger S,
    4. Weber B,
    5. Pautier P,
    6. Fabbro M,
    7. Selle F, et al.
    Expected benefits of topotecan combined with lapatinib in recurrent ovarian cancer according to biological profile: a phase II trial. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2012; 22: 1483–8.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  96. 96.↵
    2. Weroha SJ,
    3. Oberg AL,
    4. Ziegler KL,
    5. Dakhilm SR,
    6. Rowland KM,
    7. Hartmann LC, et al.
    Phase II trial of lapatinib and topotecan (LapTop) in patients with platinum-refractory/resistant ovarian and primary peritoneal carcinoma. Gynecol Oncol. 2011; 122: 116–20.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  97. 97.↵
    2. Garcia AA,
    3. Sill MW,
    4. Lankes HA,
    5. Godwin AK,
    6. Mannel RS,
    7. Armstrong DK, et al.
    A phase II evaluation of lapatinib in the treatment of persistent or recurrent epithelial ovarian or primary peritoneal carcinoma: A gynecologic oncology group study. Gynecol Oncol. 2012; 124: 569–74.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  98. 98.↵
    2. Mu Z,
    3. Klinowska T,
    4. Dong X,
    5. Foster E,
    6. Womack C,
    7. Fernandez SV, et al.
    AZD8931, an equipotent, reversible inhibitor of signaling by epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), HER2, and HER3: preclinical activity in HER2 non-amplified inflammatory breast cancer models. J Exp Clin Cancer Res. 2014; 33: 47.
    OpenUrl
  99. 99.↵
    2. Tjulandin S,
    3. Moiseyenko V,
    4. Semiglazov V,
    5. Manikhas G,
    6. Learoyd M,
    7. Saunders A, et al.
    Phase I, dose-finding study of AZD8931, an inhibitor of EGFR (erbB1), HER2 (erbB2) and HER3 (erbB3) signaling, in patients with advanced solid tumors. Invest New Drugs. 2014; 32: 145–53.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  100. 100.↵
    2. Solca F,
    3. Dahl G,
    4. Zoephel A,
    5. Bader G,
    6. Sanderson M,
    7. Klein C, et al.
    Target Binding Properties and Cellular Activity of Afatinib (BIBW 2992), an Irreversible ErbB Family Blocker. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 2012; 343: 342–50.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  101. 101.↵
    2. Lewis N,
    3. Marshall J,
    4. Amelsberg A,
    5. Cohen RB,
    6. Stopfer P,
    7. Hwang J, et al.
    A phase I dose escalation study of BIBW 2992, an irreversible dual EGFR/HER2 receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor, in a 3 week on 1 week off schedule in patients with advanced solid tumors. Br J Cancer. 2006; 24: 3091–91.
    OpenUrl
  102. 102.↵
    2. Gordon MS,
    3. Mendelson DS,
    4. Gross M,
    5. Uttenreuther-Fischer M,
    6. Ould-Kaci M,
    7. Zhao Y, et al.
    A Phase I, open-label, dose-escalation study of continuous once-daily oral treatment with afatinib in patients with advanced solid tumors. Invest New Drugs. 2013; 31: 409–16.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  103. 103.↵
    2. Ring A,
    3. Wheatley D,
    4. Hatcher H,
    5. Laing R,
    6. Plummer R,
    7. Uttenreuther-Fischer M, et al.
    Phase I Study to Assess the Combination of Afatinib with Trastuzumab in Patients with Advanced or Metastatic HER2-Positive Breast Cancer. Clin Cancer Res. 2015; 21: 2737–44.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  104. 104.↵
    2. Lin NU,
    3. Winer EP,
    4. Wheatley D,
    5. Carey LA,
    6. Houston S,
    7. Mendelson D, et al.
    A phase II study of afatinib (BIBW 2992), an irreversible ErbB family blocker, in patients with HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer progressing after trastuzumab. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2012; 133: 1057–65.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  105. 105.↵
    2. Wang Sq,
    3. Liu St,
    4. Zhao Bx,
    5. Yang Fh,
    6. Wang Yt,
    7. Liang Qy, et al.
    Afatinib reverses multidrug resistance in ovarian cancer via dually inhibiting ATP binding cassette subfamily B member 1. Oncotarget. 2015; 6: 26142–60.
    OpenUrl
  106. 106.↵
    2. Hanker AB,
    3. Brewer MR,
    4. Sheehan JH,
    5. Koch JP,
    6. Sliwoski GR,
    7. Nagy R, et al.
    An Acquired HER2T798I Gatekeeper Mutation Induces Resistance to Neratinib in a Patient with HER2 Mutant-Driven Breast Cancer. Cancer Discov. 2017; 7: 575–85.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  107. 107.↵
    2. Solca F,
    3. Baum A,
    4. Himmelsbach F,
    5. Amelsberg A,
    6. Adolf G.
    Efficacy of BIBW 2992, an irreversible dual EGFR/HER2 receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor, in combination with cytotoxic agents. EJC Suppl. 2006; 4: 172.
