Cancer risk in relatives of BRCA1/2 pathogenic variant carriers in a large series of unselected patients with breast cancer =========================================================================================================================== * Jiaming Liu * Lu Yao * Jie Sun * Li Hu * Jiuan Chen * Juan Zhang * Ye Xu * Yuntao Xie ## Abstract **Objective:** The spectrum and risk of cancer in relatives of *BRCA1/2* pathogenic variant carriers in the Chinese population have not been established. **Methods:** A family history of cancer in 9903 unselected breast cancer patients was retrospectively analyzed. *BRCA1/2* status was determined for all patients and relative risks (RRs) were calculated to evaluate cancer risk in relatives of the patients. **Results:** The incidences of breast cancer in female relatives of *BRCA1* carriers, *BRCA2* carriers, and non-carriers were 33.0%, 32.2%, and 7.7%, respectively. The corresponding incidences of ovarian cancer were 11.5%, 2.4%, and 0.5%, respectively. The incidences of pancreatic cancer in male relatives of *BRCA1* carriers, *BRCA2* carriers, and non-carriers were 1.4%, 2.7%, and 0.6%, respectively. The corresponding incidences of prostate cancer were 1.0%, 2.1%, and 0.4%, respectively. The risks of breast and ovarian cancers in female relatives of *BRCA1* and *BRCA2* carriers were significantly higher than female relatives of non-carriers (*BRCA1*: RR = 4.29, *P* < 0.001 and RR = 21.95, *P* < 0.001; *BRCA2*: RR = 4.19, *P* < 0.001 and RR = 4.65, *P* < 0.001, respectively). Additionally, higher risks of pancreatic and prostate cancers were noted in male relatives of *BRCA2* carriers than non-carriers (RR = 4.34, *P* = 0.001 and RR = 4.86, *P* = 0.001, respectively). **Conclusions:** Female relatives of *BRCA1* and *BRCA2* carriers are at increased risk for breast and ovarian cancers, and male relatives of *BRCA2* carriers are at increased risk for pancreatic and prostate cancers. * *BRCA1* variant * *BRCA2* variant * cancer risk in relatives * Chinese breast cancer patients * family history of cancer ## Introduction Germline pathogenic variants in *BRCA1/2* genes result in increased risks of various cancers *via* an autosomal dominant pattern of inheritance1. A series of studies on the spectrum and risk of cancer in *BRCA1/2* pathogenic variant carriers (hereafter referred to *BRCA1/2* carriers) have been conducted2–18. It is well-known that *BRCA1* and *BRCA2* carriers are at increased risk for breast and ovarian cancers, and *BRCA2* carriers are at increased risk for pancreatic and prostate cancers2,6,7,9–11,16–18. The cancer risks and spectra appear to differ between *BRCA1* and *BRCA2* carriers; specifically, the risk for ovarian cancer in *BRCA1* carriers is higher than *BRCA2* carriers2,7,17, and the risks for pancreatic and prostate cancers in *BRCA2* carriers may be higher than *BRCA1* carriers7,9–11,18. The associations between *BRCA1/2* carriers and other cancers, such as colorectal and gastric cancers, have not been established, thus warrant further investigation3–6,11–15,17,18. Most previous studies involving *BRCA*-associated cancer have focused on *BRCA1/2* carriers; however, a limited number of studies have examined the cancer risk and spectrum in relatives of *BRCA1/2* carriers. One study reported that relatives of *BRCA1* and *BRCA2* carriers have an increased risk for breast and ovarian cancers, and relatives of *BRCA2* carriers also have an increased risk for pancreatic cancer19. In addition, the data regarding the cancer risks in relatives of *BRCA1/2* carriers are largely based on Western populations; scant data exists that pertains to Chinese populations. Chinese individuals have significantly different cancer spectra and risks compared with Western individuals, with relatively lower risks of breast and prostate cancers and relatively higher risks of gastric, esophageal, and liver cancers20,21. Moreover, the spectrum of *BRCA1/2* variants in Chinese women is different from Western women, with approximately 30% of variants not present in Caucasian women22–24. Therefore, the cancer risks in relatives of *BRCA1/2* carriers in Chinese women might be different from Caucasian women. In the present study we aimed to