Elsevier

Cancer Treatment Reviews

Volume 58, July 2017, Pages 1-13
Cancer Treatment Reviews

Systematic or Meta-analysis Studies
Prognostic role of pretreatment blood neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio in advanced cancer survivors: A systematic review and meta-analysis of 66 cohort studies

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ctrv.2017.05.005Get rights and content

Highlights

  • 66 cohorts with over 14 cancer types representing 24536 participants are included.

  • High pretreatment NLR is associated with poor prognosis in advanced cancer.

  • The impact of petreatment NLR remains consistent when adjusted for confounders.

  • Large-scale prospective studies of specific cancer type are strongly advocated.

Abstract

Background

Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) is crucial for the incidence and mortality of various tumors. However, little is known on NLR and its association with prognosis in advanced tumors. Here we performed a meta-analysis to establish the prognostic significance of pretreatment blood NLR for advanced tumors.

Methods

A systematic literature search through April 2016 was performed to evaluate the association between pretreatment blood NLR and overall survival (OS) or progression-free survival (PFS) in patients with advanced tumors. Data were extracted from studies reporting hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence interval (CI) and pooled using the Mantel–Haenszel random-effect model.

Results

Sixty-six studies with a total of 24536 individuals were included in the meta-analysis. Pooled analyses revealed that elevated pretreatment NLR was associated with worse OS (HR 1.70, 95% CI 1.57–1.84, P < 0.001) and PFS (HR 1.61, 95% CI 1.42–1.82, P < 0.001) in advanced tumors. Subgroup analysis stratified by tumor type demonstrated that pancreatic cancer patients with high pretreatment NLR had the worst OS (HR 1.94, 95% CI 1.55–2.54, P < 0.001) and colorectal cancer with the worst PFS (HR 1.74, 95% CI 1.04–2.90, P < 0.001). When stratified by cut-off value for NLR, we found that cut-off value being five indicated the worst PFS (HR 2.23, 95% CI 1.54–3.23, P = 0.019).

Conclusions

Overall, high pretreatment blood NLR could be an adverse prognostic indicator for advanced tumor. Large-scale prospective studies investigating its survival outcomes in specific cancer type are strongly advocated.

Introduction

Surgery remains the main option of curative therapy for most of the solid tumors. Nevertheless, there remain significant challenges for oncologists to stratify risk before giving any treatment preoperatively. In clinics, we mainly rely on the clinical and pathological staging based on preoperative imaging or biopsy to predict the outcomes of cancer patients, instead of considering the patient level data [1], [2], [3], [4], [5], [6]. In addition, current staging system cannot always accurately predict the risk of disease recurrence and benefit from adjuvant chemotherapy in advanced cancer patients [7], [8]. Therefore, some more effective and convenient indicators should be developed to assist clinicians with preoperative patient risk stratification, patient counseling, and guide clinical trial enrollment.

At present, there is increasing evidence that tumor-associated inflammation and tumor microenvironment play a more and more important role in the cancer development, progression and metastasis and might be related to systemic inflammation [9], [10], [11], [12]. Inflammatory responses in tumor microenvironment have been reflected by some common markers in peripheral blood, for example, some cytokines, leucocytes and their subtypes. Increased level of leucocytes, particularly lymphocytes, has been implicated to be a good indicator for cancer prognosis [13], [14], as it is indicated that lymphocyte-mediated cytotoxicity can result in the release of large amounts of cytokines which can inhibit the growth and metastasis of cancer cells [15]. The poorly understood mechanisms of this association may likely reflect more aggressive behavior in tumors with greater inflammation.

Numerous observational studies and meta-analyses have reported that elevated NLR is associated with poor prognosis in various cancers, such as gastric cancer, esophageal cancer, pancreatic cancer and osteosarcoma [16], [17], [18], [19], [20], [21], [22], [23], [24], [25], [26], [115]. However, the prognostic impact of NLR in advanced cancers is still not determined. The purpose of this meta-analysis is to investigate the association between pretreatment blood NLR and the survival outcomes for metastatic cancers based on the current evidence.

