Abstract
OBJECTIVE To study the relationship among microsatellite instability (MSI), frameshift mutations (FM) of the transforming growth factor β receptor II (TGFβR II), méthylation state of the hMLFU promoter and hMLFU protein expression level In gastric cancers, and to explore their relationship to gastric carcinogenesis.
METHODS DNA was isolated from 101 gastric specimens and 5 microsatelllte loci were detected. PCR, electrophoresis on denatured polyacrylamide gels and silver staining were performed to detect the MSI. The FMs of TGFβR II were also screened with the same method. HMLFU méthylation was analyzed by méthylation specific PCR (MSP) and sequencing. HMLH1 protein expression was detected using immunohistochemistry.
RESULTS The Incidence of MSIs was 53.7% and 0% in the cancers and normal tissues, respectively, with the frequency of MSIs being significantly higher in the gastric cancers compared to the normal gastric tissues (P<0.05). The frequency of hMLH1 méthylation was 41.5% (17/41 ) in the gastric cancers and 0%(0/60) in the normal group. Decreased hMLH1 expression was observed In 94.1%(16/17) of cases exhibiting méthylation. FMs of TGFβR II were Identified in 5 (62.5%) of the 8 samples with MSIH. In contrast, FMs were not found in MSI-L or microsatellite stable (MSS) cases.
CONCLUSION MSIs and FMs of TGFβR II may play an important role In gastric carcinogenesis. HMLH1 méthylation is an important modification of the DNA which results in inactivation of hMLH1 and mismatch repair defects which lead to MSIs and FMs of TGFβR II.
keywords
- gastric cancer
- microsatellite instability
- methylation specific PCR
- HMLH1 transforming growth factor β receptor II
Gastric carcinogenesis is based on the development of genomic instability. One form of genomic instability, MSI, has been identified in many tumors.[1] MSI comprises length mutations in tandem oligonucleotide repeats, which are believed to be a failure of the DNA mismatch repair (MMR) system’s ability to correct errors during the replication of DNA. This leads to the accumulation of nucleotide mutations and alterations in the length of microsatellite sequences. [2] Gastrointestinal tumors with DNA MMR defects often display MSI and FMs. Recent studies indicate that defects in MMR result in frequent FMs of the TGFβR II gene.[3] TGFβR II is a candidate tumor suppressor gene, and the interaction of TGFβR II with TGF suggests its involvement in the control of proliferation suppression of tumorigenicity inducement of cell cycle arrest at the G1 phase and cell apoptosis. [4] MSI and FM represent a late with the absence of the MMR gene, hMLHl.[5,6] In sporadic endometrial carcinomas, loss of hMLHl expression is frequently the result of hyperméthylation of the hMLHl gene. The hMLHl protein, a MMR enzyme, maintains the fidelity of the genome during cellular proliferation. It acts as a 'molecular matchmaker', recruiting other DNA-repair proteins to the MMR complex. Dysfunction of hMLHl leads to MSI and FM.
To clarify possible mechanisms in gastric cancer development, in this study we evaluated the level of MSI, TGFβRII gene FMs, the expression of the hMLHl and the méthylation of the hMLHl promoter in gastric cancers and normal gastric tissues.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Specimens and QNA extraction
A total of 101 gastric cancers and normal mucosas were obtained from patients undergoing surgery in the General Hospital, Tianjin, China. Genomic DNA was isolated by a standard phenol-chloroform extraction protocol.[7]
MSP and DNA sequencing of the hMLHl gene
HMLHl méthylation was detected by MSP as described previously.[8] The purified MSP products were directly cycle-sequenced using a Becman CEQ 2000 according to the manufacturer’s instructions.
Determination of MSI
MSI analysis was performed on all cases using 5 mi-crosatellite loci recommended by the National Cancer Institute workshop.[9] The PCR products were electrophoresed on 8% denaturing polyacrylamide gels (PAGE) followed by silver staining. Samples producing PCR products of abnormal sizes of electrophoretic mobility at 2 or more of the 5 loci analyzed were considered as MSI-high (MSI-H), whereas those showing a shift in one locus were classified as MSI-low (MSI-L). The remaining samples, lacking MSI events, were designated to be microsatellite stable (MSS).
