Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • About
    • About CBM
    • Editorial Board
    • Announcement
  • Articles
    • Ahead of print
    • Current Issue
    • Archive
    • Collections
    • Cover Story
  • For Authors
    • Instructions for Authors
    • Resources
    • Submit a Manuscript
  • For Reviewers
    • Become a Reviewer
    • Instructions for Reviewers
    • Resources
    • Outstanding Reviewer
  • Subscription
  • Alerts
    • Email Alerts
    • RSS Feeds
    • Table of Contents
  • Contact us
  • Other Publications
    • cbm

User menu

  • My alerts

Search

  • Advanced search
Cancer Biology & Medicine
  • Other Publications
    • cbm
  • My alerts
Cancer Biology & Medicine

Advanced Search

 

  • Home
  • About
    • About CBM
    • Editorial Board
    • Announcement
  • Articles
    • Ahead of print
    • Current Issue
    • Archive
    • Collections
    • Cover Story
  • For Authors
    • Instructions for Authors
    • Resources
    • Submit a Manuscript
  • For Reviewers
    • Become a Reviewer
    • Instructions for Reviewers
    • Resources
    • Outstanding Reviewer
  • Subscription
  • Alerts
    • Email Alerts
    • RSS Feeds
    • Table of Contents
  • Contact us
  • Follow cbm on Twitter
  • Visit cbm on Facebook
Research ArticleResearch Article

The Diagnosis and Differential Diagnosis of Ureteral Fibroepithelial Polyps

Wanru Geng, Ning Li, Qi Yu, Huiqin Zhou and Hongmin Xu
Chinese Journal of Clinical Oncology October 2006, 3 (5) 373-375;
Wanru Geng
Department of Pathology, the Second Affiliated Hospital of the General Hospital of the PLA, Beijing, 100091, China.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Ning Li
Department of Pathology, the Second Affiliated Hospital of the General Hospital of the PLA, Beijing, 100091, China.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Qi Yu
Department of Pathology, the Second Affiliated Hospital of the General Hospital of the PLA, Beijing, 100091, China.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Huiqin Zhou
Department of Pathology, the Second Affiliated Hospital of the General Hospital of the PLA, Beijing, 100091, China.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Hongmin Xu
Department of Pathology, the Second Affiliated Hospital of the General Hospital of the PLA, Beijing, 100091, China.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

OBJECTIVE To study the clinical pathologic characteristics and differential diagnosis of ureteral fibroepithelial polyps.

METHODS One case of ureteral fibroepithelial polyps was studied by clinical data analysis and light microscopy.

RESULTS The tumor was located in the lower ureter. Histologically, the polyp was composed of expanded blood vessels and fibrous connective tissue under normal or proliferous transitional epithelium.

CONCLUSION Benign ureteral fibroepithelial polyps are extremely rare, recognition of it's precise histological features can facilitate its correct diagnosis.

KEYWORDS:

keywords

  • fibroepithelial
  • polyps
  • ureteral polyps
  • diagnosis
  • differential diagnosis

Ureteral fibroepithelial polyps (FEP) are rare benign tumors, which are usually encountered in children, but are especially un-common in adults. This article is a report of a case of ureteral fibroepithelial polyps in an adult. We have summarized its pathogenesis, pathologic characteristics and differential diagnosis from relevant reports.

Case Report

A 40-year-old man presented with a ureteral mass to the Second Affiliated Hospital of the General Hospital of the PLA, Beijing, China. It was detected incidentally in a general health examination. Physical examination of the patient was unremarkable, with no indication of hematuria, frequent micturition, urgent micturition, pain during urination or dysuria. B-mode ultrasound showed a 2.3 × 1.6 × 0.8 cm tumor in the posterior wall of the bladder. Intravenous pyelography and nuclear magnetic resonance both indicated that the tumor was in the lower left ureteral segment. At surgery, there was a palpable dilation 5 cm distal to the left ureteropelvic junction, and a slight dilatation of the upper ureter. In addition, the ureter wall was thicker than normal. A longitudinal ureterotomy incision was made and a mass with smooth surface approximately 0.8 cm in width was encountered. The pelviureteric region, including the polyp, was resected segmentally and then was sent for histopathologic examination.

