Abstract
OBJECTIVE To observe the clinical effect of Biafine cream in preventing and treating radioactive skin destruction of nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) patients induced by synchronized intensity-modulated radiotherapy and chemotherapy.
METHODS The patients were treated with Varian-600CD 6 MV X-ray three-dimensional (3D) conformal intensity-modulation radiotherapy (IMRT), with a 120-blade multiple leaf-blade grating and in combination with synchronal Capecitabine chemotherapy. Fifty-one patients undergoing radiotherapy and chemotherapy were randomized into 2 groups: 25 in the treatment group received a Biafine cream application following the first radiotherapy and / or chemotherapy, while the other 26, served as controls. They received no application of the cream, but only followed normal procedures for conventional radiotherapy and health education.
RESULTS The rate of the skin-reaction was 100% in the patients of both groups. A mild radiation reaction (grade-I and II) occurred as follows: 88.0% (22/25 cases) in the treatment group and 57.7% (15/26 cases) in the control group. A grade-III radiation reaction developed in 12.0% (3/25 cases) in the treatment group, and 42.3% (11/26 cases) in the controls. There was a significant difference, P<0.01 between the two groups. Concerning the degree of the skin response before the patients received a dose of 40 Gy, the radiation reaction emerged in 32.0% (8/25) of the cases in the treatment group, and in 96.2% (25/26) of the cases of the control group.
CONCLUSION Biafine cream can effectively reduce the acute irradiation or chemotherapy-induced dermal injury. It can alleviate the patients’ suffering, improve their quality of life, and can ensure less injurious radiotherapy.
keywords
- nasopharyngeal carcinoma
- synchronized radiotherapy and chemotherapy
- radiation injury
- radiation protection agent
Introduction
Radiation therapy (RT) is the major therapeutic tool for treating nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) patients. Simple RT can achieve a favorable response for patients at an early stage, with a 5-year survival rate of over 90%. However, concerning Stage-III and IV patients accounting for 70% of the first visit cases, simple RT is not adequate. The local recurrence and distant metastasis rate may reach up to 40%~50%, and the 5-year survival only ranges from 20% to 30%[1]. Intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT), as a type of advanced technology, was developed because of demand. Ideally it can focus on any form of the radiation target, maximally protect sensitive normal tissues in or outside the target area, and can raise the local control rate, without an increase in complications in normal tissue. IMRT is on the leading edge of tumor radiotherapy in the 21th century[2].
Over the past few years, owing to the technical advantages of IMRT, this method has been widely used in radiation-treatment of tumors, such as NPC, prostate carcinoma, breast and lung cancer, etc.[3] With the premise of improving the local control rate, researchers in China and overseas have been unremittingly studying IMRT-chemotherapeutic combined regimens to reduce the distant metastasis rate and to further upgrade survival. Positive results from metaanalysis[4-6] and 6 clinical test centers have shown that synchronal radiation therapy and chemotherapy can promote the overall tumor-free survival rates of patients with locally advanced NPC.
Nowadays synchronal radiation treatment and/or chemotherapy, in combination with adjuvant chemo-therapy, is employed as the standard treatment plan for locally advanced NPC in America and European countries[6].
In addition to the lethal effects of radiation and chemotherapeutics on tumor cells, radioactive damage to normal tissues, including skin destruction, can also occur. This is especially true when chemotherapy and radiotherapy are simultaneously administered and a cutaneous reaction frequently develops in the patients[7]. Based on the retrospective analysis of the clinical records and reports from the Sunnybrook Cancer Center, Toronto, Canada[8], obvious skin reactions occurred in about 80% of the patients following chemotherapy with concomitant radiotherapy, including a considerable moist excoriation, which required locally-applied cream and/or supportive care to allow completion of the radiotherapy. Recently in our department, Biafine cream was used with satisfactory results in prevention of radioactive damage to the patients with NPC who underwent concurrent radiochemotherapy.
