Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • About
    • About CBM
    • Editorial Board
    • Announcement
  • Articles
    • Ahead of print
    • Current Issue
    • Archive
    • Collections
    • Cover Story
  • For Authors
    • Instructions for Authors
    • Resources
    • Submit a Manuscript
  • For Reviewers
    • Become a Reviewer
    • Instructions for Reviewers
    • Resources
    • Outstanding Reviewer
  • Subscription
  • Alerts
    • Email Alerts
    • RSS Feeds
    • Table of Contents
  • Contact us
  • Other Publications
    • cbm

User menu

  • My alerts

Search

  • Advanced search
Cancer Biology & Medicine
  • Other Publications
    • cbm
  • My alerts
Cancer Biology & Medicine

Advanced Search

 

  • Home
  • About
    • About CBM
    • Editorial Board
    • Announcement
  • Articles
    • Ahead of print
    • Current Issue
    • Archive
    • Collections
    • Cover Story
  • For Authors
    • Instructions for Authors
    • Resources
    • Submit a Manuscript
  • For Reviewers
    • Become a Reviewer
    • Instructions for Reviewers
    • Resources
    • Outstanding Reviewer
  • Subscription
  • Alerts
    • Email Alerts
    • RSS Feeds
    • Table of Contents
  • Contact us
  • Follow cbm on Twitter
  • Visit cbm on Facebook
Review ArticleReview
Open Access

Circadian-driven transcriptional programs govern metastatic progression

Jie Wang, Hao Pan, Xuan Wang, Yuru Ren, Yiwen Huang, Yizhou Liu, Hejin Lai, Zhimin Fei, Ning Pu and Yu Wang
Cancer Biology & Medicine September 2026, 23 (9) 1213-1229; DOI: https://doi.org/10.20892/j.issn.2095-3941.2025.0491
Jie Wang
1Department of Chinese Medicine & Integrative Medicine, Shanghai Geriatric Medical Center, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai 201104, China
2Department of Chinese Medicine & Integrative Medicine, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai 200030, China
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Hao Pan
3Department of Neurosurgery, Shuguang Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shanghai 201203, China
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Xuan Wang
4Endocrinology Department, Shanghai Municipal Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shanghai 200071, China
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Yuru Ren
5Department of Peripheral Vascular Surgery, Shuguang Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shanghai 201203, China
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Yiwen Huang
4Endocrinology Department, Shanghai Municipal Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shanghai 200071, China
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Yizhou Liu
6Department of Neurology, Shuguang Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shanghai 201203, China
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Hejin Lai
7CAS Key Laboratory of Nutrition, Metabolism and Food Safety, Shanghai Institute of Nutrition and Health, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai 200031, China
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Zhimin Fei
3Department of Neurosurgery, Shuguang Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shanghai 201203, China
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Zhimin Fei
  • For correspondence: tommyfei{at}126.com npu15{at}fudan.edu.cn yummy0326{at}163.com
Ning Pu
8Department of Pancreatic Surgery, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai 200032, China
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Ning Pu
  • For correspondence: tommyfei{at}126.com npu15{at}fudan.edu.cn yummy0326{at}163.com
Yu Wang
6Department of Neurology, Shuguang Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shanghai 201203, China
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Yu Wang
  • For correspondence: tommyfei{at}126.com npu15{at}fudan.edu.cn yummy0326{at}163.com
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • The TTFL of circadian rhythm. The circadian clock is organized around the TTFL composed of three interlocked regulatory loops that coordinate rhythmic gene expression across the day–night cycle. 1. Core feedback loop: During the daytime, the heterodimeric transcription factors, CLOCK and BMAL1, bind to E-box elements in the nucleus, activating the transcription of core CLOCK genes, including PERs and CRYs, as well as CLOCK-controlled genes, such as DBP, RORs, and REV-ERBs. Newly synthesized PER and CRY proteins accumulate in the cytoplasm during the night, where CK1 phosphorylates PER proteins, regulating the stability and timing of nuclear entry. Phosphorylated PER/CRY complexes translocate into the nucleus and inhibit CLOCK/BMAL1-mediated transcription. Subsequently, PER and CRY proteins are ubiquitinated and degraded by the proteasome, thereby relieving negative feedback and allowing a new circadian cycle to begin. 2. Secondary feedback loop: In the secondary feedback loop, CLOCK/BMAL1-driven transcription induces the nuclear receptors, REV-ERBs and RORs, which competitively bind to same ROREs in the promoters of circadian genes. Through RORE-dependent mechanisms, REV-ERBs repress whereas RORs activate BMAL1 transcription, thereby stabilizing oscillatory amplitude and phase. Beyond regulating core clock components, RORE-mediated signaling contributes to the phase-aligned expression of downstream clock-associated regulators, including NFIL3, providing a temporal connection between the secondary feedback loop and D-box-dependent circadian output. 3. Third feedback loop: The loop involves DBP and NFIL3, which competitively bind to D-box elements to regulate rhythmic transcription of downstream clock-controlled genes, thereby contributing to circadian output that is temporally coordinated with ROR-mediated regulation. BMAL1, brain and muscle ARNT-like protein1; CK1, casein kinase 1; CLOCK, circadian locomotor output cycles kaput; CRYs, cryptochromes, CRY1, CRY2; DBP, d-element-binding protein; NFIL3, nuclear factor interleukin 3; PERs, period circadian regulators, PER1, PER2, PER3; RORs, retinoic acid receptor-related orphan receptors, RORα, RORβ, RORγ; RORE, ROR response element; REV-ERBs, nuclear receptor subfamily 1 group d members, REV-ERBα, REV-ERBβ; TTFL, transcription–translation feedback loop.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 1