    OpenUrl
  108. 108.↵
    2. Puvanenthiran S,
    3. Essapen S,
    4. Seddon AM,
    5. Modjtahedi H.
    Impact of the putative cancer stem cell markers and growth factor receptor expression on the sensitivity of ovarian cancer cells to treatment with various forms of small molecule tyrosine kinase inhibitors and cytotoxic drugs. Int J Oncol. 2016; 49: 1825–38.
    OpenUrl
  109. 109.↵
    2. Carmi C,
    3. Mor M,
    4. Petronini PG,
    5. Alfieri RR.
    Clinical perspectives for irreversible tyrosine kinase inhibitors in cancer. Biochem Pharmacol. 2012; 84: 1388–99.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  110. 110.↵
    2. Slichenmyer WJ,
    3. Elliott WL,
    4. Fry DW.
    CI-1033, a pan-erbB tyrosine kinase inhibitor. Semin Oncol. 2001; 28: 80–85.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  111. 111.↵
    2. Hassan W,
    3. Chitcholtan K,
    4. Sykes P,
    5. Garrill A.
    A Combination of Two Receptor Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors, Canertinib and PHA665752 Compromises Ovarian Cancer Cell Growth in 3D Cell Models. Oncol Ther. 2016; 4: 257–74.
    OpenUrl
  112. 112.↵
    2. Campos S,
    3. Hamid O,
    4. Seiden MV,
    5. Oza A,
    6. Plante M,
    7. Potkul RK, et al.
    Multicenter, randomized phase II trial of oral CI-1033 for previously treated advanced ovarian cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2005; 23: 5597–604.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  113. 113.↵
    2. Prasasya RD,
    3. Vang KZ,
    4. Kreeger PK.
    A multivariate model of ErbB network composition predicts ovarian cancer cell response to canertinib. Biotechnol Bioeng. 2012; 109: 213–24.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  114. 114.↵
    2. Deeks ED.
    Neratinib: First Global Approval. Drugs. 2017; 77: 1695–704.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  115. 115.↵
    2. Chan A,
    3. Delaloge S,
    4. Holmes FA,
    5. Moy B,
    6. Iwata H,
    7. Harvey VJ, et al.
    Neratinib after trastuzumab-based adjuvant therapy in patients with HER2-positive breast cancer (ExteNET): a multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase III trial. Lancet Oncol. 2016; 17: 367–77.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  116. 116.↵
    2. Sequist LV,
    3. Besse B,
    4. Lynch TJ,
    5. Miller VA,
    6. Wong KK,
    7. Gitlitz B, et al.
    Neratinib, an irreversible pan-ErbB receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor: results of a phase II trial in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2010; 28: 3076–83.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  117. 117.↵
    2. Awada A,
    3. Dirix L,
    4. Manso Sanchez L,
    5. Xu B,
    6. Luu T,
    7. Dieras V, et al.
    Safety and efficacy of neratinib (HKI-272) plus vinorelbine in the treatment of patients with ErbB2-positive metastatic breast cancer pretreated with anti-HER2 therapy. Ann Oncol. 2013; 24: 109–16.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  118. 118.
    2. Gandhi L,
    3. Bahleda R,
    4. Tolaney SM,
    5. Kwak EL,
    6. Cleary JM,
    7. Pandya SS, et al.
    Phase I study of neratinib in combination with temsirolimus in patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-dependent and other solid tumors. J Clin Oncol. 2014; 32: 68–75.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  119. 119.
    2. Jankowitz RC,
    3. Abraham J,
    4. Tan AR,
    5. Limentani SA,
    6. Tierno MB,
    7. Adamson LM, et al.
    Safety and efficacy of neratinib in combination with weekly paclitaxel and trastuzumab in women with metastatic HER2positive breast cancer: an NSABP Foundation Research Program phase I study. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 2013; 72: 1205–12.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  120. 120.
    2. Saura C,
    3. Garcia-Saenz JA,
    4. Xu B,
    5. Harb W,
    6. Moroose R,
    7. Pluard T, et al.
    Safety and efficacy of neratinib in combination with capecitabine in patients with metastatic human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive breast cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2014; 32: 3626–33.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  121. 121.↵
    2. Chow LW,
    3. Xu B,
    4. Gupta S,
    5. Freyman A,
    6. Zhao Y,
    7. Abbas R, et al.
    Combination neratinib (HKI-272) and paclitaxel therapy in patients with HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer. Br J Cancer. 2013; 108: 1985–93.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  122. 122.↵
    2. Schwab CL,
    3. English DP,
    4. Black J,
    5. Bellone S,
    6. Lopez S,
    7. Cocco E, et al.
    Neratinib shows efficacy in the treatment of HER2 amplified carcinosarcoma in vitro and in vivo. Gynecol Oncol. 2015; 139: 112–7.
