Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • About
    • About CBM
    • Editorial Board
    • Announcement
  • Articles
    • Ahead of print
    • Current Issue
    • Archive
    • Collections
    • Cover Story
  • For Authors
    • Instructions for Authors
    • Resources
    • Submit a Manuscript
  • For Reviewers
    • Become a Reviewer
    • Instructions for Reviewers
    • Resources
    • Outstanding Reviewer
  • Subscription
  • Alerts
    • Email Alerts
    • RSS Feeds
    • Table of Contents
  • Contact us
  • Other Publications
    • cbm

User menu

  • My alerts

Search

  • Advanced search
Cancer Biology & Medicine
  • Other Publications
    • cbm
  • My alerts
Cancer Biology & Medicine

Advanced Search

 

  • Home
  • About
    • About CBM
    • Editorial Board
    • Announcement
  • Articles
    • Ahead of print
    • Current Issue
    • Archive
    • Collections
    • Cover Story
  • For Authors
    • Instructions for Authors
    • Resources
    • Submit a Manuscript
  • For Reviewers
    • Become a Reviewer
    • Instructions for Reviewers
    • Resources
    • Outstanding Reviewer
  • Subscription
  • Alerts
    • Email Alerts
    • RSS Feeds
    • Table of Contents
  • Contact us
  • Follow cbm on Twitter
  • Visit cbm on Facebook
LetterLetter
Open Access

Impact of pre-neoadjuvant radioactive iodine seed marking on pathologic complete response and survival in early-stage breast cancer patients

Yihao Geng, Qi Zhang, Zhao Bi, Zhiqiang Shi, Qiuchen Zhao, Xiaowei Qi, Rongrong Zhao, Yongsheng Wang and Pengfei Qiu
Cancer Biology & Medicine December 2025, 20250578; DOI: https://doi.org/10.20892/j.issn.2095-3941.2025.0578
Yihao Geng
1Breast Cancer Center, Shandong Cancer Hospital and Institute, Shandong First Medical University and Shandong Academy of Medical Sciences, Jinan 250117, China
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Qi Zhang
1Breast Cancer Center, Shandong Cancer Hospital and Institute, Shandong First Medical University and Shandong Academy of Medical Sciences, Jinan 250117, China
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Zhao Bi
1Breast Cancer Center, Shandong Cancer Hospital and Institute, Shandong First Medical University and Shandong Academy of Medical Sciences, Jinan 250117, China
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Zhiqiang Shi
1Breast Cancer Center, Shandong Cancer Hospital and Institute, Shandong First Medical University and Shandong Academy of Medical Sciences, Jinan 250117, China
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Qiuchen Zhao
2Cancer Research UK Cambridge Centre and Department of Oncology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 0XZ, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Xiaowei Qi
3Department of Breast and Thyroid Surgery, Southwest Hospital, Army Medical University, Chongqing 400038, China
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Rongrong Zhao
1Breast Cancer Center, Shandong Cancer Hospital and Institute, Shandong First Medical University and Shandong Academy of Medical Sciences, Jinan 250117, China
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Rongrong Zhao
  • For correspondence: zhaorongrong2002{at}126.com yswang{at}sdfmu.edu.cn qiu.pf{at}outlook.com
Yongsheng Wang
1Breast Cancer Center, Shandong Cancer Hospital and Institute, Shandong First Medical University and Shandong Academy of Medical Sciences, Jinan 250117, China
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Yongsheng Wang
  • For correspondence: zhaorongrong2002{at}126.com yswang{at}sdfmu.edu.cn qiu.pf{at}outlook.com
Pengfei Qiu
1Breast Cancer Center, Shandong Cancer Hospital and Institute, Shandong First Medical University and Shandong Academy of Medical Sciences, Jinan 250117, China
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Pengfei Qiu
  • For correspondence: zhaorongrong2002{at}126.com yswang{at}sdfmu.edu.cn qiu.pf{at}outlook.com
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • Supplementary Materials
  • Figure 1
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 1
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 1
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 1

