Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • About
    • About CBM
    • Editorial Board
    • Announcement
  • Articles
    • Ahead of print
    • Current Issue
    • Archive
    • Collections
    • Cover Story
  • For Authors
    • Instructions for Authors
    • Resources
    • Submit a Manuscript
  • For Reviewers
    • Become a Reviewer
    • Instructions for Reviewers
    • Resources
    • Outstanding Reviewer
  • Subscription
  • Alerts
    • Email Alerts
    • RSS Feeds
    • Table of Contents
  • Contact us
  • Other Publications
    • cbm

User menu

  • My alerts

Search

  • Advanced search
Cancer Biology & Medicine
  • Other Publications
    • cbm
  • My alerts
Cancer Biology & Medicine

Advanced Search

 

  • Home
  • About
    • About CBM
    • Editorial Board
    • Announcement
  • Articles
    • Ahead of print
    • Current Issue
    • Archive
    • Collections
    • Cover Story
  • For Authors
    • Instructions for Authors
    • Resources
    • Submit a Manuscript
  • For Reviewers
    • Become a Reviewer
    • Instructions for Reviewers
    • Resources
    • Outstanding Reviewer
  • Subscription
  • Alerts
    • Email Alerts
    • RSS Feeds
    • Table of Contents
  • Contact us
  • Follow cbm on Twitter
  • Visit cbm on Facebook
Research ArticleOriginal Article
Open Access

Myeloid cell reprogramming combined with zoledronic acid effectively suppresses bone metastasis

Yuting Luo, Yiran Cai, Zizheng Jiang, Ke Zheng, Shiji Ren, Lixia Yu, Baorui Liu, Tao Shi and Jia Wei
Cancer Biology & Medicine July 2026, 20260168; DOI: https://doi.org/10.20892/j.issn.2095-3941.2026.0168
Yuting Luo
Department of Oncology, Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital, Affiliated Hospital of Medical School, Nanjing University, Nanjing 210008, China
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Yiran Cai
Department of Oncology, Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital, Affiliated Hospital of Medical School, Nanjing University, Nanjing 210008, China
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Zizheng Jiang
Department of Oncology, Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital, Affiliated Hospital of Medical School, Nanjing University, Nanjing 210008, China
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Ke Zheng
Department of Oncology, Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital, Affiliated Hospital of Medical School, Nanjing University, Nanjing 210008, China
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Shiji Ren
Department of Oncology, Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital, Affiliated Hospital of Medical School, Nanjing University, Nanjing 210008, China
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Lixia Yu
Department of Oncology, Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital, Affiliated Hospital of Medical School, Nanjing University, Nanjing 210008, China
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Baorui Liu
Department of Oncology, Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital, Affiliated Hospital of Medical School, Nanjing University, Nanjing 210008, China
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Tao Shi
Department of Oncology, Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital, Affiliated Hospital of Medical School, Nanjing University, Nanjing 210008, China
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Tao Shi
  • For correspondence: taoshi{at}smail.nju.edu.cn jiawei99{at}nju.edu.cn
Jia Wei
Department of Oncology, Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital, Affiliated Hospital of Medical School, Nanjing University, Nanjing 210008, China
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Jia Wei
  • For correspondence: taoshi{at}smail.nju.edu.cn jiawei99{at}nju.edu.cn
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Supplementary Materials
  • In Part I the immune landscape of bone metastasis was characterized by CyTOF analysis of bone marrow CD45+ immune cells from tumor-bearing and healthy mice. The therapeutic efficacy of zoledronic acid was evaluated by measuring tumor burden and immune changes in the bone microenvironment. The bone TME was dominated by expanded immunosuppressive myeloid populations and zoledronic acid alone failed to effectively reprogram the myeloid compartment or suppress tumor progression. In Part II mechanisms underlying myeloid reprogramming was investigated using ex vivo co-culture assays, neutrophil-specific Ckap4 deletion mouse models, and integrative clinical database analyses, which showed that the DKK1-CKAP4 signaling axis impairs neutrophil maturation, promotes the differentiation of OCPs toward osteoclast-like cells, and drives macrophage polarization in the bone TME. In Part III the combination of DKK1 blockade and zoledronic acid was shown to remodel the bone metastatic immune microenvironment, inhibits tumor progression, and enhance antitumor immunity. CyTOF, mass cytometry; DKK1, Dickkopf-related protein 1; CKAP4, cytoskeleton-associated protein 4; OCP, osteoclast precursor cell. Figure created with Microsoft PowerPoint.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Study Flowchart

    In Part I the immune landscape of bone metastasis was characterized by CyTOF analysis of bone marrow CD45+ immune cells from tumor-bearing and healthy mice. The therapeutic efficacy of zoledronic acid was evaluated by measuring tumor burden and immune changes in the bone microenvironment. The bone TME was dominated by expanded immunosuppressive myeloid populations and zoledronic acid alone failed to effectively reprogram the myeloid compartment or suppress tumor progression. In Part II mechanisms underlying myeloid reprogramming was investigated using ex vivo co-culture assays, neutrophil-specific Ckap4 deletion mouse models, and integrative clinical database analyses, which showed that the DKK1-CKAP4 signaling axis impairs neutrophil maturation, promotes the differentiation of OCPs toward osteoclast-like cells, and drives macrophage polarization in the bone TME. In Part III the combination of DKK1 blockade and zoledronic acid was shown to remodel the bone metastatic immune microenvironment, inhibits tumor progression, and enhance antitumor immunity. CyTOF, mass cytometry; DKK1, Dickkopf-related protein 1; CKAP4, cytoskeleton-associated protein 4; OCP, osteoclast precursor cell. Figure created with Microsoft PowerPoint.