clarify and characterize the spectra and risks of cancers in relatives of *BRCA1/2* carriers in a large series of unselected Chinese patients with breast cancer. ## Materials and methods ### Study population Between October 2003 and May 2015, a total of 10,341 consecutive patients with breast cancer who were treated at the Breast Center of Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute were enrolled in a breast cancer database. All patients were confirmed to have breast cancer based on preoperative biopsy or postoperative histologic examination. *BRCA1/2* germline variants were determined in all patients by next-generation and/or Sanger sequencing, or multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification, as described previously25–27. All of the *BRCA1/2* variants have been listed in detail in previous studies25–27. The *BRCA1/2* status in 438 patients could not be determined due to insufficient quantity or poor quality of genomic DNA. Therefore, 9903 patients with breast cancer were ultimately enrolled in this study. Among these patients, four carried pathogenic variants in both the *BRCA1* and *BRCA2* genes, and were considered *BRCA1* carriers at the time of analysis. Variables, including demographics, clinicopathologic characteristics, and a family history of cancers, were extracted from the breast cancer database, and uncertain family history was confirmed and supplemented through telephone calls or outpatient visits. Written informed consent was obtained during hospitalization from all patients whose clinical information and blood samples could be used for research, including genetic testing. The study was performed in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki. Ethical approval for this study was obtained from the Ethics Committee of Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute (Approval No. 2011KT12). ### Definitions *BRCA1/2* variants are considered pathogenic when classified as pathogenic or likely pathogenic. Variants with uncertain significance (VUS) or likely benign or benign are considered non-pathogenic based on current American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics guidelines. Only patients with pathogenic variants were defined as carriers; other patients were considered to be non-carriers. A family history of cancers referred to cancers that occurred in first-, second- and third-degree relatives of the participants in our study. The cancer history of the participants and further relatives were not included in the analysis. A history of cancer in any relative that corresponded to the cancer in a study participant was regarded as a positive family history. Considering data accessibility, we used the family of the participants but not individuals as the unit with which to analyze the cancer risks of relatives; thus, cancer risks in relatives were calculated based on the family history of the study participants. Of note, a very small fraction of patients may have come from the same family, and such families may have been counted more than once. For convenience, related cancers with a low incidence were merged together for the analysis. For example, lymphoma included Hodgkin’s lymphoma and non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma, and urothelial carcinoma included bladder cancer and cancers of the ureter and urethra. Furthermore, fallopian tube cancer was considered ovarian cancer. ### Statistical analysis We analyzed all types of cancer with positive family history counts equal to or greater than five among *BRCA1/2* carriers, and those with counts less than five were summarized as “other cancers”. Continuous and categorical variables are described as the means ± standard deviations (SD) and frequencies with a percentage (%), respectively. Student’s *t*-test was performed to analyze differences in continuous variables, the Wilcoxon rank-sum test was used to analyze differences in ordered categorical variables, and the Pearson chi square test or Fisher’s exact test was used to analyze differences in unordered categorical variables. In addition, we calculated relative risks (RRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for comparison of cancer risks in relatives of *BRCA1* carriers, *BRCA2* carriers, and non-carriers. All statistical analyses were performed using StataSE 15 (StataCorp LP, College Station, TX, USA). Only two-tailed *P* values < 0.05 were considered statistically significant. ## Results ### Distributions of cancers in relatives of patients with breast cancer There were 538 germline *BRCA1/2* pathogenic variant carriers (209 for *BRCA1* and 329 for *BRCA2*) and 9365 non-carriers in this study. The distribution of cancers in the relatives of the patients with breast cancer are presented in **Table 1**. The incidences of *BRCA1* and *BRCA2* carriers among relatives with 1, 2, and ≥3 cancer types were significantly higher than non-carriers (**Table 1**). Additionally, the proportion of *BRCA1* and *BRCA2* carriers with 1, 2, and ≥3 affected family members was significantly greater than non-carriers (**Table 1**). Differences in the number of cancer types and cancer-affected members among relatives between *BRCA1* and *BRCA2* carriers, however, were not significant (**Table 1**). View this table: [Table 1](http://www.cancerbiomed.org/content/20/2/147/T1) Table 1 Demographics of patients with breast cancer and distributions of cancers in their relatives according to *BRCA* status ### Cancer risks in female relatives of *BRCA1* and *BRCA2* carriers The most common cancers in female relatives of *BRCA1* carriers were breast (33.0%), ovarian (11.5%), and liver (3.8%) cancers, followed by lung and cervical cancers (2.4% each; **Table 2**). The risks for breast and ovarian cancers in female relatives of *BRCA1* carriers were significantly higher than the risks in female relatives of non-carriers (breast cancer: RR = 4.29, 95% CI = 3.50-5.27; *P* < 0.001 and ovarian cancer: RR = 21.95, 95% = CI 13.73-35.07; *P* < 0.001). Furthermore, the risks for liver (RR = 3.73, 95% CI = 1.84-7.58; *P* = 0.002) and cervical cancers (RR = 2.99, 95% CI = 1.22-7.31; *P* = 0.030) in female relatives of *BRCA1* carriers were significantly higher than female relatives of non-carriers. The cancer risks in female relatives of *BRCA1* carriers and non-carriers were not significantly different with respect to gastric, pancreatic, and colorectal cancers (**Table 2**). The most frequent cancer sites in female relatives of *BRCA2* carriers were the breast (32.2%), lung (3.7%), and ovary (2.4%), followed by the cervix and pancreas (1.5% each; **Table 2**). The risks for breast (RR = 4.19, 95% CI = 3.53-4.98; *P* < 0.001) and ovarian cancers (RR = 4.65, 95% CI = 2.22-9.73; *P* = 0.001) in female relatives of *BRCA2* carriers were also significantly higher than female relatives of non-carriers. Moreover, the risks for lymphoma (RR = 3.16, 95% CI = 1.13-8.83; *P* = 0.046) and kidney cancer (RR = 4.07, 95% CI = 1.22-13.56; *P* = 0.046) in female relatives of *BRCA2* carriers were significantly higher than female relatives of non-carriers. The pancreatic cancer risk for female relatives of *BRCA2* carriers was marginally but not significantly higher than female relatives of non-carriers (RR = 2.54, 95% CI = 1.02-6.30; *P* = 0.055). Female relatives of *BRCA1* carriers had significantly higher risks for ovarian (RR = 4.72, 95% CI = 2.16-10.31; *P* < 0.001), liver (RR = 6.30, 95% CI = 1.35-29.36; *P* = 0.016), and any cancers (RR = 1.22, 95% CI = 1.02-1.46; *P* = 0.032) than female relatives of *BRCA2* carriers (**Table 2**). Differences in the risks for other cancers (liver, gastric, and colorectal cancers) between female relatives of *BRCA1* and *BRCA2* carriers were not significant (**Table 2**). View this table: [Table 2](http://www.cancerbiomed.org/content/20/2/147/T2) Table 2 Cancer risks in female relatives of germline *BRCA1* and *BRCA2* pathogenic variant carriers ### Cancer risks in male relatives of *BRCA1* and *BRCA2* carriers The most common cancers in male relatives of *BRCA1* carriers were lung (7.2%), esophageal (6.2%), and gastric cancers (4.8%), followed by liver cancer and lymphoma (2.4% each; **Table 3**). Male relatives of *BRCA1* carriers had significantly higher risks of esophageal cancer (RR = 2.33, 95% CI 1= 0.36-4.00; *P* = 0.002) and lymphoma (RR = 4.77, 95% CI = 1.92-11.86; *P* = 0.005) than male relatives of non-carriers. No significant differences in