Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • About
    • About CBM
    • Editorial Board
    • Announcement
  • Articles
    • Ahead of print
    • Current Issue
    • Archive
    • Collections
    • Cover Story
  • For Authors
    • Instructions for Authors
    • Resources
    • Submit a Manuscript
  • For Reviewers
    • Become a Reviewer
    • Instructions for Reviewers
    • Resources
    • Outstanding Reviewer
  • Subscription
  • Alerts
    • Email Alerts
    • RSS Feeds
    • Table of Contents
  • Contact us
  • Other Publications
    • cbm

User menu

  • My alerts

Search

  • Advanced search
Cancer Biology & Medicine
  • Other Publications
    • cbm
  • My alerts
Cancer Biology & Medicine

Advanced Search

 

  • Home
  • About
    • About CBM
    • Editorial Board
    • Announcement
  • Articles
    • Ahead of print
    • Current Issue
    • Archive
    • Collections
    • Cover Story
  • For Authors
    • Instructions for Authors
    • Resources
    • Submit a Manuscript
  • For Reviewers
    • Become a Reviewer
    • Instructions for Reviewers
    • Resources
    • Outstanding Reviewer
  • Subscription
  • Alerts
    • Email Alerts
    • RSS Feeds
    • Table of Contents
  • Contact us
  • Follow cbm on Twitter
  • Visit cbm on Facebook
Research ArticleResearch Article

Detection of Recurrent Cervical Cancer by Whole-body FDG PET Scans

Jiaxin Yang, Jinhui Wang, Zhaohui Zhu, Keng Shen and Bocheng Wang
Chinese Journal of Clinical Oncology April 2008, 5 (2) 125-127; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11805-008-0125-0
Jiaxin Yang
1Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jinhui Wang
1Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: [email protected]
Zhaohui Zhu
2PET Center, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing 100730, China.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Keng Shen
2PET Center, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing 100730, China.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Bocheng Wang
2PET Center, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing 100730, China.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

OBJECTIVE To evaluate the role of whole-body {18F}fluro-2-dexoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography (PET) scans in the detection of recurrent cervical cancer.

METHODS Between June, 2000 and January, 2006, 25 patients had undergone a PET scan at the Peking Union Medical College Hospital to evaluate possible recurrent cervical cancer. All the PET findings were reviewed and compared to available clinical data to classify each PET scan result as a true positive, true negative, false positive, or false negative.

RESULTS A total of 38 PET scans were conducted on the 25 patients whose median age was 46 years. The Stage distributions were IA (n = 1), IB (n = 11), IIA (n = 5), IIB (n = 4), IIIB (n = 2), IVB (n = 1), and unknown Stage (n = 1). There were 22 cases of squamous cell carcinoma and 3 cases of adenocarcinoma resulting in 9 true positive PET scans, 27 true negatives, 2 false positives and no false negatives. The sensitivity of the FDG PET scans for detecting recurrent cervical cancer was 100%, specificity 93.1%, positive predictive value 81.8%, and negative predictive value 100%.

CONCLUSION The whole body FDG PET scans are a sensitive and specific imaging modality for the detection of recurrent cervical cancer. However the cost of PET scans is too high at this time. A large prospective study will determine whether this modality should be used routinely and take the place of other imaging methods in the early detection of recurrent cervical carcinoma

KEY WORDS:

keywords

  • tomography
  • emission-computed
  • positron
  • 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose
  • recurrent cervical cancer

Introduction

Since more and more Pap smears have been used as a method for early diagnosis of cervical neoplasms, most cervical carcinomas are found in an early stage. However 20~40% of the cervical cancers are still found at a late Stage (IIa~IVb). Patients are treated for cervical cancer by either a radical hysterectomy or radiotherapy. Usually following treatment is finished, the methods for follow up are very limited. Recurrent cervical cancer is a devastating disease for those women unfortunate enough to suffer such an event. Early detection of a localized disease that can be treated with either radiotherapy or pelvic exenteration often offers the only chance for complete eradication of the disease. Usually a pelvic examination, Papanicolaou smear, and chest radiography are used for diagnosis of a recurrence. Whole-body positron emission tomography (PET) using the glucose analog{18F} fluoro-2-dexoxyglucose (FDG) has been demonstrated to be useful in the staging of cervical cancer, being superior to either CT or MRI for detection of nodal disease. The detection of nodal disease, especially periaortic nodal disease provides the basis for individual treatment, and is a significant prognostic factor for survival.

In the present study, we evaluated the clinical usefulness of whole-body FDG-PET scans in detecting recurrent cervical cancer in women with or without symptoms.

Patients and Methods

This study involved 25 patients who received medical care at the Peking Union Medical College for Cervical Cancer, and who had undergone PET scan imaging in an attempt to detect recurrent cancer between June, 2000 and January, 2006. A minimum of 6 months follow-up after the post treatment PET scan was required to be included in this study. The International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) classification was used for clinical staging.

