Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • About
    • About CBM
    • Editorial Board
    • Announcement
  • Articles
    • Ahead of print
    • Current Issue
    • Archive
    • Collections
    • Cover Story
  • For Authors
    • Instructions for Authors
    • Resources
    • Submit a Manuscript
  • For Reviewers
    • Become a Reviewer
    • Instructions for Reviewers
    • Resources
    • Outstanding Reviewer
  • Subscription
  • Alerts
    • Email Alerts
    • RSS Feeds
    • Table of Contents
  • Contact us
  • Other Publications
    • cbm

User menu

  • My alerts

Search

  • Advanced search
Cancer Biology & Medicine
  • Other Publications
    • cbm
  • My alerts
Cancer Biology & Medicine

Advanced Search

 

  • Home
  • About
    • About CBM
    • Editorial Board
    • Announcement
  • Articles
    • Ahead of print
    • Current Issue
    • Archive
    • Collections
    • Cover Story
  • For Authors
    • Instructions for Authors
    • Resources
    • Submit a Manuscript
  • For Reviewers
    • Become a Reviewer
    • Instructions for Reviewers
    • Resources
    • Outstanding Reviewer
  • Subscription
  • Alerts
    • Email Alerts
    • RSS Feeds
    • Table of Contents
  • Contact us
  • Follow cbm on Twitter
  • Visit cbm on Facebook
EditorialEditorial
Open Access

Chimeric antigen receptor macrophages: a new frontier in hepatocellular carcinoma treatment

Rainbow Wing Hei Leung, Clarence Tsun Ting Wong and Terence Kin Wah Lee
Cancer Biology & Medicine September 2025, 20250427; DOI: https://doi.org/10.20892/j.issn.2095-3941.2025.0427
Rainbow Wing Hei Leung
Department of Applied Biology and Chemical Technology, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong, China
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Clarence Tsun Ting Wong
Department of Applied Biology and Chemical Technology, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong, China
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Clarence Tsun Ting Wong
  • For correspondence: clarence-tt.wong{at}polyu.edu.hk terence.kw.lee{at}polyu.edu.hk
Terence Kin Wah Lee
Department of Applied Biology and Chemical Technology, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong, China
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Terence Kin Wah Lee
  • For correspondence: clarence-tt.wong{at}polyu.edu.hk terence.kw.lee{at}polyu.edu.hk
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF
Loading

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the fourth leading cause of cancer-related mortality worldwide1. The primary treatment options for this disease are surgical resection and liver transplantation. Unfortunately, most HCC cases are diagnosed in advanced stages and are inoperable. Even after surgery, the long-term prognosis remains unsatisfactory, because of a high recurrence rate. The HCC treatment landscape has recently evolved with the development of multikinase inhibitors2. Sorafenib has been found to be beneficial for patients with advanced HCC. More recently, lenvatinib, another MKI that selectively inhibits VEGFR1–3, FGFR1–4, PDGFRα, RET, and KIT, was approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) as a first-line treatment for unresectable advanced HCC. In a phase III clinical trial, lenvatinib has been found to be non-inferior to sorafenib in terms of overall survival among treated patients with advanced HCC3. However, the survival benefits of both sorafenib and lenvatinib remain limited, because of intrinsic and extrinsic drug resistance.

Recent advancements in immunotherapy have opened new avenues for the treatment of advanced HCC. Immune checkpoint inhibitors, such as nivolumab and atezolizumab, have received FDA approval for use in patients with advanced HCC. However, the response rates to these therapies remain suboptimal, and their reported efficacy is below 20%4. Combination therapies enhance treatment efficacy, according to phase III clinical trial data. For instance, the IMbrave150 study (NCT03434379) demonstrated that atezolizumab in combination with bevacizumab has superior therapeutic efficacy to that of sorafenib alone5. Additionally, in the phase III HIMALAYA study (NCT03298451), the single tremelimumab regular interval durvalumab (STRIDE) regimen, compared with sorafenib, significantly improved overall survival6. On the basis of compelling data, these treatment regimens have been approved by the FDA for the treatment of advanced HCC. However, despite these advancements, the efficacy of immunotherapy in HCC continues to be limited, thus underscoring an urgent need to understand resistance mechanisms and identify predictive biomarkers of efficacy. Consequently, new therapeutic options must be explored for this challenging disease.

Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) therapy has provided a groundbreaking cancer immunotherapy approach. CAR-T cell therapy, the primary cell therapy-based option currently available, involves genetically modifying a patient’s T cells to express a synthetic receptor known as a CAR, which consists of an extracellular antigen-binding domain, a hinge region, a transmembrane domain, and an intracellular signaling domain7. After being modified, these CAR-T cells are infused back into the patient, in whom they recognize and bind cancer cells, and trigger an immune response that ultimately leads to tumor cell destruction. CAR-T cell therapy has demonstrated significant therapeutic efficacy in patients with hematological malignancies. Considerable progress has recently been made in clinical trials and preclinical animal models using CAR-T cells in solid tumors, including HCC. CAR-T cells have been designed to target a range of antigens preferentially expressed in HCC cells, such as glypican-3 (GPC3)8, alpha-fetoprotein9, and CD14710. Phase I data have shown promising antitumor activity of CT017 targeting GPC3 in patients with advanced HCC, accompanied by tolerable adverse effects (NCT03980288). Additionally, multiple clinical trials are currently recruiting participants to assess the efficacy and safety profile of epithelial cell adhesion molecule (EpCAM) CAR-T cells (NCT02729493) and MUC1 CAR-T cells for patients with advanced HCC (NCT02587689)7. Despite these advancements, the application of CAR-T therapy in HCC presents several challenges, including off-target effects, poor infiltration efficiency, induction of CAR-T cell exhaustion within the immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment (TME), and loss or reduction of antigen presentation in solid tumor cells11. Additionally, the high production costs of CAR-T cells limit their widespread clinical application12. Consequently, optimizing CAR-T cells for specific and efficient cancer treatment remains an ongoing challenge, thus highlighting the urgent need for alternative cell therapy approaches13.

CAR macrophages (CAR-Ms) have emerged as a promising alternative cell therapy approach. Tumor-associated macrophages, the most abundant innate immune cells, constitute approximately 50% of the tumor mass within the TME in many solid tumors. These cells play critical roles in tumor progression by modulating various behaviors, including cell proliferation, angiogenesis, metastasis, immune escape, and therapeutic resistance. As professional antigen-presenting cells, activated macrophages also contribute to promoting an adaptive antitumor immune response14. CAR-Ms’ intrinsic functional properties have enabled a new immunotherapy for solid cancers with promise in overcoming the limitations of CAR-T therapy. CAR-Ms offer several advantages over CAR-T cells11: first, macrophages can substantially penetrate the TME; second, they decrease the ratio of tumor-associated macrophages that promote tumor growth; third, they enhance antigen presentation and prime T cells; and fourth, they have limited circulation times and diminished tumor toxicity, particularly with respect to cytokine release syndrome. Because of its potential advantages over CAR-T approaches, several preclinical and clinical studies have investigated the use of CAR-M therapy in various cancer types.

