Table 1

Pivotal trials in treatment of hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative MBC with CDK4/6 inhibitors

First-line treatmentSecond-line treatmentFirst- and second-line treatments
PALOMA-2MONALEESA-2MONARCH-3MONALEESA-7PARSIFALPALOMA-3MONARCH-2MONALEESA-3
DesignPhase III, placebo controlledPhase III, placebo controlledPhase III, placebo controlledPhase III, placebo controlledPhase II, open labelPhase III, placebo controlledPhase III, placebo controlledPhase III, placebo controlled
Patients (n)666 post-menopausal668 post-menopausal493 post-menopausal672 pre-menopausal486 post-menopausal521 post-menopausal669 post-menopausal726 post-menopausal
CDK4/6 InhibitorPalbociclibRibociclibAbemaciclibRibociclibPalbociclib (control arm)PalbociclibAbemaciclibRibociclib
Endocrine partnerLetrozoleLetrozoleAnastrozole or letrozoleLetrozole, anastrozole or tamoxifen + goserelinLetrozole or fulvestrantFulvestrantFulvestrantFulvestrant
Primary endpoint: PFS (CDK4/6 inhibitor + ET vs. ET)
HR (95% CI; P value)0.58 (0.46–0.72; < 0.0001)0.56 (0.45–0.72; < 0.00000009)0.54 (0.41–0.70; 0.00002)0.55 (0.44–0.69; < 0.0001)1.13 (0.90–1.5; 0.321)0.46 (0.36–0.59; < 0.0001)0.55 (0.45–0.68; < 0.001)0.59 (0.48–0.73; < 0.001)
Median PFS (months)24.8 vs. 14.5 (Δ10.3)25.3 vs. 16 (Δ9.3)28 vs. 14.7 (Δ13.3)23.8 vs. 13 (Δ10.8)27.9 vs. 32.8 (Δ4.9)9.5 vs. 4.6 (Δ4.9)16.4 vs. 9.3 (Δ7.1)20.5 vs. 12.8 (Δ7.7)
Secondary endpoint: OS (CDK4/6 inhibitor + ET vs. ET)
HR (95% CI; P value)0.71 (0.54–0.95; 0.00973)1 (0.7–1.5; 0.986)0.81 (0.64–1.03; 0.09)0.75 (0.61–0.95; 0.01)0.72 (0.57–0.92; 0.0045)
Median OS (months)Not yet reported (August 2023)Not yet reported (August 2021)Not yet reported (July 2021)NR vs. 40. 94-year OS 67.6% vs. 67.5%34.9 vs. 28 (Δ6.9)46.7 vs. 37.3 (Δ9.4)NR vs. 40

HER2, human epidermal growth factor 2; MBC, metastatic breast cancer; CDK4/6, cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6; PFS, progression-free survival; ET, endocrine therapy; HR, hazards ratio; CI, confidence interval; OS, overall survival.