Abstract
Background and Objective
Afatinib is a potent, irreversible, ErbB family blocker in clinical development for the treatment of a variety of solid tumours. This study evaluated the pharmacokinetics of afatinib (10–100 mg once daily) in cancer patients.
Methods
Data from 221 patients with advanced solid tumours in four phase I and one phase II trial were analysed using non-compartmental methods.
Results
Within each dose group, the shape of the geometric mean plasma concentration–time profiles after single and multiple doses were comparable. Maximum plasma concentration (C max) values were achieved 2–5 h after dosing and thereafter declined at least bi-exponentially. Steady-state plasma concentrations were attained within 8 days after the start of dosing. The geometric mean terminal elimination half-life at steady state was about 37 h. Repeated dosing resulted in a 2.77-fold accumulation based on the area under the plasma concentration–time curve (AUC), and 2.11-fold accumulation based on C max values. A slightly more than dose-proportional increase in afatinib exposure was observed. There was moderate intra-individual variability in afatinib trough concentration values (the geometric coefficient of variation (gCV) ranged from 22.2 to 67.5 %). The inter-patient variability in plasma concentrations was moderate to high (e.g. at the 40 mg dose, the gCVs ranged from 35.6 to 221 %). The exposure to afatinib (as measured by AUC and C max) correlated with the severity of the most common adverse events of afatinib—diarrhoea and rash.
Conclusion
The pharmacokinetic profile of afatinib supports a once-daily dosage regimen. As expected for this patient population, the pharmacokinetic parameters of afatinib showed moderate to high inter-patient variability. Afatinib exhibits non-linear pharmacokinetics.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Li D, Ambrogio L, Shimamura T, et al. BIBW2992, an irreversible EGFR/HER2 inhibitor highly effective in preclinical lung cancer models. Oncogene. 2008;27(34):4702–11.
Solca F, Dahl G, Zoephel A, et al. Target binding properties and cellular activity of afatinib (BIBW 2992), an irreversible ErbB family blocker. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 2012;343(2):342–50.
Eskens FA, Mom CH, Planting AS, et al. A phase I dose escalation study of BIBW 2992, an irreversible dual inhibitor of epidermal growth factor receptor 1 (EGFR) and 2 (HER2) tyrosine kinase in a 2-week on, 2-week off schedule in patients with advanced solid tumours. Br J Cancer. 2008;98(1):80–5.
Marshall J, Hwang J, Eskens FA, et al. A phase I, open-label, dose escalation study of afatinib, in a 3-week-on/1-week-off schedule in patients with advanced solid tumors. Invest New Drugs. 2013;31(2):399–408.
Yap TA, Vidal L, Adam J, et al. Phase I trial of the irreversible EGFR and HER2 kinase inhibitor BIBW 2992 in patients with advanced solid tumors. J Clin Oncol. 2010;28(25):3965–72.
Gordon MS, Mendelson DS, Gross M, et al. A phase I, open-label, dose-escalation study of continuous once-daily oral treatment with afatinib in patients with advanced solid tumors. Invest New Drugs. 2013;31(2):409–16.
Kristeleit H, Puglisi M, Middleton GW, et al. Phase II, open-label trial to assess the effect of continuous oral afatinib (BIBW 2992) at a daily dose of 50 mg on QTc, pharmacokinetics, and efficacy in relapsed or refractory solid tumors including brain metastases and glioblastoma that is not amenable to other therapy [abstract no. 2613]. J Clin Oncol. 2011;29:15 (Suppl).
Ang J, Mikropoulos C, Stavridi F, et al. A phase I study of daily BIBW 2992, an irreversible EGFR/HER-2 dual kinase inhibitor, in combination with weekly paclitaxel [abstract]. J Clin Oncol. 2009;27(15):e14541.
Awada AH, Dumez H, Hendlisz A, et al. Phase I study of pulsatile 3-day administration of afatinib (BIBW 2992) in combination with docetaxel in advanced solid tumors. Invest New Drugs. 2013;31(3):734–41.
Bahleda R, Soria J, Berge Y, et al. Phase I trial assessing safety and pharmacokinetics of afatinib (BIBW 2992) with intravenous weekly vinorelbine in advanced solid tumors [abstract no. 2585]. J Clin Oncol. 2011;29:15 (Suppl).
Vermorken JB, Rottey S, Ehrnrooth E, et al. A phase Ib, open-label study to assess the safety of continuous oral treatment with afatinib in combination with two chemotherapy regimens: cisplatin plus paclitaxel and cisplatin plus 5-fluorouracil, in patients with advanced solid tumors. Ann Oncol. 2013;24(5):1392–400.
