Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • About
    • About CBM
    • Editorial Board
    • Announcement
  • Articles
    • Ahead of print
    • Current Issue
    • Archive
    • Collections
    • Cover Story
  • For Authors
    • Instructions for Authors
    • Resources
    • Submit a Manuscript
  • For Reviewers
    • Become a Reviewer
    • Instructions for Reviewers
    • Resources
    • Outstanding Reviewer
  • Subscription
  • Alerts
    • Email Alerts
    • RSS Feeds
    • Table of Contents
  • Contact us
  • Other Publications
    • cbm

User menu

  • My alerts

Search

  • Advanced search
Cancer Biology & Medicine
  • Other Publications
    • cbm
  • My alerts
Cancer Biology & Medicine

Advanced Search

 

  • Home
  • About
    • About CBM
    • Editorial Board
    • Announcement
  • Articles
    • Ahead of print
    • Current Issue
    • Archive
    • Collections
    • Cover Story
  • For Authors
    • Instructions for Authors
    • Resources
    • Submit a Manuscript
  • For Reviewers
    • Become a Reviewer
    • Instructions for Reviewers
    • Resources
    • Outstanding Reviewer
  • Subscription
  • Alerts
    • Email Alerts
    • RSS Feeds
    • Table of Contents
  • Contact us
  • Follow cbm on Twitter
  • Visit cbm on Facebook
OtherPerspective

Intercellular transmission of cGAS-STING signaling in cancer

Qirou Wu, Xiaohong Leng and Pinglong Xu
Cancer Biology & Medicine February 2023, 20 (2) 93-97; DOI: https://doi.org/10.20892/j.issn.2095-3941.2022.0750
Qirou Wu
1MOE Laboratory of Biosystems Homeostasis and Protection and Zhejiang Provincial Key Laboratory for Cancer Molecular Cell Biology, Life Sciences Institute, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310058, China
2Institute of Intelligent Medicine, Hangzhou Global Scientific and Technological Innovation Center, Zhejiang University (HIC-ZJU), Hangzhou 310058, China
3Cancer Center, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310058, China
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Xiaohong Leng
1MOE Laboratory of Biosystems Homeostasis and Protection and Zhejiang Provincial Key Laboratory for Cancer Molecular Cell Biology, Life Sciences Institute, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310058, China
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Pinglong Xu
1MOE Laboratory of Biosystems Homeostasis and Protection and Zhejiang Provincial Key Laboratory for Cancer Molecular Cell Biology, Life Sciences Institute, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310058, China
2Institute of Intelligent Medicine, Hangzhou Global Scientific and Technological Innovation Center, Zhejiang University (HIC-ZJU), Hangzhou 310058, China
3Cancer Center, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310058, China
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: xupl{at}zju.edu.cn
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF
Loading

This article has a correction. Please see:

  • Erratum to Intercellular transmission of cGAS-STING signaling in cancer - April 15, 2023

Cellular communication is necessary for organizing multicellular organisms, and is critical in tumorigenesis and progression. Immune and tumor cells use the cGAS-STING mechanism to sense and respond to genomic instability, DNA damage, and mitochondrial dysfunction induced by extra- and intracellular stresses. As an essential component of innate nucleic acid sensing, cGAS-STING signaling is critical in various pathological processes, including microbial infection, autoimmunity, inflammation, organ degeneration, and malignancy. The cytosolic DNA sensor cyclic GMP-AMP synthase (cGAS) senses aberrant or displaced dsDNA in the cytosol and synthesizes 2′3′-cyclic GMP-AMP (cGAMP). Endoplasmic reticulum (ER)-resident adaptor stimulator of interferon genes (STING), mobilized by this second messenger, is trafficked among the ER, ER-Golgi intermediate compartment, and Golgi apparatus, and forms distinct STING signalosomes, which in turn trigger various molecular programs controlling mRNA translation, autophagy, organelle reorganization, and interferon (IFN) production1. The non-canonical functions of cGAS-STING signaling have recently gained extensive attention. These functions occur in various cellular processes, including senescence, autophagy, and cap-dependent mRNA translation1,2.

