Reflections on the withdrawal of medical articles and the development of writing and publishing standards

References

1. 1.↵
   2. Tang L.

   Five ways China must cultivate research integrity. Nature. 2019; 575: 589–91.

   OpenUrlCrossRef
2. 2.↵
   2. Li S.

   Analysis on the withdrawal of papers from journals in the field of forensic science. J Forensic Med. 2020; 36: 699–705.

   OpenUrl
3. 3.↵
   2. Shi Y.

   Joint investigation and sanction of research misconduct: lessons from the case of Tumor Biology retraction. Sci Soc. 2020; 10: 102–12.

   OpenUrl
4. 4.↵
   2. Wang L,
   3. Liu Z.

   Keeping a clean research environment: addressing research misconduct and improving scientific integrity in China. Cancer Lett. 2019; 464: 1–4.

   OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
5. 5.↵
   2. Yuan J,
   3. Huai M.

   Analysis on concept, performance, and influencing factors of dishonest research. Sci Soc. 2018; 8: 22–38.

   OpenUrl
6. 6.↵
   2. David Z.

   Social punishments for scientific misconduct. Nature. 2018; 564: 312.

   OpenUrl
7. 7.↵
   2. Cong H,
   3. Gu P.

   On the types and characteristics of academic misconduct. J Changsha Univ Sci Technol (Soc Sci). 2018; 33: 31–5.

   OpenUrl
8. 8.↵
   2. Else H.

   ‘Tortured phrases’ give away fabricated research papers. Nature. 2021; 596: 328–9.

   OpenUrl