Recurrent diseases were confirmed in all cases with either tissue biopsy or the demonstration of a progressive disease by CT. Clinical proof of no recurrent disease consisted of a negative tissue biopsy, negative CT, or a lack of clinical evidence of recurrence within 6 months of the PET scan.

Results

The 25 patients underwent a total of 38 PET scans for surveillance purposes or because of the development of symptoms suggestive of a tumor recurrence. The ages of the patients ranged from 31 to 80 years, with a mean of 46. Patient FIGO staging was as follows: IA 1, IB 11, IIA 5, IIB 4, IIIB 2, and IVB 1. Only one patient was not staged. The pathological types of cervical carcinoma were 22 cases of squamous carcinoma and 3 cases of adenocarcinoma. Twenty patients received a radical hysterectomy, and others underwent radiotherapy. Eight patients were given neoadjuvant chemotherapy before surgery.

True positive PET scans were found 9 times (23.7%) and false positives were found in 2 patients (5.3%). True negative scans were found 27 times (71.1%), but there were no false negatives. So in this study, the sensitivity of PET scanning for the recurrence of cervical cancer was 100% and the specificity 93.1%. The positive predictive value and negative predictive value were 81.8% and 100% respectively. The 8th patient listed in Table 1 was given a PET scan twice. Cases 9 and 10 were confirmed to be false positives. All cases with positive PET scans are listed in Table1.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 1.

Summary of cases with positive PET scans.

Patient No.9 was a 39 year old woman with a IB staged squamous carcinoma. She received a radical hysterectomy and during follow-up the CT scan showed there was a cyst in the pelvis. The patient then was given a PET scan afterward, the result of which also showed there was a cyst in the pelvis under the abdominal incision. This patient underwent an operation after all these examinations only to find that the pathological results showed there were no cancer cells, but rather inflammation of the tissue and new dilation of the left ovarian paragraph duct. Case No.10 was a 39 year old woman with stage IB squamous carcinoma. She received a radical hysterectomy and radiotherapy after the operation. During the follow-up for one year, she was given a PET scan without any symptoms. The result showed positive lymph notes near the bladder, but neither the pelvic examination nor the CT scan showed a pelvic mass. The patient was followed-up for 5 years and all the examinations were normal.

Discussion

It is important to diagnose a recurrence of cervical cancer as early as possible. Early diagnosis for isolated metastases can be given curative therapy. It is estimated that approximately 35% of the patients with invasive cervical cancer will have recurrent or persistent disease after therapy[1-3]. The diagnosis of recurrent cervical cancer is often difficult to establish. After radical hysterectomy, about one-fourth of recurrences occur locally in the upper part of the vagina or the area previously occupied by the cervix. The location of recurrences after radiation therapy developed 76% locally and 24% at a distance[4-6]. Unfortunately, most recurrences can not be diagnosed early. The purpose of this study was to inves-tigate the usefulness of PET scan imaging in the early detection of recurrent disease in patients previously treated for cervical cancer[7-9].

Unfortunately, women with symptomatic recurrent cervical cancer have limited treatment options and often do not survive their disease. Early detection of recurrent disease has the potential to improve survival for these women, although this remains unproven by this study. Bodurka et al.[1] have shown that for women with recurrences, survival is better for asymptomatic women compared to symptomatic women.

Havrilesky et al.[8] have reported the results similar to ours by finding sensitivity for PET scans to be 86%. Rose et al.[9] reported the sensitivity of PET scan to be 90%. Clearly PET scans are useful in detecting recurrent disease in women with cervical cancer[10-12].

Are other diagnostic evaluations better than PET, such as CT scans? In Park’s study[13], they found PET was much better than CT by reporting that the sensitivity and specificity of CT scans was 77% and 83% respectively, and the sensitivity and specificity of PET scans was 100% and 94% respectively. Rose et al.[9] indicated that PET was better than CT for lymph node detection. Unfortunately, as shown in our study, the majority of these women had disease that was no longer localized to the pelvis. CT is also an important method to detect the metastatic sites. Due to any number factors however we can not conclude whether PET scans are better than CT. Ours was a small series, and therefore it may lack adequate power to detect small differences. Also this was a retrospective study and surveillance PET scans were performed at varying intervals after treatment was completed.

It is clear that PET scan imaging is useful in the detection of recurrent cervical carcinoma in symptomatic and asymptomatic patients. PET scans post-therapy in asymptomatic patients for surveillance purposes appears promising, but it is more expensive than other procedures and must await further study with prospective, standardized protocols before it is can be recommended for routine use. To improve survival in women with recurrent cervical carcinoma is a challenge for all gynecologic clinicians.

