Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • About
    • About CBM
    • Editorial Board
    • Announcement
  • Articles
    • Ahead of print
    • Current Issue
    • Archive
    • Collections
    • Cover Story
  • For Authors
    • Instructions for Authors
    • Resources
    • Submit a Manuscript
  • For Reviewers
    • Become a Reviewer
    • Instructions for Reviewers
    • Resources
    • Outstanding Reviewer
  • Subscription
  • Alerts
    • Email Alerts
    • RSS Feeds
    • Table of Contents
  • Contact us
  • Other Publications
    • cbm

User menu

  • My alerts

Search

  • Advanced search
Cancer Biology & Medicine
  • Other Publications
    • cbm
  • My alerts
Cancer Biology & Medicine

Advanced Search

 

  • Home
  • About
    • About CBM
    • Editorial Board
    • Announcement
  • Articles
    • Ahead of print
    • Current Issue
    • Archive
    • Collections
    • Cover Story
  • For Authors
    • Instructions for Authors
    • Resources
    • Submit a Manuscript
  • For Reviewers
    • Become a Reviewer
    • Instructions for Reviewers
    • Resources
    • Outstanding Reviewer
  • Subscription
  • Alerts
    • Email Alerts
    • RSS Feeds
    • Table of Contents
  • Contact us
  • Follow cbm on Twitter
  • Visit cbm on Facebook
LetterLetter
Open Access

Non-essential role of S100A9 in hematopoiesis in primary MPN and MDS mouse models

Qinglin Li, Xuezhen Ma, Zhaofeng Li, Xinshu Xie, Yating Lu, Hanqi Liu, Ailing Zou, Yexin Yang, Jie Ouyang, Shuqian Xu and Yang Mei
Cancer Biology & Medicine July 2025, 22 (7) 806-811; DOI: https://doi.org/10.20892/j.issn.2095-3941.2025.0185
Qinglin Li
1School of Biomedical Sciences, Hunan Provincial Key Laboratory of Animal Model and Molecular Medicine, Hunan University, Changsha 410082, China
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Xuezhen Ma
1School of Biomedical Sciences, Hunan Provincial Key Laboratory of Animal Model and Molecular Medicine, Hunan University, Changsha 410082, China
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Zhaofeng Li
1School of Biomedical Sciences, Hunan Provincial Key Laboratory of Animal Model and Molecular Medicine, Hunan University, Changsha 410082, China
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Xinshu Xie
1School of Biomedical Sciences, Hunan Provincial Key Laboratory of Animal Model and Molecular Medicine, Hunan University, Changsha 410082, China
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Yating Lu
1School of Biomedical Sciences, Hunan Provincial Key Laboratory of Animal Model and Molecular Medicine, Hunan University, Changsha 410082, China
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Hanqi Liu
1School of Biomedical Sciences, Hunan Provincial Key Laboratory of Animal Model and Molecular Medicine, Hunan University, Changsha 410082, China
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Ailing Zou
1School of Biomedical Sciences, Hunan Provincial Key Laboratory of Animal Model and Molecular Medicine, Hunan University, Changsha 410082, China
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Yexin Yang
1School of Biomedical Sciences, Hunan Provincial Key Laboratory of Animal Model and Molecular Medicine, Hunan University, Changsha 410082, China
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jie Ouyang
1School of Biomedical Sciences, Hunan Provincial Key Laboratory of Animal Model and Molecular Medicine, Hunan University, Changsha 410082, China
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Shuqian Xu
2Department of Hematology, Qilu Hospital of Shandong University, Jinan 250012, China
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Shuqian Xu
  • For correspondence: shuqian.xu{at}email.sdu.edu.cn yanmei{at}hnu.edu.cn
Yang Mei
1School of Biomedical Sciences, Hunan Provincial Key Laboratory of Animal Model and Molecular Medicine, Hunan University, Changsha 410082, China
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Yang Mei
  • For correspondence: shuqian.xu{at}email.sdu.edu.cn yanmei{at}hnu.edu.cn
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF
Loading