Materials and Methods
General data
From January 2006 to April 2007, 51 first-visit patients were hospitalized in our department owing to a final pathologic diagnosis of poorly-differentiated squamous NPC. Complete data for these patients was available. According to the Chinese 1992 staging system[3], the T1~4 N0~3M0 patients were randomly divided into two groups, i.e., a control group and a medicated group. There were 26 patients in the control group, with 20 males and 6 females. Their ages ranged from 32 to 75 years, with a median age of 48. The clinical stages included 16 Stage-III and 10 Stage-IV cases. There were 25 patients in the medication group, 18 males and 7 females, with ages ranging from 28 to 76 years and a median of 44. The clinical stages included 14 Stage-III and 11 Stage-IV cases.
Treatment methods
3D conformal modulating radiotherapy was used for both groups by applying the following techniques: ①mask fixation was attached to the patient’s head, neck and shoulder, and the Philips MX 8000 big pore diameter spiral CT employed to perform an enhancement scanning of a 2.5-mm layer thickness. The image was transmitted onto a Varian Somavision computer platform by the Varis network system; ② the irradiation scope was devised based on the lesion, the gross tumor volume (GTV), clinical target volume (CTV) and planning target volume (PTV) etc., as well as defining the organs to be protected; ③a radiotherapeutic schedule was planed using the Eclipse reverse treatment planning system; ④full-range modulated radiotherapy was performed following the radiotherapeutic plan that was validated by a senior radiotherapist.
The radioactive source was produced by a Varian-600CD linear accelerator emitting 6 MV-X-rays, and a 120-blade multi leaf-blade grating was employed, with a sliding-window mode to implement the intensity-modulation irradiation. After the first-phase irradiation at a dose of 56~60 Gy, CT reexamination was conducted, with a reduced field and an increased dose of 70~78 Gy at the nasopharynx. The median dose was 70 Gy. The treatment dose range was from 60 to 70 Gy for the patients with lymph node swelling in the neck. A prophylactic irradiation dose of 56 Gy was applied for those without lymph node swelling.
Concomitant chemotherapy was used. During the radiotherapy, Capecitabine was taken orally at a dose of 750~1,500 mg/m2 from day 1 to 14, and was repeated at days 28~42. There was no statistically significant difference in comparing sex, age, pathogenetic condition, applied irradiation field and radiation dose between the patients of the two groups (P>0.05).
The radiation protection methods included: ①routine normal procedures: at the beginning of and during the course of radiotherapy, identical application of the radiotherapy was conducted for the patients of both groups, i.e. the patients were instructed to have their hair cut, to shave their beard and to trim their nails prior to radiotherapy. If itching occured, regional patting was used, but scratching on the skin was not permitted. The patients were advised to keep the area of their skin that had been irradiated clean and dry. They were advised to wear soft, loose-bodied cotton-yarn underwear, with a large collar, to avoid friction. They were advised to stay out of the sunlight, as far as possible to prevent sweating in the summer, and try to avoid strong cleaning agents such as soap etc. when having a bath. Cooled or superheated water as well as rubbing of the skin, with a towel was to be avoid. Placing sticky fabrics on the irradiated sites was disallowed, and application of excitant ointments or other drugs on the skin of the irradiated region also was not permitted. The diet for these patients was to consist of easily digestible foods with a high protein and vitamin content, fresh vegetables and fruits, as well as ample drinking water, but hot and spicy food was to be avoided.
②Medication: following the first radiotherapy in the medicated group, Biafine cream was immediately applied on the skin of the irradiated area, with a range 1 cm larger than the treated area. The thickness of the cream was about 1~2 mm, so that the surface of the skin could not be seen. Light rubbing was needed to enhance absorption of the Biafine by the skin, and was repeated in the morning and in the evening each day, until the radiotherapy was completed. During the radiation therapy, applications of the Biafine cream were stopped at least 4 h before the radiotherapy that day, and towels, or dry absorbent gauze and cotton swab were used to promptly wipe off the remaining ointment, or to wash off the drug. In the control group, the usual care was conducted, without any applied ointment.