  • The bone metastasis microenvironment is predominantly composed of immunosuppressive myeloid cell populations. (A) t-SNE analysis of immune cell populations from bone marrow of tumor-free mice (tumor-free) and mice with established bone metastases (bone-mets), identifying distinct cell clusters (C01-C26). (B) t-SNE plots showing the distribution of immune cell clusters in the bone marrow from tumor-free mice and bone-mets mice. (C) Heatmap displaying the differential expression of selected marker across the identified immune cell clusters. (D, E) Quantification of the frequency of major immune cells in the bone marrow of tumor-free mice and bone-mets mice: (D) Monocytes/macrophages, neutrophils, and DCs; (E) B cells, CD4+ T cells, CD8+ T cells, NK cells, eosinophils, and basophils. (F) Schematic of the 4T1 bone metastasis model establishment and treatment (zoledronic acid, 100 μg/kg, i.p., 2 doses over 21 days). (G) Representative images and MRI scans of bone metastases at day 21. (H) Quantification of tumor burden. (I–N) Flow cytometry analysis of bone metastasis microenvironment for: (I) CD8+/CD3+ T cells; (J) NKp46+/CD45+ CD3− NK cells; (K) MHC-II+/CD11c+ dendritic cells; (L) F4/80+/CD11b+ macrophages; (M) CD86+ and CD163+ macrophages; (N) Ly6G+/CD11b+ cells and CD101+ TANs. Bone-mets, bone-metastases; DC, dendritic cell; i.a., intraarterial; Mac, macrophage; Mono, monocyte; MRI, magnetic resonance imaging; NK, natural killer; TAM, tumor-associated macrophage; TAN, tumor-associated neutrophil; ZA, zoledronic acid. Significance is denoted as ns (not significant), *P < 0.05, and **P < 0.01.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    The bone metastasis microenvironment is predominantly composed of immunosuppressive myeloid cell populations. (A) t-SNE analysis of immune cell populations from bone marrow of tumor-free mice (tumor-free) and mice with established bone metastases (bone-mets), identifying distinct cell clusters (C01-C26). (B) t-SNE plots showing the distribution of immune cell clusters in the bone marrow from tumor-free mice and bone-mets mice. (C) Heatmap displaying the differential expression of selected marker across the identified immune cell clusters. (D, E) Quantification of the frequency of major immune cells in the bone marrow of tumor-free mice and bone-mets mice: (D) Monocytes/macrophages, neutrophils, and DCs; (E) B cells, CD4+ T cells, CD8+ T cells, NK cells, eosinophils, and basophils. (F) Schematic of the 4T1 bone metastasis model establishment and treatment (zoledronic acid, 100 μg/kg, i.p., 2 doses over 21 days). (G) Representative images and MRI scans of bone metastases at day 21. (H) Quantification of tumor burden. (I–N) Flow cytometry analysis of bone metastasis microenvironment for: (I) CD8+/CD3+ T cells; (J) NKp46+/CD45+ CD3− NK cells; (K) MHC-II+/CD11c+ dendritic cells; (L) F4/80+/CD11b+ macrophages; (M) CD86+ and CD163+ macrophages; (N) Ly6G+/CD11b+ cells and CD101+ TANs. Bone-mets, bone-metastases; DC, dendritic cell; i.a., intraarterial; Mac, macrophage; Mono, monocyte; MRI, magnetic resonance imaging; NK, natural killer; TAM, tumor-associated macrophage; TAN, tumor-associated neutrophil; ZA, zoledronic acid. Significance is denoted as ns (not significant), *P < 0.05, and **P < 0.01.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    The bone metastasis microenvironment is predominantly composed of immunosuppressive myeloid cell populations. (A) t-SNE analysis of immune cell populations from bone marrow of tumor-free mice (tumor-free) and mice with established bone metastases (bone-mets), identifying distinct cell clusters (C01-C26). (B) t-SNE plots showing the distribution of immune cell clusters in the bone marrow from tumor-free mice and bone-mets mice. (C) Heatmap displaying the differential expression of selected marker across the identified immune cell clusters. (D, E) Quantification of the frequency of major immune cells in the bone marrow of tumor-free mice and bone-mets mice: (D) Monocytes/macrophages, neutrophils, and DCs; (E) B cells, CD4+ T cells, CD8+ T cells, NK cells, eosinophils, and basophils. (F) Schematic of the 4T1 bone metastasis model establishment and treatment (zoledronic acid, 100 μg/kg, i.p., 2 doses over 21 days). (G) Representative images and MRI scans of bone metastases at day 21. (H) Quantification of tumor burden. (I–N) Flow cytometry analysis of bone metastasis microenvironment for: (I) CD8+/CD3+ T cells; (J) NKp46+/CD45+ CD3− NK cells; (K) MHC-II+/CD11c+ dendritic cells; (L) F4/80+/CD11b+ macrophages; (M) CD86+ and CD163+ macrophages; (N) Ly6G+/CD11b+ cells and CD101+ TANs. Bone-mets, bone-metastases; DC, dendritic cell; i.a., intraarterial; Mac, macrophage; Mono, monocyte; MRI, magnetic resonance imaging; NK, natural killer; TAM, tumor-associated macrophage; TAN, tumor-associated neutrophil; ZA, zoledronic acid. Significance is denoted as ns (not significant), *P < 0.05, and **P < 0.01.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 1