    Impact of 125I seed marking on neoadjuvant therapeutic efficacy and postoperative disease recurrence. (A) Schematic of key procedural details for 125I seed implantation. (B) The key parameters of 125I seed marking. (C) Intergroup differences in pCR rates among the overall population. (D) Intergroup differences in pCR rates among the HR+/HER2−subgroup. (E) Intergroup differences in pCR rates among the HER2+ subgroup. (F) Intergroup differences in pCR rates among the TNBC subgroup. (G) The impact of 125I seed marking on the 3-year iDFS in the overall population. (H) Kaplan–Meier curves of 3-year iDFS stratified by 125I seed marking and pCR status. Group A = without 125I seed-marked group. Group B = 125I seed-marked group. *P < 0.05; **P < 0.01; ***P < 0.001; NS, no statistically significant difference. pCR, pathological complete response; HR+, hormone receptor positive; HER2-, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 negative; HER2+, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 positive; TNBC, triple-negative breast cancer; iDFS, invasive disease-free survival.

Tables

  • Figures
  • Supplementary Materials
    • View popup
    Table 1

    Baseline characteristics of patients before and after PSM

    CharacteristicsBefore PSMAfter PSM
    Group A# (n = 833)Group B# (n = 216)P valueGroup A# (n = 432)Group B# (n = 216)P value
    Age, years0.4990.911
     ≤ 50411 (49.34)101 (46.76)204 (47.22)101 (46.76)
     > 50422 (50.66)115 (53.24)228 (52.78)115 (53.24)
    Menopausal status0.3600.824
     Premenopausal431 (51.74)104 (48.15)212 (49.07)104 (48.15)
     Menopausal402 (48.26)112 (51.85)220 (50.93)112 (51.85)
    Histopathologic type0.1000.604
     Ductal805 (96.64)214 (99.07)430 (99.54)214 (99.07)
     Lobular or mixed12 (1.44)2 (0.93)2 (0.46)2 (0.93)
     Other16 (1.92)0 (0)0 (0)0 (0)
    Ki-670.001*0.999
     < 20%106 (12.73)11 (5.09)21 (4.86)11 (5.09)
     ≥ 20%727 (87.27)205 (94.91)411 (95.14)205 (94.91)
    Location0.2110.399
     Outside498 (59.78)119 (55.09)253 (58.56)119 (55.09)
     Central/inside335 (40.22)97 (44.91)179 (41.44)97 (44.91)
    Clinical T stage at presentation< 0.001*0.906
     T1117 (14.05)48 (22.22)86 (19.91)48 (22.22)
     T2532 (63.87)146 (67.59)298 (68.98)146 (67.59)
     T395 (11.40)17 (7.87)38 (8.80)17 (7.87)
     T489 (10.68)5 (2.32)10 (2.32)5 (2.32)
    Clinical N stage at presentation0.007*0.616
     N075 (9.00)26 (12.04)47 (10.88)26 (12.04)
     N1550 (66.03)158 (73.15)303 (70.14)158 (73.15)
     N2135 (16.21)25 (11.57)63 (14.58)25 (11.57)
     N373 (8.76)7 (3.24)19 (4.40)7 (3.24)
    Subtype< 0.001*0.086
     HR+/HER2−316 (37.94)31 (14.35)70 (16.20)31 (14.35)
     HER2+339 (40.70)129 (59.72)219 (50.69)129 (59.72)
     TNBC178 (21.36)56 (25.93)143 (33.10)56 (25.93)
    Breast surgery0.4630.857
     Mastectomy612 (73.47)164 (75.93)330 (76.39)164 (75.93)
     BCS221 (26.53)52 (24.07)101 (23.61)52 (24.07)
    Axillary surgery0.5830.692
     SLNB330 (39.62)90 (41.67)173 (40.05)90 (41.67)
     ALND503 (60.38)126 (58.33)259 (59.95)126 (58.33)
    Radiotherapy0.1750.529
     Yes347 (41.66)79 (36.57)169 (39.12)79 (36.57)
     No486 (58.34)137 (63.43)263 (60.88)137 (63.43)

    PSM, propensity score matching; HR+/HER2−, hormone receptor-positive/HER2-negative breast cancer; HER2+, HER2-positive breast cancer; TNBC, triple-negative breast cancer; BCS, breast-conserving surgery; SLNB, sentinel lymph node biopsy; ALND, axillary lymph node dissection. *Difference was statistically significant. Group A# = without 125I seed-marked group, Group B# = 125I seed-marked group.