Miller VA, Hirsh V, Cadranel J, et al. Afatinib versus placebo for patients with advanced, metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer after failure of erlotinib, gefitinib, or both, and one or two lines of chemotherapy (LUX-Lung 1): a phase 2b/3 randomised trial. Lancet Oncol. 2012;13(5):528–38.
Yang JC, Shih JY, Su WC, et al. Afatinib for patients with lung adenocarcinoma and epidermal growth factor receptor mutations (LUX-Lung 2): a phase 2 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2012;13(5):539–48.
Cohen EEW, Fayette J, Cupissol D, et al. A randomized, open-label, phase II study of afatinib (BIBW 2992) versus cetuximab in recurrent or metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck: final data [abstract PP101]. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2012;269(4):1374.
Lin NU, Winer EP, Wheatley D, et al. A phase II study of afatinib (BIBW 2992), an irreversible ErbB family blocker, in patients with HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer progressing after trastuzumab. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2012;133(3):1057–65.
Sequist LV, Yang JC, Yamamoto N, et al. Phase III study of afatinib or cisplatin/pemetrexed in metastatic lung adenocarcinoma patients with epidermal growth factor receptor mutations. J Clin Oncol. 2013 (in press).
Stopfer P, Marzin K, Narjes H, et al. Afatinib pharmacokinetics and metabolism after oral administration to healthy male volunteers. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 2012;69(4):1051–61.
Smith BP, Vandenhende FR, DeSante KA, et al. Confidence interval criteria for assessment of dose proportionality. Pharm Res. 2000;17(10):1278–83.
Heise T, Graefe-Mody EU, Huttner S, et al. Pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics and tolerability of multiple oral doses of linagliptin, a dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitor in male type 2 diabetes patients. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2009;11(8):786–94.
Baselga J, Rischin D, Ranson M, et al. Phase I safety, pharmacokinetic, and pharmacodynamic trial of ZD1839, a selective oral epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor, in patients with five selected solid tumor types. J Clin Oncol. 2002;20(21):4292–302.
Ranson M, Hammond LA, Ferry D, et al. ZD1839, a selective oral epidermal growth factor receptor–tyrosine kinase inhibitor, is well tolerated and active in patients with solid, malignant tumors: results of a phase I trial. J Clin Oncol. 2002;20(9):2240–50.
Hidalgo M, Bloedow D. Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics: maximizing the clinical potential of erlotinib (Tarceva). Semin Oncol. 2003;30(3 Suppl 7):25–33.
Burris HA III, Hurwitz HI, Dees EC, et al. Phase I safety, pharmacokinetics, and clinical activity study of lapatinib (GW572016), a reversible dual inhibitor of epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinases, in heavily pretreated patients with metastatic carcinomas. J Clin Oncol. 2005;23(23):5305–13.
van Erp NP, Gelderblom H, Guchelaar HJ. Clinical pharmacokinetics of tyrosine kinase inhibitors. Cancer Treat Rev. 2009;35(8):692–706.
Hirsh V. Managing treatment-related adverse events associated with EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer. Curr Oncol. 2011;18(3):126–38.
Bruno R, Mass RD, Jones C, et al. Preliminary population pharmacokinetics (PPK) and exposure–safety (E–S) relationships of erlotinib HCL in patients with metastatic breast cancer (MBC) [abstract no. 823]. Proc Am Soc Clin Oncol. 2003;22.
Lu JF, Eppler SM, Wolf J, et al. Clinical pharmacokinetics of erlotinib in patients with solid tumors and exposure–safety relationship in patients with non-small cell lung cancer. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2006;80(2):136–45.
Thomas F, Rochaix P, White-Koning M, et al. Population pharmacokinetics of erlotinib and its pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic relationships in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Eur J Cancer. 2009;45(13):2316–23.
Acknowledgments
This study was sponsored by Boehringer Ingelheim, Germany. The sponsor was responsible for the design and conduct of the study, and the collection and management of the data. The authors were responsible for the analysis and interpretation of the data and the preparation of the manuscript. All authors are employees of Boehringer Ingelheim, meet the criteria for authorship recommended by the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE), were fully responsible for all content and editorial decisions, and were involved at all stages of the manuscript development.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Electronic Supplementary Material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Wind, S., Schmid, M., Erhardt, J. et al. Pharmacokinetics of Afatinib, a Selective Irreversible ErbB Family Blocker, in Patients with Advanced Solid Tumours. Clin Pharmacokinet 52, 1101–1109 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40262-013-0091-4
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40262-013-0091-4