    The bone metastasis microenvironment is predominantly composed of immunosuppressive myeloid cell populations. (A) t-SNE analysis of immune cell populations from bone marrow of tumor-free mice (tumor-free) and mice with established bone metastases (bone-mets), identifying distinct cell clusters (C01-C26). (B) t-SNE plots showing the distribution of immune cell clusters in the bone marrow from tumor-free mice and bone-mets mice. (C) Heatmap displaying the differential expression of selected marker across the identified immune cell clusters. (D, E) Quantification of the frequency of major immune cells in the bone marrow of tumor-free mice and bone-mets mice: (D) Monocytes/macrophages, neutrophils, and DCs; (E) B cells, CD4+ T cells, CD8+ T cells, NK cells, eosinophils, and basophils. (F) Schematic of the 4T1 bone metastasis model establishment and treatment (zoledronic acid, 100 μg/kg, i.p., 2 doses over 21 days). (G) Representative images and MRI scans of bone metastases at day 21. (H) Quantification of tumor burden. (I–N) Flow cytometry analysis of bone metastasis microenvironment for: (I) CD8+/CD3+ T cells; (J) NKp46+/CD45+ CD3− NK cells; (K) MHC-II+/CD11c+ dendritic cells; (L) F4/80+/CD11b+ macrophages; (M) CD86+ and CD163+ macrophages; (N) Ly6G+/CD11b+ cells and CD101+ TANs. Bone-mets, bone-metastases; DC, dendritic cell; i.a., intraarterial; Mac, macrophage; Mono, monocyte; MRI, magnetic resonance imaging; NK, natural killer; TAM, tumor-associated macrophage; TAN, tumor-associated neutrophil; ZA, zoledronic acid. Significance is denoted as ns (not significant), *P < 0.05, and **P < 0.01.

  • DKK1 induces immature and immunosuppressive TANs in bone metastases. (A) Immature neutrophils sorted from mouse bone marrow were stimulated ex vivo with GM-CSF (50 ng/mL) or GM-CSF + DKK1 (50 ng/mL); mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) of Ly6G, CXCR2, CD101, and CXCR4 were assessed by flow cytometry. (B) Sorted immature neutrophils were treated with or without GM-CSF and DKK1 for 24 h, then co-cultured with primary CD8+ T cells (1:1) for 48 h. (C) The IFN-γ secretion was measured after co-culture. (D) CD25, CD69, and CD107a expression in CD8+ T cells were analyzed by flow cytometry. (E) After co-culture, CD8+ T cells were further co-cultured with CFSE-labeled tumor cells at a 5:1 ratio and tumor cell apoptosis was measured after 8 h. BM, bone marrow; DKK1, dickkopf-1; GM-CSF, granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor; MACS, magnetic activated cell sorting; Neu, neutrophil. Significance is denoted as ns (not significant), *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001, and ****P < 0.0001.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    DKK1 induces immature and immunosuppressive TANs in bone metastases. (A) Immature neutrophils sorted from mouse bone marrow were stimulated ex vivo with GM-CSF (50 ng/mL) or GM-CSF + DKK1 (50 ng/mL); mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) of Ly6G, CXCR2, CD101, and CXCR4 were assessed by flow cytometry. (B) Sorted immature neutrophils were treated with or without GM-CSF and DKK1 for 24 h, then co-cultured with primary CD8+ T cells (1:1) for 48 h. (C) The IFN-γ secretion was measured after co-culture. (D) CD25, CD69, and CD107a expression in CD8+ T cells were analyzed by flow cytometry. (E) After co-culture, CD8+ T cells were further co-cultured with CFSE-labeled tumor cells at a 5:1 ratio and tumor cell apoptosis was measured after 8 h. BM, bone marrow; DKK1, dickkopf-1; GM-CSF, granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor; MACS, magnetic activated cell sorting; Neu, neutrophil. Significance is denoted as ns (not significant), *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001, and ****P < 0.0001.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 2

