Elsevier

European Urology

Volume 63, Issue 6, June 2013, Pages 1059-1071
European Urology

Guidelines
European Guidelines on Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinomas: 2013 Update

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2013.03.032Get rights and content

Abstract

Context

The European Association of Urology (EAU) guideline group for upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) has prepared updated guidelines to aid clinicians in assessing the current evidence-based management of UTUC and to incorporate present recommendations into daily clinical practice.

Objective

To provide a brief overview of the EAU guidelines on UTUC as an aid to clinicians in their daily clinical practice.

Evidence acquisition

The recommendations provided in the current guidelines are based on a thorough review of available UTUC guidelines and articles identified using a systematic search of Medline. Data on urothelial malignancies and UTUCs in the literature were searched using Medline with the following keywords: urinary tract cancer; urothelial carcinomas; upper urinary tract, carcinoma; renal pelvis; ureter; bladder cancer; chemotherapy; nephroureterectomy; adjuvant treatment; instillation; neoadjuvant treatment; recurrence; risk factors; nomogram; and survival. References were weighted by a panel of experts.

Evidence synthesis

There is a lack of data in the current literature to provide strong recommendations (ie, grade A) due to the rarity of the disease. A number of recent multicentre studies are now available, and there is a growing interest in UTUC in the recent literature. Overall, 135 references have been included here, but most of these studies are still retrospective analyses. The TNM 2009 classification is recommended. Recommendations are given for diagnosis as well as radical and conservative treatment (ie, imperative and elective cases); additionally, prognostic factors are discussed. Recommendations are also provided for patient follow-up after different therapeutic options.

Conclusions

These guidelines contain information for the management of individual patients according to a current standardised approach. Physicians must take into account the specific clinical characteristics of each individual patient when determining the optimal treatment regimen including tumour location, grade, and stage; renal function; molecular marker status; and medical comorbidities.

Introduction

The prior version of the European Association of Urology (EAU) guidelines on upper urinary tract tumours known as upper tract urothelial carcinomas (UTUCs) were published in 2011 [1]. The EAU Guidelines Working Panel for UTUCs has prepared the current guidelines to provide evidence-based information for the clinical management of these rare tumours and to help clinicians incorporate these recommendations into their practice. The current update is based on a structured literature search.

Section snippets

Data identification

A Medline search was performed on urothelial malignancies and UTUC management using combinations of the following terms: urinary tract cancer; urothelial carcinomas; upper urinary tract; carcinoma; renal pelvis; ureter; bladder cancer; chemotherapy; nephroureterectomy; adjuvant treatment; instillation; neoadjuvant treatment; recurrence; risk factors; nomogram; and survival. The publications concerning UTUCs were mostly retrospective including some large multicentre studies. Due to the scarcity

Epidemiology

Urothelial carcinomas (UCs) are the fourth most common tumours after prostate (or breast), lung, and colorectal cancer [4], [5]. They can be located in the lower urinary tract (bladder and urethra) or upper urinary tract (pyelocaliceal cavities and ureter). Bladder tumours account for 90–95% of UCs and are the most common malignancy of the urinary tract [1], [5]. In contrast, UTUCs are uncommon and account for only 5–10% of UCs [4], [6]. The estimated annual incidence of UTUCs in Western

Conclusions

These renewed UTUC guidelines contain information for the diagnosis and treatment of individual patients according to a current standardised approach. When determining the optimal treatment regimen for their patients, urologists must take into account each individual patient's specific clinical characteristics with regard to renal function including medical comorbidity; tumour location, grade, and stage; and molecular marker status.

References (152)

  • D. Perez-Montiel et al.

    High-grade urothelial carcinoma of the renal pelvis: clinicopathologic study of 108 cases with emphasis on unusual morphologic variants

    Mod Pathol

    (2006)
  • A. Orsola et al.

    Renal collecting (Bellini) duct carcinoma displays similar characteristics to upper tract urothelial cell carcinoma

    Urology

    (2005)
  • J.E. Busby et al.

    Upper urinary tract tumors with nontransitional histology: a single-center experience

    Urology

    (2006)
  • A. Ouzzane et al.

    Small cell carcinoma of the upper urinary tract (UUT-SCC): report of a rare entity and systematic review of the literature

    Cancer Treat Rev

    (2011)
  • M. Rink et al.

    Impact of histological variants on clinical outcomes of patients with upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma

    J Urol

    (2012)
  • A. Lopez-Beltran et al.

    Handling and pathology reporting of specimens with carcinoma of the urinary bladder, ureter, and renal pelvis

    Eur Urol

    (2004)
  • J.D. Raman et al.

    Does preoperative symptom classification impact prognosis in patients with clinically localized upper-tract urothelial carcinoma managed by radical nephroureterectomy?

    Urol Oncol

    (2011)
  • Y. Ito et al.

    Preoperative hydronephrosis grade independently predicts worse pathological outcomes in patients undergoing nephroureterectomy for upper tract urothelial carcinoma

    J Urol

    (2011)
  • G.S. Sudakoff et al.

    Multidetector computerized tomography urography as the primary imaging modality for detecting urinary tract neoplasms in patients with asymptomatic hematuria

    J Urol

    (2008)
  • L.J. Wang et al.

    Diagnostic accuracy of transitional cell carcinoma on multidetector computerized tomography urography in patients with gross hematuria

    J Urol

    (2009)
  • L.J. Wang et al.