the risks of other cancers (gastric, liver, and colorectal cancers) between male relatives of *BRCA1* carriers and non-carriers were detected (**Table 3**). The most common cancers in male relatives of *BRCA2* carriers were lung (4.9%), esophageal (4.9%), and liver cancers (4.3%), followed by gastric (2.8%) and pancreatic (2.7%) cancers (**Table 3**). In contrast, male relatives of *BRCA2* carriers had significantly higher risks of pancreatic (RR = 4.34, 95% CI = 2.17-8.68; *P* = 0.001) and prostate cancers (RR = 4.86, 95% CI = 2.20-10.75; *P* = 0.001) than male relatives of non-carriers. In addition, the risks of esophageal (RR =1.82, 95% CI = 1.11-2.98; *P* = 0.017), kidney (RR = 4.22, 95% CI = 1.48-11.98; *P* = 0. 020), and breast cancers (RR = 9.49, 95% CI = 1.92-46.83; *P* = 0.028) in male relatives of *BRCA2* carriers were significantly higher than male relatives of non-carriers. Differences in cancer risks between male relatives of *BRCA2* carriers and non-carriers, however, were not significant with respect to gastric, liver, and colorectal cancers. No significant differences in any type of cancer or overall cancer risk existed between male relatives of *BRCA1* and *BRCA2* carriers. View this table: [Table 3](http://www.cancerbiomed.org/content/20/2/147/T3) Table 3 Cancer risks in male relatives of germline *BRCA1* and *BRCA2* pathogenic variant carriers ## Discussion This is the first study to determine the cancer risks in relatives of *BRCA1/2* carriers in the Chinese population. This study was based on a family history of cancer in 9903 unselected breast cancer patients. We found that the risks for breast and ovarian cancers in the female relatives of *BRCA1* and *BRCA2* carriers were significantly higher than non-carriers, and the risks for pancreatic and prostate cancers in male relatives of *BRCA2* carriers were also significantly increased. In our study breast cancer was the most common cancer among female relatives of both *BRCA1* and *BRCA2* carriers. Ovarian cancer was the second and third most common cancer among female relatives of *BRCA1* (21.95-fold increased risk) and *BRCA2* carriers (4.65-fold increased risk), respectively. Additionally, our study demonstrated that relatives of *BRCA1* carriers have a significantly higher risk for ovarian cancer (RR = 4.72) than relatives of *BRCA2* carriers, suggesting that relatives of *BRCA1* carriers should be more aware of ovarian cancer than *BRCA2* carriers. Pancreatic cancer is another common *BRCA*-associated cancer; however, multiple studies have shown that *BRCA2*, but not *BRCA1*, predisposes individuals to pancreatic cancer3,7,11,19. Our study findings were in agreement to these reports. Indeed, the pancreatic cancer risk was significantly increased in male relatives of *BRCA2* carriers (RR = 4.34) but not relatives of *BRCA1* carriers. Although pancreatic cancer risks were not shown to be significantly elevated in female relatives of *BRCA1* or *BRCA2* carriers, a trend toward risk for pancreatic cancer was still observed for female relatives of *BRCA2* carriers (RR 2.54, 95% CI 1.02-6.30; *P* = 0.055). Notably, an increased risk for pancreatic cancer was reported in female *BRCA2* carriers in a previous study3. Prostatic cancer is also associated with *BRCA*3,6–11,17,18,28,29. Similarly, we found a significantly increased risk for prostate cancer in male relatives of *BRCA2* carriers (RR = 4.86; *P* = 0.001), but a non-significant risk in male relatives of *BRCA1* carriers (RR = 2.19; *P* = 0.241); our finding is in agreement with previous studies3,7,9,11,17,18. In addition, we also found that the risks for liver and cervical cancers in female relatives of *BRCA1* carriers, and lymphoma and kidney cancer in female relatives of *BRCA2* carriers were significantly increased compared with female relatives of non-carriers. Moreover, the risks of esophageal cancer and lymphoma were markedly elevated in male relatives of *BRCA1* carriers, and the risks of esophageal, kidney, and breast cancers in male relatives of *BRCA2* carriers were also increased. It should be noted that the sample size of relatives with these cancers was small, and further studies are needed. The cancer spectrum of relatives of non-carriers