    The TTFL of circadian rhythm. The circadian clock is organized around the TTFL composed of three interlocked regulatory loops that coordinate rhythmic gene expression across the day–night cycle. 1. Core feedback loop: During the daytime, the heterodimeric transcription factors, CLOCK and BMAL1, bind to E-box elements in the nucleus, activating the transcription of core CLOCK genes, including PERs and CRYs, as well as CLOCK-controlled genes, such as DBP, RORs, and REV-ERBs. Newly synthesized PER and CRY proteins accumulate in the cytoplasm during the night, where CK1 phosphorylates PER proteins, regulating the stability and timing of nuclear entry. Phosphorylated PER/CRY complexes translocate into the nucleus and inhibit CLOCK/BMAL1-mediated transcription. Subsequently, PER and CRY proteins are ubiquitinated and degraded by the proteasome, thereby relieving negative feedback and allowing a new circadian cycle to begin. 2. Secondary feedback loop: In the secondary feedback loop, CLOCK/BMAL1-driven transcription induces the nuclear receptors, REV-ERBs and RORs, which competitively bind to same ROREs in the promoters of circadian genes. Through RORE-dependent mechanisms, REV-ERBs repress whereas RORs activate BMAL1 transcription, thereby stabilizing oscillatory amplitude and phase. Beyond regulating core clock components, RORE-mediated signaling contributes to the phase-aligned expression of downstream clock-associated regulators, including NFIL3, providing a temporal connection between the secondary feedback loop and D-box-dependent circadian output. 3. Third feedback loop: The loop involves DBP and NFIL3, which competitively bind to D-box elements to regulate rhythmic transcription of downstream clock-controlled genes, thereby contributing to circadian output that is temporally coordinated with ROR-mediated regulation. BMAL1, brain and muscle ARNT-like protein1; CK1, casein kinase 1; CLOCK, circadian locomotor output cycles kaput; CRYs, cryptochromes, CRY1, CRY2; DBP, d-element-binding protein; NFIL3, nuclear factor interleukin 3; PERs, period circadian regulators, PER1, PER2, PER3; RORs, retinoic acid receptor-related orphan receptors, RORα, RORβ, RORγ; RORE, ROR response element; REV-ERBs, nuclear receptor subfamily 1 group d members, REV-ERBα, REV-ERBβ; TTFL, transcription–translation feedback loop.