Detection the FM of TGFβR II
A 149-bp region encompassing the (A) 10 tract in the TGFβR II gene was amplified with primers 5-TAG AAC AGT TTG CCA TGA C-3' and 5'-GTT GTA TTG CAC TCA TCA G-3'. The presence of TGFβR II FM was investigated by PCR followed by PAGE as described above. The presence of bandshifts or an additional band was interpreted as a FM of TGFβR II.
Immunohistochemistry
Immunostaining for hMLHl was performed on all of the cases using the standard streptavidin-biotin-peroxidase complex method as described previously.[10] The stains were graded: (a) negative or weak positive, no stained cells or <30% of the entire population of cells stained; (b) positive, >30% of the entire population of cells stained.
Statistical analysis
Statistical analysis was performed using a two-tailed x2 or Fisher’s exact test. A P<0.05 was considered to represent a statistically significant difference.
RESULTS
MSI
A total of 101 samples were analyzed for MSI status by 5 microsatellite markers, BAT26, D2S123, D3S1067, D3S1577 and D17S250. In 41 gastric cancer samples, 22 (53.7%) were MSI, 8 (19.5%) were MSI-H and 14 (34.2%) were MSI-L. However none were MSI in normal gastric mucosa samples. A significant difference in frequency of MSI was observed between these 2 groups (P<0.05). Furthermore, the frequency of MSI and MSI-H in samples with hMLHl méthylation was much higher than that in unmethylated samples (P<0.05, Tables 1~3, Fig. 1.
FMs of TGFβR II
FMs of TGFβR II were identified in 5 MSI-H samples with hMLHl méthylation, but no mutations were detected in MSI-L, MSS or normal gastric mucosa samples (Table 2, Fig. 2).
HMLHl promoter méthylation analysis
Results of hMLHl promoter hyperméthylation assays versus MSI studies are summarized in Tables 1~3 and Fig. 3. We demonstrated that hMLHl méthylation occurred in 0 (0%) of 60 normal samples and 17 of 41 (41.5%) gastric cancers. Sixteen of these 17 cases had loss of the hMLHl protein. All of the 8 MSI-H cases were consistent with hMLHl méthylation and decreased expression. Nine of 14 (64.2%) MSI-L showed hMLHl méthylation and none of 79 MSS patients exhibited hMLHl promoter hyperméthylation (PP<0.05 for MSI-H or MSI-L versus MSS).'
Direct sequencing of the methylated DNA PCR products confirmed the retention of cytosines at all CpGs within the PCR product, whereas single isolated cytosines were all converted to thymines in the DNA PCR products Fig. 4.
Immunohistochemistry
Decreased hMLHl expression was noted in 16 of 17 (94.1%) hMLHl methylated samples, 8 of 8 (100%) MSI-H cases and 16 of 41 (39.0%) gastric cancers, but only 1 of 84 (1.2%) unmethylated samples, 0 of 79 (0%) MSS cases and 1 of 60 (1.7%) normal gastric samples respectively (P<0.05). These results show that decreased hMLHl expression was associated with hMLHl promoter hyperméthylation, MSI-H and gastric cancers. (Tables 1~3).
DISCUSSION
Approximately 10-15% of gastrointestinal tumors are caused by defective MMR, characterized by the presence of MSI and the absence of protein expression for any of the various genes involved in DNA MMR.[11] In fact MMR gene defects do not provide mutated cells with a direct selective advantage, but rather increase the probability of mutations in other genes that other-wise would occur at low frequency. In our research, we found that MSI occurred in more than 50% of sporadic gastric carcinomas, accompanied by hMLHl méthylation at a high frequency (41.5%). In contrast, MSI and hMLHl méthylation were not detected in normal gastric tissue samples, and MSI-H was exclusively associated with hMLHl hyperméthylation which was rare in MSS and MSI-L samples. Furthermore, the majority of gastric carcinomas with hMLHl méthylation exhibited decreased hMLHl protein expression. Thse findings show that hMLHl promoter hyperméthylation is associated with hMLHl transcriptional inactivation and MMR deficiency, suggesting that hMLHl méthylation and MSI are very important mechanisms in gastric carcinogenesis.
