Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • About
    • About CBM
    • Editorial Board
    • Announcement
  • Articles
    • Ahead of print
    • Current Issue
    • Archive
    • Collections
    • Cover Story
  • For Authors
    • Instructions for Authors
    • Resources
    • Submit a Manuscript
  • For Reviewers
    • Become a Reviewer
    • Instructions for Reviewers
    • Resources
    • Outstanding Reviewer
  • Subscription
  • Alerts
    • Email Alerts
    • RSS Feeds
    • Table of Contents
  • Contact us
  • Other Publications
    • cbm

User menu

  • My alerts

Search

  • Advanced search
Cancer Biology & Medicine
  • Other Publications
    • cbm
  • My alerts
Cancer Biology & Medicine

Advanced Search

 

  • Home
  • About
    • About CBM
    • Editorial Board
    • Announcement
  • Articles
    • Ahead of print
    • Current Issue
    • Archive
    • Collections
    • Cover Story
  • For Authors
    • Instructions for Authors
    • Resources
    • Submit a Manuscript
  • For Reviewers
    • Become a Reviewer
    • Instructions for Reviewers
    • Resources
    • Outstanding Reviewer
  • Subscription
  • Alerts
    • Email Alerts
    • RSS Feeds
    • Table of Contents
  • Contact us
  • Follow cbm on Twitter
  • Visit cbm on Facebook
Research ArticleOriginal Article

Clinicopathologic Characteristics and Surgical Outcome of Gastric Cancer in Patients Younger than 36 Years of Age

Dapeng Lin, Ping Lu, Caigang Liu, Huimian Xu, Shubao Wang and Junqing Chen
Clinical Oncology and Cancer Research August 2009, 6 (4) 263-266; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11805-009-0263-z
Dapeng Lin
Department of Oncology, the First Affiliated Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang 110001, Liaoning Province, China.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Ping Lu
Department of Oncology, the First Affiliated Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang 110001, Liaoning Province, China.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: lindapeng2002{at}163.com
Caigang Liu
Department of Oncology, the First Affiliated Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang 110001, Liaoning Province, China.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Huimian Xu
Department of Oncology, the First Affiliated Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang 110001, Liaoning Province, China.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Shubao Wang
Department of Oncology, the First Affiliated Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang 110001, Liaoning Province, China.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Junqing Chen
Department of Oncology, the First Affiliated Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang 110001, Liaoning Province, China.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

OBJECTIVE This study was designed to determine the clinicopathologic features of young patients who underwent gastrectomy for gastric cancer and to improve the clinical management of this disease.

METHODS From 1981 to 2000, among 1,830 gastric cancer patients were admitt ed in our hospital for surgical treatment, 66 of them were < 36 years of age. The clinicopathologic data of these young patients were collected and reviewed.

RESULTS The male : female ratio was 1.2 : 1. Most tumors were located in the lower third of the stomach (63.1%). The overall 5-year survival rate of 66 cases was 28.7%. The 5-year survival rates in the patients with early stages and with advanced stages of gastric carcinoma were 77.8% (7/9) and 21.1% (12/57), respectively. Unfavorable prognostic factors associated with poor 5-year survival included the degree of the invasion in the gastric wall (P < 0.05), and curability of resection (non-curative vs. curative; P < 0.05).

CONCLUSION Gastric cancer in young adults tends to be more advanced presentation when diagnosed. However, young patients with early gastric cancer can tolerate radical treatments well. It is important to promptly make a precise diagnosis for gastric carcinoma in young patients and to treat it in early stage.

KEY WORDS:

keywords

  • gastric carcinoma
  • clinicopathologic characteristics
  • young patients prognosis

Introduction

Gastric cancer (GC), one of the most common malignant diseases, is the second leading cause of cancer-related death both in China and rest of the world (700,000 deaths annually)[1,2]. Gastric carcinoma is usually found in aged population at a mean age of approximately 50-60 years old[3-6]. The incidence of GC in subjects at 40 years of age or younger is very low and ranges between 2%-15%[7-9]. It is assumed that carcinoma in young patients develops aggressively and with a poor prognosis. Thus, in our study we retrospectively analyzed the clinicopathologic characteristics for young patients with gastric cancer.

Patients and Methods

Patients

From 1981 to 2000, 1,830 patients with gastric carcinoma underwent surgery in the Department of Oncology, the First Affiliated Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang. Of these, 66 (3.61%) were young patients (defined as younger than 36 years of age). The clinicopathologic features of these young patients were retrospectively reviewed.

