Abstract
The Wnt/β-catenin signaling pathway regulates many aspects of tumor biology, and many studies have focused on the role of this signaling pathway in tumor cells. However, it is now clear that tumor development and metastasis depend on the two-way interaction between cancer cells and their environment, thereby forming a tumor microenvironment (TME). In this review, we discuss how Wnt/β-catenin signaling regulates cross-interactions among different components of the TME, including immune cells, stem cells, tumor vasculature, and noncellular components of the TME in hepatocellular carcinoma. We also investigate their preclinical and clinical insights for primary liver cancer intervention, and explore the significance of using Wnt/β-catenin mutations as a biomarker to predict resistance in immunotherapy.
keywords
Introduction
Globally, primary liver cancer has been upgraded to the third leading cause of cancer-related mortality according to the latest data released by International Agency for Research on Cancer. Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the most frequent primary liver cancer, accounting for about 70%–85%1. In HCC, most patients diagnosed at early or intermediate stages can potentially be cured by surgery, including liver resection, transplantation, and ablation or palliative locoregional therapies such as transarterial chemoembolization. However, the disease recurrence rate is high. Approximately 40% of patients diagnosed with advanced disease can be palliatively treated with systemic therapy when curative therapies and transarterial chemoembolization are no longer available2.
The multi-tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) sorafenib is the first drug to be granted approval by U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for treating advanced HCC. Recently, other TKIs like lenvatinib commonly used in first-line treatment, and regorafenib, cabozantinib, and ramucirumab used in second-line treatment are also approved because of survival advantages in phase III clinical trials3. With the development of immunotherapy, immune checkpoint inhibitors against PD-1 and CTLA-4 have also been approved by the FDA for the second-line treatment of HCC4. However, the limited median survivals of these patients after treatment with 12–13 months using first-line treatments and 9–11 months using second-line treatments are still an outstanding issue5. Identifying more feasible targets and using predictive biomarkers to screen suitable patients is therefore necessary. Furthermore, comprehending mechanisms underlying drug response or resistance and exploring combinational therapies are imperative to improve the efficacies of HCC immunotherapies and the patients’ survival.
A tumor is a type of organoid structure consisting of malignant cells and their environment. The occurrence and development of liver tumors have been attributed to altered signaling pathways and tumor microenvironments (TMEs) involving vasculature, inflammatory cells, stromal cells, and the extracellular matrix (ECM)6. Therefore, effective treatment strategies need to understand both factors.
The Wnt/β-catenin signaling pathway is extremely conserved and tightly regulated. It plays a vital role in liver biology. Despite inactivity in most mature and healthy livers, this signaling pathway can be reactivated during cell renewal and/or regeneration processes, some pathological conditions, also diseases and cancer7. Abnormal Wnt/β-catenin signaling induces the occurrence and/or progress of various liver diseases, including cancer. In the 2 most common types of primary liver cancer, HCC and cholangiocarcinoma, the Wnt/β-catenin signaling is often hyperactivated and promotes the initiation and progression of tumors8. Activating mutations of CTNNB1, which codes β-catenin, have been detected in 11%–37% of HCC patients, and inactivating mutations of Axin1 or APC exist in approximately 5%–15% or 1%–2% of liver cancer specimens, respectively, acting as negative regulators9.
In this review, we describe the complex interactions involving the Wnt/β-catenin signaling pathway in the TME of HCCs. We also describe the clinically targeted therapies currently designed for this pathway as well as preclinical and clinical applications encompassing Wnt/β-catenin signaling in HCC treatments with sorafenib or immune checkpoint inhibitors. Understanding the role of the Wnt/β-catenin signaling pathway in TME can help us understand the initiation and progression of liver cancer, and provide new avenues for targeted treatment of this disorder.
The Wnt/β-catenin signaling pathway
The Wnt signaling pathway participates in many basic processes of embryonic development and homeostasis. It is commonly classified into canonical or Wnt/β-catenin signaling pathways and non-canonical pathways, including planar cell polarity and the Wnt/calcium signaling pathway10.
