Objectives: Given the advances in renal imaging modalities in the recent years, a greater number of renal cell carcinomas (RCCs) with tumour size of <3 cm are being detected radiologically. Consequently, there is a pressing need for accurate typing of RCCs which, in turn, will aid in selection of cases of nephron-sparing surgery.
Methods: A total of 31 cases of renal masses with available fine needle aspiration (FNA) material and concomitant histopathology details were retrieved. They included 27 RCCs (17 clear cells, eight papillary and two chromophobe), one oncocytoma, one liposarcoma and two benign lesions - one xanthogranulomatous pyelonephritis (XPN) and one benign cyst. Two investigators reviewed all FNA material. The degree of concordance between cytological typing and histological typing was assessed.
Results: There was excellent agreement between the FNA typing and the final diagnosis, with correct classification in 28 of 31 cases. Among the three discordant cases, two were RCCs. The first was a papillary RCC (PRCC) that was misdiagnosed on FNA as clear cell RCC. Another case that was typed as a PRCC on final histopathology was diagnosed 'suspicious cells' on FNA. The third case was an XPN that was misdiagnosed on FNA as RCC with necrosis.
Conclusions: There is an excellent concordance (90.3%) between the FNA diagnosis and the final histological diagnosis, especially in RCCs. There is a tendency for misdiagnosis with PRCC. Lesions with extensive necrosis and relatively insufficient diagnostic material on FNA specimens must be interpreted with caution. Better concordance might be observed with more extensive sampling.