Abstract
When exposed to ionizing radiation (IR), eukaryotic cells activate checkpoint pathways to delay the progression of the cell cycle1,2,3. Defects in the IR-induced S-phase checkpoint cause ‘radioresistant DNA synthesis’, a phenomenon that has been identified in cancer-prone patients suffering from ataxia-telangiectasia, a disease caused by mutations in the ATM gene4,5,6. The Cdc25A phosphatase7 activates the cyclin-dependent kinase 2 (Cdk2) needed for DNA synthesis8,9, but becomes degraded in response to DNA damage10 or stalled replication11. Here we report a functional link between ATM, the checkpoint signalling kinase Chk2/Cds1 (Chk2)12 and Cdc25A, and implicate this mechanism in controlling the S-phase checkpoint. We show that IR-induced destruction of Cdc25A requires both ATM and the Chk2-mediated phosphorylation of Cdc25A on serine 123. An IR-induced loss of Cdc25A protein prevents dephosphorylation of Cdk2 and leads to a transient blockade of DNA replication. We also show that tumour-associated Chk2 alleles13 cannot bind or phosphorylate Cdc25A, and that cells expressing these Chk2 alleles, elevated Cdc25A or a Cdk2 mutant unable to undergo inhibitory phosphorylation (Cdk2AF) fail to inhibit DNA synthesis when irradiated. These results support Chk2 as a candidate tumour suppressor, and identify the ATM–Chk2–Cdc25A–Cdk2 pathway as a genomic integrity checkpoint that prevents radioresistant DNA synthesis.
Similar content being viewed by others
Main
To investigate whether degradation of Cdc25A affects the IR-induced S-phase checkpoint, we measured DNA synthesis in human U-2-OS/B3C4 cells engineered to express ectopic haemagglutinin A (HA)-tagged Cdc25A in a tetracycline-repressible manner10. Endogenous Cdc25A was degraded rapidly in response to IR, along with the dose-dependent inhibition of DNA synthesis (Fig. 1a); however, when the HA–Cdc25A protein was transiently elevated to levels high enough to prevent its degradation, it abrogated the S-phase checkpoint (Fig. 1a), resulting in radioresistant DNA synthesis (RDS) comparable to that seen in cells from ataxia-telangiectasia patients4,5,6.
We thought that if destruction of Cdc25A were involved in the S-phase checkpoint, it should be only transient, as the IR-induced inhibition of DNA replication lasts only several hours5. Our kinetic measurements showed that Cdc25A was almost completely downregulated by 30 min after irradiation, and recovered to the levels of non-irradiated cells 4–8 h later (Fig. 1b). The maximum downregulation of Cdc25A between 1 and 3 h after IR correlated with an increased inhibitory phosphorylation of Cdk2 on Tyr 15, a reduction of the S-phase-promoting cyclin E/Cdk2 kinase activity, and nearly 50% inhibition of DNA synthesis (Fig. 1b).
These results suggested that the main consequence of the IR-induced Cdc25A downregulation was inhibition of Cdk2, implying that interference with the Cdk2 inhibitory phosphorylation should abrogate the S-phase checkpoint. Indeed, brief conditional expression of the Cdk2AF allele14, in which the inhibitory Thr 14 and Tyr 15 are replaced by alanine and phenylalanine, respectively, mimicked the effect of Cdc25A overexpression and resulted in RDS (Fig. 1c). Simultaneous expression of both HA–Cdc25A and Cdk2AF did not further increase the degree of RDS (Fig. 1c), indicating that both proteins function in the same pathway.
Ultraviolet-light-induced downregulation of Cdc25A requires the activation of Chk1 (ref. 10), a key signal transducer that, together with Chk2, is implicated in checkpoint pathways activated by damaged or unreplicated DNA12,15,16,17,18,19. To assess whether Chk1 or Chk2 may regulate abundance of Cdc25A on IR, we measured their ability to phosphorylate Cdc25A. The activity and electrophoretic mobility of Chk1 remained unchanged until several hours after IR (Fig. 2a; and data not shown), but Chk2 became activated rapidly, as judged by its lower electrophoretic mobility and enhanced phosphorylation of GST–Cdc25A 1 h after IR (Fig. 2a). These results suggest that Chk2, but not Chk1, becomes activated with kinetics indicative of a link between IR-induced DNA damage and the rapid inhibition of S phase. Detailed time-course measurements showed that the kinetics of IR-induced Chk2 activity closely paralleled the loss of Cdc25A protein and phosphatase activity, the downregulation of cyclin E/Cdk2 by inhibitory phosphorylation, and the decrease in DNA synthesis (Fig. 1b).
