DNA256-cDNA266-cDNA341 haplotypes correlation analysis between case-control groups.
| Haplotype* | Patients n = 30 (%) | Controls n = 132 (%) | P | χ2 | OR | 95%CI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GCT | 10 (16.67) | 31 (23.48) | 0.285 | 1.142 | 0.652 | [0.296-1.435] |
| AAT | 9 (15.00) | 8 (6.06) | 0.043 | 4.085 | 2.735 | [1.000-7.485] |
| GAT | 38 (63.33) | 77 (58.33) | 0.512 | 0.429 | 1.234 | [0.689-2.314] |
| GCC | 3 (5.00) | 15 (11.36) | 0.161 | 1.966 | 0.411 | [0.114-1.476] |
| GAC | 0 (0.00) | 1 (0.80) | 0.499 | 0.457 | 1.458 | [1.325-1.605] |
↵* There should be 23 (8) combinations in DNA256-cDNA266-cDNA341, but only 5 haplotypes were detected because of the linkage disequilibrium. Each of the proportion of haplotypes was not uniform, of which GAT were the most in the cervical cancer group and in the control group.