Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Original Article
  • Published:

Immunotherapy

Chimeric antigen receptor-modified T cells derived from defined CD8+ and CD4+ subsets confer superior antitumor reactivity in vivo

Abstract

Adoptive T-cell therapy with gene-modified T cells expressing a tumor-reactive T-cell receptor or chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) is a rapidly growing field of translational medicine and has shown success in the treatment of B-cell malignancies and solid tumors. In all reported trials, patients have received T-cell products comprising random compositions of CD4+ and CD8+ naive and memory T cells, meaning that each patient received a different therapeutic agent. This variation may have influenced the efficacy of T-cell therapy, and complicates comparison of outcomes between different patients and across trials. We analyzed CD19 CAR-expressing effector T cells derived from different subsets (CD4+/CD8+ naive, central memory, effector memory). T cells derived from each of the subsets were efficiently transduced and expanded, but showed clear differences in effector function and proliferation in vitro and in vivo. Combining the most potent CD4+ and CD8+ CAR-expressing subsets, resulted in synergistic antitumor effects in vivo. We show that CAR-T-cell products generated from defined T-cell subsets can provide uniform potency compared with products derived from unselected T cells that vary in phenotypic composition. These findings have important implications for the formulation of T-cell products for adoptive therapies.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5
Figure 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Jensen MC, Riddell SR . Design and implementation of adoptive therapy with chimeric antigen receptor-modified T cells. Immunol Rev 2014; 257: 127–144.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Kochenderfer JN, Rosenberg SA . Treating B-cell cancer with T cells expressing anti-CD19 chimeric antigen receptors. Nat Rev Clin Oncol 2013; 10: 267–276.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Davila ML, Riviere I, Wang X, Bartido S, Park J, Curran K et al. Efficacy and toxicity management of 19-28z CAR T Cell therapy in B cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Sci Transl Med 2014; 6: 224ra225.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Grupp SA, Kalos M, Barrett D, Aplenc R, Porter DL, Rheingold SR et al. Chimeric antigen receptor-modified T cells for acute lymphoid leukemia. N Engl J Med 2013; 368: 1509–1518.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Kalos M, Levine BL, Porter DL, Katz S, Grupp SA, Bagg A et al. T cells with chimeric antigen receptors have potent antitumor effects and can establish memory in patients with advanced leukemia. Sci Transl Med 2011; 3: 95ra73.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Kochenderfer JN, Dudley ME, Feldman SA, Wilson WH, Spaner DE, Maric I et al. B-cell depletion and remissions of malignancy along with cytokine-associated toxicity in a clinical trial of anti-CD19 chimeric-antigen-receptor-transduced T cells. Blood 2012; 119: 2709–2720.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Porter DL, Levine BL, Kalos M, Bagg A, June CH . Chimeric antigen receptor-modified T cells in chronic lymphoid leukemia. N Engl J Med 2011; 365: 725–733.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Maude SL, Frey N, Shaw PA, Aplenc R, Barrett DM, Bunin NJ et al. Chimeric antigen receptor T cells for sustained remissions in leukemia. N Engl J Med 2014; 371: 1507–1517.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Savoldo B, Ramos CA, Liu E, Mims MP, Keating MJ, Carrum G et al. CD28 costimulation improves expansion and persistence of chimeric antigen receptor-modified T cells in lymphoma patients. J Clin Invest 2011; 121: 1822–1826.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Brentjens RJ, Riviere I, Park JH, Davila ML, Wang X, Stefanski J et al. Safety and persistence of adoptively transferred autologous CD19-targeted T cells in patients with relapsed or chemotherapy refractory B-cell leukemias. Blood 2011; 118: 4817–4828.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Brentjens RJ, Santos E, Nikhamin Y, Yeh R, Matsushita M, La Perle K et al. Genetically targeted T cells eradicate systemic acute lymphoblastic leukemia xenografts. Clin Cancer Res 2007; 13 (18 Pt 1): 5426–5435.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Carpenito C, Milone MC, Hassan R, Simonet JC, Lakhal M, Suhoski MM et al. Control of large, established tumor xenografts with genetically retargeted human T cells containing CD28 and CD137 domains. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2009; 106: 3360–3365.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Hudecek M, Lupo-Stanghellini MT, Kosasih PL, Sommermeyer D, Jensen MC, Rader C et al. Receptor affinity and extracellular domain modifications affect tumor recognition by ROR1-specific chimeric antigen receptor T cells. Clin Cancer Res 2013; 19: 3153–3164.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. James SE, Greenberg PD, Jensen MC, Lin Y, Wang J, Till BG et al. Antigen sensitivity of CD22-specific chimeric TCR is modulated by target epitope distance from the cell membrane. J Immunol 2008; 180: 7028–7038.