PEI-PEG as a siRNA Genetic Vector Demonstrating Interference in the Expression of CD44v6 Protein in Gastric Cancer Cells

References

1. ↵
   1. Bourguignon LY,
   2. Zhu D,
   3. Zhu H.

   CD44 isoform-cytoskeleton interaction in oncogenic signaling and tumor progression. Front Biosci 1998; 3: 637-649.

   OpenUrl
2. ↵
   1. Yamamichi K,
   2. Uehara Y,
   3. Kitamura N, et al.

   Incresed expression of CD44v6 mRNA significantly correlates with distant metastasis and poor prognosis in gastric cancer. Int J Cancer 1998; 79: 256-262.

   OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
3. ↵
   1. Leung PK,
   2. Whittaker PA.

   RNA interference: from gene silencing to gene-specific therapeutics. Pharmacol Ther 2005; 107: 222-239.

   OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
4. ↵
   1. Read ML,
   2. Logan A,
   3. Seymour LW.

   Barriers to gene delivery using synthetic vectors. Adv Genet 2005; 52: 19-46.

   OpenUrl
5. ↵
   1. Hong JW,
   2. Park JH,
   3. Huh KM, et al.

   PEGylated polyethylenimine for in vivo local gene delivery based on lipiodolized emulsion system. J Control Release 2004; 99: 167-176.

   OpenUrlPubMed
6. ↵
   1. Nimesh S,
   2. Goyal A,
   3. Pawar V, et al.

   Polyethylenimine nanoparticles as efficient transfecting agents for mammalian cells. J Control Release 2006; 110: 457-468.

   OpenUrlPubMed
7. ↵
   1. Shuai X,
   2. Merdan T,
   3. Unger F, et al.

   Novel biodegradable ternary copolymers hy-PEI-g-PCL-b-PEG: synthesis, characterization, and potential as efficient non-viral gene delivery vectors. Macromolecules 2003; 36: 5751-5759.

   OpenUrlCrossRef
8. ↵
   1. Sun H,
   2. Han SX,
   3. Xiao JX, et al.

   CD44V6 expression and its significance in cervical cancer tissue. Di Si Jun Yi Daxue Xuebao 2002; 23: 462-466 (Chinese).

   OpenUrl
9. ↵
   1. Liu Z,
   2. Chen JZ.

   Expressive significance of CD44V6 in cervical cancer. Shiyong Zhongliu Zazhi (J Pract Oncol) 2001; 16: 49-51 (Chinese).

   OpenUrl
10. ↵
    1. Lu PL,
    2. Ji F,
    3. Peng KR, et al.

    Expression of CD44v6 mRNA in gastric cancer. Zhejiang Yixue 2004; 26: 184-186 (Chinese).

    OpenUrl
11. ↵
    1. Andersen MØ,
    2. Howard KA,
    3. Paludan SR, et al.

    Delivery of siRNA from lyophilized polymeric surfaces. Biomaterials 2008; 29: 506-512.

    OpenUrlPubMed
12. ↵
    1. Zhu J,
    2. Tang A,
    3. Law LP, et al.

    Amphiphilic core-shell nanoparticles with polyethylene-imine) shells as potential gene delivery carriers. Bioconjug Chem 2005; 16: 139-146.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
13. ↵
    1. Liang B,
    2. He ML,
    3. Xiao ZP, et al.

    Synthesis and characterization of folate-PEG-grafted-hyperbranched-PEI for tumor-targeted gene delivery. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 2008; 367: 874-880.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
14. 1. Nguyen HK,
    2. Lemieux P,
    3. Vinogradov SV, et al.

    Evaluation of polyether-polyethyleneimine graft copolymers as gene transfer agents. Gene Ther 2000; 7: 126-138.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
15. ↵
    1. Fischer D,
    2. Osburg B,
    3. Petersen H, et al.

    Effect of poly (ethylene imine) molecular weight and pegylation on organ distribution and pharmacokinetics of polyplexes with oligodeoxynucleotides in mice. Drug Metab Dispos 2004; 32: 983-992.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
16. ↵
    1. Lungwitz U,
    2. Breunig M,
    3. Blunk T, et al.

    Polyethylenimine-based non-viral gene delivery systems. Eur J Pharm Biopharm 2005; 60: 247-266.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
17. ↵
    1. Jere D,
    2. Yoo MK,
    3. Arote R, et al.

    Poly (amino ester) composed of poly (ethylene glycol) and aminosilane prepared by combinatorial chemistry as a gene carrier. Pharm Res 2008; 25: 875-885.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
18. ↵
    1. Corsi K,
    2. Chellat F,
    3. Yahia L, et al.

    Mesenchymal stem cells, MG63 and HEK293 transfection using chitosan-DNA nanoparticles. Biomaterials 2003; 24: 1255-1264.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science