Statistical analysis

All data were analyzed using SPSS16.0 statistical software. The survival rate of the patient was calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method, and the relative parameters of prognostic factors were investigated using the Cox proportional hazards model. The Chi-squared test was used to evaluate the statistical significance of differences and P value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

Of 1830 patients, 66 (3.61%) were classified as young patients with the age of < 36 years and among them, 36 were male and 30 were female. The ratio of male and female was 1.2:1. The age of the patients at initial diagnosis ranged from 21-35 years, with a mean age of 31.4 years.

The clinicopathologic features of the patients are summarized in Table 1. Among the 66 cases, there were 2 patients whose tumor was located mainly in the upper third of the stomach, 7 located in the middle third, 41 located in the lower third, and 16 located almost throughout the entire stomach. The tumor size ranged from 2 cm-15 cm (mean, 6.6 cm).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 1.

Clinicopathologic findings and survival rate of the gastric carcinoma in study patients.

Univariate analysis showed that depth of invasion, tumor site, tumor size, distant metastasis and curative resection were the significant prognostic factors for young patients with gastric carcinoma.

The analysis using Cox proportional regression hazard model revealed that the invasive depth of tumor and curative resection were the factors which affected prognosis (Table 2).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 2.

Multivariable analysis for overall survival after resection.

The overall 5-year survival rate of the 66 cases was 28.7% (19/66). Nine cases with early stages of gastric carcinoma had much better prognosis (P < 0.001) than the others with advanced gastric carcinoma. The 5-year survival rate of the patients with early stages of gastric carcinoma was 77.8% (7/9) and that of the advanced gastric carcinoma patients was 21.1% (12/57) (Fig. 1). Survival curves showed the relationship between the survival time and the type of resection for the patients. The survival rate of the patients receiving the curative resection was significantly higher than that of those receiving non-curative resection (Fig. 2).

Fig. 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 1.

Cumulative survival rates in early and advanced gastric carcinoma patients.

Fig. 2.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 2.

Survival curves of the patients who underwent resection. The survival rate for young patients those with curative resection were significantly better than for those with non-curative resection.

There were no significant differences between the 5-year survival rate and the gender, or between the 5-year survival rate and the lymph node metastasis. The 5-year survival rate of the male patients was 33.3% (12/36) and that of the female was 23.3% (7/30). For the patients with lymph node metastasis, the 5-year survival rate was 23.5% (8/34). In the patients without lymph node metastases, the 5-year survival rate was 34.4% (11/32).

Discussion

Although declining trends of morbidity and mortality of gastric cancer have been reported, it is still one of the most common malignancies of the gastrointestinal tract and the leading cause of cancer death in the world[10-12]. Most patients with gastric cancer are diagnosed at between the age of 50 and 70 years, and 2%-15% of the cases are found in subjects at 40 years old or younger[5,13-15]. In our study, the young patients less than 36 years old only accounted for 3.61% (66/1830) of all patients with gastric cancer treated in the Department of Oncology, the First Affiliated Hospital of China Medical University.

The sex distribution of young patients with gastric cancer is controversial. In most series, the number of the female is either similar or higher than the male, and the ratio of the male and the female ranges from 1.6 to 0.64[5,16-19]. Other investigators have noted an equal frequency of both males and females in young patients or a male predominance[20]. Mori et al.[21] investigated 23 patients with early stages of gastric carcinoma and reported female predominance (the male: female ratio was 1:2.8). Umeyama et al.[22], investigated that in patients younger than 30 years of age, females predominated (male: female ratio, 0.85/1; n = 513), but in patients older than 30, this ratio became reversed (male: female ratio, 1.45/1; n = 579), which more closely approximates the situation seen in elderly patients (male : female ratio, 2/1). In our study, the ratio between the male and the female was 1.2 : 1. The reasons for the difference in gender ratios in gastric cancer are currently unknown.

A higher proportion of tumors in the upper third of the stomach in young patients has also been postulated by some authors[5,16,23]. However, in contrast to these reports, we found a difference in the distribution of GC in the young patients and mostly in cases with tumors located in the low third of the stomach (41/66, 62.1%). Wang et al.[3] and Choi et al.[4] reported the same tendency.

Concerning depth of tumor, it has been reported that the deep invasion of tumor happened in a high proportion of young patients with advanced cancer. However, 13.6% of our young patients had early stage of cancer. The prognosis of young patients with gastric carcinoma has shown considerable variation, although it is generally poorer than or similar to that of older patients[4-6]. Some authors have found that young patients have a worse prognosis mainly due to the different features of gastric cancers in younger and older patients and a frequent delay in diagnosis[5,6,24].

