Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • About
    • About CBM
    • Editorial Board
    • Announcement
  • Articles
    • Ahead of print
    • Current Issue
    • Archive
    • Collections
    • Cover Story
  • For Authors
    • Instructions for Authors
    • Resources
    • Submit a Manuscript
  • For Reviewers
    • Become a Reviewer
    • Instructions for Reviewers
    • Resources
    • Outstanding Reviewer
  • Subscription
  • Alerts
    • Email Alerts
    • RSS Feeds
    • Table of Contents
  • Contact us
  • Other Publications
    • cbm

User menu

  • My alerts

Search

  • Advanced search
Cancer Biology & Medicine
  • Other Publications
    • cbm
  • My alerts
Cancer Biology & Medicine

Advanced Search

 

  • Home
  • About
    • About CBM
    • Editorial Board
    • Announcement
  • Articles
    • Ahead of print
    • Current Issue
    • Archive
    • Collections
    • Cover Story
  • For Authors
    • Instructions for Authors
    • Resources
    • Submit a Manuscript
  • For Reviewers
    • Become a Reviewer
    • Instructions for Reviewers
    • Resources
    • Outstanding Reviewer
  • Subscription
  • Alerts
    • Email Alerts
    • RSS Feeds
    • Table of Contents
  • Contact us
  • Follow cbm on Twitter
  • Visit cbm on Facebook
Review ArticleReview
Open Access

The role of reactive oxygen species in gastric cancer

Yuqi Wang, Jingli Xu, Zhenjie Fu, Ruolan Zhang, Weiwei Zhu, Qianyu Zhao, Ping Wang, Can Hu and Xiangdong Cheng
Cancer Biology & Medicine September 2024, 21 (9) 740-753; DOI: https://doi.org/10.20892/j.issn.2095-3941.2024.0182
Yuqi Wang
1College of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Zhejiang University of Technology, Hangzhou 310014, China
2Department of Gastric Surgery, Zhejiang Cancer Hospital, Hangzhou 310022, China
3Key Laboratory of Prevention, Diagnosis and Therapy of Upper Gastrointestinal Cancer of Zhejiang Province, Hangzhou 310022, China
4Zhejiang Provincial Research Center for Upper Gastrointestinal Tract Cancer, Zhejiang Cancer Hospital, Hangzhou 310022, China
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jingli Xu
2Department of Gastric Surgery, Zhejiang Cancer Hospital, Hangzhou 310022, China
3Key Laboratory of Prevention, Diagnosis and Therapy of Upper Gastrointestinal Cancer of Zhejiang Province, Hangzhou 310022, China
4Zhejiang Provincial Research Center for Upper Gastrointestinal Tract Cancer, Zhejiang Cancer Hospital, Hangzhou 310022, China
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Zhenjie Fu
2Department of Gastric Surgery, Zhejiang Cancer Hospital, Hangzhou 310022, China
3Key Laboratory of Prevention, Diagnosis and Therapy of Upper Gastrointestinal Cancer of Zhejiang Province, Hangzhou 310022, China
4Zhejiang Provincial Research Center for Upper Gastrointestinal Tract Cancer, Zhejiang Cancer Hospital, Hangzhou 310022, China
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Ruolan Zhang
2Department of Gastric Surgery, Zhejiang Cancer Hospital, Hangzhou 310022, China
3Key Laboratory of Prevention, Diagnosis and Therapy of Upper Gastrointestinal Cancer of Zhejiang Province, Hangzhou 310022, China
4Zhejiang Provincial Research Center for Upper Gastrointestinal Tract Cancer, Zhejiang Cancer Hospital, Hangzhou 310022, China
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Weiwei Zhu
2Department of Gastric Surgery, Zhejiang Cancer Hospital, Hangzhou 310022, China
3Key Laboratory of Prevention, Diagnosis and Therapy of Upper Gastrointestinal Cancer of Zhejiang Province, Hangzhou 310022, China
4Zhejiang Provincial Research Center for Upper Gastrointestinal Tract Cancer, Zhejiang Cancer Hospital, Hangzhou 310022, China
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Qianyu Zhao
2Department of Gastric Surgery, Zhejiang Cancer Hospital, Hangzhou 310022, China
3Key Laboratory of Prevention, Diagnosis and Therapy of Upper Gastrointestinal Cancer of Zhejiang Province, Hangzhou 310022, China
4Zhejiang Provincial Research Center for Upper Gastrointestinal Tract Cancer, Zhejiang Cancer Hospital, Hangzhou 310022, China
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Ping Wang
1College of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Zhejiang University of Technology, Hangzhou 310014, China
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Can Hu
2Department of Gastric Surgery, Zhejiang Cancer Hospital, Hangzhou 310022, China
3Key Laboratory of Prevention, Diagnosis and Therapy of Upper Gastrointestinal Cancer of Zhejiang Province, Hangzhou 310022, China
4Zhejiang Provincial Research Center for Upper Gastrointestinal Tract Cancer, Zhejiang Cancer Hospital, Hangzhou 310022, China
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Can Hu
  • For correspondence: hucanchina{at}163.com chengxd{at}zjcc.org.cn
Xiangdong Cheng
2Department of Gastric Surgery, Zhejiang Cancer Hospital, Hangzhou 310022, China
3Key Laboratory of Prevention, Diagnosis and Therapy of Upper Gastrointestinal Cancer of Zhejiang Province, Hangzhou 310022, China
4Zhejiang Provincial Research Center for Upper Gastrointestinal Tract Cancer, Zhejiang Cancer Hospital, Hangzhou 310022, China
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Xiangdong Cheng
  • For correspondence: hucanchina{at}163.com chengxd{at}zjcc.org.cn
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Gastric cancer (GC) ranks fifth in cancer incidence and fourth in cancer-related mortality worldwide. Reactive oxygen species (ROS) are highly oxidative oxygen-derived products that have crucial roles in cell signaling regulation and maintaining internal balance. ROS are closely associated with the occurrence, development, and treatment of GC. This review summarizes recent findings on the sources of ROS and the bidirectional regulatory effects on GC and discusses various treatment modalities for GC that are related to ROS induction. In addition, the regulation of ROS by natural small molecule compounds with the highest potential for development and applications in anti-GC research is summarized. The aim of the review is to accelerate the clinical application of modulating ROS levels as a therapeutic strategy for GC.

keywords

  • Gastric cancer
  • reactive oxygen species
  • ROS
  • antitumor therapy
  • natural products
  • pharmacology

Introduction

Gastric cancer (GC) is one of the most prevalent cancers globally, ranking fifth in incidence and fourth in mortality among all cancer types1. GC, being a leading cause of cancer-related deaths, is a multifactorial disease associated with geographic location, race, age, dietary habits, genetic predisposition, and H. pylori infection2,3. Emerging experimental and analytical techniques have provided new GC screening strategies for biomarker identification and population stratification. There have also been notable developments in the treatment of GC4,5. Surgery, chemotherapy, radiotherapy, and immunotherapy, among other primary treatment methods, have contributed to enhancing survival among patients with GC. Nevertheless, GC accounted for over one million deaths in 20201. Therefore, it is essential to develop new treatments and anticancer drugs. Reactive oxygen species (ROS) are highly reactive molecules capable of oxidation and are closely linked to tumor progression by promoting both tumor initiation and inducing cell death. Tumor cells exhibit higher oxidation‒reduction (REDOX) levels compared to healthy cells, rendering tumor cells more susceptible to ROS6. Research involving regulation of REDOX in GC provides a novel approach to GC treatment. Indeed, some therapeutic modalities hinder GC progression by modulating ROS levels. This review outlines therapeutic interventions relevant to GC.

Generation of ROS

Various types of ROS exist and are categorized into exogenous and endogenous ROS based on the source. The majority of ROS originate from the mitochondrial respiratory chain, which leads to a steady stream of ROS generated during intracellular metabolism. To maintain the stability of intracellular oxidation levels it is necessary to remove excessive ROS by enzymatic reduction or compound oxidation7.