Evaluation of the patient’s skin in both groups was conducted, so as to observe and record the time, degree and duration of the skin reaction. Over the whole time period, i.e. from the start of the chemotherapy to the end of the radiotherapy, the average therapeutic time was 53 days, ranging from 46 to 62 days.
Observation index
Based on the SOMA scorings[2], in a degree-I skin reaction skin erythema and pigmentation will occur, and in degree-II cases a dry desquamation develops. A moist excoriation is apparent in the degree-III cases, with an exposed dermis and exoserosis. Pain will occur in the radiotherapy area, and all skin reactions are found on both sides of the neck.
Statistical analysis
SPSS 11.0 software was used to compare the two groups, and a precise χ2 test was conducted. A value of P<0.05 indicated a significant difference between the two groups.
Results
Incidence rate of skin reactions
The incidence rate of skin reactions in the two groups was 100%. However, the severity of the reaction was significantly lower in the medicated group compared to the control group (P=0.01). See Table 1.
Incidence rate of skin reactions in the two groups (%).
Slight radiation reactions (degree-I plus II) developed in 88.0% ( 22/25 cases) of the patients in the medicated group and 57.7% (15/26 cases) in the control group, while degree-III radiation reactions respectively attained 12.0% (3/25 cases) and 42.3% (11/26 cases) in the medicated and control groups. There was a significant difference between the two groups. Severe radiation reactions, i.e. wet reaction (WR) occurred in 3 cases of the medicated group. Effusion was reduced at day one after medication, and incrustation occurred on day 3, with disappearance of pain. From day 5 or 6, the scab fell off and fresh skin formed. There was no need to withdraw radiotherapy, due to skin reactions, in these cases of the medicated group. Severe radiation reactions (WR) occurred in 11 of the control group cases, so radio-therapy had to be discontinued in 6 of these 11 cases. Debridement, change of dressing and application of hydropathic compresses with Chinese herbal drugs were used to treat the 6 patients with radiotherapy withdrawal. They received high-flow oxygen therapy on the destroyed skin area and general administration of antibiotics. The patients receiving the therapy and antibiotics fully recovered 1 or 2 weeks later.
Rate of skin reactions related to the irradiation dosage
The response rates were 32.0% (8/25 cases) and 96.2% (25/26 cases) respectively in the medicated and the control groups, and all skin reactions occurred before the exposure dose of 40 Gy. See Table 2.
Relation of the rate of skin reactions to the irradiation dosage (%).
Discussion
There is a high risk for NPC in China and countries of south-eastern Asia, with radiotherapy being the treatment of choice[4]. In the past, the shortcomings of conventional radiotherapy for NPC include the following: ①a high dose and too large of an irradiated volume; ②an inhomogeneous distribution of the dose at the target site; ③it is difficult to enhance the dose at the target site, which prevents an increase in the local control rate; ④a dose overlapping or gap at the junction between the neighboring fields; ⑤an exorbitant dose to normal tissues and critical organs, and ⑥a conspicuous tissue reaction in the morning and evening.
As a new technology, the IMRT technique attains a concordance between a uniform high-dose 3D area and the target site. Moreover, different doses of irradiation can be given at different target sites, and its advantage lies in the ability to treat complicated clinical foci. Concomitant boosts of irradiation area are permitted, which can produce the effects of a synchronal accelerated modulation radiotherapy. With the same treatment frequency, different doses were given in various related target sites. It has been confirmed by several studies from China and overseas[9,10] that with conformal IMRT of NPC, one can raise the irradiation dose to the tumor, reduce injury at peripheral normal tissues, enhance the local control rate and attain an improvement in the patient’s quality of life. Previous reports showed that[11] up to September 30, 2006, there were 52 hospitals in China, including 115 IMRT clinics and departments, which provided radiotherapy. Use of IMRT has gradually increased in clinical practice in China.