  • Circadian clock-specific TME that affects immune suppression and angiogenesis. Schematic illustration of how circadian clock components modulate immune suppression and angiogenesis in the TME. (A) Circadian regulation of immune suppression. Core clock genes, including BMAL1, BMAL2, CLOCK, PER2, RORα, and RORγ, influence the differentiation, function, and metabolic state of multiple immune cell populations within the TME. Circadian regulation affects CAFs, CD8+ T cells, CD4+ T cells, Tregs, DCs, and neutrophils, thereby shaping immunosuppressive signaling pathways, such as NF-κB and metabolic processes, including cholesterol metabolism. In parallel, circadian disruption, exemplified by CJL, promotes the accumulation and suppressive activity of MDSCs through the CXCL5–CXCR2 axis and impairs NK cell function via altered CD122 signaling, collectively enhancing immune suppression. (B) Circadian regulation of angiogenesis. Circadian clock components, including CLOCK, BMAL1, PER2, and RORα, regulate angiogenic processes by modulating VEGF signaling in ECs. Disruption of circadian rhythms, such as exposure to LL, enhances VEGF-driven angiogenesis, thereby facilitating tumor vascularization. BMAL1, brain and muscle ARNT-like protein1; BMAL2, brain and muscle ARNT-like protein2; CAFs, cancer-associated fibroblasts; CJL, chronic jet lag; CXCL5, C-X-C motif chemokine ligand 5; CXCR2, C-X-C motif chemokine receptor 2; DCs, dendritic cells; ECs, endothelial cells; LL, constant light; MDSCs, myeloid-derived suppressor cells; NK cells, natural killer cells; PER2, period circadian regulator 2; RORα/γ, retinoic acid receptor-related orphan receptor alpha/gamma; TME, tumor microenvironment; Tregs, regulatory T cells; VEGF, vascular endothelial growth factor.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 2

    Circadian clock-specific TME that affects immune suppression and angiogenesis. Schematic illustration of how circadian clock components modulate immune suppression and angiogenesis in the TME. (A) Circadian regulation of immune suppression. Core clock genes, including BMAL1, BMAL2, CLOCK, PER2, RORα, and RORγ, influence the differentiation, function, and metabolic state of multiple immune cell populations within the TME. Circadian regulation affects CAFs, CD8+ T cells, CD4+ T cells, Tregs, DCs, and neutrophils, thereby shaping immunosuppressive signaling pathways, such as NF-κB and metabolic processes, including cholesterol metabolism. In parallel, circadian disruption, exemplified by CJL, promotes the accumulation and suppressive activity of MDSCs through the CXCL5–CXCR2 axis and impairs NK cell function via altered CD122 signaling, collectively enhancing immune suppression. (B) Circadian regulation of angiogenesis. Circadian clock components, including CLOCK, BMAL1, PER2, and RORα, regulate angiogenic processes by modulating VEGF signaling in ECs. Disruption of circadian rhythms, such as exposure to LL, enhances VEGF-driven angiogenesis, thereby facilitating tumor vascularization. BMAL1, brain and muscle ARNT-like protein1; BMAL2, brain and muscle ARNT-like protein2; CAFs, cancer-associated fibroblasts; CJL, chronic jet lag; CXCL5, C-X-C motif chemokine ligand 5; CXCR2, C-X-C motif chemokine receptor 2; DCs, dendritic cells; ECs, endothelial cells; LL, constant light; MDSCs, myeloid-derived suppressor cells; NK cells, natural killer cells; PER2, period circadian regulator 2; RORα/γ, retinoic acid receptor-related orphan receptor alpha/gamma; TME, tumor microenvironment; Tregs, regulatory T cells; VEGF, vascular endothelial growth factor.

