Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • About
    • About CBM
    • Editorial Board
    • Announcement
  • Articles
    • Ahead of print
    • Current Issue
    • Archive
    • Collections
    • Cover Story
  • For Authors
    • Instructions for Authors
    • Resources
    • Submit a Manuscript
  • For Reviewers
    • Become a Reviewer
    • Instructions for Reviewers
    • Resources
    • Outstanding Reviewer
  • Subscription
  • Alerts
    • Email Alerts
    • RSS Feeds
    • Table of Contents
  • Contact us
  • Other Publications
    • cbm

User menu

  • My alerts

Search

  • Advanced search
Cancer Biology & Medicine
  • Other Publications
    • cbm
  • My alerts
Cancer Biology & Medicine

Advanced Search

 

  • Home
  • About
    • About CBM
    • Editorial Board
    • Announcement
  • Articles
    • Ahead of print
    • Current Issue
    • Archive
    • Collections
    • Cover Story
  • For Authors
    • Instructions for Authors
    • Resources
    • Submit a Manuscript
  • For Reviewers
    • Become a Reviewer
    • Instructions for Reviewers
    • Resources
    • Outstanding Reviewer
  • Subscription
  • Alerts
    • Email Alerts
    • RSS Feeds
    • Table of Contents
  • Contact us
  • Follow cbm on Twitter
  • Visit cbm on Facebook
Research ArticleOriginal Article
Open Access

Cancer-derived exosomal circTMEM56 enhances the efficacy of HCC radiotherapy through the miR-136-5p/STING axis

Li Yuan, Yue Wang, Junjie Cheng, Shilin Lin, Aying Ma, Kunchao Li, Yiming Zheng, Zhaochong Zeng, Aiwu Ke, Chao Gao and Shisuo Du
Cancer Biology & Medicine April 2025, 22 (4) 396-411; DOI: https://doi.org/10.20892/j.issn.2095-3941.2024.0544
Li Yuan
1Liver Cancer Institute, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Cancer Invasion (Fudan University), Ministry of Education, Shanghai 200032, China
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Yue Wang
1Liver Cancer Institute, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Cancer Invasion (Fudan University), Ministry of Education, Shanghai 200032, China
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Junjie Cheng
2Graduate School of Bengbu Medical University, Bengbu 233030, China
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Shilin Lin
1Liver Cancer Institute, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Cancer Invasion (Fudan University), Ministry of Education, Shanghai 200032, China
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Aying Ma
1Liver Cancer Institute, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Cancer Invasion (Fudan University), Ministry of Education, Shanghai 200032, China
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Kunchao Li
3Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang 330000, China
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Yiming Zheng
1Liver Cancer Institute, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Cancer Invasion (Fudan University), Ministry of Education, Shanghai 200032, China
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Zhaochong Zeng
4Department of Radiation Oncology, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai 200032, China
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Aiwu Ke
1Liver Cancer Institute, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Cancer Invasion (Fudan University), Ministry of Education, Shanghai 200032, China
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Aiwu Ke
  • For correspondence: [email protected] [email protected] [email protected]
Chao Gao
1Liver Cancer Institute, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Cancer Invasion (Fudan University), Ministry of Education, Shanghai 200032, China
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Chao Gao
  • For correspondence: [email protected] [email protected] [email protected]
Shisuo Du
4Department of Radiation Oncology, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai 200032, China
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Shisuo Du
  • For correspondence: [email protected] [email protected] [email protected]
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Supplementary Materials
  • Figure 1
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 1

    Downregulation of circTMEM56 is associated with a poor radiotherapy (RT) response and prognosis in patients with liver cancer. (A) t-SNE diagram of CD45+ major tumor-infiltrating immune cell types in patients with and without abscopal effects (AEs). (B) CD8+ T cell level and number of dendritic cells (DCs) in the blood of patients with and without AEs. (C) IFN-β level in the blood of patients with and without AEs. (D) Peripheral blood CD141+ DCs (cDC1 subset) levels in AE-positive versus AE-negative patient cohorts. (E) Heat maps of circRNA expression in tumor tissues of liver cancer patients with and without AEs after RT. (F) Differentially expressed circRNAs identified in tumor tissues and plasma exosomes of patients with and without AEs. (G) qPCR results showing circTMEM56 transcribed using primers from cDNA. (H) Schematic diagram of circTMEM56. Sanger sequencing revealed back-splicing sites. (I) qPCR results showing significantly higher circTMEM56 expression in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) tissues of patients with AEs compared to patients without AEs. (J) qPCR results showing significantly higher circTMEM56 expression in the blood of patients with AEs compared to patients without AEs. (K) In situ hybridization results indicating significantly higher expression of circTMEM56 in HCC tissues of patients with AEs compared to patients without AEs. (L) Variations in circTEME56 expression in 30 HCC tissues and adjacent tissues. (M) In situ hybridization results showing significantly lower circTMEM56 expression in HCC tissues compared to para-cancer tissues. (N) Kaplan-Meier analysis of overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) in 209 HCC patients was performed based on circTEME56 expression. *P < 0.05; **P < 0.01; ***P < 0.001.