Wnts belong to a highly evolutionally conserved, secreted protein family, which is necessary for triggering the Wnt signaling pathway. The human Wnt family containing 19 gene-encoding cysteine-rich glycoproteins bind to more than 15 receptors and co-receptors11,12. The Wnt pathway has been shown to participate in cell proliferation, survival, self-renewal or differentiation, and tissue patterning of multicellular organisms13.
In the canonical pathway, the Wnt ligands (Wnt1, Wnt2, Wnt3, Wnt3a, Wnt7a, Wnt7b, Wnt8a, Wnt8b, Wnt10b, or Wnt16) bind to corresponding Frizzled receptors (10 kinds found in human and mice) and low-density lipoprotein receptor-related proteins 5/6 (LRP5/6) co-receptors on the cell surface, to initiate intracellular signal transduction through nuclear translocation of β-catenin14. The β-catenin is composed of 3 domains: the N-terminal region containing the phosphorylation sites for CK1α and GSK-3β, the armadillo repeat including 12 copies, and the C-terminal domain interacting with TCF/LEF. When Wnt ligands are absent, most β-catenin combines with E-cadherin in adherence junctions at the plasma membrane. The β-catenin in the cytoplasm is degraded by a degradation complex consisting of adenomatous polyposis coli protein (APC), the Axin scaffolding protein, and 2 kinases, casein kinase I isoform-α (CK1α) and glycogen synthase kinase 3β (GSK-3β)15. CK1α and GSK-3β can separately phosphorylate Ser45 and Thr41, Ser37, and Ser33 at the N-terminus of β-catenin. Then, β-transducin repeat-containing protein (β-TrCP), a component of the E3 ubiquitin ligase complex, recognizes phosphorylated β-catenin. Finally, β-catenin is polyubiquitinated and undergoes proteasome degradation16 (Figure 1A). However, when the Wnt ligand binds to the frizzled protein receptor cooperative with LRP5/6, phosphorylation of Dishevelled protein (DVL) and recruitment of Axin and other degradation complex components are induced, leading to dissociation of the degradation complex, inhibition of β-catenin phosphorylation, and nuclear transportation17. Axin proteins are rapidly degraded by tankyrase enzymes via ubiquitin-mediated proteasomal degradation. In the nucleus, β-catenin acts with the transcription factors of T cell Factor/Lymphoid Enhancer Factor (TCF/LEF) family. P300, CREB-binding protein (CBP), Pygo, BCL9, and other transcriptional co-activators are recruited for initiating transcription of Wnt target genes mediating the formation of the extracellular matrix, anti-apoptosis, cell proliferation (CJUN, MYC, and CYD1) and angiogenesis (VEGF and c-MET)18,19 (Figure 1B). Mutations of key genes in this process can prevent β-catenin phosphorylation and then abrogate its degradation. The consequence of increasing β-catenin protein levels in both cytoplasm and nucleus results in the constitutive activation of Wnt/β-catenin pathway.
The Wnt/β-catenin signaling pathway in the TME
Wnt-mediated shaping of tumor immunity
The immune infiltrate refers to the entire encompassing immune cells in the TME. They have been thought to be involved in the regulation of tumor development. There is a great need for more comprehensive knowledge of tumor immunity. We have therefore summarized current findings of the manipulation of tumor infiltrates by Wnt/β-catenin signaling, which has allowed us to better understand multi-component antitumor responses to guide us in the development of more effective immunotherapies for HCC patients (Figure 2 and Table 1).