Sources of ROS

ROS are highly active oxidizing substances produced in REDOX reactions. ROS are predominantly found in the form of free radicals, including superoxide radical anion (O2•−), hydroxyl radical (•OH), and alkoxyl/alkyl peroxyl (RO•/ROO•)8. The other type of ROS is a non-free radical ROS, the most common of which is hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) and commonly referred to as ROS in vivo. Because most free-radical ROS contain an unpaired electron in the outer orbitals, free-radical ROS are highly reactive and prone to initiating free radical chain reactions9. Most decomposition and synthesis processes in cells involve REDOX reactions, which facilitates the transfer of electrons between highly active substances.

Mitochondria, which are crucial for REDOX and electron transfer, are the primary sites of endogenous ROS production7. The electron transport chain (ETC) is a mitochondria-associated process where electrons are transferred through electron carriers, leading to a series of consecutive REDOX reactions. The direction of the ETC typically aligns with the increasing standard reduction potential. Glucose, fatty acids, and other substances enter the tricarboxylic acid (TCA) cycle during catabolism to generate ETC-reducing agents, like nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide (NADH) and flavin adenine dinucleotide (FAD), which are vital for sustaining TCA cycle functionality. Oxygen accepts electrons and is then reduced to produce water and adenosine triphosphate (ATP) through oxidative phosphorylation (OXPHOS)10,11. The TCA cycle is coupled with OXPHOS, during which oxygen is consumed and large amounts of ATP are produced. Hence, the ETC is also termed the respiratory chain. During the process of oxidative phosphorylation, a large amount of ATP is produced to provide energy for life activities. When a mitochondrion ETC transfers electrons to oxygen via complex I, II, and III, oxygen radicals are generated12. Oxygen atoms receive a varying number of electrons, which leads to different degrees of oxidation and the formation of oxygen radicals, including O2•−, H2O2, and •OH. Therefore, ROS are produced as byproducts of electrons passing through the ETC13. Peroxidase-related enzymes and enzyme systems that are associated with biological membranes, such as mitochondria and the endoplasmic reticulum (ER), are involved in ROS generation and metabolism, and intimately associated with these membranes. The endoplasmic reticulum redox reductase (Erol), nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide phosphate oxidase (NOX) family, and other enzymes and enzyme systems are the primary contributors to the production of ROS14. Some side-reaction enzymes, such as xanthine oxidase (XO) and lipoxygenase (LOX), promote the production of ROS. In addition, some exogenous stimuli, such as ultraviolet radiation, ionization, drugs, chemotherapy, and radiotherapy, also promote the ROS response. The mitochondrial respiratory process, one of the major sources of ROS, is summarized in Figure 1.

Figure 1
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 1

The electron transport chain in the mitochondrial respiratory process is one of the major sources of ROS. Glucose undergoes glycolysis in the cytoplasm to form pyruvate, which is then converted to acetyl CoA and enters the TCA cycle in the mitochondria. The TCA cycle involves the interconversion of reduced and oxidized NADH forms. The transfer of H+ generated in the TCA cycle through the four complexes (I–IV) of the respiratory chain is closely associated with ROS production.

Antioxidant enzymes and compounds in cells

Metabolism involves redox reactions and alterations in the oxidation and reduction states of the substances involved in maintaining dynamic equilibrium within the cell15. Hence, antioxidants and the maintenance of cellular redox homeostasis are essential.

Glutathione peroxidase (GPX), peroxiredoxin (Prx), Superoxide dismutase (SOD), and other substances catalyze ROS reduction to less reactive forms, alleviating oxidative stress in cells16. For example, GPX catalyzes the reduction of H2O2 to water and the conversion of reduced glutathione (GSH) to oxidized GSH (GSSG). GSSG can be reduced by glutathione reductase (GR) until GSSG is oxidized. Prx is converted to oxidized Prx when Prx is catalyzed by H2O2, then reactivated by thioredoxin (Trx). Oxidized Trx is then reduced by thioredoxin reductase (TrxR). The above series of redox reactions not only eliminate intracellular ROS but restore the activity of related enzymes. In the above GPX-related antioxidant processes, NAPDH acting as a reducing equivalent is an important antioxidant. Cells can increase NADPH in response to oxidative stress in various ways, including activation of 5’ adenosine monophosphate-activated protein kinase (AMPK) and pentose phosphate pathway enhancers17.

In addition, reductive substances, such as vitamins A, C, and E and some metal ions, are involved in maintaining cellular oxidative balance and facilitating normal cellular growth, division, and the activity of vital enzymes and biochemical processes18,19.

Regulatory mechanism of ROS

In addition to the above-mentioned antioxidant enzymes and compounds, the expression of antioxidant genes and the function of mitochondria are also essential for maintaining redox balance.

A significant portion of these genes encode antioxidants and other cytoprotective proteins. A previous study demonstrated that 3-hydroxybutyrate dehydrogenase 2 (BDH2) reduces the nuclear factor erythroid 2-related factor 2 (Nrf2) protein level by binding to the E3 ubiquitin ligase, Keap1. Specifically, Keap1 facilitates the proteasomal degradation of Nrf2. Upon activation, Nrf2 binds to antioxidant response elements (AREs) in the promoters of target genes20. This binding reduces ARE promoter activity, leading to ROS accumulation. The Keap1-Nrf2 pathway has a pivotal role in ROS regulation21,22.

Targeted intervention of mitochondria can directly impact the primary sites of ROS production. Mitophagy reduces ROS production by degrading damaged mitochondria, thereby promoting cell survival and preventing cell death23. Mitophagy is closely related to tumor development and treatment24,25. Gamma-glutamyltransferase 7 (GGT7) recruits RAB7 by direct binding and drives RAB7 to translocate from the nucleus to the cytoplasm and inhibit ROS production, subsequently mediating mitophagy by increasing mitophagy mediators/inducers26.

Dual role of ROS in tumor cells

As a marker of tumors, ROS have a variety of functions, including transmitting self-proliferative signals, reducing the sensitivity of cells to anti-proliferative signals, and promoting cell invasion and metastasis. ROS perform similar functions in normal tissue cells, contributing to intracellular regulation and defense. Alternatively, ROS can induce distinctive processes in tumor cells, such as rapid proliferation, metastasis, and invasion. Nevertheless, elevated ROS levels can induce cell death, which constitutes one of the mechanisms of action for anticancer drugs27. The dual roles of ROS in cells are summarized in Figure 2.

Figure 2
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 2

Dual roles of ROS in cells. At the normal physiologic level, ROS maintain cell proliferation and differentiation. Excessive ROS cause damage to proteins, nucleic acids, and lipids, promotes the development of diseases, and even leads to cell cancer. When ROS levels reach a certain level pathways related to cell death are activated and excessive ROS in cells promote cell apoptosis.

Role of ROS in oncogenic functions

Low doses of ROS contribute to the development of cancer. This heightened oxidative state, surpassing that of healthy cells, significantly sustains the cancer stem cell (CSC) phenotype and promotes proliferation, metastasis, and adhesion. The Warburg effect, a result of intracellular metabolism regulation, confers a survival advantage28. Cancer metabolism involves glycolysis and the TCA cycle, lipid metabolism processes, and products that regulate cell function29,30. This process of using ATP from glycolysis as the primary source for tumor cells is also related to intracellular lipid metabolism. ROS increases the synthesis of fatty acid transport protein (FATP) and other substances help tumor cells obtain ATP via glycolysis through the Warburg effect. The heightened production of lipid peroxidation (LPO) products signifies cancer progression, providing energy for cell proliferation and migration while regulating cellular lipid levels. Tumor cells reside in a hypoxic environment, known as the tumor microenvironment (TME). Under conditions of nutrient deficiency, tumor cells resort to glycolysis to enhance survival30. Upregulation of genes in tumor cells and the synthesis of enzymes promoting lipogenesis contribute to cell cycle progression31. These are all ways in which ROS are involved in metabolic regulation.

ROS directly participate in REDOX signal transduction as a second messenger to promote tumor angiogenesis. H. pylori pathogen-associated molecular patterns (PAMPs) interact with pattern-recognition receptors (PRRs) located on immune and epithelial cells to generate ROS, and activate mechanisms underlying angiogenesis and epithelial–mesenchymal transformation (EMT). Pathways favorable for growth and metastasis are activated in tumor cells, which accelerates the original metabolic mechanism in normal cells and effects the mechanisms underlying GC progression.

ROS affects cell migration and invasion. An increase in myoferlin protein expression on the cell membrane leads to GC migration, which is correlated with a significant increase in intracellular ROS levels. When the ROS inhibitor, N-acetylcysteine (NAC), is used to inhibit the ROS accumulation of myoferlin, the redox balance is regulated and the migration of GCs is inhibited32.