  • Circadian clock-specific TME that affect invasive edge. Schematic illustration of the context-dependent roles of circadian clock components in regulating tumor invasion at the invasive edge. (1) EMT initiation: At the early stage of tumor invasion, core circadian regulators, including BMAL1, CLOCK, and PER2, participate in EMT initiation. This process is associated with increased MMP2/9 expression, altered F-actin dynamics, and regulation of EMT-related transcription factors (TWIST1 and SLUG), together with TGF-β-related signaling, thereby facilitating the transition from epithelial-to-mesenchymal phenotypes. (2) Invasive edge formation: At the invasive edge, circadian regulation is associated with the CSC-like states and collective invasive behavior. The CLOCK/BMAL1 axis has been implicated in promoting invasive phenotypes through downstream signaling modules (e.g., OLFML3–LGMN–CD162), whereas negative-feedback clock components, such as REV-ERBs and PER2 are associated with the modulation of stemness-related properties. External circadian perturbation, such as CJL, may further influence tumor cell behavior at the invasive edge. BMAL1, brain and muscle ARNT-like protein 1; CLOCK, circadian locomotor output cycles kaput; CJL, chronic jet lag; EMT, epithelial–mesenchymal transition; MMP2/9, matrix metalloproteinase 2/9; PER2, period circadian regulators 2; REV-ERBs, nuclear receptor subfamily 1 group D; SLUG, snail family transcriptional repressor 2; TGFβ, transforming growth factor beta; TWIST1, twist family bHLH transcription factor 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 3

    Circadian clock-specific TME that affect invasive edge. Schematic illustration of the context-dependent roles of circadian clock components in regulating tumor invasion at the invasive edge. (1) EMT initiation: At the early stage of tumor invasion, core circadian regulators, including BMAL1, CLOCK, and PER2, participate in EMT initiation. This process is associated with increased MMP2/9 expression, altered F-actin dynamics, and regulation of EMT-related transcription factors (TWIST1 and SLUG), together with TGF-β-related signaling, thereby facilitating the transition from epithelial-to-mesenchymal phenotypes. (2) Invasive edge formation: At the invasive edge, circadian regulation is associated with the CSC-like states and collective invasive behavior. The CLOCK/BMAL1 axis has been implicated in promoting invasive phenotypes through downstream signaling modules (e.g., OLFML3–LGMN–CD162), whereas negative-feedback clock components, such as REV-ERBs and PER2 are associated with the modulation of stemness-related properties. External circadian perturbation, such as CJL, may further influence tumor cell behavior at the invasive edge. BMAL1, brain and muscle ARNT-like protein 1; CLOCK, circadian locomotor output cycles kaput; CJL, chronic jet lag; EMT, epithelial–mesenchymal transition; MMP2/9, matrix metalloproteinase 2/9; PER2, period circadian regulators 2; REV-ERBs, nuclear receptor subfamily 1 group D; SLUG, snail family transcriptional repressor 2; TGFβ, transforming growth factor beta; TWIST1, twist family bHLH transcription factor 1.

  • Circadian clock-specific TME that affect intravasation, circulation, and extravasation. Schematic illustration of how circadian clock components regulate key steps of tumor cell dissemination, including intravasation, circulation, and extravasation, through interactions with the TME, exosome-mediated communication, and CRD. (A) Intravasation. ① The CLOCK/BMAL1 heterodimer activates the expression of NRF2, thus inhibiting secretion of IL-1β in macrophage. The CLOCK/BMAL1 heterodimer binds to the E-box to maintain the mitochondrial metabolism of macrophage homeostasis. ② RORα induces the expression of CCL2, while REV-ERBα inhibits CCL2 in macrophages. ③ CRD promotes the transition of M1 macrophages to M2 macrophages. (B) Circulation. During circulation, disseminated tumor cells are exposed to a dynamic vascular environment under conditions of circadian disruption. Circadian clock components, including BMAL1, PER2, and REV-ERBα, are associated with the regulation of tumor cell interactions with endothelial cells, platelets, and immune cells within the bloodstream, which together influence tumor cell survival and behavior during circulation. (C) Extravasation. Circadian clock genes, including CLOCK, BMAL1, and PER2, regulate endothelial activation and barrier function during extravasation. Rhythmic modulation of adhesion molecules, such as ICAM-1, together with NO signaling, influences tumor cell arrest and transmigration across the endothelium. SD and CRD exacerbate endothelial dysfunction, facilitating tumor cell extravasation into distant tissues. BMAL1, brain and muscle ARNT-like protein 1; CAF, cancer-associated fibroblast; CLOCK, circadian locomotor output cycles kaput; CRD, circadian rhythm disruption; CSCs, cancer stem cells; CCL2, C-C motif chemokine ligand 2; ECs, endothelial cells; ICAM-1, intercellular adhesion molecule 1; IL-1β, interleukin-1 beta; NO, nitric oxide; NRF2, nuclear factor erythroid 2-related factor 2; PER1/2, period circadian regulators 1/2; RAB27A, RAB27A member RAS oncogene family; REV-ERBα, nuclear receptor subfamily 1 group D member 1; RORs, retinoic acid receptor-related orphan receptors; SD, sleep disruption; TME, tumor microenvironment.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 4