To gain mechanistic insight into this link between Chk2 and Cdc25A, we assessed the IR responsiveness of Myc-tagged forms of human Chk2 transiently transfected into U-2-OS/B3C4 cells, including the engineered catalytically inactive D347A mutant12,20, and the R145W and I157T alleles13 with mutations in the putative protein-interaction FHA domain12,21,22, identified in sporadic colon cancer and as a germ-line mutation in the cancer-prone Li–Fraumeni syndrome, respectively13. On exposure to IR, the ectopic wild-type Chk2 became rapidly shifted into a more slowly migrating form, and increased its ability to interact physically with transiently elevated HA–Cdc25A in vivo and phosphorylate GST–Cdc25A in vitro (Fig. 2b). In contrast, basal activities of the three mutants of Chk2 were barely detectable in non-irradiated cells and remained low even after exposure to IR (Fig. 2b).
Notably, the D347A mutant still bound HA–Cdc25A after IR (Fig. 2b), implying that the interaction of Chk2 with its substrate(s) is mediated through its modification by an upstream regulator, independently of Chk2 autocatalytic activity. In contrast, the R145W and I157T cancer-associated mutants of Chk2 could not bind HA–Cdc25A, even though the I157T mutant preserved the IR-induced mobility shift (Fig. 2b). Thus, the tumour-associated Chk2 proteins seem defective in their ability to bind and phosphorylate substrates such as Cdc25A.
To examine whether Chk2 and Cdc25A function in a common pathway, we transfected U-2-OS cells with plasmids encoding the Chk2 alleles described in Fig. 2b, together with a gene coding for puromycin resistance. Whereas puromycin-resistant cell populations transfected with wild-type Chk2 or empty plasmid efficiently degraded Cdc25A when exposed to IR (Fig. 2c), cells expressing any of the Chk2 mutants retained substantial amounts of Cdc25A when irradiated (Fig. 2c). Consistent with these differential abilities to modulate Cdc25A protein levels, Cdk2 activity declined in cells transfected with empty vector or wild-type Chk2, but remained elevated in cells expressing the Chk2 mutants (Fig. 2d). Consequently, whereas the control cells responded by inhibiting DNA synthesis, cells expressing the Chk2 mutants failed to impose the S-phase blockade and exhibited RDS comparable to that of cells conditionally overexpressing Cdc25A (Fig. 2e). Thus, Chk2 alleles defective in catalytic activity or interaction with Cdc25A behaved as dominant-negative mutants that abrogated the S-phase checkpoint, which is consistent with Chk2 operating upstream of Cdc25A and Cdk2 in a common pathway.
In addition to Cdc25A, Chk2 also efficiently phosphorylates the p53 tumour suppressor in response to DNA damage20,23; however, the former substrate seems more relevant for S-phase arrest induced by IR, as p53 controls the G1 and sustains the G2/M checkpoints, rather than the S-phase checkpoint24,25,26, and RDS occurs independently of p53 status27. Consistent with this, rapid degradation of Cdc25A and loss of its phosphatase activity occurred in SW620 (wild-type for Chk2) but not in HCT-15 cells expressing mutant Chk2 after exposure to IR (ref. 13; Fig. 3a). Notably, both of these colon cancer cell lines express mutant p53 (ref. 13). Re-introduction of wild-type Chk2 into HCT-15 cells to a level exceeding that of the endogenous mutated protein restored the S-phase checkpoint response, including degradation of Cdc25A, increased inhibitory phosphorylation of Cdk2 and downregulation of cyclin E/Cdk2 kinase activity (Fig. 3b), and the ability to arrest S-phase progression (Fig. 3c). These results further support Chk2 as a mediator for rapidly destructing Cdc25A in response to IR, in a p53-independent S-phase checkpoint that protects cells against RDS.