Drug resistance to ROS accumulation has also become a new target for Cancer in general treatment. Blocking cancer-associated fibroblast (CAF)-exosomes mediates lipid-ROS inhibition, which leads to increasing ferroptosis levels in cancer cells and results in increasing drug sensitivity.

Role of ROS in DNA damage and repair

Prolonged exposure to high oxidative stress can increase the probability of cells becoming cancerous. This finding is due to ROS damage to DNA inhibiting the activity of enzymes involved in DNA repair. This oxidative damage to DNA is one of the significant sources of DNA genome mutations33. MHY440, a novel topoisomerase lota inhibitor, can be induced by enzymes and promote ROS production to cause ROS-dependent apoptosis34. ROS not only cause direct DNA damage but also damage the DNA damage repair system, including base excision repair (BER) for base modification, mismatch repair, nucleotide excision repair (NER) for non-homologous end linking, and homologous recombination (HR) for double-stranded DNA processes35.

Role of ROS in apoptosis

ROS accumulation regulates cell proliferation and apoptosis via key signaling pathways, such as the mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) and nuclear factor-κB (NF-κB) pathways36,37.

Activated MAPK family members, such as c-Jun N-terminal protein kinase (JNK) and p38 MAPK, induce cell apoptosis. Furthermore, MAPKs contribute to apoptosis by downregulating NF-κB, a transcription factor implicated in cell progression37,38. NF-κB is initially sequestered by IκB in the cytosol. The presence of ROS induces the phosphorylation and degradation of IκB. Consequently, NF-κB translocates to the nucleus, where NF-κB induces cell proliferation or apoptosis in the presence of excessive ROS39. NADPH oxidase is a group of membrane-associated enzymes that generate O2•− from oxygen, rapidly converting O2•− into H2O2. Lutein, a member of the xanthophyll family of carotenoids, elevates NADPH oxidase activity, consequently increasing intracellular ROS levels. This increase in ROS mediates NF-κB activation and apoptosis in GC cells39.

Role of ROS in autophagy

The phosphoinositide-3-kinase- (PI3K-) and NF-κB signaling pathways are classical autophagy pathways induced by oxidative stress40. In addition, new signaling pathways regulating GC autophagy have been discovered in recent years. The organic arsenical-derived ROS-modulating drug, ACZ2, induces ROS accumulation by depleting GSH and TrxR1, triggering a subsequent ER stress response by activating the PERK/EIF2/ATF4/CHOP signaling pathways, which is a crucial step in ACZ2-mediated autophagy41. CYT997, a novel microtubule-targeting agent, induces cell apoptosis and triggers autophagy. CYT997 induces apoptosis by stimulating intracellular mitochondrial ROS generation through regulation of the Janus kinase 2 (JAK2)/signal transducer and activator of transcription 3 (STAT3) signaling pathway in GC cells42.

Role of ROS in ferroptosis

Iron accumulation in cells increases lipid peroxide levels, which damages vital structural and functional lipid components, alters cellular pathways regulated by redox balance, and triggering cell death pathways. Cystine/Glutamate reverse transporter (System Xc−), glutathione peroxidase (GP), NOX, and voltage-dependent anion channels (VDACs) in the mitochondrial outer membrane influence lipid transport. GPX and xCT are crucial for maintaining intracellular redox balance, inhibiting lipid peroxidation (LPO), and protecting cells from ferroptosis. GPX4 and System Xc− are two of the key systems43,44.

The Wnt/β-catenin signaling pathway, a crucial regulator of GPX4, is significantly dysregulated in GC patients. Wang et al.45 reported that the β-catenin/TCF4 transcription complex, a key transcription factor, directly interacts with the GPX4 promoter region, promoting GPX4 expression and inhibiting ferroptosis in GC cells. Inhibition of System Xc− leads to insufficient substrate synthesis of GSH, reduces the ROS scavenging ability of GPX4, and induces ferroptosis. Ophiopogonin B (OP-B) blocks the GPX4/System Xc− system, causing ROS accumulation and inducing ferroptosis in GC46.

Unlike the above-mentioned ROS-related cell death mechanisms, iron death involves a distinct regulatory pathway targeting LPO. Arachidonate lipoxygenase (ALOX), especially ALOX15, is implicated in LPO and catalyzes the synthesis of oxidized lipid products, like 4-hydroxy-2-nonenal (4-HNE). Cell membrane Exo-miR-522 directly targets ALOX15 and is linked to lipid oxidation in GC cells, which inhibits oxidized lipid production and prevents ferroptosis47. The key aspects related to ROS in ferroptosis are shown in Figure 3.

Figure 3
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 3

Key aspects related to ROS in ferroptosis. Ferroptosis is an iron-dependent type of non-classical programmed cell death caused by the accumulation of LPO products. GPX4 and System Xc− have important roles in ferroptosis. Iron is transported by TFRC into the cell, where iron participates in the Fenton reaction and produces ROS. ROS accumulate and attack the cell membrane to produce LPO. The cell takes up glutamate via the Xc− system (SLC7A11 and SLC3A2) and subsequently converts glutamate into cystine, serving as a substrate for GSH synthesis. GPX4 regulates the interconversion between GSH and GSSH to regulate intracellular oxidation levels and the accumulation of lipid peroxidation products.

Role of ROS in the immune response

Appropriate levels of oxidative stress enhance the inflammatory response. In immune cells, ROS act as second messengers to increase the degree of the inflammatory response. ROS are intermediates involved in key immune steps, such as phagocytosis, antigen processing, and antigen presentation48. A specific degree of oxidative stress can sustain the activation and proliferation of immune cells while triggering inflammatory factors. The regulatory outcome depends on how much ROS exceeds normal levels; modest ROS elevations bolster the immune system, whereas high levels of ROS instigate pathologic inflammatory responses.

Other cell death pathways related to ROS

Parthanatos is a pathway dependent on PARP1 and independent of caspase, which differs from other known cell death forms49. ROS, generated by cell stimulation, cause DNA damage, promote gene expression in the PARP family, and trigger parthanatos50. Pyroptosis, marked by inflammasome activation and pro-inflammatory cytokine release, is a programmed cell death type. Using sonodynamic therapy (SDT) to transport hydrophilic tirapazamine (TPZ) targets ROS release, exacerbating hypoxia and inducing pyroptosis51.

Anti-GC therapy based on ROS regulation

Chemotherapy and ROS regulation

Many classical clinical drugs are also related to the regulation of ROS in digestive tract tumors. A therapeutic dose of oxaliplatin causes linear dysfunction, while high concentrations of oxaliplatin increase ROS levels in mitochondria. 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) is a classic antitumor drug. 5-FU induces nuclear damage in the nucleus and mitochondrial nucleic acid. Binding of 5-FU to mitochondrial DNA leads to the instability of mitochondrial DNA and protein synthesis. Therefore, 5-FU also induces mitochondria-mediated damage52. Recent studies suggest that baicalin increases intracellular ROS levels, potentially counteracting 5-FU resistance53.

Radiotherapy and ROS regulation

Radiation therapy directly induces DNA damage through ionization or indirectly induces ROS production, which causes DNA damage. The main cause of damage is DNA damage in the nucleus52.

Immunotherapy and ROS regulation

The occurrence of immune dysfunction can be improved through immunotherapy. Dysregulated lipid metabolism and heightened ROS production can result in LPO. Elevated cluster of differentiation 36 (CD36) receptor expression can lead to cellular accumulation of oxidized lipids, causing downstream T-cell dysfunction, particularly CD8+ T-cell dysfunction in tumors, thereby restraining cell proliferation and limiting the energy supply54. All of these changes depend on the interaction of the cancer cell and the TME55. ROS act as a defense barrier to eliminate harmful substances, such as foreign bacteria, and eliminate abnormal cells that have a tendency to become cancerous. The release of highly oxidizing molecules by neutrophils destroys the structure of exogenous pathogens by means of immune clearance56. In the GC TME neutrophils undergo spontaneous ferroptosis, releasing lipid peroxides that dampen T-cell activity and increase ROS production. Immunotherapy targeting neutrophils, by enhancing ROS production, induce neutrophil ferroptosis in the TME, culminating in immunogenic cell death (ICD)57.