    OpenUrl
  123. 123.↵
    2. Menderes G,
    3. Bonazzoli E,
    4. Bellone S,
    5. Black JD,
    6. Lopez S,
    7. Pettinella F, et al.
    Efficacy of neratinib in the treatment of HER2/neu-amplified epithelial ovarian carcinoma in vitro and in vivo. Med Oncol. 2017; 34: 91.
    OpenUrl
  124. 124.↵
    2. Hyman DM,
    3. Piha-Paul SA,
    4. Won H,
    5. Rodon J,
    6. Saura C,
    7. Shapiro GI, et al.
    HER kinase inhibition in patients with HER2- and HER3-mutant cancers. Nature. 2018; 554: 189–94.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  125. 125.↵
    2. Momeny M,
    3. Zarrinrad G,
    4. Moghaddaskho F,
    5. Poursheikhani A,
    6. Sankanian G,
    7. Zaghal A, et al.
    Dacomitinib, a pan-inhibitor of ErbB receptors, suppresses growth and invasive capacity of chemoresistant ovarian carcinoma cells. Sci Rep. 2017; 7: 4204.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  126. 126.↵
    2. Calvo E,
    3. Soria JC,
    4. Ma WW,
    5. Wang T,
    6. Bahleda R,
    7. Tolcher AW, et al.
    A Phase I Clinical Trial and Independent Patient-Derived Xenograft Study of Combined Targeted Treatment with Dacomitinib and Figitumumab in Advanced Solid Tumors. Clin Cancer Res. 2017; 23: 1177–85.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  127. 127.↵
    2. Annunziata CM,
    3. Walker AJ,
    4. Minasian L,
    5. Yu M,
    6. Kotz H,
    7. Wood BJ, et al.
    Vandetanib, designed to inhibit VEGFR2 and EGFR signaling, had no clinical activity as monotherapy for recurrent ovarian cancer and no detectable modulation of VEGFR2. Clin Cancer Res. 2010; 16: 664–72.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  128. 128.↵
    2. Rosen L,
    3. Lopez A,
    4. Mulay M.
    A Phase I/II study of SU101 in patients with ovarian, prostate, and non-small cell lung cancers. Proc Am Soc Clin Oncol; 1997.
  129. 129.↵
    2. Chap L,
    3. Chachoua A,
    4. Lopez A,
    5. DePaoli A,
    6. Hannah A.
    A Phase II study of SU101 in patients with advanced ovarian cancer. Proc. Annu. Meet. Am. Soc. Clin. Oncol; 1999.
  130. 130.↵
    2. Tai CJ,
    3. Lo HY,
    4. Hsu CH,
    5. Tai CJ,
    6. Liu WM.
    Remission of a negative Her2/Neu overexpressive metastatic ovarian cancer patient by the single agent of trastuzumab as salvage therapy. Gynecol Oncol. 2006; 101: 184–5.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  131. 131.↵
    2. Paez JG,
    3. Jänne PA,
    4. Lee JC,
    5. Tracy S,
    6. Greulich H,
    7. Gabriel S, et al.
    EGFR Mutations in Lung Cancer: Correlation with Clinical Response to Gefitinib Therapy. Science. 2004; 304: 1497–500.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  132. 132.↵
    2. Huang L,
    3. Fu L.
    Mechanisms of resistance to EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors. Acta Pharmaceutica Sinica B. 2015; 5: 390–401.
    OpenUrl
  133. 133.↵
    2. Takezawa K,
    3. Pirazzoli V,
    4. Arcila ME,
    5. Nebhan CA,
    6. Song X,
    7. de Stanchina E, et al.
    HER2 amplification: a potential mechanism of acquired resistance to EGFR inhibition in EGFR mutant lung cancers that lack the second-site EGFR T790M mutation. Cancer Discov. 2012; 2: 922–33.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  134. 134.↵
    2. Kobayashi S,
    3. Boggon TJ,
    4. Dayaram T,
    5. Janne PA,
    6. Kocher O,
    7. Meyerson M, et al.
    EGFR mutation and resistance of non-small-cell lung cancer to gefitinib. N Engl J Med. 2005; 352: 786–92.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  135. 135.↵
    2. Yamaguchi F,
    3. Fukuchi K,
    4. Yamazaki Y,
    5. Takayasu H,
    6. Tazawa S,
    7. Tateno H, et al.
    Acquired resistance L747S mutation in an epidermal growth factor receptor-tyrosine kinase inhibitor-naïve patient: A report of three cases. Oncol Lett. 2014; 7: 357–60.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  136. 136.↵
    2. Zoppoli G,
    3. Moran E,
    4. Soncini D,
    5. Cea M,
    6. Garuti A,
    7. Rocco I, et al.
    Ras-Induced Resistance to Lapatinib is Overcome by MEK Inhibition. Curr Cancer Drug Targets. 2010; 10: 168–75.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  137. 137.