S100 proteins govern cellular proliferation, differentiation, apoptosis, calcium homeostasis, energy metabolism, and inflammation. This heterodimeric calcium-binding protein, consisting of the S100A8 and S100A9 subunits, modulates myeloid cell development. S100A9 elevation has been found in myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPN), myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS), and acute myeloid leukemia (AML)1–3. Notably, transgenic mice with S100A9 overexpression develop myeloid dysplasia that closely mimics human MDS2. Haploinsufficiency in Rps14, a human del(5q) MDS-associated gene, leads to impaired erythroid differentiation and triggers overexpression of S100A8/S100A93. However, whether endogenous S100A9 is essential for normal or pathological hematopoiesis in vivo is largely unknown.

To evaluate the roles of S100A9 in hematopoiesis, we analyzed S100A9−/− mice. Peripheral blood parameters and bone marrow (BM) or spleen (SP) cellularity analysis showed scarcely any differences between WT and S100A9 null mice (Figures S1 and S2). We therefore induced stress hematopoiesis by treating the mice with 5-fluorouracil (5-Fu) and phenylhydrazine (PHZ). Unexpectedly, S100A9 loss had minimal effects on the mice during hematopoietic recovery (Figures S3 and S4).

We next asked whether S100A9 might play roles in hematological malignant conditions, such as MPN and MDS. We first crossed S100A9−/− mice with MPN mice (JAK2V617F/+Vav-Cre)—a model closely resembling human polycythemia vera. The JAK2V617F mutation attenuated survival regardless of the presence of S100A9 expression (Figure 1A). Moreover, the splenomegaly in JAK2V617F mutant mice was not alleviated by S100A9 deletion (Figure 1B). BM and SP cellularity did not differ between JAK2V617FVav-Cre and JAK2V617FS100A9−/−Vav-Cre mice (Figure 1C). Erythrocytosis promoted by JAK2V617F mutation was not alleviated by S100A9 depletion, despite a decline in platelet counts observed in JAK2V617FS100A9−/−Vav-Cre mice (Figure 1D and Figure S5A–T). This outcome, combined with the previously described role of S100A9 in facilitating the formation of procoagulant platelets through GPIbα4, underscores S100A9’s role in promoting thrombopoiesis. Subsequently, we conducted lineage analysis through flow cytometry assays. The JAK2V617F mutant mice exhibited aberrant elevations in both the proportions and cell counts of TER119+ erythroid cells in the BM and SP (Figure 1D and Figure S5U). However, the deletion of S100A9 in the presence of JAK2V617F mutation only slightly ameliorated the absolute number of erythroid cells in the BM but not the SP (Figure 1D), and the percentages remained unchanged (Figure S5U). Likewise, myeloid and lymphoid cells in BM or SP showed no differences between JAK2V617F mutant mice and JAK2/S100A9 double-mutant mice (Figure 1D and Figure S5V). These results suggest that S100A9 does not substantially contribute to the pathogenesis of JAK2V617F/+-driven polycythemia. A prior study has indicated that the overexpression of S100A9, triggered by the Srsf2P95H mutation, hindered polycythemia in JAK2V617F/+ mice5. Together, these results indicate that activation, rather than deletion, of S100A9 might be a suitable approach for MPN therapy.