Macrophages
Tumor-associated macrophages (TAMs) exert their effects on the development of inflammation-related cancers, including HCC, as the main components of the TME. Macrophages can be polarized into M1 macrophages, which have anti-tumor functions induced by IFN-γ alone or with lipopolysaccharides and M2 macrophages, which exhibit pro-tumor function induced by IL-4 and IL-1320. There is emerging evidence showing that TAMs aggravate tumor development, vascularization, metastasis, and suppress acquired immunity by producing various cytokines, chemokines, growth factors, and matrix metalloproteinases (MMP)21. It has been reported that Wnt ligands from macrophages can activate the Wnt signal pathway in oncocytes. In chronic liver disease, after phagocytosis of hepatocyte debris, hepatic macrophages secrete Wnt-3a, as an activator of Wnt/β-catenin signaling in hepatic progenitor cells (HPCs) to promote their differentiation into hepatocytes22 (Figure 2). Macrophages are crucial sources of Wnts in the liver during steatosis. Steatosis-induced activation of Wnt/β-catenin promotes the propagation of tumor initiating cells and progression of tumorigenesis23 (Figure 2). One study reported that liver regeneration was initiated through β-catenin activation in hepatocytes after partial hepatectomy. This kind of β-catenin activation is regulated by Wnt secreted from endothelial cells and Kupffer cells24. Moreover, Wnt/β-catenin can also be triggered inside macrophages by secreted Wnt ligands from cancer cells. The hepatic tumor cells can activate the Wnt/β-catenin signaling pathway by a paracrine function to stimulate M2 macrophage polarization, which promotes protumor activity25. In the tumor mouse model, orthotopically inoculated hepatic Hepa1-6 and Wnt3a secreted from Hepa1-6 can activate Wnt/β-catenin signaling and also function as a mitogen for Kupffer cells like TAMs (kclTAMs). However, whether there are other secreting Wnt ligands or mitogens playing roles in the modulation of kclTAM propagation needs further investigation26. It was also verified that one kind of long noncoding RNA, LINC00662, could activate the Wnt/β-catenin pathway in an autocrine manner by increasing Wnt3a expression and secretion, and also in a paracrine manner to promote M2 macrophage polarization, leading to HCC tumorigenesis and metastasis in vivo27 (Figure 2). Therefore, in future work, efficient strategies for HCC treatment involve inhibiting secretion of Wnts from hepatoma cells or macrophages, as well as inhibiting activation of Wnt/β-catenin signaling.
Dendritic cells (DCs)
DCs function as specialized cells that recognize and present antigens to T cells, with antigenic specificity to modulate T cell functions. DCs are crucial in regulating adaptive immunity. Notch signaling triggers expression of more than 8 Frizzled receptors, to activate the downstream canonical Wnt pathway in hematopoietic progenitor cells, thereby favoring differentiation of DCs28. Expressions of β-catenin and GSK-3β are higher in DCs than in monocytes. Crosstalk of the Wnt and MAPK signaling pathways has been implicated in DC differentiation, maturation, and function29. It has been reported that tumor-intrinsic constitutive activation of β-catenin can affect antitumor immunity by defective recruitment of DCs into the tumor microenvironment in melanomas30, and the failure of DC recruitment is partly due to decreased chemokine CCL4 and high IL-10 production resulting from β-catenin activation within tumor cells31,32. In HCC, it was also found that the CTNNB1 mutation correlated with reduced DCs33. The activation of β-catenin promotes immune evasion, which can be ascribed to failing recruitment of DCs, which in turn influences antigen-specific T cell activity34.
Lymphocytes
The lymphocyte infiltration density of most malignant cancer tissues is heterogenous. Based on the cytotoxic T cell infiltrate within the tumor, it was called a cold or hot tumor in immunotherapy terminology35. For many tumors, increased CD8+ T lymphocytes have been associated with a better prognosis. Nonetheless, the genetic and epigenetic mechanisms underlying the differences of T cell infiltration among tumors are not clear. For HCC, about one-third of patients with gain-of-function mutations of CTNNB1 are relevant to scarce intratumoral T cell content36. HCC patients with CTNNB1 mutations have significantly reduced CD8+, CD4+ T cells, Th2 cells, Tfh cells, and B cells33. Luke et al.37 concluded by analyzing solid tumors in TCGA that tissue inflammation lacking T cells occurred frequently in primary cancers including HCC, and they found a correlation between tumor intrinsic activation of Wnt/β-catenin and non-T cell-inflamed TMEs. Mei et al.38 revealed that DVL1 expression and the infiltration levels of CD4+ T, CD8+ T, and B cells in HCC were negatively correlated. Blockade of Wnt signaling activation in HCC-bearing mice increased CD4+ and CD8+ T cells39. By employing a novel HCC mouse model with the hydrodynamic tail vein delivery of exogenous antigens, and the CRISPR technique aiming at antioncogenes and genetic elements encoding oncogenes, it has been functionally demonstrated that β-catenin activation results in immune escape and tolerance to anti-PD-1 therapy. This can be partially interpreted by abortively producing chemokine CCL5, which affects the supplementation of CD103+ DCs, further influencing antigen-specific CD8+ T cells in the liver, leading to decreased immune surveillance34. Treg cells, as important immunosuppressive cells, have been proven to be regulated by β-catenin through activation of CCL28 in gastric cancer40. Inhibition of the β-catenin/BCL9 interaction can suppress Treg cell infiltration through the TGF-β-CCL20/CCL22 axis in colorectal cancer41. In HCC-bearing mice, inhibition of Wnt activation lead to reduced CD25+Foxp3+ Treg cells39. Based on these observations, we speculate that there is a connection between Wnt signaling and Treg cells. However, whether and how Wnt/β-catenin signaling directly regulates Treg cells remains unclear in studies of HCC.