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Kowolik CM, Topp MS, Gonzalez S, Pfeiffer T, Olivares S, Gonzalez N et al. CD28 costimulation provided through a CD19-specific chimeric antigen receptor enhances in vivo persistence and antitumor efficacy of adoptively transferred T cells. Cancer Res 2006; 66: 10995–11004.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Milone MC, Fish JD, Carpenito C, Carroll RG, Binder GK, Teachey D et al. Chimeric receptors containing CD137 signal transduction domains mediate enhanced survival of T cells and increased antileukemic efficacy in vivo. Mol Ther 2009; 17: 1453–1464.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Kaech SM, Hemby S, Kersh E, Ahmed R . Molecular and functional profiling of memory CD8 T cell differentiation. Cell 2002; 111: 837–851.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Graef P, Buchholz VR, Stemberger C, Flossdorf M, Henkel L, Schiemann M et al. Serial transfer of single-cell-derived immunocompetence reveals stemness of CD8(+) central memory T cells. Immunity 2014; 41: 116–126.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Gattinoni L, Lugli E, Ji Y, Pos Z, Paulos CM, Quigley MF et al. A human memory T cell subset with stem cell-like properties. Nat Med 2011; 17: 1290–1297.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Stemberger C, Huster KM, Koffler M, Anderl F, Schiemann M, Wagner H et al. A single naive CD8+ T cell precursor can develop into diverse effector and memory subsets. Immunity 2007; 27: 985–997.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Buchholz VR, Flossdorf M, Hensel I, Kretschmer L, Weissbrich B, Graf P et al. Disparate individual fates compose robust CD8+ T cell immunity. Science 2013; 340: 630–635.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Gerlach C, Rohr JC, Perie L, van Rooij N, van Heijst JW, Velds A et al. Heterogeneous differentiation patterns of individual CD8+ T cells. Science 2013; 340: 635–639.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Rocha B, Tanchot C . Towards a cellular definition of CD8+ T-cell memory: the role of CD4+ T-cell help in CD8+ T-cell responses. Curr Opin Immunol 2004; 16: 259–263.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Mitsuyasu RT, Anton PA, Deeks SG, Scadden DT, Connick E, Downs MT et al. Prolonged survival and tissue trafficking following adoptive transfer of CD4zeta gene-modified autologous CD4(+) and CD8(+) T cells in human immunodeficiency virus-infected subjects. Blood 2000; 96: 785–793.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Walker RE, Bechtel CM, Natarajan V, Baseler M, Hege KM, Metcalf JA et al. Long-term in vivo survival of receptor-modified syngeneic T cells in patients with human immunodeficiency virus infection. Blood 2000; 96: 467–474.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Mackall CL, Fleisher TA, Brown MR, Andrich MP, Chen CC, Feuerstein IM et al. Age, thymopoiesis, and CD4+ T-lymphocyte regeneration after intensive chemotherapy. N Engl J Med 1995; 332: 143–149.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Hakim FT, Cepeda R, Kaimei S, Mackall CL, McAtee N, Zujewski J et al. Constraints on CD4 recovery postchemotherapy in adults: thymic insufficiency and apoptotic decline of expanded peripheral CD4 cells. Blood 1997; 90: 3789–3798.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Terakura S, Yamamoto TN, Gardner RA, Turtle CJ, Jensen MC, Riddell SR . Generation of CD19-chimeric antigen receptor modified CD8+ T cells derived from virus-specific central memory T cells. Blood 2012; 119: 72–82.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Hudecek M, Sommermeyer D, Kosasih PL, Silva-Benedict A, Liu L, Rader C et al. The nonsignaling extracellular spacer domain of chimeric antigen receptors is decisive for in vivo antitumor activity. Cancer Immunol Res 2015; 3: 125–135.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Zola H, MacArdle PJ, Bradford T, Weedon H, Yasui H, Kurosawa Y . Preparation and characterization of a chimeric CD19 monoclonal antibody. Immunol Cell Biol 1991; 69: 411–422.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Whitlow M, Bell BA, Feng SL, Filpula D, Hardman KD, Hubert SL et al. An improved linker for single-chain Fv with reduced aggregation and enhanced proteolytic stability. Protein Engineer 1993; 6: 989–995.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Wang X, Chang WC, Wong CW, Colcher D, Sherman M, Ostberg JR et al. A transgene-encoded cell surface polypeptide for selection, in vivo tracking, and ablation of engineered cells. Blood 2011; 118: 1255–1263.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. Hudecek M, Schmitt TM, Baskar S, Lupo-Stanghellini MT, Nishida T, Yamamoto TN et al. The B-cell tumor-associated antigen ROR1 can be targeted with T cells modified to express a ROR1-specific chimeric antigen receptor. Blood 2010; 116: 4532–4541.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. Leisegang M, Engels B, Meyerhuber P, Kieback E, Sommermeyer D, Xue SA et al. Enhanced functionality of T cell receptor-redirected T cells is defined by the transgene cassette. J Mol Med 2008; 86: 573–583.