Section snippets

Search strategy

This meta-analysis was conducted in line with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines [27]. Studies were identified by searching databases including PubMed (from 1946 to April 2016) and EMBASE (from 1974 to April 2016). Medical Subject Headings and Emtree headings were searched combined with the related keywords including “metastatic cancer”, “advanced cancer”, “neutrophils”, “lymphocytes”, and “ratio”, and “survival”, “mortality” or “prognosis”. We did

Search and selection of studies

Fig. 1 shows the detailed steps of our literature search. In summary, 1249 potentially relevant citations were identified, from which 261 studies met the inclusion criteria for further assessment. After full text review, 195 studies were removed and a total of 66 studies met our inclusion criteria which were included in the final analysis [37], [38], [39], [40], [41], [42], [43], [44], [45], [46], [47], [48], [49], [50], [51], [52], [53], [54], [55], [56], [57], [58], [59], [60], [61], [62],

Principal findings

Current systematic review and meta-analysis of 66 cohort studies including over 14 cancer types with a total of 24,536 individuals gives solid evidence of an association between high pretreatment NLR and reduced OS as well as PFS. When stratified by publication type, tumor location, study design, sample size, research region, follow-up duration, initial inclusion period, metastasis type, treatment scheme, cutoff value for NLR, study quality, the results remained constant.

It is well recognized

Disclosures

The authors declare no potential conflicts of interest.

Author contributions

Study concept and design (ZM ZX);

Acquisition of data (ZM LS BW JY);

Analysis and interpretation of data (ZM LS BW JY ZX);

Drafting of the manuscript (ZM LS ZX);

Critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content (all authors);

Study supervision (ZM).

Funding

This research was supported by Shanghai TCM promotion “3-year action plan” (Grant No. ZY3-CCCX-3-3034 and ZY3-CCCX-2-1003), TCM Guide Project of Shanghai Municipal Science and Technology Commission in 2014 (Grant No. 14401931000), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 81673768, 81401834), Natural Science Foundation of Hubei Province (Grant No. 2014CFB363), Health and Family Planning Commission Program of Wuhan City (Grant No. WX14B18).

References (115)

  • A. Mangla et al.

    The association of prechemotherapy neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio with survival in non-small cell lung cancer patients

    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys

    (2014)
  • A. Linton et al.

    Glasgow prognostic score as a prognostic factor in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer treated with docetaxel-based chemotherapy

    Clin Genitourin Cancer

    (2013)
  • B. Cetin et al.

    Is the pretreatment neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio an important prognostic parameter in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma?

    Clin genitourin Cancer

    (2013)
  • C. Botta et al.

    Baseline inflammatory status defined by neutrophil to lymphocyte cell count ratio (NLR) predicts progression free survival (PFS) in metastatic colorectal cancer patients (mCRC) undergoing bevacizumab based biochemotherapy

    Eur J Cancer

    (2011)
  • C.P. Neal et al.

    Evaluation of the prognostic value of systemic inflammation and socioeconomic deprivation in patients with resectable colorectal liver metastases

    Eur J Cancer

    (2009)
  • K.J. Halazun et al.

    Elevated preoperative neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio predicts survival following hepatic resection for colorectal liver metastases

    Eur J Surg Oncol: J Eur Soc Surg Oncol Brit Assoc Surg Oncol

    (2008)
  • K. Stanley et al.

    Magnetic resonance imaging defined mucinous rectal carcinoma is an independent imaging biomarker for poor prognosis and poor response to preoperative chemoradiotherapy

    Eur J Cancer

    (2014)
  • J.S. Park et al.

    Accuracy of preoperative MRI in predicting pathology stage in rectal cancers: node-for-node matched histopathology validation of MRI features

    Dis Colon Rectum

    (2014)
  • I. Joo et al.

    Prospective comparison of 3T MRI with diffusion-weighted imaging and MDCT for the preoperative TNM staging of gastric cancer

    J Magn Reson Imaging

    (2015)
  • J.-Y. Choi et al.

    CT and MR imaging diagnosis and staging of hepatocellular carcinoma: part I. Development, growth, and spread: key pathologic and imaging aspects

    Radiology

    (2014)
  • D. Moszkowicz et al.

    Can we predict complete or major response after chemoradiotherapy for rectal cancer by noninvasive methods? Results of a prospective study on 61 patients

    Am. Surgeon

    (2014)
  • L.A. Heijnen et al.