Natural killer T (NKT) cells are important innate-like hepatic lymphocytes implicated in immune responses during infection, cancer, and autoimmunity42. NKT cells are divided into 2 major subsets having opposing roles in immune responses by secreting proinflammatory or antiinflammatory chemokines and cytokines43. Invariant NKT cells and the chemokine-like factor, LECT2, co-regulate the progression of tumors at the cellular and molecular levels, respectively, in β-catenin-induced HCCs44. A study using mouse model also revealed the complex functions of Wnt/β-catenin signaling in regulating hepatic NKT cell activation. The imposing effects of β-catenin on NKTs are dependent or independent on Wnt45.
Wnt/β-catenin in cancer stem cells (CSCs)
CSCs refer to a subpopulation of poorly differentiated cells that are qualified with the same self-renewing and pluripotent potentials as common somatic stem cells (SSCs)46,47. There is emerging evidence that CSCs within the TME are associated with aggressive tumor progression, chemoresistance, and recurrence in HCC patients. Hepa1-6 CSC spheroids with activating β-catenin have a stronger in vivo tumorigenic ability in the immunocompetent liver microenvironment of a HCC orthotopic mouse model48. EPCAM, LGR5, CD44, and CD133 are representative cell surface markers of CSCs49–51. A subset of “superpotent CSCs”-Wnt-activityhighALDH1+EpCAM+ triple-positive cells with the highest tumorigenesis capacity among all HCC cells promotes Wnt/β-catenin signaling by increased DVL152. HCC is believed to originate from CSCs. The existence of autocrine Wnt signaling, particularly Wnt3 in EpCAM+ CSCs from HCC, was reported in 201753. LGR5 is the target gene of the canonical Wnt signaling. In LGR5+ circulating stem/progenitor cells, Wnt, and R-spondin receptor encoded by LGR5 further upregulate the expressions of CD44 and CD13354. Wnt signaling can also be activated in liver CSC by a long noncoding RNA called lncTCF7, which attracts the SWI/SNF compound to the TCF7 promoter, thus inducing CSC self-renewal and tumor propagation55. Besides, Fan et al.56 discovered that CSC-like traits, tumorigenicity, and sorafenib-resistance in HCC were enhanced by active Wnt/β-catenin pathway stimulated by the nonreceptor protein tyrosine kinase 2. Activation of the Wnt/β-catenin signaling pathway induced by Ring1 also promotes transformation of HPCs into liver cancer stem-like cells57. In addition, β-catenin is involved in Shp2-promoted liver CSC expansion connected with patient responses to chemotherapeutics58. In mouse hepatic stellate cells and liver tumor-initiating stem cell-like cells, the Wnt/β-catenin pathway regulates stearoyl-CoA desaturase expression to stabilize LRP5 and LRP6 mRNA, further augmenting Wnt signaling to result in liver fibrosis and tumor development59. The epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) has been confirmed to be closely related to activation of CSC in tumor tissues60–62. It has also been suggested that the EMT is regulated by the Wnt/β-catenin pathway in HCC63,64.