S100A9 is not required for hematopoietic dysfunction in the JAK2V617F mutant MPN and age-related MDS mouse model. (A) Kaplan–Meier survival curve showing the survival of the indicated mice. Control, n = 10; S100A9−/−, n = 9; JAK2VF/+Vav-Cre, n = 23; JAK2VF/+S100A9−/−Vav-Cre, n = 22. (B) Quantitative analyses of spleen weight vs. body weight. n = 3 per group. (C) Absolute cell counts in the BM and SP from the indicated mice. n = 3 per group. (D) Flow cytometry analysis of TER119+ erythroid, lymphoid, and myeloid cells in the BM and SP. Top, quantification of absolute counts of TER119+ erythroid cells and various differentiation stages of erythroid cells. I–VI represent proerythroblasts (ProE), basophilic erythroblasts (BasoE), polychromatic erythroblasts (PolyE), orthochromatic erythroblasts (OrthoE), reticulocytes (Ret), and red blood cells (RBCs). n = 3 per group. Bottom, absolute counts of lymphoid and myeloid cells. B cells, B220+; T cells, CD3e+; myeloid cells, CD11b+; monocytes/macrophages, Ly6G−CD11b+; granulocytes, Ly6G+CD11b+. n = 3 per group. (E) Merged UMAP plots showing the distribution and overlap of annotated cell populations from the BM of aged (12- to 14-month-old) control and DKO mice. (F) As in I, except that the S100A9 expression pattern is illustrated on merged UMAP plots. (G) Violin plots showing S100A9 expression levels across the indicated cell populations. (H) Relative serum S100A9 levels, determined by multiplex ELISA. Control, n = 12; DKO, n = 7. (I) Kaplan–Meier survival analysis assessing the effects of combined S100A9 deletion in Diaph1−/− Mir146−/− mice. Control, n = 17; DKO, n = 40; TKO, n = 46. (J) Quantitative analysis of spleen weight normalized to body weight. (K) Absolute cell numbers in the BM and SP. (L) Flow cytometry analysis of TER119+ erythroid, lymphoid, and myeloid cells in the BM and SP. Top, quantification of absolute counts of TER119+ erythroid cells and various differentiation stages of erythroid cells. I, ProE; II, BasoE; III, PolyE; IV, OrthoE; V, reticulocytes; and VI, RBCs. Bottom, absolute counts of lymphoid and myeloid cells. B cells, B220+; T cells, CD3e+; myeloid cells, CD11b+; monocytes/macrophages, Ly6G−CD11b+; granulocytes, Ly6G+CD11b+. Control, n = 8; DKO, n = 5; TKO, n = 7. (M) Percentages (left) and absolute cell counts (right) of LK (Lin−c-Kit+Sca1−), LSK (Lin−c-Kit+Sca1+), and LS (Lin−c-Kit−Sca1+) cells in the BM lineage negative cells (Lin−) of the indicated mice. (N) SLAM-LSK (CD150+CD48−LSK) and MPP (CD150−CD48−LSK) were gated from LSK cells of the indicated mice; frequency (left) and cell count (right) are shown. (O) Analysis of LT-HSC (CD135+CD34−LSK), ST-HSC (CD135−CD34−LSK), and MPP (CD135−CD34+LSK), similarly to N. (P) Colony formation assays of bone marrow mononuclear cells isolated from the indicated mice. Colonies were scored 14 days post-plating. (Q) Fibrosis in the sternum from the indicated mice, assessed through reticulin staining, with the fibrotic index quantified by fiber length measurement. DKO, Diaph1−/− Mir146−/−; TKO, Diaph1−/−Mir146−/− S100A9−/−. Control, n = 8; DKO, n = 5; TKO, n = 7 in H–J; control, n = 5; DKO, n = 4; TKO, n = 3 in J–L; control, n = 10; DKO, n = 8; TKO, n = 6 in P; quantified colony numbers in Q were as follows: control, n = 15; DKO, n = 55; TKO, n = 49. All data are shown as mean ± SEM. All P values were calculated with 2-tailed unpaired Student’s t-tests, except in G, in which the Wilcoxon Rank-Sum test was used. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001, ****P < 0.0001.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
S100A9 is not required for hematopoietic dysfunction in the JAK2V617F mutant MPN and age-related MDS mouse model. (A) Kaplan–Meier survival curve showing the survival of the indicated mice. Control, n = 10; S100A9−/−, n = 9; JAK2VF/+Vav-Cre, n = 23; JAK2VF/+S100A9−/−Vav-Cre, n = 22. (B) Quantitative analyses of spleen weight vs. body weight. n = 3 per group. (C) Absolute cell counts in the BM and SP from the indicated mice. n = 3 per group. (D) Flow cytometry analysis of TER119+ erythroid, lymphoid, and myeloid cells in the BM and SP. Top, quantification of absolute counts of TER119+ erythroid cells and various differentiation stages of erythroid cells. I–VI represent proerythroblasts (ProE), basophilic erythroblasts (BasoE), polychromatic erythroblasts (PolyE), orthochromatic erythroblasts (OrthoE), reticulocytes (Ret), and red blood cells (RBCs). n = 3 per group. Bottom, absolute counts of lymphoid and myeloid cells. B cells, B220+; T cells, CD3e+; myeloid cells, CD11b+; monocytes/macrophages, Ly6G−CD11b+; granulocytes, Ly6G+CD11b+. n = 3 per group. (E) Merged UMAP plots showing the distribution and overlap of annotated cell populations from the BM of aged (12- to 14-month-old) control and DKO mice. (F) As in I, except that the S100A9 expression pattern is illustrated on merged UMAP plots. (G) Violin plots showing S100A9 expression levels across the indicated cell populations. (H) Relative serum S100A9 levels, determined by multiplex ELISA. Control, n = 12; DKO, n = 7. (I) Kaplan–Meier survival analysis assessing the effects of combined S100A9 deletion in Diaph1−/− Mir146−/− mice. Control, n = 17; DKO, n = 40; TKO, n = 46. (J) Quantitative analysis of spleen weight normalized to body weight. (K) Absolute cell numbers in the BM and SP. (L) Flow cytometry analysis of TER119+ erythroid, lymphoid, and myeloid cells in the BM and SP. Top, quantification of absolute counts of TER119+ erythroid cells and various differentiation stages of erythroid cells. I, ProE; II, BasoE; III, PolyE; IV, OrthoE; V, reticulocytes; and VI, RBCs. Bottom, absolute counts of lymphoid and myeloid cells. B cells, B220+; T cells, CD3e+; myeloid cells, CD11b+; monocytes/macrophages, Ly6G−CD11b+; granulocytes, Ly6G+CD11b+. Control, n = 8; DKO, n = 5; TKO, n = 7. (M) Percentages (left) and absolute cell counts (right) of LK (Lin−c-Kit+Sca1−), LSK (Lin−c-Kit+Sca1+), and LS (Lin−c-Kit−Sca1+) cells in the BM lineage negative cells (Lin−) of the indicated mice. (N) SLAM-LSK (CD150+CD48−LSK) and MPP (CD150−CD48−LSK) were gated from LSK cells of the indicated mice; frequency (left) and cell count (right) are shown. (O) Analysis of LT-HSC (CD135+CD34−LSK), ST-HSC (CD135−CD34−LSK), and MPP (CD135−CD34+LSK), similarly to N. (P) Colony formation assays of bone marrow mononuclear cells isolated from the indicated mice. Colonies were scored 14 days post-plating. (Q) Fibrosis in the sternum from the indicated mice, assessed through reticulin staining, with the fibrotic index quantified by fiber length measurement. DKO, Diaph1−/− Mir146−/−; TKO, Diaph1−/−Mir146−/− S100A9−/−. Control, n = 8; DKO, n = 5; TKO, n = 7 in H–J; control, n = 5; DKO, n = 4; TKO, n = 3 in J–L; control, n = 10; DKO, n = 8; TKO, n = 6 in P; quantified colony numbers in Q were as follows: control, n = 15; DKO, n = 55; TKO, n = 49. All data are shown as mean ± SEM. All P values were calculated with 2-tailed unpaired Student’s t-tests, except in G, in which the Wilcoxon Rank-Sum test was used. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001, ****P < 0.0001.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 1