It is known that younger patients show a tendency to have a larger proportion of diffuse and undifferentiated tumors and the linitis plastica appears more frequently in the young patients than in older patients[24-26]. Other studies have suggested that the delay in the diagnosis is a negative prognostic factor in young patients and that they also have more aggressive disease[26,27]. Lai et al.[28], also showed that the survival of patients younger than 35 years, despite the more aggressive features of the tumor depended on the stage of the disease, not on the age of the patients.

However, among young patients with early stages of carcinoma, high 5-year survival rate (7/9, 77.8%) was recognized in the study. Mori et al.[21] reported that the 5-year survival rate of 23 patients with early gastric carcinoma was 100%. Among the young patients with advanced carcinoma, a poorer 5-year survival rate (12/57, 21.1%) was seen in this study. Choi et al.[4] reported that the 5-year overall survival rate of young patients with advanced gastric carcinoma younger than 35 was 51.9%. These findings suggest that young patients with early gastric cancer can tolerate radical treatments well. Prompt and accurate diagnosis of gastric cancer in young patients and starting treatment in the early stage are thus crucial. However, early diagnoses in young patients can be difficult. Doctors should pay more attention to young patients with upper gastrointestinal symptoms, and endoscopic examinations should be recommended in those cases with a high clinical suspicion of GC. The young population should be educated on the signs and symptoms indicative of the presence of GC. The rate of early diagnosis might be increased in young patients if these recommendations are followed.

  • Received April 14, 2009.
  • Accepted July 27, 2009.
  • Copyright © 2009 by Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute & Hospital and Springer