Understanding the pathways that regulate CSC self-renewal, differentiation, and tumorigenicity are important for the development of anti-cancer therapies. Conserved signaling pathways like Notch, Hedgehog, and Wnt pathways play important roles in the function of normal stem cells and are also implicated in cancer65. Small molecular inhibitors targeting these associated pathways have been implicated in preclinical and clinical studies65–67. However, the specific mechanism of how the Wnt signaling pathway orchestrates interactions between CSCs and the TME needs further investigation.
The Wnt-mediated construction of tumor angiogenesis
Tumor angiogenesis is a key factor in maintaining tumor growth. Angiogenic factors take part in tumor angiogenesis, infiltration, and metastasis. At the molecular level, angiogenesis is a consequence of competition between proangiogenic factors and inhibitors. Many key angiogenic factors have been discovered, including vascular endothelial growth factor, matrix metalloproteinase, fibroblast growth factor (FGF), platelet-derived growth factors, angiopoietins, hepatocyte growth factor, and hypoxia-inducible factor68. HCC has properties of hypervascularization and vascular abnormalities. Tumor vascularity can expand by enrolling existing vessels into the tumor zone in HCC69. The Wnt/β-catenin signaling pathway regulates angiogenic factors. Enhanced Wnt/β-catenin-mediated FGF18 expression and secretion are induced by ribosomal protein, S15a, which promotes angiogenesis and tumor growth in HCC cells70. Yang et al.71 reported that miR-1301 restrained HCC cell transplantation, aggression, and vascularization by reducing Wnt/β-catenin signaling by targeting BCL9, a coactivator of β-catenin transcription. Endotheliocytes express many Wnt pathway-associated elements, and the activation of Wnt1 can induce endotheliocytes expansion and capillary-like network arrangements (Figure 2)47,72. Functional studies of HCC by Hu et al.73 also showed that Wnt signaling was necessary for angiogenesis. Wnt antagonists inhibit tube formation and decrease microvessel density and angiogenic factors. The study clarified the antitumor potential of Wnt antagonists in increasing cell apoptosis and in attenuating tumor angiogenesis.
Wnt signaling and noncellular components
In addition to various cell types, the TME also includes noncellular components involving the ECM, growth factors, proteolytic enzymes, and their inhibitors74. The ECM participates in the initiation and progression of tumors, and also affects cancer therapy75. Cysteine-rich 61, a member of the CCN growth factor family and also an ECM protein, is a target gene of β-catenin and promotes the progression of HCC through regulation of hepatic stellate cells76,77. Dermatopontin is an ECM protein implicated in intercellular adhesion and ECM development. Liu et al.78 reported that dermatopontin repressed HCC proliferation by inactivating pro-oncogenic Wnt/β-catenin signaling through inhibition of CXX4. As for the growth factors in the TME, the intricate crosstalk of Wnt/β-catenin and the epidermal growth factor receptor, FGF pathways have been discussed in the context of HCC79,80. Upregulation of FGF15/19 signaling activates canonical Wnt signaling and the EMT to facilitate HCC in a metabolic disorder background81. Overexpression of platelet-derived growth factor B enhances expression of pro-oncogenic factors, including β-catenin, VEGF, and platelet endothelial cell adhesion molecule-182. MMPs are a family of endoproteases, which degrade the ECM including collagen, gelatin, and elastin. It is thought that MMP-2 and MMP-9 are direct targets of Wnt/β-catenin signaling83. Activation of the Wnt/β-catenin pathway promotes the EMT, migration, and malignant development of HCC by regulating MMP84,85. Exosomes are small extracellular vesicles ranging in size from 30 to 150 nm, and are increasingly regarded as important carriers of information in the TME86. It has been shown that exosomes contributed to HCC development and progression87,88. Yu et al.89 showed that hypoxia-induced exosomes activated the Wnt/β-catenin pathway and promoted proliferation, migration, and the EMT in normoxic HCC cells.
Crosstalk with other pathways in the TME
The interaction between the Wnt and Notch signaling pathways participates in many developmental processes. Cells can use the pattern Notch-ON/Wnt-OFF or Wnt-ON/Notch-OFF to regulate signaling. These 2 pathways modulate each other at different signal transduction levels90. A study reported that in liver cancer stem cells, Notch negatively regulated active β-catenin protein expression, and Notch1 was downstream of Wnt/β-catenin signaling91. In mice KclTAM, activation of Notch signaling impeded CTNNB1 mRNA. This negative correlation was also confirmed in CD68+ macrophages of patient-derived HCC biopsies92.