Targeted therapy and ROS regulation

During tumorigenesis, various non-coding RNAs and proteins exert distinct effects by modulating the levels of ROS, impacting tumor growth and proliferation. The key regulatory targets of ROS have a pivotal role in the diagnosis and treatment of GC.

Cancer-associated non-coding RNAs, including microRNAs (miRNAs) and long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs), are RNAs that are not translated into proteins58. MiRNAs are small, single-stranded, short nucleotide sequences (between 19 and 25 nucleotides in length). MiRNAs bind to the 3′ untranslated region (3′ UTR) of messenger RNAs (mRNAs), leading to mRNA degradation or translation inhibition59. However, miRNA function can be blocked by lncRNAs. Numerous lncRNAs > 200 nucleotides in length function as miRNA sponges, reducing the suppression of target mRNAs by binding to miRNA molecules60. Furthermore, lncRNAs also interact with mRNAs, forming lncRNA‒mRNA complexes that directly regulate the functionality of mRNAs and influence cellular physiologic processes61.

GC death is promoted by targeting the inhibition of ROS-associated genes and related transcribed and translated products. Some exosomal lncRNAs and miRNAs have a role in regulating cell proliferation via ROS modulation62. Zhang et al.63 reported that exosomal ferroptosis-associated lncRNA (exo-lncFERO), which originates from GC cells, induces SCD1 expression in gastrointestinal neoplasms, thereby regulating ROS levels and inhibiting ferroptosis. Exosomal miR-522, derived from CAFs, targets ALOX15 and blocks lipid-ROS accumulation, thus inhibiting ferroptosis in GC cells47. The targeted inhibition of ROS targets with the above influences has great anti-GC potential.

Targeted regulation of ROS-related energy production processes. Considering differences in TCA cycle metabolism, targeted inhibition of metabolic energy supplies is needed for cancer cells. Cancer cells are highly dependent on the TCA cycle gene, Myc, and the frequently mutated RAS subfamily genes, including KRAS, NRAS, and HRAS. Myc is a type of proto-oncogene that regulates the process of oxidative phosphorylation and glutamine metabolites. Mutations in similar proto-oncogenes and suppressor genes may induce changes in the activity of important enzymes in the TCA cycle. These mutations include succinate dehydrogenase (SDH), fumarate hydratase (FH), and the IDH family, including IDH1, IDH2, and IDH3. These mutations lead to mitochondrial dysfunction and serve as markers of cellular targeting26. In addition, some LPOs can form covalent interactions with mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) and mitochondrial proteins, which also leads to mitochondrial dysfunction64.

Natural products modulating ROS levels for anticancer efficacy

Further elevation of ROS levels increases the susceptibility of cancer cells to oxidative stress-induced cell death65. Natural products and their derivatives represent a major source for anticancer drug discovery and studies have shown that natural products exert antitumor effects by modulating ROS levels. The sources and ROS-related regulatory mechanisms of natural small molecular compounds in GC are shown in Table 1.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 1

Sources and ROS-related regulatory mechanisms of natural small molecular compounds

Natural product-mediated energy metabolism

Overexpression of pyruvate dehydrogenase kinase 1 (PDHK1) in GC cells hinders mitochondrial OXPHOS by obstructing the conversion of pyruvate to acetyl-CoA, thus promoting pyruvate entry into aerobic glycolysis. ROS are byproducts of mitochondrial OXPHOS79.

Recent investigations have highlighted helichrysetin (HEL), a chalcone isolated from Alpinia katsumadai Hayata, as an inhibitor of the c-Myc/PDHK1 axis. HEL inhibits the c-Myc/PDHK1 axis by inhibiting hyperactivation of the mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR)/p70S6K pathway in GC cells. Consequently, HEL exerts inhibitory effects on GC by enhancing mitochondrial OXPHOS and decreasing glycolysis, which is substantiated by increased mitochondrial ATP production and the accumulation of excessive ROS. Importantly, the introduction of ROS scavengers rescues the decrease in viability observed in HEL-treated cells80.

However, using a glycolysis inhibitor or mitochondrial metabolism inhibitor alone exhibits limited cancer prevention efficacy81. Growing evidence indicates that cancer cells freely reprogram the metabolic phenotype from glycolysis to OXPHOS or intermediate metabolism (glycolysis and OXPHOS) to resist hypoxic/oxidative stress or chemotherapy82. Isoliquiritigenin (ISL), a natural flavonoid, also disrupts c-Myc/PDHK1/PGC-1α-mediated energy metabolism, resulting in the suppression of glucose uptake and lactic acid production and secretion. Consequently, ISL suppresses mitochondrial OXPHOS and glycolysis but increases ROS accumulation, thereby inhibiting the progression of GC83.

Changes in the metabolism of tumor cells may involve tumor suppressor factors related to the promotion of mitochondrial oxidation activities, such as the tumor suppressor factor, p53, which stabilizes ROS in cells by promoting mitochondrial respiration, thereby partly impeding favorable survival conditions for tumor cells84. Therefore, natural products that modulate the energy metabolism of tumor cells and influence ROS levels hold significant promise for cancer inhibition.

Natural products induce ferroptosis

Tanshinone IIA (Tan IIA), a pharmacologically active compound from the Chinese herb, Salvia miltiorrhiza Bunge (Danshen), inhibits SLC7A11 by upregulating p53 expression, inducing ferroptosis in GC cells85. The kiwifruit plant, Actinidia chinensis Planch (ACP), inhibits the expression of GPX4 and xCT, leading to the accumulation of ROS in GC cells86. Baicalin, an active component of the traditional Chinese medicine, Huangqin, markedly enhances ferroptosis in GCs by downregulating GPX4 expression when administered in conjunction with conventional chemotherapy agents53.

Intracellular redox-active iron promotes lipid ROS production, which are essential for the execution of ferroptosis87. Ferritin, comprising Ferritin heavy chain 1 (FTH1) and light chain (FTL), is a cytosolic iron storage protein complex that has a vital antioxidant role in cells88. Zheng et al.89 reported that polyphyllin I (PPI), a natural compound extracted from the root of Paris polyphylla, downregulates FTH1 expression through Nrf2, thereby inducing ferroptosis in GC cells.

Natural products regulate ROS-related signaling pathways

Naringin, the second most predominant monomer among flavonoids derived from Korean Byungkyul Citrus platymamma, was identified in a previous study for its ability to induce ROS production in GC cells. This induction subsequently activates p38 MAPK, leading to autophagic cell death in GC cells90. Several natural products have been reported to activate the MAPK pathway and inhibit the NF-κB pathway. Cyanidin-3-O-glucoside (C3G), an active ingredient in anthocyanins, isoorientin (ISO), a flavonoid compound with a luteolin structure, and calycosin, an active compound in plants, increase the phosphorylation levels of p38 and c-Jun N-terminal kinase and decrease NF-κB expression through elevated ROS levels91,92.

In the present study we found that paeoniflorin (PF) exerts antitumor effects in vivo and in vitro and induces apoptotic cell death through ER stress, calcium ions (Ca2+), and ROS release. However, ROS inhibition by diphenyleneiodonium (DPI) and N-acetylcysteine (NAC) blocks cell death and the endoplasmic reticulum kinase (PERK) signaling pathway via the reduction of NOX4. Moreover, PF triggers a synergistic inhibitory effect on the EMT process under radiation exposure in radiation-resistant cells. These findings indicate that PF-induced Ca2+ and ROS release overcomes radioresistance via ER stress and induces cell death under radiation in GCs93.

Other therapies and ROS regulation

Photodynamic therapy (PDT) has become an ideal and promising therapeutic method for fighting cancer but its common application in clinical practice is limited by the expensive devices and light sources and the phototoxicity of photosensitizers. A previous study explored the antitumor efficacy of a novel 450-nm blue laser (BL) combined with sinoporphyrin sodium (DVDMS)-mediated PDT against human GC in vitro and in vivo, focusing on the autophagy pathway. Nanoparticle-based drug-delivery systems include liposomes, liposome-like vesicles, mito-porters, and designing mitochondria-targeted nanocarriers, which have the ability to selectively deliver drugs to the mitochondria. These carriers selectively deliver drugs to mitochondria with high ROS levels, thereby achieving targeted therapy of tumor cells94. The regulation of ROS in antitumor therapies of GC are summarized in Figure 4.