A clinical trial based on the CAR-M strategy has led to FDA approval. The encouraging data suggest that CAR-Ms may provide a safe and feasible approach to targeting solid tumors. A first-in-human phase 1 clinical trial of CT-0508 (NCT04660929), an anti-human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) CAR-M, has demonstrated preliminary safety and tolerability in patients with advanced HER2-overexpressing tumors (scored as 3+ according to immunohistochemistry or 2+ according to immunohistochemistry and positivity according to in situ hybridization) after their most recent systemic therapy15. No patients developed grade 3 or 4 cytokine release syndrome, and none experienced immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome. Additionally, no prolonged immunosuppression or cytopenia was observed. Researchers have generated human CAR-Ms bearing a CD3 ζ signaling domain through adenoviral transfection of the CAR gene15. In that trial, only 44% of patients achieved stable disease, which was observed exclusively in HER2 3+ patients, thereby underscoring the need to confirm robust target expression before CAR-M treatment. Unlike conventional CAR-T therapies, CT-0508 quickly exited the peripheral blood and was found in 92% of post-treatment biopsies. This treatment activated myeloid cells in the TME and led to global upregulation of antigen processing, inflammation, and chemokine signatures, thus indicating immune-mediated TME remodeling. However, CT-0508’s efficacy might be limited by its short persistence in the TME. Transitioning from terminally differentiated macrophages to CAR monocytes, which have a tenfold longer half-life in mice, might enhance persistence and allow for as many as 10 billion cells per apheresis. A phase 1 trial of CT-0525, anti-HER2 CAR monocytes, is currently ongoing (NCT06254807). In addition, CT-0508 has been demonstrated to suppress the growth of colorectal cancer tumors derived from CT26-hHER2 in a syngeneic mouse model16. The therapeutic efficacy of CT-0508 relies on T cell action, given that treatment with anti-CD8 and/or anti-CD4 depleting antibodies has been found to abolish CAR-M-induced anti-tumor responses in mice. Additionally, CT-0508-treated tumors exhibit an inflamed TME characterized by the influx and activation of T cells, pro-inflammatory macrophages, and cytokines. On the basis of these findings, the effects of combining CT-0508 with antibodies to PD-1 have been evaluated in the CT26-hHER2 model. This combination did not induce severe adverse effects and achieved maximal tumor suppression and prolonged survival by complementing PD-1 inhibition, thereby enhancing tumor-infiltrating lymphocyte activation. However, the therapeutic efficacy of CT-0508 was limited by its low persistence in the TME, similarly to observations in a clinical trial conducted by the same group. Therefore, using CAR monocytes for combination therapy might be more advantageous. Specifically in HCC, several preclinical studies have explored the therapeutic potential of CAR-Ms for treatment. In 2023, Yang et al17. used lipid nanoparticle-mediated dual mRNA co-delivery to generate Siglec-GΔITIM-expressing GPC3-specific CAR macrophages in situ. lipid nanoparticle (LNP)-engineered Siglec-GΔITIM-expressing GPC3-specific CAR-Ms demonstrated significantly enhanced HCC-specific engulfment by macrophages, thereby stimulating an adaptive anti-tumor immune response and ultimately suppressing HCC tumor growth. Similarly, Zhang et al18. have developed quadrivalent CAR macrophages incorporating GPC3-CAR and Super IL-2 by using the same lipid nanoparticle method. These CAR macrophages have been found to effectively infiltrate tumor sites and stimulate durable T cell memory against both antigen-positive and antigen-negative cells18. Another research group has developed CAR-Ms by transfecting a CAR construct containing a single-chain variable fragment (scFv) targeting GPC3 and the CD3ζ intracellular domain through an adenoviral approach. This method has demonstrated efficient engulfment of HCC cells in a three-dimensional spheroid model19. Collectively, these encouraging findings underscore the therapeutic potential of CAR-Ms in cancer therapy, including HCC.

Perspectives

Despite encouraging current in vitro, in vivo animal, and clinical data, several limitations in the current CAR-M approach to HCC treatment require further optimization and improvement. First, many CAR-M therapies rely on viral transfection to introduce CAR components into macrophages. Whether the use of adenoviruses for engineering CAR macrophages poses immunogenicity concerns, which could potentially result in their rapid rejection, must be determined13. Second, because of the non-proliferative nature of macrophages, patients are administered a finite number of these cells through in vitro or in vivo methods, thus potentially influencing treatment efficacy. Consequently, ongoing administration of CAR-Ms might be necessary to maintain therapeutic effectiveness. Third, a major challenge lies in maintaining CAR-Ms in a pro-inflammatory M1 state after they migrate to the TME. Transitioning to a less inflammatory M2 state might create an immunosuppressive TME that diminishes the efficacy of treatments administered alone or in conjunction with immune checkpoint therapies.