HMLHl méthylation and MSI were noted in 1 case of carcinoma in situ and 2 cases of early gastric carcinoma, which strongly suggests that hyperméthylation of hMLHl and MSI are initial vital events in gastric carcinogenesis. The lesions with hMLHl hyperméthylation and MSI may be more prone to develop carcinoma. lino et al.[12]have also reported on cases of serrated adenoma with hMLHl hyperméthylation leading to MSI-H cancer. Taken together, these findings suggest that epigenetic silencing of hMLHl may play an important role in initiation of gastric cancer, which, after subsequent inactivation of hMLHl, is required for entry into the pathway leading to microsatellite-unstable gastric cancer. HMLHl méthylation may represent an early event in gastric oncogenesis that culminates in disordered DNA MMR.
Tumor cells with an inactivated MMR system often exhibit marked MSI. However, because most microsatellites are noncoding, mutations of such sequences are thought to only reflect MMR defects rather than participate in tumor development. A direct oncogenetic effect of a high mutation rate in coding regions has recently been suggested for the TGFβR II gene, which is often observed in cancers exhibiting MSI (+). The new candidate tumor suppressor gene, TGFβR II, which is also targeted for MMR defects, was identified. The TGFβ-TGFβR II signaling system is important in growth regulation and cancer progression. [B1 The TGFβR family is divided into 3 groups: TGFβR I, TGFβR II and TGFβR III. TGFβR II phosphorylâtes TGFβR I, which activates TGFβR I kinase and initiates downstream signaling. So the normal function of the TGFβR II is the most important factor when the TGF beta signaling system fulfills its biological role, such as arresting the cell in the G1 phase, suppressing the growth of certain cancer cells, induction of apoptosis and inhibition of proliferation.
A lack of the expression of TGF and/or TGFβR II, as well as mutations of the related genes have been reported in human and animal malignancies[14] These abnormalities were considered to be the cause of interruption of the growth signal from TGF to the cell nucleus, resulting in the uncontrolled growth of the involved cells. In gastric and ovarian cancers, the loss of TGFβ growth inhibition has been attributed to mutations of TGFβR II.[15] Understanding the molecular mechanisms of gastric epithelial cell transformation and escape from normal growth regulation is critical to the discovery of effective methods for gastric cancer prevention, detection, and cure.
FMs in the TGFβR II gene were frequently detected in gastric cancers with hMLHl méthylation and MSI-H phenotype in our study. These mutations will likely yield truncated, non-functional proteins, resulting in the loss of both growth inhibition and apoptotic responses by TGFβ, which would favor tumor formation. Therefore, the inactivation of this receptor may be an important step in tumorigenesis. In our study, TGFβR II mutations in 5 (62.5%) of the 8 MSI-H tumors but in none of the MSI-L or MSS gastric cases, indicate that these mutations are specific for MSI-H tumors that exhibit a tendency to accumulate FMs. Our study has shown that gastric cancers with hMLHl méthylation accumulate MSI and FMs within the TGFβR II gene. There have been reports regarding TGF effects which support the concert that TGF is involved in cancer invasion and metastasis.[15] We suggest that one of the molecular features of the malignant epithelium is an acquired resistance to the antiproliferative effects of TGF-β because mutated TGFβR II could neither bind to TGF nor play its role. Insensitivity to TGF-mediated growth arrest will lead to a cellular malignant phenotype.
On the basis of our findings, we can conclude that hMLHl hyperméthylation correlates well with its transcriptional silence and MMR defects, which lead to MSI and TGFβR II FMs. MSI and TGFβR II are the targets of MMR defects, so detection of hMLHl méthylation, MSI and TGFβRII FMs may be useful in early diagnosis of gastric cancer.
- Received March 6, 2006.
- Accepted June 20, 2006.
- Copyright © 2006 by Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute & Hospital and Springer