  • Received July 11, 2007.
  • Accepted January 7, 2008.
  • Copyright © 2008 by Chinese Anti–Cancer Association

References

  1. ↵
    1. Bodurka-Bevers D,
    2. Morris M,
    3. Eifel P.
    Posttherapy surveillance of women with cervical cancer: an out come analysis. Gynecol Oncol 2000; 78: 187-193.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Philip J and
    2. William T.
    Clinical Gynecologic Oncology. Health science Asia, Elsevier Science 2002.
  2. ↵
    1. Crowe JP Jr.,
    2. Adler LP,
    3. Shenk RR, et al.
    Positron emission tomography and breast masses:comparison with clinical, mammographic, and pathological findings. Ann Surg Oncol 1994; 1: 132-140.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  3. ↵
    1. Knight SB,
    2. Delbeke D,
    3. Stewart JR, et al.
    Evaluation of pulmonary lesions with FDG-PET. Comparison of findings in patients with and without a history of prior malignancy. Chest 1996; 109: 982-988.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Grigsby PW,
    2. Siegel BA,
    3. Dehdashti F.
    Lymph node staging by positron emission tomography in patients with carcinoma of the cervix. J Clin Oncol 2001; 19: 3745-3749.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  4. ↵
    1. Chang TC,
    2. Law KS,
    3. Hong JH, et al.
    Positron emission tomography for unexplained elevation of serum squamous cell carcinoma antigen levels during followup for patients with cervical malignancies: a phase II study. Cancer 2004; 101: 164-171.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  5. ↵
    1. Unger JB,
    2. Ivy JJ,
    3. Connor P, et al.
    Detection of recurrent cervical cancer by whole body FDG PET scan in asymptomatic and symptomatic women. Gynecol Oncol 2004; 94: 212-216.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  6. ↵
    1. Havrilesky LK,
    2. Wong TZ,
    3. Secord AA, et al.
    The role of PET scanning in the detection of recurrent cervical cancer. Gynecol Oncol 2003; 90: 186-190.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  7. ↵
    1. Rose PG,
    2. Adler LP,
    3. Rodriguea M, et al.
    Position emission tomography for evaluation para-aortic nodal metastasis in locally advanced cervical cancer before surgical staging: a surgicopathologic study. J Clincal Oncol 1999; 17: 41-45.
    OpenUrl
  8. ↵
    1. Sakurai H,
    2. Suzuki Y,
    3. Nonaka T, et al.
    FDG-PET in the detection of recurrence of uterine cervical carcinoma following radiation therapy-tumor volume and FDG uptake value. Gynecol Oncol 2006; 100: 601-607.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Chung HH,
    2. Kim SK,
    3. Kim TH, et al.
    Clinical impact of FDG-PET imaging in post-therapy surveillance of uterine cervical cancer: From diagnosis to prognosis. Gynecol Oncol 2006;103:165-170.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  9. ↵
    1. Li XS and
    2. Zhou CW.
    Summary of the evaluation of CT, MRI and PET in Cervical cancer before the operation and during the follow-up. J Development in Cancer 2006; 2: 119-122 (Chinese).
    OpenUrl
  10. ↵
    1. Park DH,
    2. Kim KH,
    3. Park SY, et al.
    Diagnosis of recurrent uterine cervical cancer: computed tomograph versus position emission tomograph. Korean J Radiol 2000; 1: 51-55.
    OpenUrlPubMed
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Cancer Biology and Medicine: 5 (2)
Chinese Journal of Clinical Oncology
Vol. 5, Issue 2
April 2008
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Print
Download PDF
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Cancer Biology & Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Detection of Recurrent Cervical Cancer by Whole-body FDG PET Scans
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Cancer Biology & Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Cancer Biology & Medicine web site.
Citation Tools
Detection of Recurrent Cervical Cancer by Whole-body FDG PET Scans
Jiaxin Yang, Jinhui Wang, Zhaohui Zhu, Keng Shen, Bocheng Wang
Chinese Journal of Clinical Oncology Apr 2008, 5 (2) 125-127; DOI: 10.1007/s11805-008-0125-0

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Detection of Recurrent Cervical Cancer by Whole-body FDG PET Scans
Jiaxin Yang, Jinhui Wang, Zhaohui Zhu, Keng Shen, Bocheng Wang
Chinese Journal of Clinical Oncology Apr 2008, 5 (2) 125-127; DOI: 10.1007/s11805-008-0125-0
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Introduction
    • Patients and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Pemetrexed Monotherapy and Pemetrexed Plus Platinum Combination Therapy as Non-First-Line Treatments for Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
  • Multi-Targeted Therapies in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
  • Radiotherapy in Non-Functioning Pituitary Macroadenoma: Mansoura Experience
Show more Research Article

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • tomography
  • emission-computed
  • positron
  • 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose
  • recurrent cervical cancer

Navigate

  • Home
  • Current Issue

More Information

  • About CBM
  • About CACA
  • About TMUCIH
  • Editorial Board
  • Subscription

For Authors

  • Instructions for authors
  • Journal Policies
  • Submit a Manuscript

Journal Services

  • Email Alerts
  • Facebook
  • RSS Feeds
  • Twitter

 

© 2025 Cancer Biology & Medicine

Powered by HighWire