    Circadian clock-specific TME that affect intravasation, circulation, and extravasation. Schematic illustration of how circadian clock components regulate key steps of tumor cell dissemination, including intravasation, circulation, and extravasation, through interactions with the TME, exosome-mediated communication, and CRD. (A) Intravasation. ① The CLOCK/BMAL1 heterodimer activates the expression of NRF2, thus inhibiting secretion of IL-1β in macrophage. The CLOCK/BMAL1 heterodimer binds to the E-box to maintain the mitochondrial metabolism of macrophage homeostasis. ② RORα induces the expression of CCL2, while REV-ERBα inhibits CCL2 in macrophages. ③ CRD promotes the transition of M1 macrophages to M2 macrophages. (B) Circulation. During circulation, disseminated tumor cells are exposed to a dynamic vascular environment under conditions of circadian disruption. Circadian clock components, including BMAL1, PER2, and REV-ERBα, are associated with the regulation of tumor cell interactions with endothelial cells, platelets, and immune cells within the bloodstream, which together influence tumor cell survival and behavior during circulation. (C) Extravasation. Circadian clock genes, including CLOCK, BMAL1, and PER2, regulate endothelial activation and barrier function during extravasation. Rhythmic modulation of adhesion molecules, such as ICAM-1, together with NO signaling, influences tumor cell arrest and transmigration across the endothelium. SD and CRD exacerbate endothelial dysfunction, facilitating tumor cell extravasation into distant tissues. BMAL1, brain and muscle ARNT-like protein 1; CAF, cancer-associated fibroblast; CLOCK, circadian locomotor output cycles kaput; CRD, circadian rhythm disruption; CSCs, cancer stem cells; CCL2, C-C motif chemokine ligand 2; ECs, endothelial cells; ICAM-1, intercellular adhesion molecule 1; IL-1β, interleukin-1 beta; NO, nitric oxide; NRF2, nuclear factor erythroid 2-related factor 2; PER1/2, period circadian regulators 1/2; RAB27A, RAB27A member RAS oncogene family; REV-ERBα, nuclear receptor subfamily 1 group D member 1; RORs, retinoic acid receptor-related orphan receptors; SD, sleep disruption; TME, tumor microenvironment.

  • Circadian clock cell-cycle crosstalk on tumor metastasis. Schematic illustration of the interactions between circadian clock components and cell-cycle regulators controlling transitions through G1, S, G2, and M phases. G1 phase: Cell-cycle entry is governed by cyclin D–Cdk4/6. Under CCD, cyclin D–Cdk4/6 activity is modulated with PER2 shown as an inhibitory regulator. p21/p27 act as checkpoint mediators at the G1/S boundary and are influenced by PER1, REV-ERBα, RORα, and CJL. These interactions collectively regulate progression toward the S phase. S phase: Progression through S phase involves cyclin E–Cdk2 and cyclin A–Cdk2 complexes. PER1 is linked to cyclin E–Cdk2 regulation, while REV-ERBα modulates cyclin A–Cdk2 activity, contributing to S-phase control. G2 phase: Transition into mitosis is coordinated by cyclin B–Cdk1. BMAL1/CLOCK regulate WEE1, which in turn modulates cyclin B–Cdk1 activity. CRY1 and PER1 influence WEE1, further integrating circadian control at the G2 checkpoint. M phase and G2/M checkpoint: Circadian components intersect with DDR pathways, including PER2–CHK2, CRY1–TIM–ATR–CHK1, and PER1–TIM–ATM–CHK2, which modulate cyclin B–Cdk1-dependent mitotic progression. External cues, such as DD are depicted as additional modulators at this stage. ATR, ATR serine/threonine kinase; ATM, ATM serine/threonine kinase; BMAL1, brain and muscle ARNT-like protein1; CCD, chronic circadian disruption; CDK, cyclin-dependent kinase; CHK1/2, checkpoint kinase1/2; Cdk1/2/4/6, cyclin dependent kinase 1/2/4/6; CLOCK, circadian locomotor output cycles kaput; CRY1, cryptochrome1; CJL, chronic jet-lag; DD, constant dark; PER1/2, period circadian regulator1/2; RORα, retinoic acid receptor-related orphan receptorα; REV-ERBα, nuclear receptor subfamily 1 group d member; TIM, timeless; WEE1, G2 checkpoint kinase.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 5

