ReviewCancer stem cells, cancer cell plasticity and radiation therapy☆
Introduction
In 2010, the estimated medical costs of cancer care in the United States exceeded $124 billion (source: National Cancer Institute). Yet, despite the enormous spending for cancer care, many cancers are still fatal and 5-year survival rates have not significantly changed over the decades. This raises the question as to whether current radiation treatment approaches can be technically further fine-tuned to improve cancer cure rates, or if cancer therapy in general needs a paradigm shift to substantially improve future outcome.
Aside from surgery, other current standard cancer therapies, such as radiotherapy, chemotherapy, and most targeted therapies have been designed, developed and evaluated for their effectiveness based on bulk tumor responses. This approach for developing novel anti-cancer therapies continues to be widely applied despite our broad knowledge of the undisputable heterogeneity of human tumors. It has been known for over a century that tumors exhibit a remarkable phenotypical heterogeneity, which extends to their radiosensitivity, drug resistance and genetic alterations of the individual cells composing a tumor mass. Employing bulk tumor responses as the primary end point for determining the effectiveness of novel treatments is certainly a very practical approach. However, such an approach will only be successful in yielding cures if the response of the bulk tumor represents the response of the most resistant subpopulation of cells within the heterogeneous tumor and this might hold true for only some cancers like advanced melanoma.
In this review we hope to add to the ongoing discussions about clinically relevant tumor heterogeneity and its potential roots [1], [2]. We will focus on the effects of ionizing radiation on the heterogeneity of solid tumors in the context of competing models of tumor organization, the cancer stem cell hypothesis and the clonal evolution model.
Section snippets
The cancer stem cell hypothesis
The cancer stem cell (CSC) concept was first formulated in the 1800s, and has its roots in Rudolf Virchow's Cellular Pathologie [3], and a case report by Julius Cohnheim in 1875 [4]. A seminal paper by Steven Paget in 1889 first gave rise to the “seed and soil hypothesis” for cancer, hypothesizing that cancer cells within a tumor have the intrinsic capability to “seed” a metastasis in a distant organ that has favorable conditions for secondary tumor growth (soil) [5]. In 1961 Pierce and Speers
The clonal evolution model
The clonal evolution model of cancer is an alternative model for the organizational structure of tumors initially described by Peter Nowell in 1976 [17]. Similar to the cancer stem cell hypothesis, the model assumes a clonal origin of cancers with the important distinction that it does not propose a hierarchical organization for tumors. The clonal evolution model postulates that the genetic instability of cancer cells leads to different clones of cells that contribute to the cellular
Cancer stem cell markers
The CSC hypothesis and the clonal evolution model are not necessarily mutually exclusive. Both models agree on the existence of a subpopulation of cells with increased tumorigenicity in solid cancers. However, a disagreement arises from these models on whether the tumorigenic population of cells within a tumor is static and rare and exhibits stem cell traits, or whether increased tumorigenicity is a transient feature of competing cell populations that shifts from one cell population to another
Stem cells factors and plasticity
The stem cell state of pluripotent normal stem cells is governed by stem cell factors, which become silenced during differentiation as a consequence of DNA methylation and chromatin remodeling. This process is reversible and transfection of somatic cells with the four Yamanaka factors Sox2, Oct4, Klf4, and c-Myc [56] generates induced pluripotent stem (iPS) cells. All four-transcription factors are wired in an incompletely understood network with Nanog, a unique set of transcription factors,
Effect of tumor microenvironment on CSCs plasticity
As summarized above new evidence is emerging supporting the phenomenon of spontaneous and therapy-induced reprogramming of cancer cells into CSCs. The number of these studies is still small; nonetheless they have begun to uncover the mechanism behind the conversion of cancer cells into CSCs. In the case of radiation-induced reprogramming, the re-expression of stem cell factors correlates with the reprogramming events. Although radiation-induced reprogramming of non-stem cells into CSCs is
Concluding remarks
For most cancers, survival rates have remained unchanged for decades and systemic disease is almost always fatal. Experimental and clinical data provide a growing body of evidence supporting the hierarchical organization of cancers with a small number CSCs able to self-renew, repopulate a tumor after treatment and initiate metastatic growth. The resistance of CSCs to chemotherapy and their relative resistance to radiotherapy explain why macroscopic tumor response to anti-cancer treatments is
Conflict of interest
None.
References (115)
The distribution of secondary growths in cancer of the breast
Lancet
(1889)- et al.
Tumor-initiating cells are rare in many human tumors
Cell Stem Cell
(2010) - et al.
Genetic instability and Darwinian selection in tumours
Trends Cell Biol
(1999) - et al.
Heterogeneity in cancer: cancer stem cells versus clonal evolution
Cell
(2009) - et al.
Characterization of CD133+ hepatocellular carcinoma cells as cancer stem/progenitor cells
Biochem Biophys Res Commun
(2006) - et al.
Direct demonstration of elevated aldehyde dehydrogenase in human hematopoietic progenitor cells
Blood
(1990) - et al.