    DKK1 induces immature and immunosuppressive TANs in bone metastases. (A) Immature neutrophils sorted from mouse bone marrow were stimulated ex vivo with GM-CSF (50 ng/mL) or GM-CSF + DKK1 (50 ng/mL); mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) of Ly6G, CXCR2, CD101, and CXCR4 were assessed by flow cytometry. (B) Sorted immature neutrophils were treated with or without GM-CSF and DKK1 for 24 h, then co-cultured with primary CD8+ T cells (1:1) for 48 h. (C) The IFN-γ secretion was measured after co-culture. (D) CD25, CD69, and CD107a expression in CD8+ T cells were analyzed by flow cytometry. (E) After co-culture, CD8+ T cells were further co-cultured with CFSE-labeled tumor cells at a 5:1 ratio and tumor cell apoptosis was measured after 8 h. BM, bone marrow; DKK1, dickkopf-1; GM-CSF, granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor; MACS, magnetic activated cell sorting; Neu, neutrophil. Significance is denoted as ns (not significant), *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001, and ****P < 0.0001.

  • Neutrophil-specific Ckap4 deletion promotes neutrophil maturation and restrains bone metastases tumor progression. (A) Schematic illustrating DKK1-CKAP4 interaction on neutrophils. (B, C) Ckap4fl/fl and Ckap4fl/flS100a8cre mice were injected intra-arterially with LLC cells. Representative endpoint images and MRI scans of bone metastases are shown. (D) Quantification of tumor burden. (E) Proportion of mature neutrophils (CD11b+Ly6G+CD101+) in bone marrow analyzed by flow cytometry. (F–I) Flow cytometry analysis of bone TME for (F) CD86+/F4/80+, CD163+/F4/80+; (G) MHC-II+/CD11c+, CD103+ DCs; (H) CD8+/CD3+ T cells; (I) CD25+/CD8+, CD69+/CD8+, and CD107a+/CD8+ cells. BM, bone marrow; CKAP4, cytoskeleton-associated protein 4; DC, dendritic cell; DKK1, dickkopf-1; MRI, magnetic resonance imaging; TAM, tumor-associated macrophage; TAN, tumor-associated neutrophil. Data are presented as mean ± SEM. ns, not significant, *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, and ***P < 0.001.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 3

    Neutrophil-specific Ckap4 deletion promotes neutrophil maturation and restrains bone metastases tumor progression. (A) Schematic illustrating DKK1-CKAP4 interaction on neutrophils. (B, C) Ckap4fl/fl and Ckap4fl/flS100a8cre mice were injected intra-arterially with LLC cells. Representative endpoint images and MRI scans of bone metastases are shown. (D) Quantification of tumor burden. (E) Proportion of mature neutrophils (CD11b+Ly6G+CD101+) in bone marrow analyzed by flow cytometry. (F–I) Flow cytometry analysis of bone TME for (F) CD86+/F4/80+, CD163+/F4/80+; (G) MHC-II+/CD11c+, CD103+ DCs; (H) CD8+/CD3+ T cells; (I) CD25+/CD8+, CD69+/CD8+, and CD107a+/CD8+ cells. BM, bone marrow; CKAP4, cytoskeleton-associated protein 4; DC, dendritic cell; DKK1, dickkopf-1; MRI, magnetic resonance imaging; TAM, tumor-associated macrophage; TAN, tumor-associated neutrophil. Data are presented as mean ± SEM. ns, not significant, *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, and ***P < 0.001.

  • DKK1 promotes the maturation and activation of osteoclast progenitors. (A) Osteoclast precursor cells from Balb/c mouse bone marrow were differentiated ex vivo with M-CSF (50 ng/mL) and RANKL (50 ng/mL), then treated with DKK1 (50 ng/mL) or DKK1 plus αDKK1 (10 μg/mL). (B, C) TRAP staining was used to quantify TRAP+ multinucleated cells with osteoclast-like features in each group. (D) Cytokines (IL-6, CCL2, and TNF-α) were measured after induction. (E) Gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA) of breast cancer GEO datasets (GSE14018, GSE14020, and GSE54323) showing the association between DKK1 expression and osteoclast- or osteoblast-related pathways. BM, bone marrow; DKK1, dickkopf-1; NES, normalized enrichment score; OCPs, osteoclast precursor cells; TRAP, tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase; αDKK1, DKK1 antibody. Significance is denoted as ns (not significant), *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001, and ****P < 0.0001.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    DKK1 promotes the maturation and activation of osteoclast progenitors. (A) Osteoclast precursor cells from Balb/c mouse bone marrow were differentiated ex vivo with M-CSF (50 ng/mL) and RANKL (50 ng/mL), then treated with DKK1 (50 ng/mL) or DKK1 plus αDKK1 (10 μg/mL). (B, C) TRAP staining was used to quantify TRAP+ multinucleated cells with osteoclast-like features in each group. (D) Cytokines (IL-6, CCL2, and TNF-α) were measured after induction. (E) Gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA) of breast cancer GEO datasets (GSE14018, GSE14020, and GSE54323) showing the association between DKK1 expression and osteoclast- or osteoblast-related pathways. BM, bone marrow; DKK1, dickkopf-1; NES, normalized enrichment score; OCPs, osteoclast precursor cells; TRAP, tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase; αDKK1, DKK1 antibody. Significance is denoted as ns (not significant), *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001, and ****P < 0.0001.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    DKK1 promotes the maturation and activation of osteoclast progenitors. (A) Osteoclast precursor cells from Balb/c mouse bone marrow were differentiated ex vivo with M-CSF (50 ng/mL) and RANKL (50 ng/mL), then treated with DKK1 (50 ng/mL) or DKK1 plus αDKK1 (10 μg/mL). (B, C) TRAP staining was used to quantify TRAP+ multinucleated cells with osteoclast-like features in each group. (D) Cytokines (IL-6, CCL2, and TNF-α) were measured after induction. (E) Gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA) of breast cancer GEO datasets (GSE14018, GSE14020, and GSE54323) showing the association between DKK1 expression and osteoclast- or osteoblast-related pathways. BM, bone marrow; DKK1, dickkopf-1; NES, normalized enrichment score; OCPs, osteoclast precursor cells; TRAP, tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase; αDKK1, DKK1 antibody. Significance is denoted as ns (not significant), *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001, and ****P < 0.0001.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 4