Notably, the complexity of cGAS-STING signaling is further enhanced by an intriguing feature of intercellular transmission (Figure 1) that has recently been established in several seminal discoveries. The effective intercellular transfer of cGAS-STING signaling enables the sharing of critical information arising from infected, injured, or cancerous cells and the activation of multiple bystander cells in innate immune responses. In cancers, intercellular communication of cGAS-STING signaling connects the tumor microenvironment and pathogenic, immune, and stromal cells, thus promoting or compromising various immune responses and substantially altering disease progression. Understanding this intercellular interplay would greatly aid in developing therapeutics against malignancy. In this perspective, we discuss current knowledge, effects on cancer biology, and implications of in cancer progression and therapeutics.

Figure 1
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 1

Intercellular communication in cGAS-STING signaling. (A) Schematic diagram of canonical cGAS-STING signaling. The DNA sensor cyclic GMP-AMP synthase (cGAS) recognizes a wide range of double-strand DNA (dsDNA) and is activated, thus generating the second messenger 2′3′-cyclic GMP-AMP (cGAMP), which in turn activates membrane-bound stimulator of interferon genes (STING) and induces interferons (IFNs). (B-E) Intercellular transmission of cGAS-STING signaling, including the transfer of dsDNA through phagocytosis, facilitated internalization, and extracellular vesicles (B); the intercellular transmission of cGAMP through gap junctions, receptor-based transport, viral particles, and membrane fusion (C); the intercellular transmission of activated STING triggered by RAB22A-mediated non-canonical autophagy (D); the intercellular communication of IFN signaling through autocrine and paracrine ligand-receptor systems, and subsequent activation of the Janus kinase (JAK)-signal transducer and activator of transcription (STAT) pathway and induction of the expression of various interferon-stimulated genes (ISGs) (E).

Intercellular transmission of dsDNA

Unlike normal cells, free cytoplasmic dsDNA commonly arises in tumor cells because of chromatin instability and altered metabolism. These dsDNAs are derived from multiple sources, including genomic, mitochondrial, apoptotic, and transposable elements, all of which activate cGAS-STING signaling and subsequently induce innate immune responses3. The modes of dsDNA transmission include phagocytosis, facilitated internalization, and extracellular vesicles (EVs).

Phagocytosis

dsDNA transfer between cancer cells and immune cells typically occurs through phagocytosis in the tumor microenvironment. Tumor cell-derived DNA accumulates in the cytoplasm of phagocytes, such as dendritic cells and macrophages, and triggers the activation of cGAS-STING signaling, thus facilitating antigen presentation and promoting acquired immune responses4.

Facilitated internalization

High levels of dsDNA are released into extracellular space after cell death. This DNA is typically non-immunogenic because of its rapid degradation. However, some antimicrobial peptides, such as LL37, bind extracellular dsDNA and facilitate its internalization into monocytes, which produce type I IFNs5.

Extracellular vesicles

dsDNA associated with small EVs (<200 nm in diameter) has been found to mediate intercellular communication in scenarios including infection, inflammation, and malignancy. EVs are lipid bilayer-bound vesicles in biological fluids and are released and captured by cells. EV-mediated delivery of foreign DNA to bystander cells is frequently detected in pathogen infections6. Tumor cell-derived EVs with dsDNA cargo regulate the tumor microenvironment, thereby promoting tumor progression and metastasis. In Crohn’s disease, EVs carrying dsDNA are shed from sites of inflammation and subsequently activate cGAS-STING signaling and enhance innate immune responses in macrophages, thus aggravating the disease7. Upregulation of the mitochondrial DNA-binding protein Lon also induces the secretion of EVs with mtDNA and PD-L1, thereby further inducing the production of IFN and IL-6, and attenuating T-cell immunity. Because dsDNA is found in many stages of cancer and has the potential to strengthen cancer immunity and mediate metastasis, further exploration of its generation and transmission is expected to yield exciting findings in cancer biology.