    2. Kim EJ,
    3. Jeong JH,
    4. Bae S,
    5. Kang S,
    6. Kim CH,
    7. Lim YB.
    mTOR inhibitors radiosensitize PTEN-deficient non-small-cell lung cancer cells harboring an EGFR activating mutation by inducing autophagy. J Cell Biochem. 2013; 114: 1248–56.
    OpenUrl
  138. 138.↵
    2. Lovly CM.
    Combating acquired resistance to tyrosine kinase inhibitors in lung cancer. Am Soc Clin Oncol Educ Book. Published online first: May 31, 2015. DOI: 10.14694/EdBook_AM.2015.35.e165.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  139. 139.↵
    2. Della Corte CM,
    3. Fasano M,
    4. Papaccio F,
    5. Ciardiello F,
    6. Morgillo F.
    Role of HGF–MET Signaling in Primary and Acquired Resistance to Targeted Therapies in Cancer. Biomedicines. 2014; 2: 345–58.
    OpenUrl
  140. 140.↵
    2. Chen CT,
    3. Kim H,
    4. Liska D,
    5. Gao S,
    6. Christensen JG,
    7. Weiser MR.
    MET Activation Mediates Resistance to Lapatinib Inhibition of HER2-Amplified Gastric Cancer Cells. Mol Cancer Ther. 2012; 11: 660–69.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  141. 141.↵
    2. Dohse M,
    3. Scharenberg C,
    4. Shukla S,
    5. Robey RW,
    6. Volkmann T,
    7. Deeken JF, et al.
    Comparison of ATP-Binding Cassette Transporter Interactions with the Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors Imatinib, Nilotinib, and Dasatinib. Drug Metab Dispos. 2010; 38: 1371–80.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  142. 142.↵
    2. Fitzgerald JB,
    3. Schoeberl B,
    4. Nielsen UB,
    5. Sorger PK.
    Systems biology and combination therapy in the quest for clinical efficacy. Nat Chem Biol. 2006; 2
  143. 143.↵
    2. Booth L,
    3. Roberts JL,
    4. Samuel P,
    5. Avogadri-Connors F,
    6. Cutler RE,
    7. Lalani AS, et al.
    The irreversible ERBB1/2/4 inhibitor neratinib interacts with the PARP1 inhibitor niraparib to kill ovarian cancer cells. Cancer Biol Ther. 2018; 19: 525–33.
    OpenUrl
  144. 144.↵
    2. Swisher EM,
    3. Sakai W,
    4. Karlan BY,
    5. Wurz K,
    6. Urban N,
    7. Taniguchi T.
    Secondary BRCA1 Mutations in BRCA1-Mutated Ovarian Carcinomas with Platinum Resistance. Cancer Res. 2008; 68: 2581–86.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  145. 145.↵
    2. Januchowski R,
    3. Zawierucha P,
    4. Andrzejewska M,
    5. Ruciński M,
    6. Zabel M.
    Microarray-based detection and expression analysis of ABC and SLC transporters in drug-resistant ovarian cancer cell lines. Biomed Pharmacother. 2013; 67: 240–45.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  146. 146.↵
    2. Zhao XQ,
    3. Xie JD,
    4. Chen XG,
    5. Sim HM,
    6. Zhang X,
    7. Liang YJ, et al.
    Neratinib Reverses ATP-Binding Cassette B1-Mediated Chemotherapeutic Drug Resistance In Vitro, In Vivo, and Ex Vivo. Mol Pharmacol. 2012; 82: 47–58.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  147. 147.
    2. Kathawala RJ,
    3. Gupta P,
    4. Ashby CR Jr.,
    5. Chen ZS.
    The modulation of ABC transporter-mediated multidrug resistance in cancer: A review of the past decade. Drug Resist Updat. 2015; 18: 1–17.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  148. 148.↵
    2. Dai C-l,
    3. Tiwari AK,
    4. Wu C-P,
    5. Su X-d,
    6. Wang S-R,
    7. Liu D-g, et al.
    Lapatinib (Tykerb®, GW572016) Reverses Multidrug Resistance in Cancer Cells by Inhibiting the Activity of ATP-Binding Cassette Subfamily B Member 1 and G Member 2. Cancer Res. 2008; 68: 7905–14.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
Back to top

In this issue

Print
Download PDF
Email Article
Citation Tools

Jump to section

Keywords