Figure 4
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 4

Regulation of ROS in GC antitumor therapy. ROS regulation in GC antitumor therapy primarily involves chemotherapy, radiotherapy, immunotherapy, and targeted therapy. Some chemical compounds may increase the level of ROS. Some chemical compounds can elevate ROS levels. Some of the drugs carried by the nanodrug delivery system enter the nucleus and target genes associated with ROS regulation. Radiotherapy typically induces DNA damage in the nucleus. Some drugs delivered via nanodrug delivery systems penetrate the nucleus and target genes involved in ROS regulation.

Conclusion

Oxidation and antioxidant capacity in cancer cells contribute to maintaining oxidation levels within a narrower balance range compared to healthy cells. This review provides a comprehensive overview of treatment modalities and strategies for GC focusing on ROS regulation, which are summarized in Figure 5. Specifically, we offer a detailed description into natural products with substantial therapeutic and developmental potential for directly or indirectly modulating ROS levels.

Figure 5
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 5

Major topic of every part in this review.

Conflict of interest statement

No potential conflicts of interest are disclosed.

Author contributions

Conceived and designed the analysis: Xiangdong Cheng, Can Hu.

Collected the data: Zhenjie Fu, Weiwei Zhu.

Contributed data or analysis tools: Ruolan Zhang, Qianyu Zhao.

Performed the analysis: Ping Wang.

Wrote the paper: Yuqi Wang, Jingli Xu.

Acknowledgements

We appreciate the great technical support from the Zhejiang Provincial Research Center for Upper Gastrointestinal Tract Cancer and Zhejiang Key Lab of Prevention, Diagnosis and Therapy of Upper Gastrointestinal Cancer.

  • Received May 15, 2024.
  • Accepted June 12, 2024.
  • Copyright: © 2024 The Authors