Intercellular transmission of cGAMP

cGAMP is secreted by cancer cells into the extracellular space and subsequently activates immune responses in receptor cells through various paracrine pathways. Transfer of cGAS-synthesized cGAMP to bystander cells is a primary mechanism underlying cytokine-independent activation of innate and adaptive immune responses. The extracellular hydrolase ENPP1 degrades extracellular cGAMP, thereby controlling the levels of cGAMP in the extracellular environment8.

Gap junctions

Cells transfer cGAMP to neighboring immune cells and activate the immune response through gap junctions, intercellular structures consisting of arrays of intercellular channels in the plasma membrane that allow for the direct transfer of ions and small molecules between cells. Connexins form gap junctions in vertebrates, and transmission of cGAMP relies on the expression of connexins. For instance, connexins 43 and 45 enable the transfer of cGAMP between epithelial and macrophages9. This macrophage transactivation amplifies positive-feedback loops of antitumor immune responses. However, cGAMP transfer also promotes tumor growth and metastasis. Brain metastatic cancer cells use gap junctions to transfer cGAMP into astrocytes in a process mediated by protocadherin 7 and connexin 43, thus resulting in the propagation of cytokines that support tumor growth, such as interferon-α (IFN-α) and tumor necrosis factor (TNF)10. In this scenario, the modulators of gap junctions that break this paracrine loop may serve as targets to treat established brain metastasis.

Receptor-based cGAMP transport

Unlike gap junctions, receptor-based transport facilitates the transmission of cGAMP to distant cells. The volume-regulated anion channel (VRAC) mediates cGAMP import and export depending on the cGAMP chemical gradient. Knockdown of leucine-rich repeat containing 8 (LRRC8A) has been found to eliminate VRAC activity and to inhibit 50%–70% of cGAMP uptake in various primary and cultured cells11. Other cGAMP transporters, including solute carrier family 19 member 1 (SLC19A1) and SLC46A2, have been found to have roles in cells such as THP-1, Nu-DUL-1, U937, and CD14+ monocytes, according to two recent studies12,13. ATP-gated P2X purinergic receptor 7 (P2X7R) is another protein that may potentially transport cGAMP14. Opening the ATP-gated P2X7R channel requires a high concentration of ATP, which may be present during cell damage or death, thus allowing nanometer-sized molecules such as cGAMP to pass through. Therefore, receptor-based transport of cGAMP requires various yet-to-be-identified transporters and functions in a context-dependent manner.

Viral particles and membrane fusion

Expressing HIV-1 Env in donor T cells leads to a membrane fusion reaction with uninfected CD4+ macrophages. The intercellular transfer of cGAMP through fusion sites augments type I IFN responses in macrophages15. HIV-1 also rapidly transfers cGAMP to surrounding cells through viral particles, as validated by mass spectrometry analysis. These viral particles containing cGAMP stimulate robust STING-mediated immune responses in cGAS-deleted dendritic cells16,17. However, the role of cGAMP transmission by viral particles and membrane fusion is less understood in cancer biology.

Intercellular transmission of activated STING proteins

STING is an ER-resident transmembrane protein that traffics to the Golgi after activation, and is degraded through autophagy and lysosomes. The lifespan of STING is associated with the membrane system. Notably, the Kang group18 has recently revealed that activated STING proteins are packaged into RAB22A-induced EVs and transported intercellularly through non-canonical autophagy. EVs containing activated STING induce downstream effects of cGAS-STING signaling in recipient cells. Host-derived STING proteins have been detected in exosomes isolated from HSV-1 infected cells, although no secretion signal peptide in STING has been identified. Activated STING proteins are packaged into Rafeesomes, the organelle formed by the fusion of ER-derived and RAB22A-mediated non-canonical autophagosomes with RAB22A-positive early endosomes18. During the process, RAB22A inactivates RAB7, thereby suppressing the fusion of the Rafeesome with the lysosome, and enabling the secretion of these inner vesicles containing activated STING as EVs. These STING-containing EVs induce IFN-β release from recipient cells into the tumor microenvironment, thus promoting antitumor immunity. These intriguing observations provide a new perspective regarding the spread of STING-armed immunity and alternative forms of intercellular transmission of functional membrane proteins.