S100A9 is not required for hematopoietic dysfunction in the JAK2V617F mutant MPN and age-related MDS mouse model. (A) Kaplan–Meier survival curve showing the survival of the indicated mice. Control, n = 10; S100A9−/−, n = 9; JAK2VF/+Vav-Cre, n = 23; JAK2VF/+S100A9−/−Vav-Cre, n = 22. (B) Quantitative analyses of spleen weight vs. body weight. n = 3 per group. (C) Absolute cell counts in the BM and SP from the indicated mice. n = 3 per group. (D) Flow cytometry analysis of TER119+ erythroid, lymphoid, and myeloid cells in the BM and SP. Top, quantification of absolute counts of TER119+ erythroid cells and various differentiation stages of erythroid cells. I–VI represent proerythroblasts (ProE), basophilic erythroblasts (BasoE), polychromatic erythroblasts (PolyE), orthochromatic erythroblasts (OrthoE), reticulocytes (Ret), and red blood cells (RBCs). n = 3 per group. Bottom, absolute counts of lymphoid and myeloid cells. B cells, B220+; T cells, CD3e+; myeloid cells, CD11b+; monocytes/macrophages, Ly6G−CD11b+; granulocytes, Ly6G+CD11b+. n = 3 per group. (E) Merged UMAP plots showing the distribution and overlap of annotated cell populations from the BM of aged (12- to 14-month-old) control and DKO mice. (F) As in I, except that the S100A9 expression pattern is illustrated on merged UMAP plots. (G) Violin plots showing S100A9 expression levels across the indicated cell populations. (H) Relative serum S100A9 levels, determined by multiplex ELISA. Control, n = 12; DKO, n = 7. (I) Kaplan–Meier survival analysis assessing the effects of combined S100A9 deletion in Diaph1−/− Mir146−/− mice. Control, n = 17; DKO, n = 40; TKO, n = 46. (J) Quantitative analysis of spleen weight normalized to body weight. (K) Absolute cell numbers in the BM and SP. (L) Flow cytometry analysis of TER119+ erythroid, lymphoid, and myeloid cells in the BM and SP. Top, quantification of absolute counts of TER119+ erythroid cells and various differentiation stages of erythroid cells. I, ProE; II, BasoE; III, PolyE; IV, OrthoE; V, reticulocytes; and VI, RBCs. Bottom, absolute counts of lymphoid and myeloid cells. B cells, B220+; T cells, CD3e+; myeloid cells, CD11b+; monocytes/macrophages, Ly6G−CD11b+; granulocytes, Ly6G+CD11b+. Control, n = 8; DKO, n = 5; TKO, n = 7. (M) Percentages (left) and absolute cell counts (right) of LK (Lin−c-Kit+Sca1−), LSK (Lin−c-Kit+Sca1+), and LS (Lin−c-Kit−Sca1+) cells in the BM lineage negative cells (Lin−) of the indicated mice. (N) SLAM-LSK (CD150+CD48−LSK) and MPP (CD150−CD48−LSK) were gated from LSK cells of the indicated mice; frequency (left) and cell count (right) are shown. (O) Analysis of LT-HSC (CD135+CD34−LSK), ST-HSC (CD135−CD34−LSK), and MPP (CD135−CD34+LSK), similarly to N. (P) Colony formation assays of bone marrow mononuclear cells isolated from the indicated mice. Colonies were scored 14 days post-plating. (Q) Fibrosis in the sternum from the indicated mice, assessed through reticulin staining, with the fibrotic index quantified by fiber length measurement. DKO, Diaph1−/− Mir146−/−; TKO, Diaph1−/−Mir146−/− S100A9−/−. Control, n = 8; DKO, n = 5; TKO, n = 7 in H–J; control, n = 5; DKO, n = 4; TKO, n = 3 in J–L; control, n = 10; DKO, n = 8; TKO, n = 6 in P; quantified colony numbers in Q were as follows: control, n = 15; DKO, n = 55; TKO, n = 49. All data are shown as mean ± SEM. All P values were calculated with 2-tailed unpaired Student’s t-tests, except in G, in which the Wilcoxon Rank-Sum test was used. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001, ****P < 0.0001.