    Nodal staging in rectal cancer: why is restaging after chemoradiation more accurate than primary nodal staging?

    Int J Colorectal Dis

    (2016)
  • O. Helm et al.

    Tumor-associated macrophages exhibit pro-and anti-inflammatory properties by which they impact on pancreatic tumorigenesis

    Int J Cancer

    (2014)
  • H. Ohtani

    Focus on TILs: prognostic significance of tumor infiltrating lymphocytes in human colorectal cancer

    Cancer Immun Archive

    (2007)
  • Z. Mei et al.

    Tumour-infiltrating inflammation and prognosis in colorectal cancer: systematic review and meta-analysis

    Br J Cancer

    (2014)
  • H.E. Ownby et al.

    Peripheral lymphocyte and eosinophil counts as indicators of prognosis in primary breast cancer

    Cancer

    (1983)
  • X. Zhang et al.

    Prognostic significance of neutrophil lymphocyte ratio in patients with gastric cancer: a meta-analysis

    PLoS ONE

    (2014)
  • H. Yodying et al.

    Prognostic significance of neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio and platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio in oncologic outcomes of esophageal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

    Ann Surg Oncol

    (2016)
  • J.-J. Yang et al.

    Prognostic significance of neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio in pancreatic cancer: a meta-analysis

    World J Gastroenterol

    (2015)
  • W.-K. Xiao et al.

    Prognostic significance of neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio in hepatocellular carcinoma: a meta-analysis

    BMC Cancer

    (2014)
  • Y. Wei et al.

    Prognostic role of NLR in urinary cancers: a meta-analysis

    PLoS ONE

    (2014)
  • A.J. Templeton et al.

    Prognostic role of neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio in solid tumors: a systematic review and meta-analysis

    J Natl Cancer Inst

    (2014)
  • A. Petrillo et al.

    Prognostic implications of baseline neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and platelet-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) in metastatic gastric cancer (GC) patients

    Ann Oncol

    (2016)
  • M. Marchioni et al.

    High neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio as prognostic factor in patients affected by upper tract urothelial cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

    Clin Genitourin Cancer

    (2016)
  • Lorente D, Mateo J, Templeton A, Zafeiriou Z, Bianchini D, Ferraldeschi R et al. Baseline neutrophil–lymphocyte ratio...
  • M.X. Li et al.

    Prognostic role of neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio in colorectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

    Int J Cancer

    (2014)
  • J.-L. Ethier et al.

    Prognostic role of neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio in breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

    Breast Cancer Res

    (2017)
  • A. Liberati et al.

    The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration

    PLoS Med

    (2009)
  • M.K. Parmar et al.

    Extracting summary statistics to perform meta-analyses of the published literature for survival endpoints

    Stat Med

    (1998)
  • J.F. Tierney et al.

    Practical methods for incorporating summary time-to-event data into meta-analysis

    Trials

    (2007)
  • J.A. Hayden et al.

    Evaluation of the quality of prognosis studies in systematic reviews

    Ann Intern Med

    (2006)
  • J.P. Higgins et al.

    Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions

    (2011)
  • Deeks J, Higgins J, Altman D. Chapter 9–Analysing data and undertaking meta-analyses: cochrane handbook for systematic...
  • J. Higgins et al.

    Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta-analysis

    Stat Med

    (2002)
  • M. Egger et al.

    Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test

    BMJ

    (1997)
  • C.B. Begg et al.

    Operating characteristics of a rank correlation test for publication bias

    Biometrics

    (1994)
  • S. Duval et al.

    Trim and fill: a simple funnel-plot–based method of testing and adjusting for publication bias in meta-analysis

    Biometrics

    (2000)
  • G.M. Zhang et al.

    Pretreatment neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio predicts prognosis in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma receiving targeted therapy

    Int J Clin Oncol

    (2016)
  • Y.C. Zeng et al.

    Pre-treatment neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio predicts prognosis in patients with locoregionally advanced laryngeal carcinoma treated with chemoradiotherapy

    Jpn J Clin Oncol

    (2016)
  • Vivaldi C, Caparello C, Musettini G, Pasquini G, Catanese S, Fornaro L et al. First-line treatment with FOLFOXIRI for...
  • Cited by (0)

    1

    These authors contributed equally to this work.

    View full text