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Lee DW, Kochenderfer JN, Stetler-Stevenson M, Cui YK, Delbrook C, Feldman SA et al. T cells expressing CD19 chimeric antigen receptors for acute lymphoblastic leukaemia in children and young adults: a phase 1 dose-escalation trial. Lancet 2015; 385: 517–528.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Stemberger C, Dreher S, Tschulik C, Piossek C, Bet J, Yamamoto TN et al. Novel serial positive enrichment technology enables clinical multiparameter cell sorting. PloS One 2012; 7: e35798.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. Hinrichs CS, Borman ZA, Cassard L, Gattinoni L, Spolski R, Yu Z et al. Adoptively transferred effector cells derived from naive rather than central memory CD8+ T cells mediate superior antitumor immunity. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2009; 106: 17469–17474.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. Berger C, Jensen MC, Lansdorp PM, Gough M, Elliott C, Riddell SR . Adoptive transfer of effector CD8+ T cells derived from central memory cells establishes persistent T cell memory in primates. J Clin Invest 2008; 118: 294–305.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Wang X, Berger C, Wong CW, Forman SJ, Riddell SR, Jensen MC . Engraftment of human central memory-derived effector CD8+ T cells in immunodeficient mice. Blood 2011; 117: 1888–1898.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  40. Moeller M, Haynes NM, Kershaw MH, Jackson JT, Teng MW, Street SE et al. Adoptive transfer of gene-engineered CD4+ helper T cells induces potent primary and secondary tumor rejection. Blood 2005; 106: 2995–3003.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Moeller M, Kershaw MH, Cameron R, Westwood JA, Trapani JA, Smyth MJ et al. Sustained antigen-specific antitumor recall response mediated by gene-modified CD4+ T helper-1 and CD8+ T cells. Cancer Res 2007; 67: 11428–11437.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Riches JC, Davies JK, McClanahan F, Fatah R, Iqbal S, Agrawal S et al. T cells from CLL patients exhibit features of T-cell exhaustion but retain capacity for cytokine production. Blood 2013; 121: 1612–1621.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  43. Kiaii S, Clear AJ, Ramsay AG, Davies D, Sangaralingam A, Lee A et al. Follicular lymphoma cells induce changes in T-cell gene expression and function: potential impact on survival and risk of transformation. J Clin Oncol 2013; 31: 2654–2661.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  44. Kochenderfer JN, Dudley ME, Kassim SH, Somerville RP, Carpenter RO, Stetler-Stevenson M et al. Chemotherapy-refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma and indolent B-cell malignancies can be effectively treated with autologous T cells expressing an anti-CD19 chimeric antigen receptor. J Clin Oncol 2015; 33: 540–549.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Berger C, Berger M, Anderson D, Riddell SR . A non-human primate model for analysis of safety, persistence, and function of adoptively transferred T cells. J Med Primatol 2011; 40: 88–103.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Klebanoff CA, Gattinoni L, Torabi-Parizi P, Kerstann K, Cardones AR, Finkelstein SE et al. Central memory self/tumor-reactive CD8+ T cells confer superior antitumor immunity compared with effector memory T cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2005; 102: 9571–9576.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  47. Gattinoni L, Zhong XS, Palmer DC, Ji Y, Hinrichs CS, Yu Z et al. Wnt signaling arrests effector T cell differentiation and generates CD8+ memory stem cells. Nat Med 2009; 15: 808–813.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank Melissa Comstock (Shared Resources, FHCRC) for expertise in performing the mouse experiments. This work was supported by grants from the National Institutes of Health CA136551, CA18029 and CA114536 (SRR). DS and MH were supported by the German Research Foundation (DFG, Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft, SO1214/1-1, HU1668/1-1, 1-2). MH was supported by the Leukemia and Lymphoma Society (LLS, 5520-11), the German Cancer Aid (Deutsche Krebshilfe e.V., Max Eder Program 110313), and the University of Würzburg (Interdisziplinäres Zentrum für Klinische Forschung, IZKF, Z-4/109 and D-244).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to S R Riddell.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

MH and SRR are inventors on a patent application (PCT/US1013/055862) related to this work that has been filed by the Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center (FHCRC) and licensed by Juno Therapeutics. SRR is founder and shareholder of Juno Therapeutics.

Additional information

Supplementary Information accompanies this paper on the Leukemia website

Supplementary information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sommermeyer, D., Hudecek, M., Kosasih, P. et al. Chimeric antigen receptor-modified T cells derived from defined CD8+ and CD4+ subsets confer superior antitumor reactivity in vivo. Leukemia 30, 492–500 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1038/leu.2015.247

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/leu.2015.247

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links