Hippo, Notch, and Wnt/β-catenin signaling interact to maintain liver size and inhibit HCC. The positive interaction of Notch signaling and Hippo signaling effector YAP/TAZ promotes severe hepatomegaly and accelerates initiation and development of HCC. Unexpectedly, canonical Wnt signaling activation inhibits the interaction between YAP/TAZ and Notch signaling. The positive feedback loop was repressed and thus inhibited the formation of HCC93. Canonical Wnt signaling activation induces KIF2C expression, then enhances mTORC1 signaling and HCC development by KIFC2 binding to TBC1D794. In HepG2 hepatoma cells, Wnt/β-catenin activation and Snail expression are dependent on ERK1/2 signaling to regulate the EMT95. TGFβ signaling also induces Wnt and Sonic hedgehog signaling activation in development of HCC EMT96. Zhang et al.97 discovered that β-catenin interacted with hif-1α to promote hif-1α signaling and to suppress Wnt/β-catenin signaling, together leading to an exaggerated EMT in hypoxic HCC. These findings further addressed the complexity of the signaling pathway interaction network.
Therapeutic inhibition of Wnt signaling in the TME
Because of the essential and multiple roles of canonical Wnt signaling in the TME, novel molecular therapies targeting this pathway have shown unlimited prospects. Therapeutic drugs that directly target the Wnt signaling cascade are currently divided into the following categories: i) inhibiting secretion of Wnt ligands using porcupine (PORCN) inhibitors. PORCN is a membrane-bound O-acyltransferase acylating Wnt ligands during the posttranslational modification stage98; ii) targeting Wnt signaling by extracellular components like Frizzled and LRP5/LRP6; iii) aiming at cytoplasmic molecules of signaling such as tankyrase and CK1α; and iv) impeding the intranuclear Wnt signaling, including β-catenin and the co-factors involved in the transcription of Wnt target genes99. However, there is currently no approved therapeutic agent for clinical use that can specifically and effectively target this pathway (Table 2). One of the major concerns is that inhibition of the Wnt signal pathway may affect Wnt-dependent stem cells and the regeneration of tissues and organs. Some modulators targeting different key steps of the Wnt/β-catenin pathway have been evaluated for their depressor effect and safety in clinical trials100. Among these trials, one study aiming at hepatocellular carcinoma using a humanized monoclonal antibody against Dickkopf-1 (DKK1), DKN-01, is involved in phase I and II trials (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03645980). DKK1 is a secreted glycoprotein inhibiting the canonical Wnt pathway, by binding to the LRP5/6 co-receptor. The role of DKK1 is controversial. Qin et al.101 found inhibition of DKK1 expression facilitated β-catenin to translocate into nuclei, which may influence the proliferation and metastasis of HCC cells. Contrary to the hypothesis that DKK1 is supposed to function as a tumor suppressor, recent studies showed its oncogenic role in activating Wnt/β-catenin signaling pathway, thus promoting the invasion, metastasis, and tumorigenicity of HCC cell lines102,103. DKK1 has been shown to have protumor effects and was correlated with poor prognosis, rendering DKK1 an attractive anticancer target104. Moreover, Liang et al.105 injected tumorigenic β-catenin and MET into β-catenin-deficient livers to induce cancer, and unexpectedly found that Sox9+ cells with stem cell properties expanded inflammatory, upregulated cytokines, and several pro-tumorigenic pathways such as Akt, Erk, and Wnt/β-catenin were also enhanced to exacerbate HCC progression. Restraining β-catenin in the liver startingly creates a pro-tumorigenic microenvironment to aggravate HCC driven by β-catenin/MET, further adding to the complicacy of this pathway. It is also worth noting that as traditional Chinese medicines have gained constant attention because of potential anticancer abilities, several of them have been used in the treatment of HCC by targeting the immunosuppressive TME106. Some traditional Chinese medicines were found to suppress proliferation, induce apoptosis, and impair invasion of liver cancer cells by blocking the Wnt/β-catenin signaling pathway, such as agkihpin (a snake venom arginine esterase)107, Dendrobium candidum extract108, ethyl acetate extract from Jiedu Xiaozheng Yin109, and Zanthoxylum avicennae110. Further animal studies and clinical trials are warranted.