We have previously reported that mice with dual deficiency in mDia1 and MiR-146a (DKO mice) show age-related anemia and ineffective erythropoiesis mimicking human MDS6. Subsequent single-cell RNA-sequencing analysis of BM nucleated cells revealed enriched S100A9 expression in neutrophils, dendritic cells, fibroblasts, and macrophages (Figure 1E–G)7. Specifically, S100A9 was aberrantly overexpressed in B cells, monocytes, stage II neutrophils, T cells, NK cells, neutrophils, and macrophages in DKO mice (Figure 1G). Moreover, serum S100A9 was significantly higher in DKO mice than controls (Figure 1H). These results collectively suggested that S100A9 might potentially contribute to MDS pathogenesis. Therefore, we crossed the DKO mice with S100A9−/− mice to generate Diaph1−/−Mir146−/−S100A9−/− triple knockout (TKO) mice to interrogate the roles of S100A9 in MDS pathogenesis. Firstly, the survival curves were similar between DKO and TKO mice during aging (Figure 1I). Accordingly, peripheral blood parameters showed minimal differences between DKO and TKO mice, except for neutrophil counts (Figure S6A–T). An enlarged SP and extramedullary erythropoiesis were consistently observed in DKO mice and were not alleviated by S100A9 ablation (Figure 1J–K). Moreover, the loss of BM cellularity in DKO mice was not ameliorated by S100A9 deletion (Figure 1K). The impaired BM erythropoiesis in DKO animals, as evidenced by the disappearance of varied developmental stages of erythroid cells, was not recovered or ameliorated after S100A9 loss in TKO mice (Figure 1L and Figure S6U). We observed similar patterns for lymphoid cells (Figure 1L and Figure S6V, B220+ and CD3e+). Notably, in agreement with the diminished peripheral neutrophil counts in TKO mice (Figure S6R), myelopoiesis was further impaired in DKO mice after S100A9 inactivation (Figure 1L and Figure S6V, CD11b+, monocytes/macrophages, and granulocytes). This observation might be attributable to S100A9-mediated modulation of CD11b expression on neutrophils under pathological conditions such as inflammation8. Secondly, our analysis of the hematopoietic stem progenitor cells (HSPCs) in the BM and SP revealed that the common progenitors (LK, CMP, and GMP), multipotent progenitors (MPP), and hematopoietic stem cells (HSCs), including long-term HSCs (LT-HSCs) and SLAM-LSK were depleted in the BM but markedly accumulated in the SP in aged DKO mice (Figure 1M–O and Figure S7A–D). Intriguingly, although S100A9 deletion did not restore BM HSPC levels, it substantially decreased splenic HSPC accumulation in DKO mice (Figure 1N). This finding was further validated through in vitro colony-forming assays in mononuclear cells (Figure 1P and Figure S7E–H). Our findings suggested that S100A9 is critical for either HSPC migration from the BM into the SP or the expansion of splenic HSPCs in the context of MDS. Thirdly, aged DKO mice exhibited fibrosis, as evidenced by reticulin staining in BM sections. However, the inactivation of S100A9 scarcely ameliorated the fibrotic conditions in DKO mice (Figure 1Q and Figure S7I).