    Multidetector computerized tomography urography is more accurate than excretory urography for diagnosing transitional cell carcinoma of the upper urinary tract in adults with hematuria

    J Urol

    (2010)
  • J.A. Witjes et al.

    Hexaminolevulinate-guided fluorescence cystoscopy in the diagnosis and follow-up of patients with non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer: review of the evidence and recommendations

    Eur Urol

    (2010)
  • K.S. Lee et al.

    MR urography versus retrograde pyelography/ureteroscopy for the exclusion of upper urinary tract malignancy

    Clin Radiol

    (2010)
  • J.R. Johannes et al.

    Voided urine fluorescence in situ hybridization testing for upper tract urothelial carcinoma surveillance

    J Urol

    (2010)
  • A.K. Smith et al.

    Inadequacy of biopsy for diagnosis of upper tract urothelial carcinoma: implications for conservative management

    Urology

    (2011)
  • S. Ishikawa et al.

    Impact of diagnostic ureteroscopy on intravesical recurrence and survival in patients with urothelial carcinoma of the upper urinary tract

    J Urol

    (2010)
  • J.C. Brien et al.

    Preoperative hydronephrosis, ureteroscopic biopsy grade and urinary cytology can improve prediction of advanced upper tract urothelial carcinoma

    J Urol

    (2010)
  • R. Abouassaly et al.

    Troubling outcomes from population-level analysis of surgery for upper tract urothelial carcinoma

    Urology

    (2010)
  • C. Jeldres et al.

    A population-based assessment of perioperative mortality after nephroureterectomy for upper-tract urothelial carcinoma

    Urology

    (2010)
  • G. Lughezzani et al.

    Prognostic factors in upper urinary tract urothelial carcinomas: a comprehensive review of the current literature

    Eur Urol

    (2012)
  • J. Lehmann et al.

    Transitional cell carcinoma of the ureter: prognostic factors influencing progression and survival

    Eur Urol

    (2007)
  • C.-C. Li et al.

    Significant predictive factors for prognosis of primary upper urinary tract cancer after radical nephroureterectomy in Taiwanese patients

    Eur Urol

    (2008)
  • H. Fajkovic et al.

    Prognostic value of extranodal extension and other lymph node parameters in patients with upper tract urothelial carcinoma

    J Urol

    (2012)
  • M.I. Fernández et al.

    Evidence-based sex-related outcomes after radical nephroureterectomy for upper tract urothelial carcinoma: results of large multicenter study

    Urology

    (2009)
  • H. Isbarn et al.

    Location of the primary tumor is not an independent predictor of cancer specific mortality in patients with upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma

    J Urol

    (2009)
  • A. Ouzzane et al.

    Ureteral and multifocal tumours have worse prognosis than renal pelvic tumours in urothelial carcinoma of the upper urinary tract treated by nephroureterectomy

    Eur Urol

    (2011)
  • T.F. Chromecki et al.

    The impact of tumor multifocality on outcomes in patients treated with radical nephroureterectomy

    Eur Urol

    (2012)
  • M. Rink et al.

    Impact of smoking on oncologic outcomes of upper tract urothelial carcinoma after radical nephroureterectomy

    Eur Urol

    (2013)
  • G. Novara et al.

    Prognostic role of lymphovascular invasion in patients with urothelial carcinoma of the upper urinary tract: an international validation study

    Eur Urol

    (2010)
  • R. Zigeuner et al.

    Tumour necrosis is an indicator of aggressive biology in patients with urothelial carcinoma of the upper urinary tract

    Eur Urol

    (2010)
  • C. Seitz et al.

    Association of tumor necrosis with pathological features and clinical outcome in 754 patients undergoing radical nephroureterectomy for upper tract urothelial carcinoma: an international validation study

    J Urol

    (2010)
  • H.M. Fritsche et al.

    Macroscopic sessile tumor architecture is a pathologic feature of biologically aggressive upper tract urothelial carcinoma

    Urol Oncol

    (2012)
  • J.C. Wheat et al.

    Concomitant carcinoma in situ is a feature of aggressive disease in patients with organ confined urothelial carcinoma following radical nephroureterectomy

    Urol Oncol

    (2012)
  • R.F. Youssef et al.

    Prognostic effect of urinary bladder carcinoma in situ on clinical outcome of subsequent upper tract urothelial carcinoma

    Urology

    (2011)
  • B. Ehdaie et al.

    Obesity adversely impacts disease specific outcomes in patients with upper tract urothelial carcinoma

    J Urol

    (2011)
  • E. Compérat et al.

    Prognostic value of MET, RON and histoprognostic factors for urothelial carcinoma in the upper urinary tract

    J Urol

    (2008)
  • Oxford Centre for Evidence-based Medicine—levels of evidence (March 2009). Centre for Evidence-based Medicine Web site....
  • M. Ploeg et al.

    The present and future burden of urinary bladder cancer in the world

    World J Urol

    (2009)
  • R. Siegel et al.

    Cancer statistics, 2012

    CA Cancer J Clin

    (2012)
  • M. Cosentino et al.

    Upper urinary tract urothelial cell carcinoma: location as a predictive factor for concomitant bladder carcinoma

    World J Urol

    (2013)
  • Cited by (385)

    • First analysis of the safety and efficacy of UGN-101 in the treatment of ureteral tumors

      2024, Urologic Oncology: Seminars and Original Investigations
    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text