ALDH1 is a marker of normal and malignant human mammary stem cells and a predictor of poor clinical outcome
Cell Stem Cell
(2007) - et al.
The CCAAT box-binding transcription factor NF-Y regulates basal expression of human proteasome genes
Biochim Biophys Acta
(2012) - et al.
A pilot study to investigate the role of the 26S proteasome in radiotherapy resistance and loco-regional recurrence following breast conserving therapy for early breast cancer
Breast
(2011) - et al.
Formation of pluripotent stem cells in the mammalian embryo depends on the POU transcription factor Oct4
Cell
(1998)
Oct4 and its pseudogenes confuse stem cell research
Cell Stem Cell
Core transcriptional regulatory circuitry in human embryonic stem cells
Cell
Induction of pluripotent stem cells from mouse embryonic and adult fibroblast cultures by defined factors
Cell
Sox2(+) adult stem and progenitor cells are important for tissue regeneration and survival of mice
Cell Stem Cell
Sox2: a possible driver of the basal-like phenotype in sporadic breast cancer
Modern Pathol
BCL-2 inhibition targets oxidative phosphorylation and selectively eradicates quiescent human leukemia stem cells
Cell Stem Cell
Transcriptional profiling of Kruppel-like factor 4 reveals a function in cell cycle regulation and epithelial differentiation
J Mol Biol
Kruppel-like factor 4 (gut-enriched Kruppel-like factor) inhibits cell proliferation by blocking G1/S progression of the cell cycle
J Biol Chem
Identification and characterization of a gene encoding a gut-enriched Kruppel-like factor expressed during growth arrest
J Biol Chem
Up-regulation of the embryonic self-renewal network through reversible polyploidy in irradiated p53-mutant tumour cells
Exp Cell Res
Cell plasticity and heterogeneity in cancer
Clin Chem
Clonal evolution in cancer
Nature
Cellular-pathologie
Arch Pathol Anat Physiol Klin Med
Congenitales, quergestreiftes Muskelsarkom der Nieren
Virch Arch Pathol Anat Physiol Klin Med
Tumors as caricatures of the process of tissue renewal: prospects for therapy by directing differentiation
Cancer Res
A cell initiating human acute myeloid leukaemia after transplantation into SCID mice
Nature
Cancerous stem cells can arise from pediatric brain tumors
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A
Identification of human brain tumour initiating cells
Nature
Stem cells, cancer, and cancer stem cells
Nature
Identification of a cancer stem cell in human brain tumors
Cancer Res
Prospective identification of tumorigenic breast cancer cells
Proc Natl Acad Sci USA
Identification of cells initiating human melanomas
Nature
Efficient tumour formation by single human melanoma cells
Nature
Human melanoma-initiating cells express neural crest nerve growth factor receptor CD271
Nature
The clonal evolution of tumor cell populations
Science
The causes and consequences of genetic heterogeneity in cancer evolution
Nature
Mutation selection and the natural history of cancer
Nature
Gleason grade progression is uncommon
Cancer Res
The utility and limitations of glycosylated human CD133 epitopes in defining cancer stem cells
J Mol Med
Limits of CD133 as a marker of glioma self-renewing cells
Int J Cancer
CD133 is a marker of bioenergetic stress in human glioma
PLoS ONE
CD133 negative glioma cells form tumors in nude rats and give rise to CD133 positive cells
Int J Cancer
Cell cycle-dependent variation of a CD133 epitope in human embryonic stem cell, colon cancer, and melanoma cell lines
Cancer Res
Glioma stem cells promote radioresistance by preferential activation of the DNA damage response
Nature
Cancer stem cell analysis and clinical outcome in patients with glioblastoma multiforme
Clin Cancer Res
Stem cell marker CD133 affects clinical outcome in glioma patients
Clin Cancer Res
Identification of putative stem cell markers, CD133 and CXCR4, in hTERT-immortalized primary nonmalignant and malignant tumor-derived human prostate epithelial cell lines and in prostate cancer specimens
Cancer Res
The response of CD24(−/low)/CD44+ breast cancer-initiating cells to radiation
J Natl Cancer Inst
Human breast cancer cell lines contain stem-like cells that self-renew, give rise to phenotypically diverse progeny and survive chemotherapy
Breast Cancer Res
Identification of a subpopulation of cells with cancer stem cell properties in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma
Proc Natl Acad Sci USA
Cited by (230)
CD71/CD44 dual-aptamer-gemcitabine conjugate for tumor co-targeting treatment of bladder cancer
2023, Chemical Engineering JournalRecent advances in aptamer-based therapeutic strategies for targeting cancer stem cells
2023, Materials Today Bio
- ☆
FP was supported by a generous gift from Steve and Cathy Fink and grants from the National Cancer Institute (RO1CA137110, 1R01CA161294) and the Army Medical Research & Materiel Command's Breast Cancer Research Program (W81XWH-11-1-0531).