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

References

  1. 1.↵
    1. Sung H,
    2. Ferlay J,
    3. Siegel RL,
    4. Laversanne M,
    5. Soerjomataram I,
    6. Jemal A, et al.
    Global cancer statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2021; 71: 209–49.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  2. 2.↵
    1. Ilic M,
    2. Ilic I.
    Epidemiology of stomach cancer. World J Gastroenterol. 2022; 28: 1187–203.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  3. 3.↵
    1. Sekiguchi M,
    2. Oda I,
    3. Matsuda T,
    4. Saito Y.
    Epidemiological trends and future perspectives of gastric cancer in Eastern Asia. Digestion. 2022; 103: 22–8.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  4. 4.↵
    1. Xu H,
    2. Li W.
    Early detection of gastric cancer in china: progress and opportunities. Cancer Biol Med. 2022; 19: 1622–8.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  5. 5.↵
    1. Maomao C,
    2. He L,
    3. Dianqin S,
    4. Siyi H,
    5. Xinxin Y,
    6. Fan Y, et al.
    Current cancer burden in China: epidemiology, etiology, and prevention. Cancer Biol Med. 2022; 19: 1121–38.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  6. 6.↵
    1. Zhang C,
    2. Cao S,
    3. Toole BP,
    4. Xu Y.
    Cancer may be a pathway to cell survival under persistent hypoxia and elevated ROS: a model for solid-cancer initiation and early development. Int J Cancer. 2015; 136: 2001–11.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  7. 7.↵
    1. Srinivasan S,
    2. Guha M,
    3. Kashina A,
    4. Avadhani NG.
    Mitochondrial dysfunction and mitochondrial dynamics-the cancer connection. Biochim Biophys Acta Bioenerg. 2017; 1858: 602–14.
    OpenUrl
  8. 8.↵
    1. Signorello MG,
    2. Ravera S,
    3. Leoncini G.
    Lectin-induced oxidative stress in human platelets. Redox Biol. 2020; 32: 101456.
  9. 9.↵
    1. Zhang L,
    2. Wang X,
    3. Cueto R,
    4. Effi C,
    5. Zhang Y,
    6. Tan H, et al.
    Biochemical basis and metabolic interplay of redox regulation. Redox Biol. 2019; 26: 101284.
  10. 10.↵
    1. Nolfi-Donegan D,
    2. Braganza A,
    3. Shiva S.
    Mitochondrial electron transport chain: oxidative phosphorylation, oxidant production, and methods of measurement. Redox Biol. 2020; 37: 101674.
  11. 11.↵
    1. Martinez-Reyes I,
    2. Chandel NS.
    Mitochondrial TCA cycle metabolites control physiology and disease. Nat Commun. 2020; 11: 102.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  12. 12.↵
    1. Parascandolo A,
    2. Laukkanen MO.
    Carcinogenesis and reactive oxygen species signaling: interaction of the NADPH oxidase NOX1-5 and superoxide dismutase 1-3 signal transduction pathways. Antioxid Redox Signal. 2019; 30: 443–86.
    OpenUrl
  13. 13.↵
    1. Anzai K.
    [Generation, detection and bio-protection of reactive oxygen species/free radicals]. Yakugaku Zasshi. 2021; 141: 1359–72.
    OpenUrl
  14. 14.↵
    1. Wang Y,
    2. Qi H,
    3. Liu Y,
    4. Duan C,
    5. Liu X,
    6. Xia T, et al.
    The double-edged roles of ROS in cancer prevention and therapy. Theranostics. 2021; 11: 4839–57.
    OpenUrl
  15. 15.↵
    1. Juan CA,
    2. de la Lastra JMP,
    3. Plou FJ,
    4. Pérez-Lebeña E.
    The chemistry of reactive oxygen species (ROS) revisited: outlining their role in biological macromolecules (DNA, lipids and proteins) and induced pathologies. Int J Mol Sci. 2021; 22: 4642.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  16. 16.↵
    1. Stone WL,
    2. Pham T,
    3. Mohiuddin SS.
    Biochemistry, antioxidants. Treasure Island, FL: StatPearls Publishing; 2022.
  17. 17.↵
    1. Hayes JD,
    2. Dinkova-Kostova AT,
    3. Tew KD.
    Oxidative stress in cancer. Cancer Cell. 2020; 38: 167–97.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  18. 18.↵
    1. Lennicke C,
    2. Cocheme HM.
    Redox metabolism: ROS as specific molecular regulators of cell signaling and function. Mol Cell. 2021; 81: 3691–707.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  19. 19.↵
    1. Magnani F,
    2. Mattevi A.
    Structure and mechanisms of ROS generation by NADPH oxidases. Curr Opin Struct Biol. 2019; 59: 91–7.
    OpenUrl
  20. 20.↵
    1. Hori R,
    2. Yamaguchi K,
    3. Sato H,
    4. Watanabe M,
    5. Tsutsumi K,
    6. Iwamoto S, et al.
    The discovery and characterization of K-563, a novel inhibitor of the Keap1/Nrf2 pathway produced by Streptomyces sp. Cancer Med. 2019; 8: 1157–68.
    OpenUrl
  21. 21.↵
    1. Casares L,
    2. Unciti-Broceta JD,
    3. Prados ME,
    4. Caprioglio D,
    5. Mattoteia D,
    6. Higgins M, et al.
    Isomeric O-methyl cannabidiolquinones with dual BACH1/Nrf2 activity. Redox Biol. 2020; 37: 101689.
  22. 22.↵
    1. Liu JZ,
    2. Hu YL,
    3. Feng Y,
    4. Jiang Y,
    5. Guo YB,
    6. Liu YF, et al.
    BDH2 triggers ROS-induced cell death and autophagy by promoting NRF2 ubiquitination in gastric cancer. J Exp Clin Cancer Res. 2020; 39: 123.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  23. 23.↵
    1. Yang H,
    2. Li Y,
    3. Hu B.
    Potential role of mitochondria in gastric cancer detection: fission and glycolysis. Oncol Lett. 2021; 21: 439.
    OpenUrl
  24. 24.↵
    1. Spinelli JB,
    2. Haigis MC.
    The multifaceted contributions of mitochondria to cellular metabolism. Nat Cell Biol. 2018; 20: 745–54.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  25. 25.↵
    1. Fan S,
    2. Price T,
    3. Huang W,
    4. Plue M,
    5. Warren J,
    6. Sundaramoorthy P, et al.
    PINK1-dependent mitophagy regulates the migration and homing of multiple myeloma cells via the MOB1B-mediated hippo-YAP/TAZ pathway. Adv Sci (Weinh). 2020; 7: 1900860.
  26. 26.↵
    1. Wang X,
    2. Zhang L,
    3. Chan FKL,
    4. Ji J,
    5. Yu J,
    6. Liang JQ.
    Gamma-glutamyltransferase 7 suppresses gastric cancer by cooperating with RAB7 to induce mitophagy. Oncogene. 2022; 41: 3485–97.
    OpenUrl
  27. 27.↵
    1. Fan X,
    2. Rao J,
    3. Zhang Z,
    4. Li D,
    5. Cui W,
    6. Zhang J, et al.
    Macranthoidin B modulates key metabolic pathways to enhance ROS generation and induce cytotoxicity and apoptosis in colorectal cancer. Cell Physiol Biochem. 2018; 46: 1317–30.
    OpenUrl
  28. 28.↵
    1. Vaupel P,
    2. Multhoff G.
    Revisiting the Warburg effect: historical dogma versus current understanding. J Physiol. 2021; 599: 1745–57.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  29. 29.↵
    1. Anderson NM,
    2. Mucka P,
    3. Kern JG,
    4. Feng H.
    The emerging role and targetability of the TCA cycle in cancer metabolism. Protein Cell. 2018; 9: 216–37.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  30. 30.↵
    1. Serena Castelli PDF,
    2. Ciccarone F,
    3. Desideri E,
    4. Ciriolo MR.
    Lipid catabolism and ROS in cancer: a bidirectional liaison. Cancers (Basel). 2021; 13: 5784.
    OpenUrl
  31. 31.↵
    1. Mounier C,
    2. Bouraoui L,
    3. Rassart E.
    Lipogenesis in cancer progression (Review). Int J Oncol. 2014; 45: 485–92.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  32. 32.↵
    1. Shi H,
    2. Cheng Y,
    3. Shi Q,
    4. Liu W,
    5. Yang X,
    6. Wang S, et al.
    Myoferlin disturbs redox equilibrium to accelerate gastric cancer migration. Front Oncol. 2022; 12: 905230.
  33. 33.↵
    1. Klaunig JE.
    Oxidative stress and cancer. Curr Pharm Des. 2018; 24: 4771–8.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  34. 34.↵
    1. Jang JY,
    2. Kang YJ,
    3. Sung B,
    4. Kim MJ,
    5. Park C,
    6. Kang D, et al.
    MHY440, a novel topoisomerase iota inhibitor, induces cell cycle arrest and apoptosis via a ROS-dependent DNA damage signaling pathway in AGS human gastric cancer cells. Molecules. 2018; 24: 96.
    OpenUrl
  35. 35.↵
    1. Huang R,
    2. Chen H,
    3. Liang J,
    4. Li Y,
    5. Yang J,
    6. Luo C, et al.
    Dual role of reactive oxygen species and their application in cancer therapy. J Cancer. 2021; 12: 5543–61.
    OpenUrl
  36. 36.↵
    1. Jalmi SK,
    2. Sinha AK.
    ROS mediated MAPK signaling in abiotic and biotic stress-striking similarities and differences. Front Plant Sci. 2015; 6: 769.
    OpenUrl
  37. 37.↵
    1. Sheng YN,
    2. Luo YH,
    3. Liu SB,
    4. Xu WT,
    5. Zhang Y,
    6. Zhang T, et al.
    Zeaxanthin induces apoptosis via ROS-regulated MAPK and AKT signaling pathway in human gastric cancer cells. OncoTargets Ther. 2020; 13: 10995–1006.
    OpenUrl
  38. 38.↵
    1. Hoesel B,
    2. Schmid JA.
    The complexity of NF-κB signaling in inflammation and cancer. Mol Cancer. 2013; 12: 86.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  39. 39.↵
    1. Eom JW,
    2. Lim JW,
    3. Kim H.
    Lutein induces reactive oxygen species-mediated apoptosis in gastric cancer AGS cells via NADPH oxidase activation. Molecules. 2023; 28: 1178.
    OpenUrl
  40. 40.↵
    1. Zhang J,
    2. Wang X,
    3. Vikash V,
    4. Ye Q,
    5. Wu D,
    6. Liu Y, et al.
    ROS and ROS-mediated cellular signaling. Oxid Med Cell Longev. 2016; 2016: 4350965.
  41. 41.↵
    1. Li Y,
    2. She W,
    3. Guo T,
    4. Huang T,
    5. Liu Y,
    6. Liu P, et al.
    The organic arsenical-derived thioredoxin and glutathione system inhibitor ACZ2 induces apoptosis and autophagy in gastric cancer via ROS-dependent ER stress. Biochem Pharmacol. 2023; 208: 115404.
  42. 42.↵
    1. Cao Y,
    2. Wang J,
    3. Tian H,
    4. Fu GH.
    Mitochondrial ROS accumulation inhibiting JAK2/STAT3 pathway is a critical modulator of CYT997-induced autophagy and apoptosis in gastric cancer. J Exp Clin Cancer Res. 2020; 39: 119.
    OpenUrl
  43. 43.↵
    1. Xu W,
    2. Sun T,
    3. Wang J,
    4. Wang T,
    5. Wang S,
    6. Liu J, et al.
    GPX4 alleviates diabetes mellitus-induced erectile dysfunction by inhibiting ferroptosis. Antioxidants (Basel). 2022; 11: 1896.
    OpenUrl
  44. 44.↵
    1. Li C,
    2. Chen H,
    3. Lan Z,
    4. He S,
    5. Chen R,
    6. Wang F, et al.
    mTOR-dependent upregulation of xCT blocks melanin synthesis and promotes tumorigenesis. Cell Death Differ. 2019; 26: 2015–28.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  45. 45.↵
    1. Wang Y,
    2. Zheng L,
    3. Shang W,
    4. Yang Z,
    5. Li T,
    6. Liu F, et al.
    WNT/beta-catenin signaling confers ferroptosis resistance by targeting GPX4 in gastric cancer. Cell Death Differ. 2022; 29: 2190–202.
    OpenUrl
  46. 46.↵
    1. Zhang L,
    2. Li C,
    3. Zhang Y,
    4. Zhang J,
    5. Yang X.
    Ophiopogonin B induces gastric cancer cell death by blocking the GPX4/XCT-dependent ferroptosis pathway. Oncol Lett. 2022; 23: 104.
    OpenUrl
  47. 47.↵
    1. Zhang H,
    2. Deng T,
    3. Liu R,
    4. Ning T,
    5. Yang H,
    6. Liu D, et al.
    CAF secreted miR-522 suppresses ferroptosis and promotes acquired chemo-resistance in gastric cancer. Mol Cancer. 2020; 19: 43.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  48. 48.↵
    1. Kennel KB,
    2. Greten FR.
    Immune cell-produced ROS and their impact on tumor growth and metastasis. Redox Biol. 2021; 42: 101891.
  49. 49.↵
    1. Koehler RC,
    2. Dawson VL,
    3. Dawson TM.
    Targeting parthanatos in ischemic stroke. Front Neurol. 2021; 12: 662034.
  50. 50.↵
    1. Zhou Y,
    2. Liu L,
    3. Tao S,
    4. Yao Y,
    5. Wang Y,
    6. Wei Q, et al.
    Parthanatos and its associated components: promising therapeutic targets for cancer. Pharmacol Res. 2021; 163: 105299.
  51. 51.↵
    1. Yu Z,
    2. Cao W,
    3. Han C,
    4. Wang Z,
    5. Qiu Y,
    6. Wang J, et al.
    Biomimetic metal-organic framework nanoparticles for synergistic combining of SDT-chemotherapy induce pyroptosis in gastric cancer. Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2022; 10: 796820.
  52. 52.↵
    1. Kim EK,
    2. Jang M,
    3. Song MJ,
    4. Kim D,
    5. Kim Y,
    6. Jang HH.
    Redox-mediated mechanism of chemoresistance in cancer cells. Antioxidants (Basel). 2019; 8: 471.
    OpenUrl
  53. 53.↵
    1. Yuan J,
    2. Khan SU,
    3. Yan J,
    4. Lu J,
    5. Yang C,
    6. Tong Q.
    Baicalin enhances the efficacy of 5-fluorouracil in gastric cancer by promoting ROS-mediated ferroptosis. Biomed Pharmacother. 2023; 164: 114986.