Perspectives

In summary, our genetic studies demonstrated that loss of S100A9 expression contributes minimally to pathophysiological hematopoiesis in primary MDS and MPN mouse models. S100A9 typically forms both homodimers and heterodimers with S100A8. Emerging evidence highlights the non-redundant roles of S100 proteins in hematological malignancies. For example, the inactivation of S100A8 expression has been found to rescue the impaired erythroid differentiation in Rps14-haploinsufficient HSPCs3. S100A8 sustains the immature phenotype in AML, and its deletion impedes MLL-AF9-induced AML progression in vivo9,10. Whereas recombinant S100A9 enhances AML cell differentiation and prolongs survival in leukemic animal models9, silencing of S100A9 paradoxically decreases AML cell viability and proliferation11. In addition, enhancer of zeste homolog 2 (EZH2) inhibition in high-risk MDS induces S100A9 overexpression, thereby activating pyroptosis12. Diminished S100A9 expression mediates leukemic transformation induced by SETD2 deficiency in an MDS mouse model (NUP98-HOXD13 transgenic mice), and exogenously supplied recombinant S100A9 decreases the expansion of HSPCs from these compound mice, as demonstrated in colony-forming unit (CFU) assays in vitro13. Whether S100A8 might compensate for S100A9 loss warrants further study. Further investigations should also be conducted to determine whether S100A8 play a more central role than S100A9 in the pathogenesis of MDS or MPN in vivo.