As RDS occurs in cells with a defective ATM gene4,5,6, as well as through deregulation of Chk2 or Cdc25A, and as ATM activates Chk2 directly (ref. 12), we next compared the response of the Chk2–Cdc25A–Cdk2 pathway in lymphoblasts derived from ataxia-telangiectasia patients to those isolated from normal individuals. Unlike normal lymphoblasts, irradiated ataxia-telangiectasia cells were unable to activate Chk2 and downregulate Cdc25A protein and activity (Fig. 3d). Consequently, exposure of ataxia-telangiectasia lymphoblasts to IR caused neither an increase in Cdk2 Tyr 15 phosphorylation nor an inhibition of cyclin E/Cdk2 kinase activity (Fig. 3d), which is consistent with the well-documented RDS phenotype in these cells5.
As signals from damaged DNA are often propagated through phosphorylation cascades, we next identified the Cdc25A residue(s) directly phosphorylated by Chk2, presumably to prime Cdc25A for rapid destruction after IR-induced DNA damage. We made glutathione S-transferase (GST)-coupled fragments derived from the Cdc25A regulatory domain and subjected them to phosphorylation by purified GST–Chk2. The fragment spanning amino acids 101–140 was strongly phosphorylated by wild-type but not by catalytically inactive Chk2 (Fig. 4a), and the sequence flanking Ser 123 of human Cdc25A, conserved in diverse mammalian species, matched the criteria for a Chk2/Chk1 consensus site identified in other proteins such as Cdc25C12,16,17,18 (Fig. 4b). Replacement of Ser 123 with alanine abolished the ability of the IR-activated Chk2 to phosphorylate the corresponding GST–Cdc25A fragment (Fig. 4c). The S123A mutation in the context of full-length Cdc25A resulted in a protein that, unlike wild-type Cdc25A, did not undergo an IR-induced shift when separated on an SDS gel (Fig. 4d), indicating that in vivo the S123A substitution abolished an important IR-dependent modification of Cdc25A. Significantly, the S123A mutation rendered Cdc25A resistant to IR-induced degradation under conditions in which a comparable amount of moderately overexpressed wild-type Cdc25A was still effectively degraded in vivo (Fig. 4e). We conclude that Chk2-dependent phosphorylation of Cdc25A on Ser 123 represents a critical step in promoting its rapid destruction in response to IR-induced DNA damage.
On the basis of this study, we propose that the ATM–Chk2–Cdc25A–Cdk2 pathway may provide the molecular explanation of the defence mechanism protecting human cells against RDS. The key components and events along this pathway in cells proficient in the S-phase checkpoint are outlined in Fig. 5 (left). The biological and pathophysiological relevance of this mechanism is further supported by the fact that tumour-associated defects of any of its main components cause RDS (Fig. 5, right), and may predispose to, or promote, tumorigenesis (refs 5, 13, 28; and this study). Cells undergoing DNA replication are particularly vulnerable to genotoxic stress including IR; the rapid degradation of Cdc25A and subsequent silencing of the Cdk2 activity may represent the initial defence barrier, which inhibits DNA synthesis to allow efficient repair. Cdc25A extends the list of important checkpoint mediators targeted by Chk2, currently encompassing the mitotic activator Cdc25C12, and the p53 (refs 20, 23) and BRCA1 (ref. 29) tumour suppressors, thereby implicating Chk2 in a complex network controlling G1, S and G2/M checkpoints, as well as DNA repair. Such a central role in protecting genome integrity is also consistent with the proposed candidacy of Chk2 for a new tumour suppressor, whose mutations may predispose to tumorigenesis in diverse tissues, as seen in patients with Li–Fraumeni syndrome13. Our finding that the tumour-associated Chk2 alleles are indeed loss-of-function mutants provides the missing functional evidence indicating that Chk2 is a genuine tumour suppressor.
Methods
Antibodies and immunochemistry
Mouse antibody HE172 to cyclin E, as well as immunoblotting, immunoprecipitation, Cdc25A phosphatase activity and in vitro kinase assays have been described10. Rabbit antisera to Cdk2 (M2) and Chk1 (FL-476), and mouse antibody to Cdc25A (F-6, used to detect the endogenous protein) were from Santa Cruz. Rabbit antiserum to Tyr15-phosphorylated Cdk1/Cdk2 was from Calbiochem, and mouse monoclonal antibody to CD20 was from Becton Dickinson. The 9E10 antibody to the Myc epitope was a gift from G. Evan. We generated mouse monoclonal antibodies to human Chk2 (DCS-270) and Cdc25A (DCS-127) by standard hybridoma technology.