  • Figure 2
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 2

    Exosome circTMEM56 from hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) cells is associated with the radiotherapy (RT) effect. (A) Representative image of exosomes extracted from patient blood using ultracentrifugation. Exosome markers are detected on exosomes enriched in patient blood. (B) circTMEM56 expression in patient blood with an abscopal effect (AE) is significantly higher than patients without AEs. (C) circTMEM56 levels in the blood of 76 patients with HCC after RT analyzed by qPCR. (D) Interferon-beta (IFN-β) levels in the blood of 76 patients with HCC after RT analyzed by ELISA. (E) Number of cDC1s in the blood of 76 patients with HCC after RT. (F) Correlation analysis showing a positive relationship between circTMEM56 and the IFN-β level. (G) Correlation analysis showing a positive relationship between circTMEM56 and the number of cDC1s. (H) Representative images of circTMEM56 and CD141 staining in HCC. (I) Correlation analysis showing a positive relationship between circTMEM56 and the IFN-β level in 209 patients with HCC. ***P < 0.001.

  • Figure 3
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 3

    circTMEM56 increases the production of type I IFN (IFN-I) from dendritic cells (DCs) and mediates an anti-tumor immune response. (A) circTMEM56 level measured by qPCR in 7 different hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) cell lines. (B) Efficacy of circTMEM56 overexpression and interference analyzed by qRT-PCR. (C) dsDNA content in the cell supernatant following different radiation doses. (D) Extracellular dsDNA content detected by immunofluorescence after different radiation doses. (E) Effects of circTMEM56 overexpression and knockdown on dsDNA release from hepatocellular carcinoma cells after radiation. (F) Effects of circTMEM56 overexpression and knockdown on IFNB1 mRNA levels in hepatocellular carcinoma cells after radiation. (G) IFNB1 mRNA levels in DCs after co-culturing with irradiated liver cancer cells. (H) Number of DCs after co-culturing with irradiated liver cancer cells. (I) IFN-β concentration in the supernatant after co-culturing of DCs with irradiated hepatocellular carcinoma cells. (J) Changes in IFNB1 mRNA levels in DCs after co-culturing with irradiated HCCs with or without GW4869. (K) Number of DCs after co-culturing with irradiated hepatocellular carcinoma cells with or without GW4869. ***P < 0.001.

  • Figure 4
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 4

    circTMEM56 amplifies radiotherapy (RT)-induced anti-tumor immune response through the miR-136-5p/STING1 axis in dendritic cells (DCs). (A) RIP was performed for circRNA in DCs using a circTMEM56 probe and a negative control (NC) probe. (B) Putative binding sites of miR-136-5p with respect to circTMEM56 predicated via StarBase v3.0. (C) Luciferase activity of pLG3-circTMEM56 in 293T cells after co-transfection with miR-136-5p. (D) circTMEM56 levels in the streptavidin-captured fractions of the 293T cell lysates after transfection with biotinylated miR-136-5p or the NC. (E) FISH analysis in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) showing co-localization of circTMEM56 with miR-136-5p in the cytoplasm. (F) A graph showing overlap of differentiated proteins. (G) GO and KEGG analyses were performed. (H) Levels of STING and CXCL10 protein expression in DCs with varying levels of circTMEM56 expression detected by western blot analysis. (I) Putative binding site of miR-136-5p on STING via StarBase v3.0. (J) Luciferase activity of pLG3-STING in 293T cells co-transfected with miR-136-5p. (K) STING mRNA levels in DCs expressed by different miR-136-5p or circTMEM56. (L) Interferon-β (IFN-β) levels in DC supernatant detected after co-culturing with irradiated HCC cells with different levels of miR-136-5p or circTMEM56 expression. (M) IFN-β levels in DCs supernatant after co-culturing with irradiated HCC cells and varying levels of STING expression. ***P < 0.001.

  • Figure 5
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 5

    Elevated exosome circTMEM56 specifically targets dendritic cells (DCs) and promotes activation of cGAS-STING pathway. (A) Relative levels of miR-136-5p in THP-1, macrophages, and cDC1 detected by qPCR. (B) Levels of STING expression in THP-1, M2 macrophages, and cDC1 cultured in conditioned medium and detected by qPCR. (C) Interferon-β (IFN-β) levels in the supernatant of THP-1 cells after co-culturing with irradiated liver cancer cells and the number of CD8+ T cells detected after co-culturing with CD8+ T cells. (D) IFN-β levels in the supernatant of M2 macrophages after co-culturing with irradiated liver cancer cells and the number of CD8+ T cells detected after co-culturing with CD8+ T cells. (E) Activation of STING detected by western blot at different radiation doses and time points. (F) Western blot analysis of STING pathway activation in DCs cultured in different conditioned media. (G) Western blot analysis of STING pathway activation in DCs cultured with different miR-136-5p levels in different conditioned media. (H) Western blot analysis to detect STING pathway activation in DCs with different levels of STING expression cultured in different conditioned media. (I) Representative images of CD8, CD141, and p-STING staining in HCC tissues. ***P < 0.001.