Supporting Information

[cbm-22-806-s001.pdf]

Conflict of interest statement

No potential conflicts of interest are disclosed.

Author contributions

Conceived and designed the analysis: Qinglin Li, Zhaofeng Li, Xuezhen Ma, Shuqian Xu, Yang Mei.

Collected the data: Qinglin Li, Zhaofeng Li, Xuezhen Ma, Xinshu Xie, Yating Lu, Hanqi Liu, Ailing Zou, Yexin Yang, Jie Ouyang.

Contributed data or analysis tools: Qinglin Li, Zhaofeng Li, Xinshu Xie, Shuqian Xu, Yang Mei.

Performed the analysis: Qinglin Li, Zhaofeng Li, Yang Mei.

Wrote the paper: Qinglin Li, Shuqian Xu, Yang Mei.

Data availability statement

The data generated in this study are available upon reasonable request from the corresponding authors.

Acknowledgments

We thank all the authors for their input and discussions regarding this work. We appreciate the donation of S100A9−/− mice from Jiahe Xie at Gannan Medical University.

  • Received April 13, 2025.
  • Accepted June 3, 2025.
  • Copyright: © 2025, The Authors

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

References

  1. 1.↵
    1. Leimkühler NB,
    2. Gleitz HFE,
    3. Ronghui L,
    4. Snoeren IAM,
    5. Fuchs SNR,
    6. Nagai JS, et al.
    Heterogeneous bone-marrow stromal progenitors drive myelofibrosis via a druggable alarmin axis. Cell Stem Cell. 2021; 28: 637–52.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  2. 2.↵
    1. Chen X,
    2. Eksioglu EA,
    3. Zhou J,
    4. Zhang L,
    5. Djeu J,
    6. Fortenbery N, et al.
    Induction of myelodysplasia by myeloid-derived suppressor cells. J Clin Invest. 2013; 123: 4595–611.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  3. 3.↵
    1. Schneider RK,
    2. Schenone M,
    3. Ferreira MV,
    4. Kramann R,
    5. Joyce CE,
    6. Hartigan C, et al.
    Rps14 haploinsufficiency causes a block in erythroid differentiation mediated by S100A8 and S100A9. Nat Med. 2016; 22: 288–97.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  4. 4.↵
    1. Colicchia M,
    2. Schrottmaier WC,
    3. Perrella G,
    4. Reyat JS,
    5. Begum J,
    6. Slater A, et al.
    S100A8/A9 drives the formation of procoagulant platelets through GPIbα. Blood. 2022; 140: 2626–43.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  5. 5.↵
    1. Yang Y,
    2. Abbas S,
    3. Sayem MA,
    4. Dutta A,
    5. Mohi G.
    SRSF2 mutation reduces polycythemia and impairs hematopoietic progenitor functions in JAK2V617F-driven myeloproliferative neoplasm. Blood Cancer J. 2023; 13: 171.
    OpenUrl
  6. 6.↵
    1. Mei Y,
    2. Zhao B,
    3. Basiorka AA,
    4. Yang J,
    5. Cao L,
    6. Zhang J, et al.
    Age-related inflammatory bone marrow microenvironment induces ineffective erythropoiesis mimicking del(5q) MDS. Leukemia. 2018; 32: 1023–33.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  7. 7.↵
    1. Mei Y,
    2. Ren KH,
    3. Liu YJ,
    4. Ma A,
    5. Xia ZJ,
    6. Han X, et al.
    Bone marrow-confined IL-6 signaling mediates the progression of myelodysplastic syndromes to acute myeloid leukemia. J Clin Invest. 2022; 132: e152673.
  8. 8.↵
    1. Scott NR,
    2. Swanson RV,
    3. Al-Hammadi N,
    4. Domingo-Gonzalez R,
    5. Rangel-Moreno J,
    6. Kriel BA, et al.
    S100A8/A9 regulates CD11b expression and neutrophil recruitment during chronic tuberculosis. J Clin Invest. 2020; 130: 3098–112.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  9. 9.↵
    1. Laouedj M,
    2. Tardif MR,
    3. Gil L,
    4. Raquil MA,
    5. Lachhab A,
    6. Pelletier M, et al.
    S100A9 induces differentiation of acute myeloid leukemia cells through TLR4. Blood. 2017; 129: 1980–90.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  10. 10.↵
    1. Nicolas E,
    2. Ramus C,
    3. Berthier S,
    4. Arlotto M,
    5. Bouamrani A,
    6. Lefebvre C, et al.
    Expression of S100A8 in leukemic cells predicts poor survival in de novo AML patients. Leukemia. 2011; 25: 57–65.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  11. 11.↵
    1. Fan R,
    2. Satilmis H,
    3. Vandewalle N,
    4. Verheye E,
    5. De Bruyne E,
    6. Menu E, et al.
    Targeting S100A9 protein affects mTOR-ER stress signaling and increases venetoclax sensitivity in Acute Myeloid Leukemia. Blood Cancer J. 2023; 13: 188.
    OpenUrl
  12. 12.↵
    1. Zhang Q,
    2. Luo Y,
    3. Ye L,
    4. Wang Y,
    5. Wang L,
    6. Yang W, et al.
    EZH2 inhibition induces pyroptosis via RHA-mediated S100A9 overexpression in myelodysplastic syndromes. Exp Hematol Oncol. 2025; 14: 9.
    OpenUrl
  13. 13.↵
    1. Chen BY,
    2. Song J,
    3. Hu CL,
    4. Chen SB,
    5. Zhang Q,
    6. Xu CH, et al.
    SETD2 deficiency accelerates MDS-associated leukemogenesis via S100a9 in NHD13 mice and predicts poor prognosis in MDS. Blood. 2020; 135: 2271–85.
    OpenUrl
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Cancer Biology & Medicine: 22 (7)
Cancer Biology & Medicine
Vol. 22, Issue 7
15 Jul 2025
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Print
Download PDF
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Cancer Biology & Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Non-essential role of S100A9 in hematopoiesis in primary MPN and MDS mouse models
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Cancer Biology & Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Cancer Biology & Medicine web site.
Citation Tools
Non-essential role of S100A9 in hematopoiesis in primary MPN and MDS mouse models
Qinglin Li, Xuezhen Ma, Zhaofeng Li, Xinshu Xie, Yating Lu, Hanqi Liu, Ailing Zou, Yexin Yang, Jie Ouyang, Shuqian Xu, Yang Mei
Cancer Biology & Medicine Jul 2025, 22 (7) 806-811; DOI: 10.20892/j.issn.2095-3941.2025.0185

