Table 2

Impact of real-time OCR de-duplication on cervical cancer over-screening rates by age, screening strategy, and county cluster, 2021–2024

ItemPre-digital (%, n/N)Post-digital (%, n/N)Absolute delta (%, 95% CI)aPAdjusted Pb
2022 (1-y)2023 (1-y)2023 (2-y cum)2024 (1-y-post)
Age
 35–4415.57 (1,610/10,338)14.97 (2,002/13,372)23.18 (3,100/13,372)0.18 (19/10,700)15.06 (14.59, 15.52)< 0.001c< 0.001
 45–5412.03 (2,013/16,735)13.34 (2,768/20,745)22.15 (4,596/20,745)0.20 (34/16,589)12.55 (12.21, 12.90)< 0.001c< 0.001
 55–647.57 (661/8,736)8.80 (1,054/11,971)16.67 (1,996/11,971)0.13 (17/12,791)8.15 (7.77, 8.53)< 0.001c< 0.001
Screening strategy
 HPV6.29 (304/4,836)3.85 (126/3,269)12.97 (424/3,269)0.00 (0/2,470)5.31 (4.82, 5.79)< 0.001< 0.001
 HPV + cytology1.62 (18/1,110)1.33 (156/11,769)3.62 (426/11,769)0.33 (31/9,318)1.02 (0.79, 1.25)< 0.001c< 0.001
 Cytology13.27 (3,962/29,863)23.79 (2,399/10,083)39.21 (3,954/10,083)NANANANA
 HPV + VIA/VILI triageNA8.05 (747/9,278)16.74 (1,553/9,278)0.19 (9/4,667)7.86 (7.29, 8.43)< 0.001c< 0.001
 HPV + cytology triageNA20.50 (2,396/11,689)28.53 (3,335/11,689)0.14 (23/16,435)20.36 (19.62, 21.09)< 0.001c< 0.001
 HPV + cytology + VIA/VILINANANA0.10 (7/7,190)NANANA
 VIA + cytology triageNANANANANANANA
Manual de-duplication cluster
 Zezhou County7.60 (330/4,342)1.56 (138/8,867)4.79 (425/8,867)0.06 (4/7,058)3.49 (3.17, 3.81)< 0.001d< 0.001
 Xiangyuan County5.43 (325/5,990)2.44 (128/5,246)8.41 (441/5,246)0.11 (6/5,646)3.93 (3.55, 4.30)< 0.001c< 0.001
 Xinping County5.17 (213/4,117)9.40 (747/7,943)19.55 (1,553/7,943)0.12 (10/8,506)7.84 (7.35, 8.33)< 0.001c< 0.001
 Yanting County0.06 (4/6,920)0.04 (3/7,003)0.07 (5/7,003)0.01 (1/7,621)0.04 (−0.01, 0.08)0.274d1.000
 Overall4.08 (872/21,369)3.50 (1,016/29,059)8.34 (2,424/29,059)0.07 (21/28,831)3.67 (3.50, 3.84)< 0.001c< 0.001
No de-duplication cluster
 Shimian County18.09 (724/4,002)31.92 (1,722/5,395)51.07 (2,755/5,395)0.00 (0/3,180)26.03 (25.14, 26.92)< 0.001d< 0.001
 Mangshi25.75 (2,688/10,438)26.53 (3,086/11,634)38.79 (4,513/11,634)0.61 (49/8,069)25.55 (24.95, 26.16)< 0.001c< 0.001
 Overall23.63 (3,412/14,440)28.23 (4,808/17,029)42.68 (7,268/17,029)0.44 (49/11,249)25.69 (25.18, 26.19)< 0.001c< 0.001
Overall11.96 (4,284/35,809)12.64 (5,824/46,088)21.03 (9,692/46,088)0.17 (70/40,080)12.17 (11.94, 12.40)< 0.001c< 0.001

*Repeat screening within the ≤ 3-year guideline interval was defined as any woman who (i) had a documented negative cervical test in the relevant look-back window and (ii) underwent screening again in the index year. The look-back windows were 1 year for 2022 (records from 2021 only) and 2023 (records from 2022 only) and 2 years for 2023 (records from 2021–2022), and 2024 (records from 2023 after digital implementation). The over-screening rates were calculated as the number of such women (numerator) divided by the total number of negative (NEG) women screened in the same index year (denominator). aAbsolute delta was calculated as the overall over-screening rate in the pre-digital period minus that in the post-digital period. bAdjusted P-values were obtained using Bonferroni correction for 16 independent tests. cχ2 test comparing 2024 with pooled 2021–23 counts. dFisher exact test comparing 2024 with pooled 2021–23 counts due to expected cell counts < 5. CI, confidence interval; cum, cumulative; HPV, human papillomavirus; NA, not applicable; VIA, visual inspection with acetic acid; VILI, visual inspection with Lugol’s iodine; y, year.