    Supplementary Materials

    • Figures
    • Tables
    • [j.issn.2095-3941.2025.0578suppl.pdf]
    PreviousNext
    Back to top

    In this issue

    Cancer Biology & Medicine: 23 (2)
    Cancer Biology & Medicine
    Vol. 23, Issue 2
    15 Feb 2026
    • Table of Contents
    • Index by author
    Print
    Download PDF
    Email Article

    Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Cancer Biology & Medicine.

    NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

    Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
    Impact of pre-neoadjuvant radioactive iodine seed marking on pathologic complete response and survival in early-stage breast cancer patients
    (Your Name) has sent you a message from Cancer Biology & Medicine
    (Your Name) thought you would like to see the Cancer Biology & Medicine web site.
    Citation Tools
    Impact of pre-neoadjuvant radioactive iodine seed marking on pathologic complete response and survival in early-stage breast cancer patients
    Yihao Geng, Qi Zhang, Zhao Bi, Zhiqiang Shi, Qiuchen Zhao, Xiaowei Qi, Rongrong Zhao, Yongsheng Wang, Pengfei Qiu
    Cancer Biology & Medicine Dec 2025, 20250578; DOI: 10.20892/j.issn.2095-3941.2025.0578

    Citation Manager Formats

    • BibTeX
    • Bookends
    • EasyBib
    • EndNote (tagged)
    • EndNote 8 (xml)
    • Medlars
    • Mendeley
    • Papers
    • RefWorks Tagged
    • Ref Manager
    • RIS
    • Zotero
    Share
    Impact of pre-neoadjuvant radioactive iodine seed marking on pathologic complete response and survival in early-stage breast cancer patients
    Yihao Geng, Qi Zhang, Zhao Bi, Zhiqiang Shi, Qiuchen Zhao, Xiaowei Qi, Rongrong Zhao, Yongsheng Wang, Pengfei Qiu
    Cancer Biology & Medicine Dec 2025, 20250578; DOI: 10.20892/j.issn.2095-3941.2025.0578
    Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
    • Tweet Widget
    • Facebook Like
    • Google Plus One

    Jump to section

    • Article
      • Clinicopathologic characteristics
      • 125I seed marking protocol
      • Logistic regression analyses of pCR and cohort construction via PSM
      • pCR outcomes with 125I seed marking in the matched cohort
      • Correlation between 125I seed marking and long-term prognosis
      • Discussion
      • Supporting Information
      • Conflict of interest statement
      • Author contributions
      • Data availability statement
      • References
    • Figures & Data
    • Info & Metrics
    • References
    • PDF

    Related Articles

    • No related articles found.
    • Google Scholar

    Cited By...

    • No citing articles found.
    • Google Scholar

    More in this TOC Section

    • Sequential nimotuzumab plus gemcitabine and nab-paclitaxel chemotherapy followed by irreversible electroporation in advanced pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: a retrospective real-world analysis
    • Identification of immune reconstitution and hematopoiesis restoration by scRNA-seq in bone marrow of multiple myeloma patients treated with high-dose melphalan following auto-HSCT
    • Blood-based prediction and early detection of pancreatic cancer recurrence after tumor resection
    Show more Letter

    Similar Articles

    Navigate

    • Home
    • Current Issue

    More Information

    • About CBM
    • About CACA
    • About TMUCIH
    • Editorial Board
    • Subscription

    For Authors

    • Instructions for authors
    • Journal Policies
    • Submit a Manuscript

    Journal Services

    • Email Alerts
    • Facebook
    • RSS Feeds
    • Twitter

     

    © 2026 Cancer Biology & Medicine

    Powered by HighWire