Several new avenues for optimizing CAR-M therapy for HCC are emerging. As previously described17,18, researchers have used lipid nanoparticle-based methods to synthesize CAR-Ms, thereby effectively overcoming the inherent limitations of viral-based approaches. Furthermore, to enhance the phagocytic potential of CAR macrophages, genetic manipulation of key phagocytosis-associated genes, such as NLRP6, might be beneficial, given that deletion of this gene leads to increased phagocytosis20. Further augmentation of the phagocytic activity of CAR-Ms may be achieved by inhibiting the CD47-SIRPα pathway. Moreover, to increase therapeutic efficacy, combining CAR-M therapy with PD-L1/PD-1 treatment might facilitate the synergistic activation of CD4 and CD8 T cells. As with CAR-T, the production of CAR-M can be costly, involves complex viral transfection procedures, and prompts long-term safety concerns. To mitigate these drawbacks, alternative strategies are urgently needed to emulate the genetic approach while offering greater reliability, shorter production times, minimized batch-to-batch variation, and reversible effects. Recently, our group has pioneered a bifunctional linker approach, conjugating it to the amines of cell surface proteins by attaching the arginine-glycine-aspartic acid (RGD) integrin-targeting peptide (αvβ3 integrin) to mouse red blood cells. This modification enables red blood cells to gain tumor-targeting abilities and tumor-killing effects through the use of photosensitizers, thus facilitating strong interactions between red blood cells and cancer cells21 (Figure 1). This novel chemical modification strategy on cell surfaces might enable the creation of CAR-Ms tailored to target specific receptors on cancer cells. Moreover, various peptides that selectively bind receptors uniquely expressed on HCC cells could be designed, synthesized, and linked to the macrophage surface through the bifunctional linker. This approach enables CAR-Ms to be developed through peptide-based methods, thus yielding peptidic CAR-Ms.

Figure 1
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 1

Schematic representation of the synthesis of peptide-linked RBCs targeting αvβ3 integrin for the specific killing of tumor cells via photodynamic therapy. RBC, red blood cell; RGD, arginine-glycine-aspartic acid.

The therapeutic efficacy of CAR-Ms has been demonstrated through various methods, including viral transfection, lipid nanoparticle delivery, and peptide-mediated modification. Although the viral method offers higher efficacy, it is costly and prompts long-term safety concerns. In contrast, lipid nanoparticle and peptide-mediated approaches are more cost-effective, scalable, and faster to produce, and pose fewer uncertainties and batch-to-batch variations. Among them, the peptide-mediated method is notable for its flexibility, by enabling rapid enhancement of efficacy and specificity by linking 1 or 2 peptides simultaneously. However, rigorous investigations are imperative to evaluate the application of this method in HCC therapy, and ensure the future safety, effectiveness, and overall viability of CAR-Ms in clinical settings.

Conflict of interest statement

No potential conflicts of interest are disclosed.

Author contributions

Conceived and designed the analysis: Clarence Tsun Ting Wong and Terence Kin Wah Lee.

Wrote the paper: Rainbow Wing Hei Leung.

  • Received July 29, 2025.
  • Accepted August 18, 2025.
  • Copyright: © 2025, The Authors

