Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • About
    • About CBM
    • Editorial Board
    • Announcement
  • Articles
    • Ahead of print
    • Current Issue
    • Archive
    • Collections
    • Cover Story
  • For Authors
    • Instructions for Authors
    • Resources
    • Submit a Manuscript
  • For Reviewers
    • Become a Reviewer
    • Instructions for Reviewers
    • Resources
    • Outstanding Reviewer
  • Subscription
  • Alerts
    • Email Alerts
    • RSS Feeds
    • Table of Contents
  • Contact us
  • Other Publications
    • cbm

User menu

  • My alerts

Search

  • Advanced search
Cancer Biology & Medicine
  • Other Publications
    • cbm
  • My alerts
Cancer Biology & Medicine

Advanced Search

 

  • Home
  • About
    • About CBM
    • Editorial Board
    • Announcement
  • Articles
    • Ahead of print
    • Current Issue
    • Archive
    • Collections
    • Cover Story
  • For Authors
    • Instructions for Authors
    • Resources
    • Submit a Manuscript
  • For Reviewers
    • Become a Reviewer
    • Instructions for Reviewers
    • Resources
    • Outstanding Reviewer
  • Subscription
  • Alerts
    • Email Alerts
    • RSS Feeds
    • Table of Contents
  • Contact us
  • Follow cbm on Twitter
  • Visit cbm on Facebook
ErratumErratum
Open Access

Erratum to From residual risk to precision intervention: the evolving role of minimal residual disease in breast cancer management

Junnan Xu, Kun Fang, Xiaoxi Li, Li Han, Shulan Sun and Tao Sun
Cancer Biology & Medicine September 2026, 20260704; DOI: https://doi.org/10.20892/j.issn.2095-3941.2026.0704
Junnan Xu
1Department of Breast Medicine, Cancer Hospital of Dalian University of Technology, Cancer Hospital of China Medical University, Liaoning Cancer Hospital & Institute, Shenyang 110042, China
2Department of Pharmacology, Cancer Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang 110042, China
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Kun Fang
2Department of Pharmacology, Cancer Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang 110042, China
3Central Laboratory, Cancer Hospital of Dalian University of Technology, Cancer Hospital of China Medical University, Liaoning Cancer Hospital & Institute, Shenyang 110042, China
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Xiaoxi Li
3Central Laboratory, Cancer Hospital of Dalian University of Technology, Cancer Hospital of China Medical University, Liaoning Cancer Hospital & Institute, Shenyang 110042, China
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Li Han
4Medicine Center, Kanghui Biotechnology Inc., Shenyang 110000, China
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Shulan Sun
3Central Laboratory, Cancer Hospital of Dalian University of Technology, Cancer Hospital of China Medical University, Liaoning Cancer Hospital & Institute, Shenyang 110042, China
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Shulan Sun
  • For correspondence: sunshulan{at}cancerhosp-ln-cmu.com jianong{at}126.com
Tao Sun
1Department of Breast Medicine, Cancer Hospital of Dalian University of Technology, Cancer Hospital of China Medical University, Liaoning Cancer Hospital & Institute, Shenyang 110042, China
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Tao Sun
  • For correspondence: sunshulan{at}cancerhosp-ln-cmu.com jianong{at}126.com
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF
Loading

The originally published version of this article1 contained errors in the section “Cross-platform MRD detection: thresholds and positivity standards” on page 1499. The authors reported incorrect data for the limit of detection (LoD) in this section. The LoD of the Signatera® (Natera) assay is 0.01% variant allele frequency (VAF). For the Signatera Genome assay, no LoD data have been publicly reported, and therefore the LoD claim for this assay has been removed. In this section, the authors’ intention was to compare the thresholds and positivity criteria of different platforms for detection of minimal residual disease (MRD). These errors do not affect the conclusions of the article. The authors apologize for these errors and for any confusion caused.

The corrected first paragraph of the section Cross-platform MRD detection: thresholds and positivity standards is presented below.

Positivity criteria vary across various MRD detection technologies. Signatera® (Natera), a tumor-informed multiplex PCR assay, customizes a personalization panel of as many as 16 somatic mutations, with a median of 11 (range 8–16), derived from WES of tumor tissue. MRD positivity is defined as the detection of ≥2 tumor-specific mutations, with a LoD95 of 0.01% VAF61,62. In contrast, the Signatera Genome assay uses WGS to identify and monitor as many as 64 patient-specific somatic mutations from tumor tissue, a number representing an expansion beyond its original 16-mutation panel. The assay uses mPCR with a sensitivity of low single-digit ppm levels and maintains the same validated chemistry as the original Signatera platform. With customized primers, serial blood-based ctDNA detection achieves MRD positivity determination via a proprietary sample-calling algorithm that compares target confidences against sample-level noise.

  • Received September 2, 2026.
  • Accepted September 2, 2026.
  • Copyright: © 2026, The Authors

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

Reference

  1. 1.↵
    1. Xu J,
    2. Fang K,
    3. Li X,
    4. Han L,
    5. Sun S,
    6. Sun T.
    From residual risk to precision intervention: the evolving role of minimal residual disease in breast cancer management. Cancer Biol Med. 2025; 22(12): 1493–514.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Cancer Biology & Medicine: 23 (9)
Cancer Biology & Medicine
Vol. 23, Issue 9
15 Sep 2026
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Print
Download PDF
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Cancer Biology & Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Erratum to From residual risk to precision intervention: the evolving role of minimal residual disease in breast cancer management
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Cancer Biology & Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Cancer Biology & Medicine web site.
Citation Tools
Erratum to From residual risk to precision intervention: the evolving role of minimal residual disease in breast cancer management
Junnan Xu, Kun Fang, Xiaoxi Li, Li Han, Shulan Sun, Tao Sun
Cancer Biology & Medicine Sep 2026, 20260704; DOI: 10.20892/j.issn.2095-3941.2026.0704

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Erratum to From residual risk to precision intervention: the evolving role of minimal residual disease in breast cancer management
Junnan Xu, Kun Fang, Xiaoxi Li, Li Han, Shulan Sun, Tao Sun
Cancer Biology & Medicine Sep 2026, 20260704; DOI: 10.20892/j.issn.2095-3941.2026.0704
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Reference
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Erratum to Flotillin1 promotes EMT of human small cell lung cancer via TGF-β signaling pathway
  • Erratum to PGK1-coupled HSP90 stabilizes GSK3β expression to regulate the stemness of breast cancer stem cells
Show more Erratum

Similar Articles

Navigate

  • Home
  • Current Issue

More Information

  • About CBM
  • About CACA
  • About TMUCIH
  • Editorial Board
  • Subscription

For Authors

  • Instructions for authors
  • Journal Policies
  • Submit a Manuscript

Journal Services

  • Email Alerts
  • Facebook
  • RSS Feeds
  • Twitter

 

© 2026 Cancer Biology & Medicine

Powered by HighWire