    Circadian clock cell-cycle crosstalk on tumor metastasis. Schematic illustration of the interactions between circadian clock components and cell-cycle regulators controlling transitions through G1, S, G2, and M phases. G1 phase: Cell-cycle entry is governed by cyclin D–Cdk4/6. Under CCD, cyclin D–Cdk4/6 activity is modulated with PER2 shown as an inhibitory regulator. p21/p27 act as checkpoint mediators at the G1/S boundary and are influenced by PER1, REV-ERBα, RORα, and CJL. These interactions collectively regulate progression toward the S phase. S phase: Progression through S phase involves cyclin E–Cdk2 and cyclin A–Cdk2 complexes. PER1 is linked to cyclin E–Cdk2 regulation, while REV-ERBα modulates cyclin A–Cdk2 activity, contributing to S-phase control. G2 phase: Transition into mitosis is coordinated by cyclin B–Cdk1. BMAL1/CLOCK regulate WEE1, which in turn modulates cyclin B–Cdk1 activity. CRY1 and PER1 influence WEE1, further integrating circadian control at the G2 checkpoint. M phase and G2/M checkpoint: Circadian components intersect with DDR pathways, including PER2–CHK2, CRY1–TIM–ATR–CHK1, and PER1–TIM–ATM–CHK2, which modulate cyclin B–Cdk1-dependent mitotic progression. External cues, such as DD are depicted as additional modulators at this stage. ATR, ATR serine/threonine kinase; ATM, ATM serine/threonine kinase; BMAL1, brain and muscle ARNT-like protein1; CCD, chronic circadian disruption; CDK, cyclin-dependent kinase; CHK1/2, checkpoint kinase1/2; Cdk1/2/4/6, cyclin dependent kinase 1/2/4/6; CLOCK, circadian locomotor output cycles kaput; CRY1, cryptochrome1; CJL, chronic jet-lag; DD, constant dark; PER1/2, period circadian regulator1/2; RORα, retinoic acid receptor-related orphan receptorα; REV-ERBα, nuclear receptor subfamily 1 group d member; TIM, timeless; WEE1, G2 checkpoint kinase.

  • Chronobiology reporting standards in circadian research. Schematic overview of key methodologic parameters that should be reported in circadian studies, including Zeitgeber time definition, light–dark cycle conditions, gender and age of experimental subjects, jet lag or chronic circadian disruption paradigms, and time-aware statistical methods.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 6

    Chronobiology reporting standards in circadian research. Schematic overview of key methodologic parameters that should be reported in circadian studies, including Zeitgeber time definition, light–dark cycle conditions, gender and age of experimental subjects, jet lag or chronic circadian disruption paradigms, and time-aware statistical methods.

Tables

  • Figures
    • View popup
    Table 1

    CLOCK gene expression across various cancer types

    NameCancer typeModelTypeMetastatic endpointEffect on cancerReferences
    BMAL1CRCHuman tissuemRNALiver metastasisIncreased metastasis of liver24
    CRCMouse modelProtein-Longer OS112
    Nasopharyngeal carcinomaHuman tissueProteinDistant metastasisDecreased tumor distant metastasis26
    BMAL2CRCHuman tissuemRNALiver metastasisIncreased metastasis of liver25
    TIMELESSBreast cancerHuman tissue/cell linesmRNA-Shorter MFS22
    Cervical cancerHuman tissueProteinPelvic lymph node metastasisIncreased metastasis of pelvic lymph nodes, shorter DFS113
    PER1Breast cancerHuman tissue/cell linesmRNA-Longer MFS22
    CRCHuman tissuemRNALiver metastasisDecreased metastasis of liver24
    PER2Breast cancerHuman tissueProteinLymph node metastasisIncreased metastasis of lymph nodes21
    Breast cancerHuman tissue/cell linesmRNA-Longer MFS22
    PER3Breast cancerHuman tissue/cell linesmRNA-Longer MFS22