Plasmids
To construct the Myc-tagged Chk2 expression vector, the human Chk2 complementary DNA (a gift from S. Elledge) was amplified by PCR with Pfu polymerase (Stratagene) and cloned into a pcDNA3 vector (Invitrogen) containing a Myc tag. The catalytically inactive D347A12,20, and tumour-associated R145W13 and I157T13 mutants of Chk2, as well as the Cdc25A S123A mutant were generated using the QuikChange Site-Directed Mutagenesis kit (Stratagene). We expressed and purified GST–Chk2 and GST–Cdc25A10 (full length and fragments) according to standard procedures.
Cell culture and RDS assay
We grew U-2-OS cells10 and SW-620 cells in DMEM containing 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS). HCT-15 cells13 and lymphoblasts derived from normal and ataxia-telangiectasia patients (donated by Y. Shiloh) were grown in RPMI with 10% FBS. The U-2-OS-derived B3C4 clone conditionally expressing haemagglutinin (HA)-tagged Cdc25A has been described10. Expression of the transgene was induced by culturing the cells in tetracycline-free medium for the durations specified in the figure legends. The U-2-OS-derived T-Rex cell line was from Invitrogen. We induced expression of Cdc25A and Cdk2AF by adding tetracycline (1 µg ml-1) 4 h before irradiation (Fig. 1c); ectopic CD20 was expressed throughout the experiment. Isolation of CD20-positive U-2-OS/T-Rex cells with anti-CD20-coupled Dynabeads has been described30. The U-2-OS- and HCT-15-derived polyclonal cell lines stably expressing Myc-tagged wild-type or mutant Chk2 were generated by calcium phosphate transfection (U-2-OS) or electroporation (HCT-15) of cells with empty pcDNA3–Myc vector or pcDNA3–Myc vector containing wild-type or mutant Chk2. A vector encoding puromycin resistance (pBabe-puro) was co-transfected, the cells were selected for neomycin (G418; 400 µg ml-1) and puromycin (1 µg ml-1) resistance, and pooled when visible colonies emerged. Ionizing radiation was delivered by X-ray generator (RT100, Philips Medico; 100 kV, 8 mA, dose-rate 0.92 Gy min-1), and cell extracts were prepared 1 h later except where indicated otherwise. Inhibition of DNA synthesis and RDS after ionizing radiation were monitored as described6,26.
References
Weinert, T. DNA damage and checkpoint pathways: molecular anatomy and interactions with repair. Cell 94, 555–558 (1998).
Hartwell, L. H. & Kastan, M. B. Cell cycle control and cancer. Science 266, 1821–1828 (1994).
Elledge, S. J. Cell cycle checkpoints: preventing an identity crisis. Science 274, 1664–1672 (1996).
Painter, R. B. & Young, B. R. Radiosensitivity in ataxia-telangiectasia: a new explanation. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 77, 7315–7317 (1980).
Rotman, G. & Shiloh, Y. ATM: a mediator of multiple responses to genotoxic stress. Oncogene 18, 6135–6144 (1999).
Stewart, G. S. et al. The DNA double-strand break repair gene hMRE11 is mutated in individuals with an ataxia-telangiectasia-like disorder. Cell 99, 577–587 (1999).
Galaktionov, K. & Beach, D. Specific activation of cdc25 tyrosine phosphatases by B-type cyclins: evidence for multiple roles of mitotic cyclins. Cell 67, 1181–1194 (1991).
Hoffmann, I., Draetta, G. & Karsenti, E. Activation of the phosphatase activity of human cdc25A by a cdk2-cyclin E dependent phosphorylation at the G1/S transition. EMBO J. 13, 4302–4310 (1994).
Jinno, S. et al. Cdc25A is a novel phosphatase functioning early in the cell cycle. EMBO J. 13, 1549–1556 (1994).
Mailand, N. et al. Rapid destruction of Cdc25A in response to DNA damage. Science 288, 1425–1429 (2000).
Molinari, M. et al. Human Cdc25A inactivation in response to S phase inhibition and its role in preventing premature mitosis. EMBO Reps 1, 71–79 (2000).
Matsuoka, S., Huang, M. & Elledge, S. J. Linkage of ATM to cell cycle regulation by the Chk2 protein kinase. Science 282, 1893–1897 (1998).
Bell, D. W. et al. Heterozygous germ line hCHK2 mutations in Li–Fraumeni syndrome. Science 286, 2528–2531 (1999).
Gu, Y., Rosenblatt J. & Morgan, D. O. Cell cycle regulation of CDK2 activity by phosphorylation of Thr160 and Tyr15. EMBO J. 11, 3995–4005 (1992).