The radiotherapeutic target sites for NPC include the nasopharynx and drainage area of the neck lymph node. With an increase in the radiation dose, injury on the skin will become more severe, resulting in a failure of dermal basal cells to produce new cells, and a loss of mature epithelial cells. If the desquamated surface is not replenished rapidly enough, skin destruction (SD) will occur. At the same time, the incidence of radiodermatitis will be high, because the neck skin is tender and is frequently affected by friction of the fixed face guard during the course of radiotherapy. Following concomitant chemotherapy and radiotherapy, the incidence of radiodermatitis will rise and the reaction enhanced. So, under these conditions the radiotherapy is usually suspended, and symptomatic treatments applied, such as taking a rest and providing anti-inflammatory treatment etc. The biologic effects of radiotherapy are decreased which adds new suffering to the patients, affects their quality of life, and even more has an impact on survival rate and time of tumor management, resulting in a decrease in the curative effect of local control of the tumor.
Over the past few years, several topical remedies have shown to lessen the symptoms of radiodermatitis. These drugs include the following: an epidermal growth factor preparation, antibacterial agents (i.e. sulfadiazine), hormones, vitamins, and Chinese herbal drugs etc.[12] It has been clear, following retrieval of the literature on radiation-induced toxicity, that there is no general standard therapeutic regimen for preventing irradiation-evoked dermal toxicity[12]. Therefore, the treatment methods for controlling this dermal toxicity can only be derived from clinical experience, and a physician’s propensity to use topical remedies.
Since 1976, Biafine has been used to treat radiodermatitis[13], and since then this drug is being used more and more in cancer radiotherapy centers. Biafine is a water-based cream which was developed and produced by the French Medix drug company. It can quicken skin wound healing and relieve radiodermatitis symptoms[14]. The process of Biafine production includes both an aqueous and oil phase. The aqueous phase contains demineralized water (75.5%), algin (0.70%) and triethanolamine (TEA) (67%). The antiseptic agents include potassium sorbate (10%), sodium methyl hydroxybenzoate (0.1%), sodium propyl methyl hydroxybenzoate (0.05%) and stearic acid TEA. The oil phase contains liquid paraffin (6.85%), ethylene-glycol stearate (3.63%), propylene glycol (2.3%), solid paraffin (1.6%), squalene (1.5%), avocado oil (1.0%), palmitic acid hexadecanol-ester (0.35%) and aromatic spices (0.13%).
Biafine deeply moisturizes the skin, and provides a good environment for dermal self-renovation. Its dual effects of cleaning and drainage can increase the skin blood flow rate to remove exudate, to improve dermal metabolism, to replenish the desquamated epidermal cells, and to promote regeneration and replenishment of the impaired cells. It also alters the ratio between interleukin 1 and interleukin 6, to stimulate fibroblast proliferation and to increase collagenic synthesis. In addition, Biafine is not greasy, is convenient to use and washes off without an uncomfortable feeling.
Several papers related to the application of Biafine and the prevention of radiodermatitis have been pub-lished in China. For instance, Sun et al.[15] reported that the incidence of skin reactions was respectively 93.8% and 30.4% in a control group and a medicated group (Biafine group). Low-grade radiation reactions, i.e., degree-I and II were 66.7% (32/48 cases) and 28.6% (16/56 cases) in the control and the medicated groups. It was reported in other studies[16] that in 41 cases of a Biafine-treated group, acute degree-I radioactive skin reaction was found in 9, and degree-II in 32. No reaction of degree-III or above was found in the group. In 40 cases of the control group, a degree-I reaction was found in 3 and degree-II in 28. In 9 of these 40 cases, the therapy was discontinued for 7 to 13 days, owing to a reaction of degree-III or over degree-III. After the Ridit analysis, there was a statistical significance between the two groups (P<0.01). It was reported by Wu and Zhu[17] that the incidence of acute degree-I radioactive injury on the skin of neck was 62.5% (15/24 cases) and 33.3% (9/27 cases) respectively in a medicated and control group. The incidence of a degree-II reaction was 25.0% (6/24 cases) and 44.4% (12/27 cases) respectively in the medicated and the control group, while the incidence of degree-III injury was 12.5 % (3/24 cases) in the treated group and 22.3 % (6/27 cases) in the control group. Among the above, there was a significant difference in the extent of degree-I radioactive dermal injury between the two groups (P<0.05).