    DKK1 promotes the maturation and activation of osteoclast progenitors. (A) Osteoclast precursor cells from Balb/c mouse bone marrow were differentiated ex vivo with M-CSF (50 ng/mL) and RANKL (50 ng/mL), then treated with DKK1 (50 ng/mL) or DKK1 plus αDKK1 (10 μg/mL). (B, C) TRAP staining was used to quantify TRAP+ multinucleated cells with osteoclast-like features in each group. (D) Cytokines (IL-6, CCL2, and TNF-α) were measured after induction. (E) Gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA) of breast cancer GEO datasets (GSE14018, GSE14020, and GSE54323) showing the association between DKK1 expression and osteoclast- or osteoblast-related pathways. BM, bone marrow; DKK1, dickkopf-1; NES, normalized enrichment score; OCPs, osteoclast precursor cells; TRAP, tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase; αDKK1, DKK1 antibody. Significance is denoted as ns (not significant), *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001, and ****P < 0.0001.

  • DKK1 induces M2 polarization and immunosuppressive function of macrophages. (A) BMDMs from Balb/c mice were stimulated with LPS (50 ng/mL) with or without DKK1 (50 ng/mL), αDKK1 (10 μg/mL), and αCKAP4 (10 μg/mL). After 48 h, (B) the concentrations of IL-6, TNF-α, CCL2, and IL10 in culture supernatants were detected by CBA. The proportion of (C) CD80+ CD86+ and (D) CD163+ CD206+ macrophages was determined by flow cytometry. (E) BMDMs from C57BL/6 mice were stimulated with LPS (50 ng/mL) with or without DKK1 (50 ng/mL), αDKK1 (10 μg/mL), and αCKAP4 (10 μg/mL). After 48 h, (F) the concentrations of IL-6, TNF-α, CCL2, and IL10 in culture supernatants were detected by CBA. The proportion of (G) CD80+ CD86+ and (H) CD163+ CD206+ macrophages was determined by flow cytometry. (I) Integrative transcriptomic analysis of human breast cancer GEO datasets (GSE14018, GSE14020, and GSE54323) showed correlations between DKK1 expression and myeloid-derived chemokines. BM, bone marrow; DKK1, Dickkopf-1; LPS, lipopolysaccharide; M-CSF, macrophage colony-stimulating factor; NES, normalized enrichment score; αCKAP4, CKAP4 antibody; αDKK1, DKK1 antibody. Significance is denoted as ns (not significant), *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001, and ****P < 0.0001.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    DKK1 induces M2 polarization and immunosuppressive function of macrophages. (A) BMDMs from Balb/c mice were stimulated with LPS (50 ng/mL) with or without DKK1 (50 ng/mL), αDKK1 (10 μg/mL), and αCKAP4 (10 μg/mL). After 48 h, (B) the concentrations of IL-6, TNF-α, CCL2, and IL10 in culture supernatants were detected by CBA. The proportion of (C) CD80+ CD86+ and (D) CD163+ CD206+ macrophages was determined by flow cytometry. (E) BMDMs from C57BL/6 mice were stimulated with LPS (50 ng/mL) with or without DKK1 (50 ng/mL), αDKK1 (10 μg/mL), and αCKAP4 (10 μg/mL). After 48 h, (F) the concentrations of IL-6, TNF-α, CCL2, and IL10 in culture supernatants were detected by CBA. The proportion of (G) CD80+ CD86+ and (H) CD163+ CD206+ macrophages was determined by flow cytometry. (I) Integrative transcriptomic analysis of human breast cancer GEO datasets (GSE14018, GSE14020, and GSE54323) showed correlations between DKK1 expression and myeloid-derived chemokines. BM, bone marrow; DKK1, Dickkopf-1; LPS, lipopolysaccharide; M-CSF, macrophage colony-stimulating factor; NES, normalized enrichment score; αCKAP4, CKAP4 antibody; αDKK1, DKK1 antibody. Significance is denoted as ns (not significant), *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001, and ****P < 0.0001.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    DKK1 induces M2 polarization and immunosuppressive function of macrophages. (A) BMDMs from Balb/c mice were stimulated with LPS (50 ng/mL) with or without DKK1 (50 ng/mL), αDKK1 (10 μg/mL), and αCKAP4 (10 μg/mL). After 48 h, (B) the concentrations of IL-6, TNF-α, CCL2, and IL10 in culture supernatants were detected by CBA. The proportion of (C) CD80+ CD86+ and (D) CD163+ CD206+ macrophages was determined by flow cytometry. (E) BMDMs from C57BL/6 mice were stimulated with LPS (50 ng/mL) with or without DKK1 (50 ng/mL), αDKK1 (10 μg/mL), and αCKAP4 (10 μg/mL). After 48 h, (F) the concentrations of IL-6, TNF-α, CCL2, and IL10 in culture supernatants were detected by CBA. The proportion of (G) CD80+ CD86+ and (H) CD163+ CD206+ macrophages was determined by flow cytometry. (I) Integrative transcriptomic analysis of human breast cancer GEO datasets (GSE14018, GSE14020, and GSE54323) showed correlations between DKK1 expression and myeloid-derived chemokines. BM, bone marrow; DKK1, Dickkopf-1; LPS, lipopolysaccharide; M-CSF, macrophage colony-stimulating factor; NES, normalized enrichment score; αCKAP4, CKAP4 antibody; αDKK1, DKK1 antibody. Significance is denoted as ns (not significant), *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001, and ****P < 0.0001.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 5