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

References

  1. 1.↵
    1. Vogel A,
    2. Meyer T,
    3. Sapisochin G,
    4. Salem R,
    5. Saborowski A.
    Hepatocellular carcinoma. Lancet. 2022; 400: 1345–62.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  2. 2.↵
    1. Llovet JM,
    2. Kelley RK,
    3. Villanueva A,
    4. Singal AG,
    5. Pikarsky E,
    6. Roayaie S, et al.
    Hepatocellular carcinoma. Nat Rev Dis Primers. 2021; 7: 6.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  3. 3.↵
    1. Kudo M,
    2. Finn RS,
    3. Qin S,
    4. Han KH,
    5. Ikeda K,
    6. Piscaglia F, et al.
    Lenvatinib versus sorafenib in first-line treatment of patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma: a randomized phase 3 non-inferiority trial. Lancet. 2018; 391: 1163–73.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  4. 4.↵
    1. Iñarrairaegui M,
    2. Melero I,
    3. Sangro B.
    Immunotherapy of hepatocellular carcinoma: facts and hopes. Clin Cancer Res. 2018; 24: 1518–24.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  5. 5.↵
    1. Finn RS,
    2. Qin S,
    3. Ikeda M,
    4. Galle PR,
    5. Ducreux M,
    6. Kim TY, et al.
    Atezolizumab plus bevacizumab in unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma. N Engl J Med. 2020; 382: 1894–905.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  6. 6.↵
    1. Sangro B,
    2. Chan SL,
    3. Kelley RK,
    4. Lau G,
    5. Kudo M,
    6. Sukeepaisarnjaroen W, et al.
    Four-year overall survival update from the phase III HIMALAYA study of tremelimumab plus durvalumab in unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma. Ann Oncol. 2024; 35: 448–57.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  7. 7.↵
    1. Sterner RC,
    2. Sterner RM.
    CAR-T cell therapy: current limitations and potential strategies. Blood Cancer J. 2021; 11: 69.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  8. 8.↵
    1. Sun RX,
    2. Liu YF,
    3. Sun YS,
    4. Zhou M,
    5. Wang Y,
    6. Shi BZ, et al.
    GPC3-targeted CAR-T cells expressing GLUT1 or AGK exhibit enhanced antitumor activity against hepatocellular carcinoma. Acta Pharmacol Sin. 2024; 45: 1937–50.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  9. 9.↵
    1. Liu H,
    2. Xu Y,
    3. Xiang J,
    4. Long L,
    5. Green S,
    6. Yang Z, et al.
    Targeting alpha-fetoprotein (AFP)-MHC complex with CAR T-cell therapy for liver cancer. Clin Cancer Res. 2017; 23: 478–88.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  10. 10.↵
    1. Zhou Y,
    2. Wei S,
    3. Xu M,
    4. Wu X,
    5. Dou W,
    6. Li H, et al.
    CAR-T cell therapy for hepatocellular carcinoma: current trends and challenges. Front Immunol. 2024; 15: 1489649.
  11. 11.↵
    1. Chen Y,
    2. Yu Z,
    3. Tan X,
    4. Jiang H,
    5. Xu Z,
    6. Fang Y, et al.
    CAR-macrophage: A new immunotherapy candidate against solid tumors. Biomed Pharmacother. 2021; 139: 111605.
  12. 12.↵
    1. Daniyan AF,
    2. Brentjens RJ.
    At the bench: chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cell therapy for the treatment of B cell malignancies. J Leukoc Biol. 2016; 100: 1255–64.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  13. 13.↵
    1. Tsahouridis O,
    2. Xu M,
    3. Song F,
    4. Savoldo B,
    5. Dotti G.
    The landscape of CAR-engineered innate immune cells for cancer immunotherapy. Nat Cancer. 2025; 6: 1145–56.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  14. 14.↵
    1. Klichinsky M,
    2. Ruella M,
    3. Shestova O,
    4. Lu XM,
    5. Best A,
    6. Zeeman M, et al.
    Human chimeric antigen receptor macrophages for cancer immunotherapy. Nat Biotechnol. 2020; 38: 947–53.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  15. 15.↵
    1. Reiss KA,
    2. Angelos MG,
    3. Dees EC,
    4. Yuan Y,
    5. Ueno NT,
    6. Pohlmann PR, et al.