Boddy, M. N., Furnari, B., Mondesert, O. & Russell, P. Replication checkpoint enforced by kinases Cds1 and Chk1. Science 280, 909–912 (1998).
Furnari, B., Rhind, N. & Russell, P. Cdc25 mitotic inducer targeted by chk1 DNA damage checkpoint kinase. Science 277, 1495–1497 (1997).
Peng, C. Y. et al. Mitotic and G2 checkpoint control: regulation of 14-3-3 protein binding by phosphorylation of Cdc25C on serine-216. Science 277, 1501–1505 (1997).
Sanchez, Y. et al. Conservation of the Chk1 checkpoint pathway in mammals: linkage of DNA damage to Cdk regulation through Cdc25. Science 277, 1497–1501 (1997).
Zeng, Y. et al. Replication checkpoint requires phosphorylation of the phosphatase Cdc25 by Cds1 or Chk1. Nature 395, 507–510 (1998).
Chehab, N. H., Malikzay, A., Appel, M. & Halazonetis, T. D. Chk2/hCds1 functions as a DNA damage checkpoint in G1 by stabilizing p53. Genes Dev. 14, 278–288 (2000).
Sun, Z., Hsiao, J., Fay, D. S. & Stern, D. F. Rad 53 FHA domain associated with phosphorylated Rad9 in the DNA damage checkpoint. Science 281, 272–274 (1998).
Durocher, D., Henckel, J., Fersht, A. R. & Jackson, S. P. The FHA domain is a modular phosphopeptide recognition motif. Mol. Cell 4, 387–394 (1999).
Hirao, A. et al. DNA damage-induced activation of p53 by the checkpoint kinase Chk2. Science 287, 1824–1827 (2000).
Chan, T. A., Hermeking, H., Lengauer, C., Kinzler, K. W. & Vogelstein, B. 14-3-3σ is required to prevent mitotic catastrophe after DNA damage. Nature 401, 616–620 (1999).
Giaccia, A. J. & Kastan, M. B. The complexity of p53 modulation: emerging patterns from divergent signals. Genes Dev. 12, 2973–2983 (1998).
Lim, D. S. et al. ATM phosphorylates p95/nbs1 in an S-phase checkpoint pathway. Nature 404, 613–617 (2000).
Xie, G. et al. Requirements for p53 and ATM gene product in the regulation of G1/S and S phase checkpoints. Oncogene 16, 721–736 (1998).
Galaktionov, K. et al. CDC25 phosphatases as potential human oncogenes. Science 269, 1575–1577 (1995).
Lee, J. S., Collins, K. M., Brown, A. L., Lee, C. H. & Chung, J. H. hCds1-mediated phosphorylation of BRCA1 regulates the DNA damage response. Nature 404, 201–204 (2000).
Santoni-Rugiu, E., Falck, J., Mailand, N., Bartek, J & Lukas, J. Involvement of Myc activity in a G1/S-promoting mechanism parallel to the pRb/E2F pathway. Mol. Cell. Biol. 20, 3497–3509 (2000).
Acknowledgements
We thank S. Elledge, G. Evan, S. I. Reed and Y. Shiloh for providing reagents; K. Hansen for advice; and the Danish Cancer Society, the Human Frontier Science Programme, Alfred Benzon's Fund, the European Commission, the Danish Medical Research Council and the Danish Cancer Research Fund for financial support.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Falck, J., Mailand, N., Syljuåsen, R. et al. The ATM–Chk2–Cdc25A checkpoint pathway guards against radioresistant DNA synthesis. Nature 410, 842–847 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1038/35071124
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/35071124
This article is cited by
-
BPA induces placental trophoblast proliferation inhibition and fetal growth restriction by inhibiting the expression of SRB1
Environmental Science and Pollution Research (2023)
-
Acetylation dependent translocation of EWSR1 regulates CHK2 alternative splicing in response to DNA damage
Oncogene (2022)
-
JAK2-CHK2 signaling safeguards the integrity of the mitotic spindle assembly checkpoint and genome stability
Cell Death & Disease (2022)
-
Natural podophyllotoxin analog 4DPG attenuates EMT and colorectal cancer progression via activation of checkpoint kinase 2
Cell Death Discovery (2021)
-
Epigenetic based synthetic lethal strategies in human cancers
Biomarker Research (2020)
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.