was similar to the common cancer spectrum of the general Chinese population20,30, which may accurately reflect cancer risks in the Chinese population. Several common malignancies in the general population, such as gastric, colorectal, and endometrial cancers, were not significantly associated with *BRCA1* or *BRCA2* variants in our study, even though correlations between these cancers and variants have been reported4,6,7,11,13. Our study findings did not rule out the possibility of increased risks for these cancers in relatives of *BRCA1/2* carriers. Several limitations should be considered when interpreting our study. Although the study involved a large cohort of unselected patients with breast cancer, the *BRCA1/2* carrier sample size was not sufficiently large, and some types of cancer were rare after stratification by gender and gene type. Familial cancers were based on a family history of cancers; recall bias was inevitable, especially for the cancer histories among second- and third-degree relatives. ## Conclusions In summary, this study investigated the cancer spectrum and risk in relatives of *BRCA1/2* carriers in a Chinese population. Our findings indicated that female relatives of *BRCA1* and *BRCA2* carriers are at increased risks for breast and ovarian cancers. The risk for ovarian cancer in female relatives of *BRCA1* carriers is even higher than female relatives of *BRCA2* carriers. In addition, male relatives of *BRCA2* carriers have increased risks for pancreatic and prostate cancers. Our study may be useful for genetic counseling and cancer risk evaluation for relatives of *BRCA1/2* carriers in the Chinese population. ## Grant support This study was supported by grants from National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 81974422, 81772824, and 81802635). ## Conflict of interest statement No potential conflicts of interest are disclosed. ## Author contributions Conceived and designed the analysis: Yuntao Xie. Collected the data: Jiaming Liu, Lu Yao, Jie Sun, Li Hu, Jiuan Chen, Juan Zhang, and Ye Xu. Contributed data or analysis tools: Jiaming Liu, Lu Yao, Jie Sun, and Ye Xu. Performed the analysis: Jiaming Liu, Lu Yao, Jie Sun, Li Hu, Jiuan Chen, Juan Zhang, Ye Xu, and Yuntao Xie. Wrote the paper: Jiaming Liu and Yuntao Xie. * Received September 27, 2022. * Accepted December 19, 2022. * Copyright: © 2023, Cancer Biology & Medicine [https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/](https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the [Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY) 4.0](https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. ## References 1. 1. Thull DL, Vogel VG. Recognition and management of hereditary breast cancer syndromes. Oncologist. 2004; 9: 13–24. [Abstract/FREE Full Text](http://www.cancerbiomed.org/lookup/ijlink/YTozOntzOjQ6InBhdGgiO3M6MTQ6Ii9sb29rdXAvaWpsaW5rIjtzOjU6InF1ZXJ5IjthOjQ6e3M6ODoibGlua1R5cGUiO3M6NDoiQUJTVCI7czoxMToiam91cm5hbENvZGUiO3M6MTM6InRoZW9uY29sb2dpc3QiO3M6NToicmVzaWQiO3M6NjoiOS8xLzEzIjtzOjQ6ImF0b20iO3M6MTg6Ii9jYm0vMjAvMi8xNDcuYXRvbSI7fXM6ODoiZnJhZ21lbnQiO3M6MDoiIjt9) 2. 2. Kuchenbaecker KB, Hopper JL, Barnes DR, Phillips KA, Mooij TM, Roos-Blom MJ, et al. Risks of breast, ovarian, and contralateral breast cancer for BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers. JAMA. 2017; 317: 2402–16. [CrossRef](http://www.cancerbiomed.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1001/jama.2017.7112&link_type=DOI) [PubMed](http://www.cancerbiomed.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=28632866&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fcbm%2F20%2F2%2F147.atom) 3. 3. Mersch J, Jackson MA, Park M, Nebgen D, Peterson SK, Singletary C, et al. Cancers associated with BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations other than breast and ovarian. Cancer. 2015; 121: 269–75. [CrossRef](http://www.cancerbiomed.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1002/cncr.29041&link_type=DOI) [PubMed](http://www.cancerbiomed.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=25224030&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fcbm%2F20%2F2%2F147.atom) [Web of Science](http://www.cancerbiomed.