For the patients in our study, the incidence of skin reactions was 100%. However, the severity was obvi-ously lower in the Biafine-treated group compared to the control group (P=0.01). The incidence of slight radiation reactions (degree-I plus II) was 88.0% (22/25 cases) and 57.7% (15/26 cases) respectively in the medicated and control groups, and degree-III radiation reactions occurred in 12.0% (3/25 cases) of the patients in the treated group and 42.3% (11/26 cases) in the control group. These results might be in contrast to the literature, probably because of a very high radiation dose to neck and joint chemotherapy. A severe radiation reaction (wet reaction) occurred in 3 cases of the medicated group. Exudation decreased at day 1 after medication, and incrustation formed and pain vanished at day 3. At day 5 or day 6 following the medication, decrustation occurred and fresh skin emerged. In the cases of the medicated group, no discontinuance of radiotherapy was required. In the control group, severe radiation reactions (wet reaction) were present in 11 cases. In 6 of the 11 cases, radiotherapy was suspended, debridement and a change of dressing, as well as herbal hydropathic compress were applied, with high-flow oxygen therapy on the destroyed skin and general administration of antibiotics. The patients receiving the therapy and antibiotics fully recovered 1 or 2 weeks later. In our group, the effect of Biafine cream indicated that the onset of skin reactions in the NPC patients receiving concomitant radiotherapy and chemotherapy was delayed compared to the control group, and only acute degree-I and II radioactive SD occurred on the neck of most patients. Application of Biafine can accelerate healing of degree-III skin reactions and lessen the patient’s pain.
Previously it was reported[17] that skin reactions occurred in 29.4% (5/17) of a Biafine-treated group of patients and 91.1% (41/45) in the controls before reaching 40 Gy of irradiation. In our study, the reactions occurred in 32.0% (8/25) of the medicated group and 96.2% (25/26) of the controls before a dose of 40 Gy, P<0.001, results which were close to the reports from the literature. These findings showed that application of the Biafine cream delayed the emergence of acute radioactive SD, and radioactive SD was not aggravated following the adjuvant chemotherapy. Moreover, when Biafine cream was used, the toxic reaction was not found in all patients of the medicated group. During the whole period of radiotherapy, the patients could engage in some physical activities such as neck revolution etc., after applying Biafine cream. These activities played an important role in lightening the post-radiotherapeutic fibrosis and sclerosis of the neck, thus improving the patients’ quality of life. So, after radiotherapy and chemotherapy, Biafine cream should be applied on the first day to protect the NPC patient’s skin, until end of the radiotherapy. It can enhance the tolerance of the patient’s skin, postpone the radiotherapy-induced skin reaction, and can decrease the degree of the reaction. The cream can effectively treat and prevent the degree-I, II and III radioactive SD, and aid in the smooth proceeding of radiotherapy.
In summary, following application of the Biafine cream, a degree-I or II radiodermatitis occurs in most of the NPC patients receiving concomitant chemotherapy with radiotherapy. However, when Biafine is used, the toxicity to the skin will not prolong the time of therapy or require the treatment to cease. Our prospective study shows that prophylaxis with Biafine for radioactive dermatofibrosis delayed the time of emergence of radioactive dermatofibrosis. Use of this cream should be practiced along with concurrent chemotherapy and radiotherapy.
- Received October 22, 2007.
- Accepted January 4, 2008.
- Copyright © 2008 by Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute & Hospital and Springer