    CAR-macrophage therapy for HER2-overexpressing advanced solid tumors: a phase 1 trial. Nat Med. 2025; 31: 1171–82.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  16. 16.↵
    1. Pierini S,
    2. Gabbasov R,
    3. Oliveira-Nunes MC,
    4. Qureshi R,
    5. Worth A,
    6. Huang S, et al.
    Chimeric antigen receptor macrophages (CAR-M) sensitize HER2+ solid tumors to PD1 blockade in preclinical models. Nat Commun. 2025; 16: 706.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  17. 17.↵
    1. Yang Z,
    2. Liu Y,
    3. Zhao K,
    4. Jing W,
    5. Gao L,
    6. Dong X, et al.
    Dual mRNA co-delivery for in situ generation of phagocytosis-enhanced CAR macrophages augments hepatocellular carcinoma immunotherapy. J Control Release. 2023; 360: 718–33.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  18. 18.↵
    1. Zhang SL,
    2. Lu HX,
    3. Zhang HL,
    4. Ding XZ,
    5. Wu QX,
    6. Lei AH, et al.
    In vivo engineered quadrivalent CAR-macrophages break tumor barrier, remodel TME and overcome tumor heterogeneity through antigen spreading. bioRxiv. 2024; 2024.11.06.621821: doi:10.1101/2024.11.06.621821.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  19. 19.↵
    1. Guan L,
    2. Wu S,
    3. Zhu Q,
    4. He X,
    5. Li X,
    6. Song G, et al.
    GPC3-targeted CAR-M cells exhibit potent antitumor activity against hepatocellular carcinoma. Biochem Biophys Rep. 2024; 39: 101741.
  20. 20.↵
    1. Li S,
    2. Fu Y,
    3. Jia X,
    4. Liu Z,
    5. Qian Z,
    6. Zha H, et al.
    NLRP6 deficiency enhances macrophage-mediated phagocytosis via E-Syt1 to inhibit hepatocellular carcinoma progression. Gut. 2025: gutjnl-2024-334448: doi:10.1136/gutjnl-2024-334448.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  21. 21.↵
    1. Chu JCH,
    2. Shao C,
    3. Ha SYY,
    4. Fong WP,
    5. Wong CTT,
    6. Ng DKP.
    One-pot peptide cyclisation and surface modification of photosensitiser-loaded red blood cells for targeted photodynamic therapy. Biomater Sci. 2021; 10: 189–201.
    OpenUrlPubMed
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Cancer Biology & Medicine: 22 (10)
Cancer Biology & Medicine
Vol. 22, Issue 10
15 Oct 2025
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Print
Download PDF
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Cancer Biology & Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Chimeric antigen receptor macrophages: a new frontier in hepatocellular carcinoma treatment
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Cancer Biology & Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Cancer Biology & Medicine web site.
Citation Tools
Chimeric antigen receptor macrophages: a new frontier in hepatocellular carcinoma treatment
Rainbow Wing Hei Leung, Clarence Tsun Ting Wong, Terence Kin Wah Lee
Cancer Biology & Medicine Sep 2025, 20250427; DOI: 10.20892/j.issn.2095-3941.2025.0427

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Chimeric antigen receptor macrophages: a new frontier in hepatocellular carcinoma treatment
Rainbow Wing Hei Leung, Clarence Tsun Ting Wong, Terence Kin Wah Lee
Cancer Biology & Medicine Sep 2025, 20250427; DOI: 10.20892/j.issn.2095-3941.2025.0427
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Perspectives
    • Conflict of interest statement
    • Author contributions
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Advances in antibody-drug conjugates for urothelial carcinoma treatment
  • Progress toward cervical cancer elimination: global disparities and China’s contributions
Show more Editorial

Similar Articles

Navigate

  • Home
  • Current Issue

More Information

  • About CBM
  • About CACA
  • About TMUCIH
  • Editorial Board
  • Subscription

For Authors

  • Instructions for authors
  • Journal Policies
  • Submit a Manuscript

Journal Services

  • Email Alerts
  • Facebook
  • RSS Feeds
  • Twitter

 

© 2025 Cancer Biology & Medicine

Powered by HighWire