General biopsy

A pale polyp-like mass with a smooth surface was encountered in the lower ureter, it was 7 cm long and 2 cm wide with a diameter of 1 cm. Microscopically, the polyps were covered by a benign-appearing transitional cell epithelium supported by a loose, vascular connective tissue infiltrated by lymphocytes (Fig. 1). The final pathologic diagnosis was conformed to be left ureteral fibroepithelial polyps.

Fig. 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 1.

Vascular loose fibrous stroma of the ureteral fibroepithelial polyps covered by transitional epithelium (H&E staining × 40).

DISCUSSION

Ureteral fibroepithelial polyps are uncommon benign tumors, which are usually encountered in children, but are rare in adults[1]. Incidence of this disease is quite low, with a projection that primary ureteral tumors comprise only 1/3,690 of the total number of urology patients. Most ureteral tumors are malignant, and benign tumors only constitute 1/20 of the total number[2]. But the actual incidence must be higher than that reported, as many cases may be completely asymptomatic for many years. Ureteral fibroepithelial polyps are a non-epithelial tumor[3], but other authors suggest that they are a tumor-like hyperplasia. In spite of the theory, which has little clinical relevance, it is well known that ureteral fibroepithelial polyps are benign tumors.

Pathogenesis

The exact etiology of the polyps is not certain. Many theories have been proposed including congenital obstruction, trauma, irritation, infection, and allergic factors[4]. Downs [5] speculated that fibroepithelial polyps originate from developmental defects of the urinary tract, while Kuppusami and Moors [6] attributed the pathogenesis to the absence of estrogen in the matrix and subsequent fibroepithelium transformation, Lou et al[7]. have suggested that FEP polyps derive from congenital malformation, an etiology being the most frequently accepted.

Patients may either be completely asymptomatic or present with unrelated symptoms, suggesting that the tumor cannot be related to a single origin. We believe that more than one factor is involved during the development of this disease.

Clinical symptoms

Clinical symptoms of fibroepithelial polyps frequently appear between the second and fourth decades of life, although the polyps can occur at any age [8]. Macksood et al[9]. hold that fibroepithelial polyps are the most usual benign ureteral lesion in children. In adults, the majority of these tumors are seen in the upper ureter, at the ureteropelvic junction[10]. There is no notable incidence difference between the left and right sides and no familial traits have been reported.

Flank pain and hematuria are the leading symptoms, but infection, urgent maturation, dysuria and urinary tract obstruction also occur as familiar symptoms. As some noted previously, cases remain completely asymptomatic for many years, until the development of hydronephrosis, which is related to the degree of obstruction of the ureter. Such was the patient's condition in our case.

In general, calcului can be found occasionally as a complication and will be not implanted into the urinary tract without growing obviously thick. However, FEP initiated by calcului are rarely found, having been reported in only one case[11].

Clinical diagnosis

Diagnosis of FEP is not difficult, but misdiagnosis can occur because of a doctor's incomplete examination. If a laboratory examination reveals an upper urinary tract obstruction without the presence of a calculus, FEP should be primarily taken into considerasion. Most cases have complications of hydronephrosis. Banner and Pollack [12] considered radiology to be a suitable procedure, while Kim et al[13]. preferred flexible ureter cystoscopy to be the best means. Typically, X-rays of FEP show a long thin filling defect. In our case, intravenous urography (IVU) revealed a filling defect in the ureter with a smooth and sharply demarcated outline. Of course, histological diagnosis confirmed the result. In general case, most FEP are long slender projections grossly with a smooth surface presenting as single or multiple villiform segment with a maximal length of 13 cm. In our case, a polyp of 7 cm long appeard. Some have claimed they can be long enough to enter into the bladder[14]. Microscopically, FEP arise from the submusoca and are composed of a loose connective tissue core covered by a layer of normal urothelium. The central edematous stromal stalk contains collagen smooth muscle fibers, fibroblasts and acute and chronic inflammatory cells meet occasionally, even some irregular star-like polynucleated cells, which may cause misdiagnosis. The polyps are connected with the ureteral wall. They have a wider stalk and looser connective tissue compared to a papillary urothelial neoplasm, and a few acute and chronic inflammatory cells may be found.