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Non-essential role of S100A9 in hematopoiesis in primary MPN and MDS mouse models
Qinglin Li, Xuezhen Ma, Zhaofeng Li, Xinshu Xie, Yating Lu, Hanqi Liu, Ailing Zou, Yexin Yang, Jie Ouyang, Shuqian Xu, Yang Mei
Cancer Biology & Medicine Jul 2025, 22 (7) 806-811; DOI: 10.20892/j.issn.2095-3941.2025.0185
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Perspectives
    • Supporting Information
    • Conflict of interest statement
    • Author contributions
    • Data availability statement
    • Acknowledgments
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Dietary restriction during active cancer therapy is associated with improved treatment response: a systematic review and meta-analysis
  • Enhancing FIT-based colorectal cancer screening through risk prediction: a comparative evaluation of 17 models in a large Chinese cohort
  • Genetic susceptibility, environmental risk factors, and incident gastric cancer risk among individuals with different Helicobacter pylori infection status: a population-based study
Show more Letter

Similar Articles

Subjects

  • Hematologic tumor and lymphoma

Navigate

  • Home
  • Current Issue

More Information

  • About CBM
  • About CACA
  • About TMUCIH
  • Editorial Board
  • Subscription

For Authors

  • Instructions for authors
  • Journal Policies
  • Submit a Manuscript

Journal Services

  • Email Alerts
  • Facebook
  • RSS Feeds
  • Twitter

 

© 2026 Cancer Biology & Medicine

Powered by HighWire