References

  1. ↵
    1. Parkin DM,
    2. Bray F,
    3. Ferlay J, et al.
    Global cancer statistics 2002. CA Cancer J Clin 2005; 55; 74-108.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  2. ↵
    1. Gallo A,
    2. Cha C.
    Updates on esophageal and gastric cancer. World J Gastroenterol 2006; 12: 3237-3242.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  3. ↵
    1. Wang JY,
    2. Hsieh JS,
    3. Huang CJ, et al.
    Clinicopathologic study of advanced gastric cancer without serosal invasion in young and old patients. J Surg Oncol 1996; 63: 36-40.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  4. ↵
    1. Choi JH,
    2. Chung HC,
    3. Yoo NC, et al.
    Gastric cancer in young patients who underwent curative resection. Am J Clin Oncol 1996; 19: 45-48.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  5. ↵
    1. Tso PL,
    2. Bringaze WL 3rd, Dauterive AH, et al.
    Gastric carcinoma in the young. Cancer 1987; 59: 1362-1365.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  6. ↵
    1. Bedikian AY,
    2. Khankhanian N,
    3. Heilbrun LK, et al.
    Gastric carcinoma in young adults. South Med J 1979; 72: 654-656.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  7. ↵
    1. Kitamura K,
    2. Yamaguchi T,
    3. Yamamoto K, et al.
    Clinicopathologic analysis of gastric cancer in young adults. Hepatogastroenterology 1996; 43; 1273-1280.
    OpenUrlPubMed
    1. Theuer CP,
    2. Kurosaki T,
    3. Taylor TH, et al.
    Unique features of gastric carcinoma in the young: a population based analysis. Cancer 1998; 83: 25-33.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  8. ↵
    1. Kath R,
    2. Fiehler J,
    3. Schneider CP, et al.
    Gastric cancer in very young adults: apropos four patients and a review of the literature. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol 2000; 126: 233-237.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  9. ↵
    1. Dicken BJ,
    2. Bigam DL,
    3. Cass C, et al.
    Gastric adenocarcinoma: review and considerations for future directions. Ann Surg 2005; 241: 27-39.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Inoue M,
    2. Tsugane S.
    Epidemiology of gastric cancer in Japan. Postgrad Med J 2005; 81: 419-424.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  10. ↵
    1. Palli D.
    Epidemiology of gastric cancer: an evaluation of available evidence. J Gastroenterol 2000; 35: 84-89.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  11. ↵
    1. Plummer M,
    2. Franceschi S,
    3. Munoz N.
    Epidemiology of gastric cancer. IARC Sci Publ 2004; 157: 311-326.
    OpenUrlPubMed
    1. Crew KD,
    2. Neugut AI.
    Epidemiology of upper gastrointestinal malignancies. Semin Oncol 2004; 31: 450-464.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  12. ↵
    1. Kelley JR,
    2. Duggan JM.
    Gastric cancer epidemiology and risk factors. J Clin Epidemiol 2003; 56: 1-9.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  13. ↵
    1. Kim DY,
    2. Joo JK,
    3. Ryu SY, et al.
    Clinicopathologic characteristics of gastric carcinoma in elderly patients: a comparison with young patients. World J Gastroenterol 2005; 11: 22-26.
    OpenUrlPubMed
    1. Bani-Hani KE.
    Clinicopathologic comparison between young and old age patients with gastric adenocarcinoma. Int J Gastrointest Cancer 2005; 35: 43-52.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Ramos-De la Medina A,
    2. Salgado-Nesme N,
    3. Torres-Villalobos G, et al.
    Clinicopathologic characteristics of gastric cancer in a young patient population. J Gastrointest Surg 2004; 8: 240-244
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  14. ↵
    1. Maconi G,
    2. Kurihara H,
    3. Panizzo V, et al.
    Gastric cancer in young patients with no alarm symptoms: focus on delay in diagnosis, stage of neoplasm and survival. Scand J Gastroenterol 2003; 38: 1249-1255.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  15. ↵
    1. Block M,
    2. Griep AH,
    3. Polard HM.
    The occurrence of gastric neoplasms in youth. Am J Med Sci 1948; 215: 398-404.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  16. ↵
    1. Mori M,
    2. Sugimachi K,
    3. Ohiwa T, et al.
    Early gastric carcinoma in Japanese patients under 30 years of age. Br J Surg 1985; 72: 289-291.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  17. ↵
    1. Umeyama K,
    2. Sowa M,
    3. Kamino K, et al.
    Gastric carcinoma in young adults in Japan. Anticancer Res 1982; 2: 283-286.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  18. ↵
    1. Katai H,
    2. Sasako M,
    3. Sano T, et al.
    Gastric carcinoma in young adults. Jpn J Clin Oncol 1996; 26: 139-143.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  19. ↵
    1. Wanebo HJ,
    2. Kennedy BJ,
    3. Chmiel J, et al.
    Cancer of the stomach: a patient care study by the American College of Surgeons. Ann Surg 1993; 218: 583-592.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Matley PJ,
    2. Dent DM,
    3. Madden MV, et al.
    Gastric carcinoma in young adults. Ann Surg 1988; 208: 593-596.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  20. ↵
    1. Hohenberger P,
    2. Gretschel S.
    Gastric cancer. Lancet 2003; 362: 305-315.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  21. ↵
    1. Eguchi T,
    2. Takahashi Y,
    3. Yamagata M, et al.
    Gastric cancer in young patients. J Am Coll Surg 1999; 188: 22-26.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  22. ↵
    1. Lai IR,
    2. Lee WJ,
    3. Chen CN, et al.
    Gastric cancer in the young. Hepatogastroenterology 1997; 44: 1641-1645.
    OpenUrlPubMed
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Cancer Biology and Medicine: 6 (4)
Clinical Oncology and Cancer Research
Vol. 6, Issue 4
1 Aug 2009
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Print
Download PDF
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Cancer Biology & Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Clinicopathologic Characteristics and Surgical Outcome of Gastric Cancer in Patients Younger than 36 Years of Age
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Cancer Biology & Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Cancer Biology & Medicine web site.
Citation Tools
Clinicopathologic Characteristics and Surgical Outcome of Gastric Cancer in Patients Younger than 36 Years of Age
Dapeng Lin, Ping Lu, Caigang Liu, Huimian Xu, Shubao Wang, Junqing Chen
Clinical Oncology and Cancer Research Aug 2009, 6 (4) 263-266; DOI: 10.1007/s11805-009-0263-z

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Clinicopathologic Characteristics and Surgical Outcome of Gastric Cancer in Patients Younger than 36 Years of Age
Dapeng Lin, Ping Lu, Caigang Liu, Huimian Xu, Shubao Wang, Junqing Chen
Clinical Oncology and Cancer Research Aug 2009, 6 (4) 263-266; DOI: 10.1007/s11805-009-0263-z
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Introduction
    • Patients and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • SPRED2 suppresses the stemness of hepatocellular carcinoma through the p53/miR-506-3p/KLF4 pathway
  • Migration and invasion inhibitory protein inhibits M2 macrophage polarization to suppress colorectal cancer progression through the STING–NFκB2–IL10 axis
  • Temporal radiomics for non-invasive preoperative prediction of pathologic complete response to neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy in non-small cell lung cancer
Show more Original Article

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • gastric carcinoma
  • clinicopathologic characteristics
  • young patients prognosis

Navigate

  • Home
  • Current Issue

More Information

  • About CBM
  • About CACA
  • About TMUCIH
  • Editorial Board
  • Subscription

For Authors

  • Instructions for authors
  • Journal Policies
  • Submit a Manuscript

Journal Services

  • Email Alerts
  • Facebook
  • RSS Feeds
  • Twitter

 

© 2026 Cancer Biology & Medicine

Powered by HighWire