Intercellular transmission of interferons

IFNs have various functions in immunity and diseases, such as adaptive immune regulation, pathogen defense, antitumor immunity, and autoimmune responses19. Type I and III IFNs are crucial secretory proteins downstream of Toll-like receptors, RIG-I-like receptors, and cGAS that activate the JAK-STAT pathway in a paracrine manner by binding receptors of bystander cells such as IFNAR1 and IFNAR2. This ligand-receptor-based intercellular communication of IFNs promotes the generation of hundreds of interferon stimulated genes, thus affecting and modulating IFN signaling19. Intercellular transmission of IFN signals in cancer commonly occurs and is crucial for modulating tumorigenesis and cancer progression, such as through directly prolonging the cell cycle and inducing apoptosis. IFNs restrain tumor metastasis by affecting vascular endothelial cells and increasing antitumor immunity in immune cells3, such as through activating dendritic cells and cytotoxic CD8+ T cells. Consequently, IFN-β is a potential adjuvant for cancer therapy20. However, the effects of IFNs on cancer biology are complex, and the protumorigenic effects of IFNs are also well accepted.

Conclusions

In most scenarios, the activation of cGAS-STING signaling facilitates antitumor immunity; consequently, leveraging the intercellular transmission of cGAS-STING signaling might serve as a promising target for treating cancers. The intercellular transmission of cGAS-STING signaling might be targeted, probably context-dependent, to benefit disease therapeutics (Table 1). For example, the physiological concentration of cGAMP is controlled by the cGAMP hydrolase ENPP1, which serves as a potential target for leveraging cGAS-STING transmission. A potent membrane-impermeable ENPP1 inhibitor, compound 32, has been found to enhance plasma cGAMP concentrations and alleviate tumor burden21 significantly and has been studied in a clinical trial22. Furthermore, DNA-containing EVs secreted from topotecan-treated cancer cells have been found to activate dendritic cells and to facilitate antitumor immunity via cGAS-STING signaling. In contrast, pharmacological inhibition of gap junctions hinders the transfer of cGAMP from cancer cells to astrocytes and restricts brain metastasis10. The delivery of activated STING via EVs adds another layer for leveraging cGAS-STING signaling by inducing the production of IFN-β and facilitating antitumor immunity18. However, activators and inhibitors of cGAMP transporters, such as LRRC8A, remain to be developed and examined.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 1

Clinical trials targeting the intercellular transmission of cGAS-STING signaling in cancers

The beneficial roles of cGAS-STING signaling in cancer progression have recently gained considerable attention. Other critical questions, such as how multiple innate DNA sensors activate the context-dependent response programs and crosstalk with each other and how the cGAS-STING pathway communicates with cancer-specific metabolism and nutrients, are intriguing questions remaining to be answered.

Conflict of interest statement

No potential conflicts of interest are disclosed.

  • Received January 2, 2023.
  • Accepted January 3, 2023.
  • Copyright: © 2023, Cancer Biology & Medicine
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY) 4.0, which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