    DKK1 induces M2 polarization and immunosuppressive function of macrophages. (A) BMDMs from Balb/c mice were stimulated with LPS (50 ng/mL) with or without DKK1 (50 ng/mL), αDKK1 (10 μg/mL), and αCKAP4 (10 μg/mL). After 48 h, (B) the concentrations of IL-6, TNF-α, CCL2, and IL10 in culture supernatants were detected by CBA. The proportion of (C) CD80+ CD86+ and (D) CD163+ CD206+ macrophages was determined by flow cytometry. (E) BMDMs from C57BL/6 mice were stimulated with LPS (50 ng/mL) with or without DKK1 (50 ng/mL), αDKK1 (10 μg/mL), and αCKAP4 (10 μg/mL). After 48 h, (F) the concentrations of IL-6, TNF-α, CCL2, and IL10 in culture supernatants were detected by CBA. The proportion of (G) CD80+ CD86+ and (H) CD163+ CD206+ macrophages was determined by flow cytometry. (I) Integrative transcriptomic analysis of human breast cancer GEO datasets (GSE14018, GSE14020, and GSE54323) showed correlations between DKK1 expression and myeloid-derived chemokines. BM, bone marrow; DKK1, Dickkopf-1; LPS, lipopolysaccharide; M-CSF, macrophage colony-stimulating factor; NES, normalized enrichment score; αCKAP4, CKAP4 antibody; αDKK1, DKK1 antibody. Significance is denoted as ns (not significant), *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001, and ****P < 0.0001.