  54. 54.↵
    1. Xu S,
    2. Chaudhary O,
    3. Rodriguez-Morales P,
    4. Sun X,
    5. Chen D,
    6. Zappasodi R, et al.
    Uptake of oxidized lipids by the scavenger receptor CD36 promotes lipid peroxidation and dysfunction in CD8+ T cells in tumors. Immunity. 2021; 54: 1561–77.e7.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  55. 55.↵
    1. Chen D,
    2. Zhang X,
    3. Li Z,
    4. Zhu B.
    Metabolic regulatory crosstalk between tumor microenvironment and tumor-associated macrophages. Theranostics. 2021; 11: 1016–30.
    OpenUrl
  56. 56.↵
    1. Poljsak B,
    2. Suput D,
    3. Milisav I.
    Achieving the balance between ROS and antioxidants: when to use the synthetic antioxidants. Oxid Med Cell Longev. 2013; 2013: 956792.
  57. 57.↵
    1. Zhu X,
    2. Zheng W,
    3. Wang X,
    4. Li Z,
    5. Shen X,
    6. Chen Q, et al.
    Enhanced photodynamic therapy synergizing with inhibition of tumor neutrophil ferroptosis boosts anti-PD-1 therapy of gastric cancer. Adv Sci (Weinh). 2024; 11: e2307870.
  58. 58.↵
    1. Li X,
    2. Zeng X,
    3. Xu Y,
    4. Wang B,
    5. Zhao Y,
    6. Lai X, et al.
    Mechanisms and rejuvenation strategies for aged hematopoietic stem cells. J Hematol Oncol. 2020; 13: 31.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  59. 59.↵
    1. Hosokawa K,
    2. Muranski P,
    3. Feng X,
    4. Keyvanfar K,
    5. Townsley DM,
    6. Dumitriu B, et al.
    Identification of novel microRNA signatures linked to acquired aplastic anemia. Haematologica. 2015; 100: 1534–45.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  60. 60.↵
    1. Monteiro JP,
    2. Bennett M,
    3. Rodor J,
    4. Caudrillier A,
    5. Ulitsky I,
    6. Baker AH.
    Endothelial function and dysfunction in the cardiovascular system: the long non-coding road. Cardiovasc Res. 2019; 115: 1692–704.
    OpenUrl
  61. 61.↵
    1. Zhang X,
    2. Xie K,
    3. Zhou H,
    4. Wu Y,
    5. Li C,
    6. Liu Y, et al.
    Role of non-coding RNAs and RNA modifiers in cancer therapy resistance. Mol Cancer. 2020; 19: 47.
    OpenUrl
  62. 62.↵
    1. Li X,
    2. Wang S,
    3. Mu W,
    4. Barry J,
    5. Han A,
    6. Carpenter RL, et al.
    Reactive oxygen species reprogram macrophages to suppress antitumor immune response through the exosomal miR-155-5P/PD-l1 pathway. J Exp Clin Cancer Res. 2022; 41: 41.
    OpenUrl
  63. 63.↵
    1. Zhang H,
    2. Wang M,
    3. He Y,
    4. Deng T,
    5. Liu R,
    6. Wang W, et al.
    Chemotoxicity-induced exosomal lncFERO regulates ferroptosis and stemness in gastric cancer stem cells. Cell Death Dis. 2021; 12: 1116.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  64. 64.↵
    1. Xiao M,
    2. Zhong H,
    3. Xia L,
    4. Tao Y,
    5. Yin H.
    Pathophysiology of mitochondrial lipid oxidation: role of 4-hydroxynonenal (4-hne) and other bioactive lipids in mitochondria. Free Radic Biol Med. 2017; 111: 316–27.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  65. 65.↵
    1. Xu H,
    2. Zhao H,
    3. Ding C,
    4. Jiang D,
    5. Zhao Z,
    6. Li Y, et al.
    Celastrol suppresses colorectal cancer via covalent targeting peroxiredoxin 1. Signal Transduct Target Ther. 2023; 8: 51.
    OpenUrl
  66. 66.
    1. Chanu KD,
    2. Thoithoisana S,
    3. Kar A,
    4. Mukherjee PK,
    5. Radhakrishnanand P,
    6. Parmar K, et al.
    Phytochemically analysed extract of Ageratina adenophora (Sprengel) R.M. King & H. Rob. initiates caspase 3-dependant apoptosis in colorectal cancer cell: a synergistic approach with chemotherapeutic drugs. J Ethnopharmacol. 2024; 322: 117591.
  67. 67.
    1. Ling JY,
    2. Wang QL,
    3. Liang HN,
    4. Liu QB,
    5. Yin DH,
    6. Lin L.
    Flavonoid-rich extract of Oldenlandia diffusa (Willd.) Roxb. Inhibits gastric cancer by activation of caspase-dependent mitochondrial apoptosis. Chin J Integr Med. 2023; 29: 213–23.
    OpenUrl
  68. 68.
    1. Le TTH,
    2. Ngo TH,
    3. Nguyen TH,
    4. Hoang VH,
    5. Nguyen VH,
    6. Nguyen PH.
    Anti-cancer activity of green synthesized silver nanoparticles using Ardisia gigantifolia leaf extract against gastric cancer cells. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2023; 661: 99–107.
    OpenUrl
  69. 69.
    1. Zhang X,
    2. Chen J,
    3. Zhou S,
    4. Zhao H.
    Ethanol extract of Eryngium foetidum leaves induces mitochondrial associated apoptosis via ROS generation in human gastric cancer cells. Nutr Cancer. 2022; 74: 2996–3006.
    OpenUrl
  70. 70.
    1. Kwon MJ,
    2. Kim JN,
    3. Park J,
    4. Kim YT,
    5. Lee MJ,
    6. Kim BJ.
    Alisma canaliculatum extract affects AGS gastric cancer cells by inducing apoptosis. Int J Med Sci. 2021; 18: 2155–61.
    OpenUrl
  71. 71.
    1. Sun XL,
    2. Zhang XW,
    3. Zhai HJ,
    4. Zhang D,
    5. Ma SY.
    Magnoflorine inhibits human gastric cancer progression by inducing autophagy, apoptosis and cell cycle arrest by JNK activation regulated by ROS. Biomed Pharmacother. 2020; 125: 109118.
  72. 72.
    1. Wang Z,
    2. Yu K,
    3. Hu Y,
    4. Su F,
    5. Gao Z,
    6. Hu T, et al.
    Schisantherin a induces cell apoptosis through ROS/JNK signaling pathway in human gastric cancer cells. Biochem Pharmacol. 2020; 173: 113673.
  73. 73.
    1. Wang H,
    2. Yuan X,
    3. Huang HM,
    4. Zou SH,
    5. Li B,
    6. Feng XQ, et al.
    Swertia mussotii extracts induce mitochondria-dependent apoptosis in gastric cancer cells. Biomed Pharmacother. 2018; 104: 603–12.
    OpenUrl
  74. 74.
    1. Gunes-Bayir A,
    2. Kiziltan HS,
    3. Kocyigit A,
    4. Guler EM,
    5. Karatas E,
    6. Toprak A.
    Effects of natural phenolic compound carvacrol on the human gastric adenocarcinoma (AGS) cells in vitro. Anticancer Drugs. 2017; 28: 522–30.
    OpenUrl
  75. 75.
    1. Ghasemi S,
    2. Moradzadeh M,
    3. Mousavi SH,
    4. Sadeghnia HR.
    Cytotoxic effects of Urtica dioica radix on human colon (HT29) and gastric (MKN45) cancer cells mediated through oxidative and apoptotic mechanisms. Cell Mol Biol (Noisy-le-grand). 2016; 62: 90–6.
    OpenUrl
  76. 76.
    1. Rasul A,
    2. Yu B,
    3. Yang LF,
    4. Ali M,
    5. Khan M,
    6. Ma T, et al.
    Induction of mitochondria-mediated apoptosis in human gastric adenocarcinoma SGC-7901 cells by kuraridin and nor-kurarinone isolated from Sophora flavescens. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2011; 12: 2499–504.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  77. 77.
    1. Hu W,
    2. Lee SK,
    3. Jung MJ,
    4. Heo SI,
    5. Hur JH,
    6. Wang MH.
    Induction of cell cycle arrest and apoptosis by the ethyl acetate fraction of Kalopanax pictus leaves in human colon cancer cells. Bioresour Technol. 2010; 101: 9366–72.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  78. 78.
    1. Liu Z,
    2. Ng EK,
    3. Liang NC,
    4. Deng YF,
    5. Leung BC,
    6. Chen GG.
    Cell death induced by Pteris semipinnata L. Is associated with p53 and oxidant stress in gastric cancer cells. FEBS Lett. 2005; 579: 1477–87.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  79. 79.↵
    1. Commander R,
    2. Wei C,
    3. Sharma A,
    4. Mouw JK,
    5. Burton LJ,
    6. Summerbell E, et al.
    Subpopulation targeting of pyruvate dehydrogenase and GLUT1 decouples metabolic heterogeneity during collective cancer cell invasion. Nat Commun. 2020; 11: 1533.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  80. 80.↵
    1. Wang P,
    2. Jin JM,
    3. Liang XH,
    4. Yu MZ,
    5. Yang C,
    6. Huang F, et al.
    Helichrysetin inhibits gastric cancer growth by targeting c-Myc/PDHK1 axis-mediated energy metabolism reprogramming. Acta Pharmacol Sin. 2022; 43: 1581–93.
    OpenUrl
  81. 81.↵
    1. Giddings EL,
    2. Champagne DP,
    3. Wu MH,
    4. Laffin JM,
    5. Thornton TM,
    6. Valenca-Pereira F, et al.
    Mitochondrial ATP fuels ABC transporter-mediated drug efflux in cancer chemoresistance. Nat Commun. 2021; 12: 2804.
    OpenUrl
  82. 82.↵
    1. Gao J,
    2. Wang Z,
    3. Guo Q,
    4. Tang H,
    5. Wang Z,
    6. Yang C, et al.
    Mitochondrion-targeted supramolecular “nano-boat” simultaneously inhibiting dual energy metabolism for tumor selective and synergistic chemo-radiotherapy. Theranostics. 2022; 12: 1286–302.
    OpenUrl
  83. 83.↵
    1. Yu M,
    2. Pan Q,
    3. Li W,
    4. Du T,
    5. Huang F,
    6. Wu H, et al.
    Isoliquiritigenin inhibits gastric cancer growth through suppressing GLUT4 mediated glucose uptake and inducing PDHK1/PGC-1α mediated energy metabolic collapse. Phytomedicine. 2023; 121: 155045.
  84. 84.↵
    1. Lu J,
    2. Tan M,
    3. Cai Q.
    The Warburg effect in tumor progression: mitochondrial oxidative metabolism as an anti-metastasis mechanism. Cancer Lett. 2015; 356: 156–64.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  85. 85.↵
    1. Guan Z,
    2. Chen J,
    3. Li X,
    4. Dong N.
    Tanshinone IIA induces ferroptosis in gastric cancer cells through p53-mediated SLC7A11 down-regulation. Biosci Rep. 2020; 40: BSR20201807.
  86. 86.↵
    1. Gao Z,
    2. Deng G,
    3. Li Y,
    4. Huang H,
    5. Sun X,
    6. Shi H, et al.
    Actinidia chinensis planch prevents proliferation and migration of gastric cancer associated with apoptosis, ferroptosis activation and mesenchymal phenotype suppression. Biomed Pharmacother. 2020; 126: 110092.
  87. 87.↵
    1. Li L,
    2. Wang K,
    3. Jia R,
    4. Xie J,
    5. Ma L,
    6. Hao Z, et al.
    Ferroportin-dependent ferroptosis induced by ellagic acid retards liver fibrosis by impairing the snare complexes formation. Redox Biol. 2022; 56: 102435.
  88. 88.↵
    1. Fang Y,
    2. Chen X,
    3. Tan Q,
    4. Zhou H,
    5. Xu J,
    6. Gu Q.
    Inhibiting ferroptosis through disrupting the NCOA4-FTH1 interaction: a new mechanism of action. ACS Cent Sci. 2021; 7: 980–9.
    OpenUrl
  89. 89.↵
    1. Zheng F,
    2. Wang Y,
    3. Zhang Q,
    4. Chen Q,
    5. Liang CL,
    6. Liu H, et al.
    Polyphyllin I suppresses the gastric cancer growth by promoting cancer cell ferroptosis. Front Pharmacol. 2023; 14: 1145407.
  90. 90.↵
    1. Raha S,
    2. Kim SM,
    3. Lee HJ,
    4. Yumnam S,
    5. Saralamma VV,
    6. Ha SE, et al.
    Naringin induces lysosomal permeabilization and autophagy cell death in AGS gastric cancer cells. Am J Chin Med. 2020; 48: 679–702.
    OpenUrl
  91. 91.↵
    1. Sun W,
    2. Zhang ND,
    3. Zhang T,
    4. Li YN,
    5. Xue H,
    6. Cao JL, et al.
    Cyanidin-3-O-glucoside induces the apoptosis of human gastric cancer MKN-45 cells through ROS-mediated signaling pathways. Molecules. 2023; 28: 652.
    OpenUrl
  92. 92.↵
    1. Zhang T,
    2. Xiu YH,
    3. Xue H,
    4. Li YN,
    5. Cao JL,
    6. Hou WS, et al.
    A mechanism of isoorientin-induced apoptosis and migration inhibition in gastric cancer AGS cells. Pharmaceuticals (Basel). 2022; 15: 1541.
    OpenUrl
  93. 93.↵
    1. Kim TW.
    Paeoniflorin induces ER stress-mediated apoptotic cell death by generating Nox4-derived ROS under radiation in gastric cancer. Nutrients. 2023; 15: 5092.
    OpenUrl
  94. 94.↵
    1. Buchke S,
    2. Sharma M,
    3. Bora A,
    4. Relekar M,
    5. Bhanu P,
    6. Kumar J.
    Mitochondria-targeted, nanoparticle-based drug-delivery systems: therapeutics for mitochondrial disorders. Life (Basel). 2022; 12: 657.
    OpenUrl
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Cancer Biology & Medicine: 21 (9)
Cancer Biology & Medicine
Vol. 21, Issue 9
15 Sep 2024
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Print
Download PDF
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Cancer Biology & Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
The role of reactive oxygen species in gastric cancer
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Cancer Biology & Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Cancer Biology & Medicine web site.
Citation Tools
The role of reactive oxygen species in gastric cancer
Yuqi Wang, Jingli Xu, Zhenjie Fu, Ruolan Zhang, Weiwei Zhu, Qianyu Zhao, Ping Wang, Can Hu, Xiangdong Cheng
Cancer Biology & Medicine Sep 2024, 21 (9) 740-753; DOI: 10.20892/j.issn.2095-3941.2024.0182