References

  1. 1.↵
    1. Chen C,
    2. Xu P.
    Cellular functions of cgas-sting signaling. Trends Cell Biol 2022; 22: 00252–5.
    OpenUrl
  2. 2.↵
    1. Zhang D,
    2. Liu Y,
    3. Zhu Y,
    4. Zhang Q,
    5. Guan H,
    6. Liu S, et al.
    A non-canonical cgas-sting-perk pathway facilitates the translational program critical for senescence and organ fibrosis. Nat Cell Biol. 2022; 24: 766–82.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  3. 3.↵
    1. Kwon J,
    2. Bakhoum SF.
    The cytosolic DNA-sensing cgas-sting pathway in cancer. Cancer discovery 2020; 10: 26–39.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  4. 4.↵
    1. Liu X,
    2. Pu Y,
    3. Cron K,
    4. Deng L,
    5. Kline J,
    6. Frazier WA, et al.
    Cd47 blockade triggers t cell-mediated destruction of immunogenic tumors. Nature medicine 2015; 21: 1209–15.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  5. 5.↵
    1. Chamilos G,
    2. Gregorio J,
    3. Meller S,
    4. Lande R,
    5. Kontoyiannis DP,
    6. Modlin RL, et al.
    Cytosolic sensing of extracellular self-DNA transported into monocytes by the antimicrobial peptide ll37. Blood 2012; 120: 3699–707.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  6. 6.↵
    1. Nandakumar R,
    2. Tschismarov R,
    3. Meissner F,
    4. Prabakaran T,
    5. Krissanaprasit A,
    6. Farahani E, et al.
    Intracellular bacteria engage a sting-tbk1-mvb12b pathway to enable paracrine cgas-sting signalling. Nature microbiology 2019; 4: 701–13.
    OpenUrl
  7. 7.↵
    1. Zhao F,
    2. Zheng T,
    3. Gong W,
    4. Wu J,
    5. Xie H,
    6. Li W, et al.
    Extracellular vesicles package dsdna to aggravate crohn’s disease by activating the sting pathway. Cell Death Dis 2021; 12: 815.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  8. 8.↵
    1. Carozza JA,
    2. Cordova AF,
    3. Brown JA,
    4. AlSaif Y,
    5. Böhnert V,
    6. Cao X, et al.
    Enpp1’s regulation of extracellular cgamp is a ubiquitous mechanism of attenuating sting signaling. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2022; 119: e2119189119.
  9. 9.↵
    1. Ablasser A,
    2. Schmid-Burgk JL,
    3. Hemmerling I,
    4. Horvath GL,
    5. Schmidt T,
    6. Latz E, et al.
    Cell intrinsic immunity spreads to bystander cells via the intercellular transfer of cgamp. Nature 2013; 503: 530–4.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  10. 10.↵
    1. Chen Q,
    2. Boire A,
    3. Jin X,
    4. Valiente M,
    5. Er EE,
    6. Lopez-Soto A, et al.
    Carcinoma-astrocyte gap junctions promote brain metastasis by cgamp transfer. Nature 2016; 533: 493–8.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  11. 11.↵
    1. Zhou C,
    2. Chen X,
    3. Planells-Cases R,
    4. Chu J,
    5. Wang L,
    6. Cao L, et al.
    Transfer of cgamp into bystander cells via lrrc8 volume-regulated anion channels augments sting-mediated interferon responses and anti-viral immunity. Immunity 2020; 52: 767–81.e6.
    OpenUrl
  12. 12.↵
    1. Ritchie C,
    2. Cordova AF,
    3. Hess GT,
    4. Bassik MC,
    5. Li L.
    Slc19a1 is an importer of the immunotransmitter cgamp. Mol Cell 2019; 75: 372–81.e5.
    OpenUrl
  13. 13.↵
    1. Cordova AF,
    2. Ritchie C,
    3. Böhnert V,
    4. Li L.
    Human slc46a2 is the dominant cgamp importer in extracellular cgamp-sensing macrophages and monocytes. ACS central science 2021; 7: 1073–88.
    OpenUrl
  14. 14.↵
    1. Zhou Y,
    2. Fei M,
    3. Zhang G,
    4. Liang WC,
    5. Lin W,
    6. Wu Y, et al.
    Blockade of the phagocytic receptor mertk on tumor-associated macrophages enhances p2x7r-dependent sting activation by tumor-derived cgamp. Immunity 2020; 52: 357–73.e9.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  15. 15.↵
    1. Xu S,
    2. Ducroux A,
    3. Ponnurangam A,
    4. Vieyres G,
    5. Franz S,
    6. Müsken M, et al.
    Cgas-mediated innate immunity spreads intercellularly through hiv-1 env-induced membrane fusion sites. Cell host & microbe 2016; 20: 443–57.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  16. 16.↵
    1. Gentili M,
    2. Kowal J,
    3. Tkach M,
    4. Satoh T,
    5. Lahaye X,
    6. Conrad C, et al.
    Transmission of innate immune signaling by packaging of cgamp in viral particles. Science (New York, N.Y.) 2015; 349: 1232–6.
    OpenUrl
  17. 17.↵
    1. Bridgeman A,
    2. Maelfait J,
    3. Davenne T,
    4. Partridge T,
    5. Peng Y,
    6. Mayer A, et al.
    Viruses transfer the antiviral second messenger cgamp between cells. Science (New York, N.Y.) 2015; 349: 1228–32.
    OpenUrl
  18. 18.↵
    1. Gao Y,
    2. Zheng X,
    3. Chang B,
    4. Lin Y,
    5. Huang X,
    6. Wang W, et al.
    Intercellular transfer of activated sting triggered by rab22a-mediated non-canonical autophagy promotes antitumor immunity. Cell Res 2022; 12: 1086–104.
    OpenUrl
  19. 19.↵
    1. Lazear HM,
    2. Schoggins JW,
    3. Diamond MS.
    Shared and distinct functions of type i and type iii interferons. Immunity 2019; 50: 907–23.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  20. 20.↵
    1. Duong E,
    2. Fessenden TB,
    3. Lutz E,
    4. Dinter T,
    5. Yim L,
    6. Blatt S, et al.
    Type i interferon activates mhc class i-dressed cd11b(+) conventional dendritic cells to promote protective antitumor cd8(+) t cell immunity. Immunity 2022; 55: 308–23.e9.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  21. 21.↵
    1. Carozza JA,
    2. Brown JA,
    3. Böhnert V,
    4. Fernandez D,
    5. AlSaif Y,
    6. Mardjuki RE, et al.
    Structure-aided development of small-molecule inhibitors of enpp1, the extracellular phosphodiesterase of the immunotransmitter cgamp. Cell chemical biology 2020; 27: 1347–58.e5.
    OpenUrl
  22. 22.↵
    1. Li J,
    2. Duran MA,
    3. Dhanota N,
    4. Chatila WK,
    5. Bettigole SE,
    6. Kwon J, et al.
    Metastasis and immune evasion from extracellular cgamp hydrolysis. Cancer discovery 2021; 11: 1212–27.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Cancer Biology & Medicine: 20 (2)
Cancer Biology & Medicine
Vol. 20, Issue 2
15 Feb 2023
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Print
Download PDF
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Cancer Biology & Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Intercellular transmission of cGAS-STING signaling in cancer
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Cancer Biology & Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Cancer Biology & Medicine web site.
Citation Tools
Intercellular transmission of cGAS-STING signaling in cancer
Qirou Wu, Xiaohong Leng, Pinglong Xu
Cancer Biology & Medicine Feb 2023, 20 (2) 93-97; DOI: 10.20892/j.issn.2095-3941.2022.0750