Differential diagnosis

Tn flammatory polyps

The main difference between FEP and inflammatory polyps lies in infection in the peripheral tissue. Microscopically, just like tiny angioma, inflammatory polyps have a rich blood supply with plentiful acute and chronic inflammatory cells. The urothelium occasionally exhibits hyperplasia or metaplasia.

Papillary urothelial neoplasm

It is a polyloid mass with a low malignancy potential that originates from the urothelium with a long stalk. Microscopically, these lesions are made up of a core of fibrovascular stroma emerging from the submusoca and covered by normal transitional epithelium. The stalk is thinner and the fibroconnective tissue is looser than that of FEP. Observed from a longitudinal section, every villus is covered by more than 5 layers of transitional epithelium, but it is free of atypia.

Inverted transitional cellular papilloma

This is a benign urothelial tumor that has an inverted growth pattern with normal or minimal cytologic atypia of the neoplastic cells. Inverted transitional cellular papilloma looks like a benign tumor with a long stalk which is covered by normal urothelium. The tumor cells are free of atypia.

Transitional cellular carcinoma

Differentiating FEP from transitional cellular carcinomas is very important because of their opposite nature which has a life-and-death impact on a patient's life span. In general, the urothelium contains abnormal cells, exceeding the thickness of normal urothelium in transitional cellular carcinoma. In some cases, invagination and infolding of normal urothelium trapped within the stroma can be seen.

Treatment and prognosis

FEP are nonepithelial tumors that originate from mesodermal tissue of the ureteral wall. No reported cases of recurrence after local resection have been found in the literature. Many surgical approaches have been advanced for benign polyps. Low grade FEP can shrink by removing the obstruction and control of the infection. Because of their benign nature, surgical therapy should be limited and conservative if the kidney function is normal; otherwise, nephroureterectomy should be performed. On follow-up examinations at nine years after surgery, tumor recurrence and canceration were not detected[15]. Recently, with the development of molecular pathology, a new suggestion has been posted: a follow-up examination has been recommended if P53 and (or) c-myc were positive immunohistochemically. These findings may indicate a malignancy potential[15].

  • Received August 1, 2006.
  • Accepted September 27, 2006.
  • Copyright © 2006 by Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute & Hospital and Springer