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=000347540900014&link_type=ISI) 4. 4. Thompson D, Easton DF, Breast Cancer Linkage Consortium. Cancer incidence in BRCA1 mutation carriers. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2002; 94: 1358–65. [CrossRef](http://www.cancerbiomed.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1093/jnci/94.18.1358&link_type=DOI) [PubMed](http://www.cancerbiomed.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=12237281&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fcbm%2F20%2F2%2F147.atom) [Web of Science](http://www.cancerbiomed.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=000178016300008&link_type=ISI) 5. 5. Brose MS, Rebbeck TR, Calzone KA, Stopfer JE, Nathanson KL, Weber BL. Cancer risk estimates for BRCA1 mutation carriers identified in a risk evaluation program. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2002; 94: 1365–72. [CrossRef](http://www.cancerbiomed.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1093/jnci/94.18.1365&link_type=DOI) [PubMed](http://www.cancerbiomed.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=12237282&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fcbm%2F20%2F2%2F147.atom) [Web of Science](http://www.cancerbiomed.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=000178016300009&link_type=ISI) 6. 6.Breast Cancer Linkage Consortium. Cancer risks in BRCA2 mutation carriers. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1999; 91: 1310–6. [CrossRef](http://www.cancerbiomed.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1093/jnci/91.15.1310&link_type=DOI) [PubMed](http://www.cancerbiomed.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10433620&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fcbm%2F20%2F2%2F147.atom) [Web of Science](http://www.cancerbiomed.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=000081836800013&link_type=ISI) 7. 7. Risch HA, McLaughlin JR, Cole DE, Rosen B, Bradley L, Fan I, et al. Population BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation frequencies and cancer penetrances: a kin-cohort study in Ontario, Canada. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2006; 98: 1694–706. [CrossRef](http://www.cancerbiomed.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1093/jnci/djj465&link_type=DOI) [PubMed](http://www.cancerbiomed.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=17148771&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fcbm%2F20%2F2%2F147.atom) 8. 8. Oh M, Alkhushaym N, Fallatah S, Althagafi A, Aljadeed R, Alsowaida Y, et al. The association of BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations with prostate cancer risk, frequency, and mortality: a meta-analysis. Prostate. 2019; 79: 880–95. [CrossRef](http://www.cancerbiomed.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1002/pros.23795&link_type=DOI) [PubMed](http://www.cancerbiomed.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=30900310&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fcbm%2F20%2F2%2F147.atom) 9. 9. Nyberg T, Frost D, Barrowdale D, Evans DG, Bancroft E, Adlard J, et al. Prostate cancer risks for male BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers: a prospective cohort study. Eur Urol. 2020; 77: 24–35. [CrossRef](http://www.cancerbiomed.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1016/j.eururo.2019.08.025&link_type=DOI) [PubMed](http://www.cancerbiomed.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=31495749&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fcbm%2F20%2F2%2F147.atom) 10. 10. Gallagher DJ, Gaudet MM, Pal P, Kirchhoff T, Balistreri L, Vora K, et al. Germline BRCA mutations denote a clinicopathologic subset of prostate cancer. Clin Cancer Res. 2010; 16: 2115–21. [Abstract/FREE Full Text](http://www.cancerbiomed.org/lookup/ijlink/YTozOntzOjQ6InBhdGgiO3M6MTQ6Ii9sb29rdXAvaWpsaW5rIjtzOjU6InF1ZXJ5IjthOjQ6e3M6ODoibGlua1R5cGUiO3M6NDoiQUJTVCI7czoxMToiam91cm5hbENvZGUiO3M6MTA6ImNsaW5jYW5yZXMiO3M6NToicmVzaWQiO3M6OToiMTYvNy8yMTE1IjtzOjQ6ImF0b20iO3M6MTg6Ii9jYm0vMjAvMi8xNDcuYXRvbSI7fXM6ODoiZnJhZ21lbnQiO3M6MDoiIjt9) 11. 11. Moran A, O’Hara C, Khan S, Shack L, Woodward E, Maher ER, et al. Risk of cancer other than breast or ovarian in individuals with BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations. Fam Cancer. 