  • Figure 6
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 6

    Exosome circTMEM56 improves the radiotherapy (RT)-induced anti-tumor immunity efficacy in vivo. (A) Representative CT images of the abdomen of mice with corresponding quantification. (B) Representative images of CD8 and CD11c staining in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). (C) Representative CT images of the abdomen of mice with corresponding quantification. (D) Representative images of CD8 and CD11c staining in HCC. (E) Representative photographs of the Hepa1-6 subcutaneous tumor model, imaged using the IVIS Imaging System. *P < 0.05; ***P < 0.001.

  • Figure 7
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 7

    Working model: circTMEM56 regulates cGAS-STING signaling pathway in DCs. miR-136-5p in the cytoplasm exerts an inhibitory effect on the STING activation before radiation (left panel). Under normal conditions STING is activated when DCs detect dsDNA released by tumor cells. Once activated STING moves from the endoplasmic reticulum to the Golgi apparatus, where STING interacts with TBK1 on the Golgi membrane. However, the inhibitory action of miR-136-5p impairs STING activity and prevents STING translocation and interaction with TBK1, thereby disrupting IRF3 phosphorylation and leading to suppression of downstream IFN signaling. Consequently, the STING signaling pathway remains in a relatively inactive state, limiting immune activation and impairing IFN-mediated responses. Radiation induces the upregulation of circTMEM56 in the cytoplasm (right panel), which acts as a ceRNA to sponge miR-136-5p, thereby reducing the inhibitory effects on STING signaling. Consequently, activation of STING leads to enhanced recruitment of TBK1 and phosphorylation of IRF3. Phosphorylated IRF3 translocates into the nucleus, where phosphorylated IRF3 binds to specific promoter regions of DNA and promotes the expression of IFN. This radiation-induced enhancement of STING activation suggests a potential mechanism for improving anti-tumor immunity through regulation of circRNA-miRNA interactions. circTMEM56, circular RNA TMEM56; ER, endoplasmic reticulum; IFN, interferon; IRF3, interferon regulatory factor 3; miR-136-5p, microRNA-136-5p; STING, Stimulator of Interferon Genes; TBK1, TANK-binding kinase 1.

Supplementary Materials

  • Figures
  • [cbm-22-396-s001.pdf]
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Cancer Biology & Medicine: 22 (4)
Cancer Biology & Medicine
Vol. 22, Issue 4
15 Apr 2025
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Print
Download PDF
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Cancer Biology & Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Cancer-derived exosomal circTMEM56 enhances the efficacy of HCC radiotherapy through the miR-136-5p/STING axis
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Cancer Biology & Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Cancer Biology & Medicine web site.
Citation Tools
Cancer-derived exosomal circTMEM56 enhances the efficacy of HCC radiotherapy through the miR-136-5p/STING axis
Li Yuan, Yue Wang, Junjie Cheng, Shilin Lin, Aying Ma, Kunchao Li, Yiming Zheng, Zhaochong Zeng, Aiwu Ke, Chao Gao, Shisuo Du
Cancer Biology & Medicine Apr 2025, 22 (4) 396-411; DOI: 10.20892/j.issn.2095-3941.2024.0544

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Cancer-derived exosomal circTMEM56 enhances the efficacy of HCC radiotherapy through the miR-136-5p/STING axis
Li Yuan, Yue Wang, Junjie Cheng, Shilin Lin, Aying Ma, Kunchao Li, Yiming Zheng, Zhaochong Zeng, Aiwu Ke, Chao Gao, Shisuo Du
Cancer Biology & Medicine Apr 2025, 22 (4) 396-411; DOI: 10.20892/j.issn.2095-3941.2024.0544
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Introduction
    • Materials and methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Conclusions
    • Supporting Information
    • Conflict of interest statement
    • Author contributions
    • Data availability statement
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Cancer cell-derived migrasomes harboring ATF6 promote breast cancer brain metastasis via endoplasmic reticulum stress-mediated disruption of the blood-brain barrier
  • Nuclear PHGDH regulates macrophage polarization through transcriptional repression of GLUD1 and GLS2 in breast cancer
  • IL-33/ST2 signalling promotes tumor growth by regulating polarization of alternatively activated macrophages
Show more Original Article

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • circTMEM56
  • hepatocellular carcinoma
  • cGAS-STING
  • radiotherapy
  • dendritic cell

Navigate

  • Home
  • Current Issue

More Information

  • About CBM
  • About CACA
  • About TMUCIH
  • Editorial Board
  • Subscription

For Authors

  • Instructions for authors
  • Journal Policies
  • Submit a Manuscript

Journal Services

  • Email Alerts
  • Facebook
  • RSS Feeds
  • Twitter

 

© 2025 Cancer Biology & Medicine

Powered by HighWire