PT - JOURNAL ARTICLE AU - Yawen Song AU - Hui Sun AU - Kailiang Wu AU - Jianke Lyu AU - Jingyue Zhang AU - Feng Gu AU - Yongjie Ma AU - Beibei Shen AU - Chijuan Wang AU - Xiaojiao Chen AU - Jing Xu AU - Weidong Li AU - Fangfang Liu AU - Li Fu TI - sLe<sup>x</sup> expression in invasive micropapillary breast carcinoma is associated with poor prognosis and can be combined with MUC1/EMA as a supplementary diagnostic indicator AID - 10.20892/j.issn.2095-3941.2020.0422 DP - 2021 May 01 TA - Cancer Biology and Medicine PG - 477--489 VI - 18 IP - 2 4099 - http://www.cancerbiomed.org/content/18/2/477.short 4100 - http://www.cancerbiomed.org/content/18/2/477.full SO - Cancer Biol Med2021 May 01; 18 AB - Objective: Mucin 1 (MUC1/EMA) and sialyl Lewis X (sLex) indicate polarity reversal in invasive micropapillary carcinoma (IMPC). The purpose of this study was to evaluate the expression of MUC1/EMA and sLex and to assess their diagnostic and prognostic value in patients with IMPC.Methods: The expression of sLex and MUC1/EMA in 100 patients with IMPC and a control group of 89 patients with invasive ductal carcinoma not otherwise specified (IDC-NOS) were analyzed with IHC. Fresh tumor tissues were collected from patients with IMPC or IDC-NOS for primary culture and immunofluorescence analysis.Results: The rate of nodal metastasis was higher in patients with IMPC than those with IDC-NOS, and IMPC cells tended to express more sLex and MUC1/EMA in the cytomembranes (the stroma-facing surfaces of the micropapillary clusters) than IDC-NOS cells. In IMPC, high cytomembrane expression of sLex, but not MUC1/EMA, indicated poor prognosis. In addition, among the 100 patients with IMPC, 10 patients had sLex+/EMA– expression patterns, and 8 patients had sLex–/EMA+ expression patterns. The primary IMPC cells were suspended, non-adherent tumor cell clusters, whereas the primary IDC cells were adherent tumor cells. Immunofluorescence analysis showed that MUC1/EMA and sLex were co-expressed on the cytomembranes in IMPC cell clusters and in the cytoplasm in IDC-NOS cells.Conclusions: sLex can be used as a prognostic indicator and can be combined with MUC1/EMA as a complementary diagnostic indicator to avoid missed IMPC diagnosis.