References

  1. ↵
    1. Wogel CD,
    2. Parris AC,
    3. Mitty HA et al
    . fibroepithelial polyp of renal pelvis. Urology. 1982;19:436–439.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  2. ↵
    1. Abeshouse BS
    , Primary benign and malignant tumors of the ureter: review of the literature and report of 1 benign and 12 malignant tumors. Am J Surg. 1956;91:237.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  3. ↵
    1. Tsuzuki, Epstein
    . fibroepithelial polyp of the lower urinary tract in Adults. The American journal of Surgical Pathology. 2005;29:460–466.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  4. ↵
    1. Camacho Martin,
    2. Betancort D,
    3. Diazlglesia JM, et al
    . A fibroepithelial myxlid polyp of the renal pelvis in a patient with horseshoe kidneys. Actas Urológicas Españolas. 1999;23:609–612.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  5. ↵
    1. Downs RA
    . Congenital polyps of the prostatic urethra: a review of the literature and report of two cases. Br J Urol. 1970;42:76–85.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  6. ↵
    1. Kuppusami K,
    2. Moors DE
    . Fibrous polyp of the verumontanum. Canadian Journal of Surgery. 1968;11:388–389.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  7. ↵
    1. Lou ES,
    2. Newman H,
    3. Levitt SB
    . Prolapsing urethral polyp in child with hypospadias. Urology. 1977;9:423–424.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  8. ↵
    1. Williams PR,
    2. Feggeter J,
    3. Miller RA
    . The diagnosis and management of benign fibrous ureteric polyps. Br J Urol. 1980;52:253–256.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  9. ↵
    1. Macksood MJ,
    2. Roth DR,
    3. Change DH et al
    . Benign fibroepithelial polyp as a cause of intermittent ureteropelvic junction obstruction in a child: a case report and review of the literature. J Urol. 1985;134:951–952.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  10. ↵
    1. Stuppler SA,
    2. Kandzari SJ
    . fibroepithelial polyps of ureter. Urology. 1975;5:553–558.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  11. ↵
    1. Taki T,
    2. Matuura O,
    3. Isobe Y, et al
    . Ureteral fibroepithelial polyp associated with urolithiasis induced by steroid therapy in a child: a case report. Hinyokika Kiyo. 2001;47:579–582.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  12. ↵
    1. Banner MP,
    2. Pollack HM
    . Fibrous ureter polyps. Radiology. 1979;130:73–76.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  13. ↵
    1. Kim H,
    2. Kim DK,
    3. Lee SJ, et al
    . fibroepithelial polyp a case report: endoscopic removal of large ureteral polyp. J Koraen Med Sei. 1996;11:80–85.
    OpenUrl
  14. ↵
    1. Qiu GY,
    2. Zhu KW,
    3. Chen KT, et al
    . One case of ureteral polyps inbursted into the bladder. Acta Academiae Medicinae Zunyi. 1997;12:642–649.
    OpenUrl
  15. ↵
    1. Galifer RB.
    2. Aubert D,
    3. Couture A, et al
    . Fibrous epithelial polyps of the pyelo-ureteral junction in children: presentation of 3 cases and review of the literature (33 cases). Chir Pediatre. 1988;29:318–324.
    OpenUrl
    1. Li GH,
    2. Chen XD,
    3. Qian SX, et al
    . Relation between Coexpression of P53 and c-myc with ureteral cancer biological behavior. Chinese Journal of Urology. 1997;18:33–35.
    OpenUrl
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Cancer Biology and Medicine: 3 (5)
Chinese Journal of Clinical Oncology
Vol. 3, Issue 5
1 Oct 2006
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Print
Download PDF
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Cancer Biology & Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
The Diagnosis and Differential Diagnosis of Ureteral Fibroepithelial Polyps
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Cancer Biology & Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Cancer Biology & Medicine web site.
Citation Tools
The Diagnosis and Differential Diagnosis of Ureteral Fibroepithelial Polyps
Wanru Geng, Ning Li, Qi Yu, Huiqin Zhou, Hongmin Xu
Chinese Journal of Clinical Oncology Oct 2006, 3 (5) 373-375;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
The Diagnosis and Differential Diagnosis of Ureteral Fibroepithelial Polyps
Wanru Geng, Ning Li, Qi Yu, Huiqin Zhou, Hongmin Xu
Chinese Journal of Clinical Oncology Oct 2006, 3 (5) 373-375;
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Case Report
    • General biopsy
    • DISCUSSION
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • B7-H4 Expression and Increased Death Risk of Cancer Patients: A Meta-Analysis
  • Efficacy and Immune Mechanisms of Cetuximab for the Treatment of Metastatic Colorectal Cancer
  • Pemetrexed Monotherapy and Pemetrexed Plus Platinum Combination Therapy as Non-First-Line Treatments for Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
Show more Research Article

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • fibroepithelial
  • polyps
  • ureteral polyps
  • diagnosis
  • differential diagnosis

Navigate

  • Home
  • Current Issue

More Information

  • About CBM
  • About CACA
  • About TMUCIH
  • Editorial Board
  • Subscription

For Authors

  • Instructions for authors
  • Journal Policies
  • Submit a Manuscript

Journal Services

  • Email Alerts
  • Facebook
  • RSS Feeds
  • Twitter

 

© 2026 Cancer Biology & Medicine

Powered by HighWire