Preclinical and clinical applications involving the Wnt/β-catenin pathway
Sorafenib is the standard therapy for patients with advanced HCC. Sorafenib has been shown to suppress Wnt/β-catenin signaling111. In turn, β-catenin can diminish apoptosis and cell growth inhibition induced by sorafenib treatment. Up-regulation of β-catenin contributes to HCC resistance112. Lin et al.113 confirmed that suppression of canonical Wnt signaling could improve the therapeutic effect of sorafenib alone in a HCC cell line and mouse xenograft model. In a preclinical pediatric HCC model, inhibition of β-catenin activity using the ICG001inhibitor combined with sorafenib led to lower cell viability and showed synergistic effects, indicating that blockade of Wnt/β-catenin signaling may attenuate sorafenib resistance114. Combinatory treatment using FH535, an artificial inhibitor of Wnt/β-catenin signaling with sorafenib on HCC cells, significantly decreased the autophagic flux and increased apoptosis115. Immunotherapy with checkpoint inhibitors is also an important emerging treatment option for HCC. Nivolumab in first-line trials and pembrolizumab in second-line trials showed promise of efficacy, but neither reached statistical significance116. Clinical trials have shown that only about 15%–20% of HCC patients showed an objective response to these therapies. Harding et al.117 found that activating mutations of the Wnt pathway partly contributed to innate resistance to immune checkpoint blockade, and clinical findings displayed shorter median progression-free survival and median overall survival. Immune exclusion HCC class, characterized by mutations in the Wnt/β-catenin, are refractory to immune checkpoint blockers5. Du et al.118 found that EGFR activation and a Wnt ligand up-regulated PD-L1 expression by binding the β-catenin/TCF/LEF transcriptional complex to the CD274 gene promoter in glioblastoma immune evasion. Consistent with this finding, Deng et al.119 identified β-catenin as a transcriptional factor for PD-L1. An innate immune effector, ISG12a, inhibits Wnt/β-catenin signaling by inhibiting proteasomal degradation of Axin, thereby repressing immune checkpoint PD-L1 expression and sensitizing cancer cells to NK cell-mediated killing in HCC and gastric cancer. There are 20%–30% of advanced HCC patients carrying gain-of-function mutations in β-catenin, which is the third most frequent mutation following the hTERT promoter and TP53. This group of patients is unlikely to benefit from immune checkpoint inhibitors34. However, it is promising to utilize alterations in the β-catenin pathway as a biomarker to direct therapy for HCC patients. Checkmate459, a randomized phase III clinical test comparing nivolumab and sorafenib in first-line HCC therapy, failed to meet its primary endpoint, which clearly emphasized the urgent need for patient selection36. Detailed studies of marker candidates can be used to stratify clinical trials and improve guidance for therapeutic decisions for HCC patients.
Conclusions and perspectives
This review highlights the roles of the Wnt/β-catenin pathway in the TME of HCC, including its complicated roles in immune infiltration, cancer stem cell tumor vascularization, and its interaction with noncellular components in the TME. What increases the difficulty of studying this pathway is that the Wnt/β-catenin pathway also crosstalks with other pathways like Notch, Hedgehog, and Hippo. Furthermore, because of the tumor heterogeneity in HCC, it is reasonable that the diversified activation of the Wnt pathway could exist in tumor nodules, which results in more intricate Wnt signaling in response to variant stress, TKI treatment, and immunotherapy. These heterogeneities may lead to tumor resistance and treatment failure. Thus, designing specific targeted drugs and individualized therapies for different patients according to their tumor molecular typing and risk factor is warranted.