    CRC

    mRNA

    Liver metastasis

    Decreased metastasis of liver
    114,115
    CRY2Breast cancerHuman tissue/cell linesmRNA-Longer MFS22
    REV-ERBαGastric cancerHuman tissueProtein-Decreased metastasis of tumor and lymph nodes28
    RORCBreast cancerHuman tissue/cell linesmRNA-Longer MFS22
    NPAS2Breast cancerHuman tissue/cell linesmRNALonger MFS22
    HLFNSCLCHuman tissue/xenograft modelmRNA/proteinDistant metastasisDecreased tumor distant metastasis29

    OS, overall survival; DFS, disease-free survival; MFS, metastasis-free survival; CRC, colorectal cancer; NSCLC, non-small cell lung cancer.

    PreviousNext
    Back to top

    In this issue

    Cancer Biology & Medicine: 23 (9)
    Cancer Biology & Medicine
    Vol. 23, Issue 9
    15 Sep 2026
    • Table of Contents
    • Index by author
    Print
    Download PDF
    Email Article

    Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Cancer Biology & Medicine.

    NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

    Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
    Circadian-driven transcriptional programs govern metastatic progression
    (Your Name) has sent you a message from Cancer Biology & Medicine
    (Your Name) thought you would like to see the Cancer Biology & Medicine web site.
    Citation Tools
    Circadian-driven transcriptional programs govern metastatic progression
    Jie Wang, Hao Pan, Xuan Wang, Yuru Ren, Yiwen Huang, Yizhou Liu, Hejin Lai, Zhimin Fei, Ning Pu, Yu Wang
    Cancer Biology & Medicine Sep 2026, 23 (9) 1213-1229; DOI: 10.20892/j.issn.2095-3941.2025.0491

    Citation Manager Formats

    • BibTeX
    • Bookends
    • EasyBib
    • EndNote (tagged)
    • EndNote 8 (xml)
    • Medlars
    • Mendeley
    • Papers
    • RefWorks Tagged
    • Ref Manager
    • RIS
    • Zotero
    Share
    Circadian-driven transcriptional programs govern metastatic progression
    Jie Wang, Hao Pan, Xuan Wang, Yuru Ren, Yiwen Huang, Yizhou Liu, Hejin Lai, Zhimin Fei, Ning Pu, Yu Wang
    Cancer Biology & Medicine Sep 2026, 23 (9) 1213-1229; DOI: 10.20892/j.issn.2095-3941.2025.0491
    Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
    • Tweet Widget
    • Facebook Like
    • Google Plus One

    Jump to section

    • Article
      • Abstract
      • Introduction
      • Clinical relevance between circadian disruption and tumor metastasis
      • Circadian clock mechanisms underlying tumor metastasis
      • Perspective
      • Conflict of interest statement
      • Author contributions
      • References
    • Figures & Data
    • Info & Metrics
    • References
    • PDF

    Related Articles

    • No related articles found.
    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar

    Cited By...

    • No citing articles found.
    • Google Scholar

    More in this TOC Section

    • cGAS–STING pathway activation drives the cold-to-hot tumor transition and sensitizes immunotherapy
    • Unravelling the role of PANoptosis in diseases: from emerging molecular mechanisms-to-therapeutic implications
    Show more Review

    Similar Articles

    Keywords

    • Circadian clock
    • tumor metastasis
    • TME
    • cancer therapy

    Navigate

    • Home
    • Current Issue

    More Information

    • About CBM
    • About CACA
    • About TMUCIH
    • Editorial Board
    • Subscription

    For Authors

    • Instructions for authors
    • Journal Policies
    • Submit a Manuscript

    Journal Services

    • Email Alerts
    • Facebook
    • RSS Feeds
    • Twitter

     

    © 2026 Cancer Biology & Medicine

    Powered by HighWire