2012; 11: 235–42. [CrossRef](http://www.cancerbiomed.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1007/s10689-011-9506-2&link_type=DOI) [PubMed](http://www.cancerbiomed.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=22187320&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fcbm%2F20%2F2%2F147.atom) 12. 12. Phelan CM, Iqbal J, Lynch HT, Lubinski J, Gronwald J, Moller P, et al. Incidence of colorectal cancer in BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers: results from a follow-up study. Br J Cancer. 2014; 110: 530–4. [CrossRef](http://www.cancerbiomed.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1038/bjc.2013.741&link_type=DOI) [PubMed](http://www.cancerbiomed.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=24292448&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fcbm%2F20%2F2%2F147.atom) 13. 13. Oh M, McBride A, Yun S, Bhattacharjee S, Slack M, Martin JR, et al. BRCA1 and BRCA2 gene mutations and colorectal cancer risk: systematic review and meta-analysis. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2018; 110: 1178–89. [CrossRef](http://www.cancerbiomed.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1093/jnci/djy148&link_type=DOI) [PubMed](http://www.cancerbiomed.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=http://www.n&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fcbm%2F20%2F2%2F147.atom) 14. 14. Cullinane CM, Creavin B, O’Connell EP, Kelly L, O’Sullivan MJ, Corrigan MA, et al. Risk of colorectal cancer associated with BRCA1 and/or BRCA2 mutation carriers: systematic review and meta-analysis. Br J Surg. 2020; 107: 951–9. 15. 15. Kitson SJ, Bafligil C, Ryan NAJ, Lalloo F, Woodward ER, Clayton RD, et al. BRCA1 and BRCA2 pathogenic variant carriers and endometrial cancer risk: a cohort study. Eur J Cancer. 2020; 136: 169–75. 16. 16. Fu F, Zhang D, Hu L, Sundaram S, Ying D, Zhang Y, et al. Association between 15 known or potential breast cancer susceptibility genes and breast cancer risks in Chinese women. Cancer Biol Med. 2021; 19: 253–62. 17. 17. Momozawa Y, Sasai R, Usui Y, Shiraishi K, Iwasaki Y, Taniyama Y, et al. Expansion of cancer risk profile for BRCA1 and BRCA2 pathogenic variants. JAMA Oncol. 2022; 8: 871–8. 18. 18. Li S, Silvestri V, Leslie G, Rebbeck TR, Neuhausen SL, Hopper JL, et al. Cancer risks associated with BRCA1 and BRCA2 pathogenic variants. J Clin Oncol. 2022; 40: 1529–41. [CrossRef](http://www.cancerbiomed.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1200/JCO.21.02112&link_type=DOI) 19. 19. Streff H, Profato J, Ye Y, Nebgen D, Peterson SK, Singletary C, et al. Cancer incidence in first- and second-degree relatives of BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers. Oncologist. 2016; 21: 869–74. [Abstract/FREE Full Text](http://www.cancerbiomed.org/lookup/ijlink/YTozOntzOjQ6InBhdGgiO3M6MTQ6Ii9sb29rdXAvaWpsaW5rIjtzOjU6InF1ZXJ5IjthOjQ6e3M6ODoibGlua1R5cGUiO3M6NDoiQUJTVCI7czoxMToiam91cm5hbENvZGUiO3M6MTM6InRoZW9uY29sb2dpc3QiO3M6NToicmVzaWQiO3M6ODoiMjEvNy84NjkiO3M6NDoiYXRvbSI7czoxODoiL2NibS8yMC8yLzE0Ny5hdG9tIjt9czo4OiJmcmFnbWVudCI7czowOiIiO30=) 20. 20. Chen W, Zheng R, Baade PD, Zhang S, Zeng H, Bray F, et al. Cancer statistics in China, 2015. CA Cancer J Clin. 2016; 66: 115–32. [CrossRef](http://www.cancerbiomed.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.3322/caac.21338&link_type=DOI) [PubMed](http://www.cancerbiomed.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=26808342&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fcbm%2F20%2F2%2F147.atom) 21. 21. Siegel RL, Miller KD, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2020. CA Cancer J Clin. 2020; 70: 7–30. [CrossRef](http://www.cancerbiomed.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.3322/caac.21590&link_type=DOI) [PubMed](http://www.cancerbiomed.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=http://www.n&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fcbm%2F20%2F2%2F147.atom) 22. 22. Suter NM, Ray RM, Hu YW, Lin MG, Porter P, Gao DL, et al. BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations in women from Shanghai China. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2004; 13: 181–9. [Abstract/FREE Full Text](http://www.cancerbiomed.org/lookup/ijlink/YTozOntzOjQ6InBhdGgiO3M6MTQ6Ii9sb29rdXAvaWpsaW5rIjtzOjU6InF1ZXJ5IjthOjQ6e3M6ODoibGlua1R5cGUiO3M6NDoiQUJTVCI7czoxMToiam91cm5hbENvZGUiO3M6NDoiY2VicCI7czo1OiJyZXNpZCI7czo4OiIxMy8yLzE4MSI7czo0OiJhdG9tIjtzOjE4OiIvY2JtLzIwLzIvMTQ3LmF0b20iO31zOjg6ImZyYWdtZW50IjtzOjA6IiI7fQ==) 23. 23. Li WF, Hu Z, Rao NY, Song CG, Zhang B, Cao MZ, et al. The prevalence of BRCA1 and BRCA2 germline mutations in high-risk breast cancer patients of Chinese Han nationality: two recurrent mutations were identified. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2008; 110: 99–109. [CrossRef](http://www.cancerbiomed.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1007/s10549-007-9708-3&link_type=DOI) [PubMed](http://www.cancerbiomed.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=17851763&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fcbm%2F20%2F2%2F147.atom) [Web of Science](http://www.cancerbiomed.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=000256471000009&link_type=ISI) 24. 24. Zhang J, Pei R, Pang Z, Ouyang T, Li J, Wang T, et al. Prevalence and characterization of BRCA1 and BRCA2 germline mutations in Chinese women with familial breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2012; 132: 421–8. [CrossRef](http://www.cancerbiomed.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1007/s10549-011-1596-x&link_type=DOI) [PubMed](http://www.cancerbiomed.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=21614564&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fcbm%2F20%2F2%2F147.atom) [Web of Science](http://www.cancerbiomed.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=000301545900006&link_type=ISI) 25. 25. Sun J, Meng H, Yao L, Lv M, Bai J, Zhang J, et al. Germline mutations in cancer susceptibility genes in a large series of unselected breast cancer patients. Clin Cancer Res. 2017; 23: 6113–9. [Abstract/FREE Full Text](http://www.cancerbiomed.org/lookup/ijlink/YTozOntzOjQ6InBhdGgiO3M6MTQ6Ii9sb29rdXAvaWpsaW5rIjtzOjU6InF1ZXJ5IjthOjQ6e3M6ODoibGlua1R5cGUiO3M6NDoiQUJTVCI7czoxMToiam91cm5hbENvZGUiO3M6MTA6ImNsaW5jYW5yZXMiO3M6NToicmVzaWQiO3M6MTA6IjIzLzIwLzYxMTMiO3M6NDoiYXRvbSI7czoxODoiL2NibS8yMC8yLzE0Ny5hdG9tIjt9czo4OiJmcmFnbWVudCI7czowOiIiO30=) 26. 26. Zhang J, Sun J, Chen J, Yao L, Ouyang T, Li J, et al. Comprehensive analysis of BRCA1 and BRCA2 germline mutations in a large cohort of 5931 Chinese women with breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2016; 158: 455–62. [CrossRef](http://www.cancerbiomed.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1007/s10549-016-3902-0&link_type=DOI) 27. 27. Su L, Zhang J, Meng H, Ouyang T, Li J, Wang T, et al. Prevalence of BRCA1/2 large genomic rearrangements in Chinese women with sporadic triple-negative or familial breast cancer. Clin Genet. 2018; 94: 165–9. 28. 28. Silvestri V, Leslie G, Barnes DR, Group C, Agnarsson BA, Aittomaki K, et al. Characterization of the cancer spectrum in men with germline BRCA1 and BRCA2 pathogenic variants: results from the consortium of investigators of modifiers of BRCA1/2 (CIMBA). JAMA Oncol. 2020; 6: 1218–30. 29. 29. Cortesi L, Domati F, Guida A, Marchi I, Toss A, Barbieri E, et al. BRCA mutation rate and characteristics of prostate tumor in breast and ovarian cancer families: analysis of 6,591 Italian pedigrees. Cancer Biol Med. 2021; 18: 470–6. [Abstract/FREE Full Text](http://www.cancerbiomed.org/lookup/ijlink/YTozOntzOjQ6InBhdGgiO3M6MTQ6Ii9sb29rdXAvaWpsaW5rIjtzOjU6InF1ZXJ5IjthOjQ6e3M6ODoibGlua1R5cGUiO3M6NDoiQUJTVCI7czoxMToiam91cm5hbENvZGUiO3M6MzoiY2JtIjtzOjU6InJlc2lkIjtzOjg6IjE4LzIvNDcwIjtzOjQ6ImF0b20iO3M6MTg6Ii9jYm0vMjAvMi8xNDcuYXRvbSI7fXM6ODoiZnJhZ21lbnQiO3M6MDoiIjt9) 30. 30. Lei S, Zheng R, Zhang S, Chen R, Wang S, Sun K, et al. Breast cancer incidence and mortality in women in China: temporal trends and projections to 2030. Cancer Biol Med. 2021; 18: 900–9. [Abstract/FREE Full Text](http://www.cancerbiomed.org/lookup/ijlink/YTozOntzOjQ6InBhdGgiO3M6MTQ6Ii9sb29rdXAvaWpsaW5rIjtzOjU6InF1ZXJ5IjthOjQ6e3M6ODoibGlua1R5cGUiO3M6NDoiQUJTVCI7czoxMToiam91cm5hbENvZGUiO3M6MzoiY2JtIjtzOjU6InJlc2lkIjtzOjg6IjE4LzMvOTAwIjtzOjQ6ImF0b20iO3M6MTg6Ii9jYm0vMjAvMi8xNDcuYXRvbSI7fXM6ODoiZnJhZ21lbnQiO3M6MDoiIjt9)