  • Combining myeloid cell reprogramming with zoledronic acid suppresses tumor progression and remodels the bone metastasis immune microenvironment. (A, D) Schematic of syngeneic breast cancer bone metastasis model (A) or syngeneic lung cancer bone metastasis model (D) and treatment: αDKK1 [10 mg/kg i.p. (7 doses over 3 weeks)] and/or zoledronic acid [100 μg/kg (2 doses)]. (B, E) Representative images and MRI scans of 4T1 (B) or LLC bone metastases (E) at endpoint. (C, F) Quantification of 4T1 (C) or LLC tumor area (F) by MRI. (G-L) Flow cytometry analysis of 4T1 (G–I) and LLC bone metastasis microenvironment (J-L): (G, J) CD8+/CD3+, CD25+/CD8+, CD69+/CD8+, and CD107a+/CD8+ T cells; (H, K) Ly6G+/CD11b+ and CD101+/Ly6G+ neutrophils; (I, L) CD86+/F4/80+ and CD163+/F4/80+ macrophages. Bone-mets, bone-metastases; DC, dendritic cell; i.a., intra-arterial; MRI, magnetic resonance imaging; NK, natural kill; TAM, tumor-associated macrophage; TAN, tumor-associated neutrophil; ZA, zoledronic acid; αDKK1, DKK1 antibody. Data are presented as mean ± SEM. ns, not significant, *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, and ***P < 0.001.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Combining myeloid cell reprogramming with zoledronic acid suppresses tumor progression and remodels the bone metastasis immune microenvironment. (A, D) Schematic of syngeneic breast cancer bone metastasis model (A) or syngeneic lung cancer bone metastasis model (D) and treatment: αDKK1 [10 mg/kg i.p. (7 doses over 3 weeks)] and/or zoledronic acid [100 μg/kg (2 doses)]. (B, E) Representative images and MRI scans of 4T1 (B) or LLC bone metastases (E) at endpoint. (C, F) Quantification of 4T1 (C) or LLC tumor area (F) by MRI. (G-L) Flow cytometry analysis of 4T1 (G–I) and LLC bone metastasis microenvironment (J-L): (G, J) CD8+/CD3+, CD25+/CD8+, CD69+/CD8+, and CD107a+/CD8+ T cells; (H, K) Ly6G+/CD11b+ and CD101+/Ly6G+ neutrophils; (I, L) CD86+/F4/80+ and CD163+/F4/80+ macrophages. Bone-mets, bone-metastases; DC, dendritic cell; i.a., intra-arterial; MRI, magnetic resonance imaging; NK, natural kill; TAM, tumor-associated macrophage; TAN, tumor-associated neutrophil; ZA, zoledronic acid; αDKK1, DKK1 antibody. Data are presented as mean ± SEM. ns, not significant, *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, and ***P < 0.001.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Combining myeloid cell reprogramming with zoledronic acid suppresses tumor progression and remodels the bone metastasis immune microenvironment. (A, D) Schematic of syngeneic breast cancer bone metastasis model (A) or syngeneic lung cancer bone metastasis model (D) and treatment: αDKK1 [10 mg/kg i.p. (7 doses over 3 weeks)] and/or zoledronic acid [100 μg/kg (2 doses)]. (B, E) Representative images and MRI scans of 4T1 (B) or LLC bone metastases (E) at endpoint. (C, F) Quantification of 4T1 (C) or LLC tumor area (F) by MRI. (G-L) Flow cytometry analysis of 4T1 (G–I) and LLC bone metastasis microenvironment (J-L): (G, J) CD8+/CD3+, CD25+/CD8+, CD69+/CD8+, and CD107a+/CD8+ T cells; (H, K) Ly6G+/CD11b+ and CD101+/Ly6G+ neutrophils; (I, L) CD86+/F4/80+ and CD163+/F4/80+ macrophages. Bone-mets, bone-metastases; DC, dendritic cell; i.a., intra-arterial; MRI, magnetic resonance imaging; NK, natural kill; TAM, tumor-associated macrophage; TAN, tumor-associated neutrophil; ZA, zoledronic acid; αDKK1, DKK1 antibody. Data are presented as mean ± SEM. ns, not significant, *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, and ***P < 0.001.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 6

    Combining myeloid cell reprogramming with zoledronic acid suppresses tumor progression and remodels the bone metastasis immune microenvironment. (A, D) Schematic of syngeneic breast cancer bone metastasis model (A) or syngeneic lung cancer bone metastasis model (D) and treatment: αDKK1 [10 mg/kg i.p. (7 doses over 3 weeks)] and/or zoledronic acid [100 μg/kg (2 doses)]. (B, E) Representative images and MRI scans of 4T1 (B) or LLC bone metastases (E) at endpoint. (C, F) Quantification of 4T1 (C) or LLC tumor area (F) by MRI. (G-L) Flow cytometry analysis of 4T1 (G–I) and LLC bone metastasis microenvironment (J-L): (G, J) CD8+/CD3+, CD25+/CD8+, CD69+/CD8+, and CD107a+/CD8+ T cells; (H, K) Ly6G+/CD11b+ and CD101+/Ly6G+ neutrophils; (I, L) CD86+/F4/80+ and CD163+/F4/80+ macrophages. Bone-mets, bone-metastases; DC, dendritic cell; i.a., intra-arterial; MRI, magnetic resonance imaging; NK, natural kill; TAM, tumor-associated macrophage; TAN, tumor-associated neutrophil; ZA, zoledronic acid; αDKK1, DKK1 antibody. Data are presented as mean ± SEM. ns, not significant, *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, and ***P < 0.001.

  • Schematic models illustrating the reprogramming of myeloid cells in the bone metastasis microenvironment combined with zoledronic acid treatment. (A, B) Overall landscape and therapeutic impact. (A) Bone metastases are enriched with immunosuppressive myeloid cell populations, including neutrophils, macrophages, and osteoclasts, which all contribute to the formation of a tumor-promoting microenvironment. These findings provide a more in-depth understanding of the impact of myeloid cells within the bone metastasis microenvironment. (B) Therapeutic blockade of DKK1 combined with zoledronic acid reshapes the bone metastasis microenvironment, enhances antitumor immune responses, and suppresses tumor progression. These findings provide a potential strategy for bone metastasis treatment and broaden the application of zoledronic acid beyond bone protection. (C, D) Mechanism explanation. (C) Our results derived from neutrophil-specific Ckap4 knockout mice and ex vivo assays demonstrated that the DKK1-CKAP4 signaling axis drives the immunosuppressive and pro-tumorigenic functional states of myeloid cells in the bone metastasis microenvironment, including an immature-like neutrophil state, the differentiation of OCPs toward osteoclast-like cells, and M2-like macrophage polarization. Mechanistically, we hypothesize that DKK1-CKAP4 signaling activates the downstream PI3K–AKT pathway, thereby reinforcing myeloid-mediated immunosuppression, impairing CD8+ T-cell function, and facilitating immune evasion. (D) DKK1 blockade plus zoledronic acid could inhibit the DKK1-CKAP4-PI3K-AKT signaling axis, reprogram myeloid cell function, re-activate CD8+ T cells, and restore antitumor immunity. These findings uncover the underlying mechanism modulating myeloid cell function within the bone metastasis microenvironment and provide the mechanistic rationale for the combination therapy of DKK1 blockade and zoledronic acid in bone-metastatic patients. CKAP4, cytoskeleton-associated protein 4; DKK1, dickkopf-1. Figure created with BioRender.com.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 7