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Intercellular transmission of cGAS-STING signaling in cancer
Qirou Wu, Xiaohong Leng, Pinglong Xu
Cancer Biology & Medicine Feb 2023, 20 (2) 93-97; DOI: 10.20892/j.issn.2095-3941.2022.0750
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Intercellular transmission of dsDNA
    • Intercellular transmission of cGAMP
    • Intercellular transmission of activated STING proteins
    • Intercellular transmission of interferons
    • Conclusions
    • Conflict of interest statement
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • Erratum to Intercellular transmission of cGAS-STING signaling in cancer
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Emerging mechanisms and implications of cGAS-STING signaling in cancer immunotherapy strategies
  • Erratum to Intercellular transmission of cGAS-STING signaling in cancer
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • From bone marrow to the tumor microenvironment: how neutrophil maturation shapes cancer immunity
  • Immunological and metabolic optimization of tumor neoantigen vaccines
  • Chromatin relaxation dynamics and histone PTMs in the early DNA damage response
Show more Perspective

Similar Articles

Navigate

  • Home
  • Current Issue

More Information

  • About CBM
  • About CACA
  • About TMUCIH
  • Editorial Board
  • Subscription

For Authors

  • Instructions for authors
  • Journal Policies
  • Submit a Manuscript

Journal Services

  • Email Alerts
  • Facebook
  • RSS Feeds
  • Twitter

 

© 2026 Cancer Biology & Medicine

Powered by HighWire