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
The role of reactive oxygen species in gastric cancer
Yuqi Wang, Jingli Xu, Zhenjie Fu, Ruolan Zhang, Weiwei Zhu, Qianyu Zhao, Ping Wang, Can Hu, Xiangdong Cheng
Cancer Biology & Medicine Sep 2024, 21 (9) 740-753; DOI: 10.20892/j.issn.2095-3941.2024.0182
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Introduction
    • Generation of ROS
    • Dual role of ROS in tumor cells
    • Anti-GC therapy based on ROS regulation
    • Conclusion
    • Conflict of interest statement
    • Author contributions
    • Acknowledgements
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Harnessing the power of cancer-associated fibroblasts to revolutionize pancreatic cancer treatment
  • From residual risk to precision intervention: the evolving role of minimal residual disease in breast cancer management
  • Primary cilia in cancer: structures, functions, mechanisms, and therapeutic implications
Show more Review

Similar Articles

Subjects

  • Gastrointestinal cancer

Keywords

  • Gastric cancer
  • reactive oxygen species
  • ROS
  • antitumor therapy
  • natural products
  • pharmacology

Navigate

  • Home
  • Current Issue

More Information

  • About CBM
  • About CACA
  • About TMUCIH
  • Editorial Board
  • Subscription

For Authors

  • Instructions for authors
  • Journal Policies
  • Submit a Manuscript

Journal Services

  • Email Alerts
  • Facebook
  • RSS Feeds
  • Twitter

 

© 2025 Cancer Biology & Medicine

Powered by HighWire