    Schematic models illustrating the reprogramming of myeloid cells in the bone metastasis microenvironment combined with zoledronic acid treatment. (A, B) Overall landscape and therapeutic impact. (A) Bone metastases are enriched with immunosuppressive myeloid cell populations, including neutrophils, macrophages, and osteoclasts, which all contribute to the formation of a tumor-promoting microenvironment. These findings provide a more in-depth understanding of the impact of myeloid cells within the bone metastasis microenvironment. (B) Therapeutic blockade of DKK1 combined with zoledronic acid reshapes the bone metastasis microenvironment, enhances antitumor immune responses, and suppresses tumor progression. These findings provide a potential strategy for bone metastasis treatment and broaden the application of zoledronic acid beyond bone protection. (C, D) Mechanism explanation. (C) Our results derived from neutrophil-specific Ckap4 knockout mice and ex vivo assays demonstrated that the DKK1-CKAP4 signaling axis drives the immunosuppressive and pro-tumorigenic functional states of myeloid cells in the bone metastasis microenvironment, including an immature-like neutrophil state, the differentiation of OCPs toward osteoclast-like cells, and M2-like macrophage polarization. Mechanistically, we hypothesize that DKK1-CKAP4 signaling activates the downstream PI3K–AKT pathway, thereby reinforcing myeloid-mediated immunosuppression, impairing CD8+ T-cell function, and facilitating immune evasion. (D) DKK1 blockade plus zoledronic acid could inhibit the DKK1-CKAP4-PI3K-AKT signaling axis, reprogram myeloid cell function, re-activate CD8+ T cells, and restore antitumor immunity. These findings uncover the underlying mechanism modulating myeloid cell function within the bone metastasis microenvironment and provide the mechanistic rationale for the combination therapy of DKK1 blockade and zoledronic acid in bone-metastatic patients. CKAP4, cytoskeleton-associated protein 4; DKK1, dickkopf-1. Figure created with BioRender.com.

Supplementary Materials

  • Figures
  • [j.issn.2095-3941.2026.0168suppl.pdf]
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Cancer Biology & Medicine: 23 (7)
Cancer Biology & Medicine
Vol. 23, Issue 7
15 Jul 2026
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Print
Download PDF
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Cancer Biology & Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Myeloid cell reprogramming combined with zoledronic acid effectively suppresses bone metastasis
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Cancer Biology & Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Cancer Biology & Medicine web site.
Citation Tools
Myeloid cell reprogramming combined with zoledronic acid effectively suppresses bone metastasis
Yuting Luo, Yiran Cai, Zizheng Jiang, Ke Zheng, Shiji Ren, Lixia Yu, Baorui Liu, Tao Shi, Jia Wei
Cancer Biology & Medicine Jul 2026, 20260168; DOI: 10.20892/j.issn.2095-3941.2026.0168

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Myeloid cell reprogramming combined with zoledronic acid effectively suppresses bone metastasis
Yuting Luo, Yiran Cai, Zizheng Jiang, Ke Zheng, Shiji Ren, Lixia Yu, Baorui Liu, Tao Shi, Jia Wei
Cancer Biology & Medicine Jul 2026, 20260168; DOI: 10.20892/j.issn.2095-3941.2026.0168
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Introduction
    • Materials and methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Conclusions
    • Supporting Information
    • Conflict of interest statement
    • Author contributions
    • Data availability statement
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Psychological health mediates the association between diet and upper gastrointestinal cancer: a cross-sectional analysis from a large-scale population-based screening project
  • Lung cancer mortality trends in China from 2013 to 2021 and projections to 2030
  • Global landscape and temporal trends in lifetime risk of colorectal cancer in 185 countries: a population-based study
Show more Original Article

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • Bone metastasis
  • myeloid cell reprogramming
  • DKK1-CKAP4 axis
  • zoledronic acid
  • combination cancer therapy

Navigate

  • Home
  • Current Issue

More Information

  • About CBM
  • About CACA
  • About TMUCIH
  • Editorial Board
  • Subscription

For Authors

  • Instructions for authors
  • Journal Policies
  • Submit a Manuscript

Journal Services

  • Email Alerts
  • Facebook
  • RSS Feeds
  • Twitter

 

© 2026 Cancer Biology & Medicine

Powered by HighWire