Tumors with mutations in the Wnt/β-catenin pathway are characterized by immune-exclusion in the TME. Both the activation and inactivation mutations of CTNNB1 are involved in liver tumor development. Precise modulation of Wnt/β-catenin is therefore essential to equilibrize anticancer effectiveness and adverse events, to address the challenges for advancing and prospective clinical tests. In spite of these fears, new modulators of the Wnt/β-catenin signaling provide us with opportunities to enhance our understanding of this extremely complex pathway, and may be used to treat Wnt-related diseases including tumors. Although several traditional Chinese medicines have been shown to inhibit Wnt/β-catenin signaling in HCC cells, relevant clinical trials and data are still lacking. The efficacy of most Chinese herbs is often dependent on a variety of components directed to multiple targets, including altering the TME and the systemic immune system. It is therefore challenging to develop a single active ingredient from traditional Chinese medicine. Considering that Wnt/β-catenin mutations exert effects on the therapy of HCC patients, including sorafenib and immune checkpoint inhibitors, they can be used as biomarkers to predict resistance to therapies and applications of Wnt modulators in combination with immunotherapy regimens for the development of novel cancer treatments. It is also worth using traditional Chinese medicine combined with immunotherapy to treat HCC, in view of their inhibitory effects on Wnt signaling. The application of Wnt modulators in preclinical and clinical studies remains to be corroborated and deserves further exploration in advanced HCC. A precise and detailed understanding of the contributions of Wnt/β-catenin signaling to diverse compositions in the TME in HCC is a prerequisite to thoroughly comprehend data from preclinical and clinical studies, to provide a foundation for conceiving better therapeutic regimens targeting Wnt/β-catenin signaling in HCC. It is promising that the emerging single-cell-based omics technology, including but not limited to scRNA-seq, scATAC-seq, single-cell mass cytometry, and spatial transcriptome analysis, have enabled microscopic interpretation of cellular behaviors and immune mechanisms. These new techniques have helped us to understand tumor heterogeneity, immune characteristics of tumors, the TME, tumor recurrence, and cancer treatment more comprehensively.
Grant support
This work was supported by the National Research Program of China (Grant Nos. 2017YFA0505803 and 2017YFC0908100), the State Key Project for Infectious Diseases (Grant Nos. 2018ZX10732202-001 and 2018ZX10302207-004), and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 81790633, 61922047, and 81902412).
Conflict of interest statement
No potential conflicts of interest are disclosed.
Author contributions
Conceived and designed the analysis: Hongyang Wang and Lei Chen.
Revised the manuscript: Xinyao Qiu and Yan Zhao.
Wrote the manuscript: Kaiting Wang.
- Received May 19, 2021.
- Accepted August 20, 2021.
- Copyright: © 2022, Cancer Biology & Medicine
This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY) 4.0, which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
References
- 1.↵
- 2.↵
- 3.↵
- 4.↵
- 5.↵
- 6.↵
- 7.↵
- 8.↵
- 9.↵
- 10.↵
- 11.↵
- 12.↵
- 13.↵
- 14.↵
- 15.↵
- 16.↵
- 17.↵
- 18.↵
- 19.↵
- 20.↵
- 21.↵
- 22.↵
- 23.↵
- 24.↵
- 25.↵
- 26.↵
- 27.↵
- 28.↵
- 29.↵
- 30.↵
- 31.↵
- 32.↵
- 33.↵
- 34.↵
- 35.↵
- 36.↵
- 37.↵
- 38.↵
- 39.↵
- 40.↵
- 41.↵
- 42.↵
- 43.↵
- 44.↵
- 45.↵
- 46.↵
- 47.↵
- 48.↵
- 49.↵
- 50.
- 51.↵
- 52.↵
- 53.↵
- 54.↵
- 55.↵
- 56.↵
- 57.↵
- 58.↵
- 59.↵
- 60.↵
- 61.
- 62.↵
- 63.↵
- 64.↵
- 65.↵
- 66.
- 67.↵
- 68.↵
- 69.↵
- 70.↵
- 71.↵
- 72.↵
- 73.↵
- 74.↵
- 75.↵
- 76.↵
- 77.↵
- 78.↵
- 79.↵
- 80.↵
- 81.↵
- 82.↵
- 83.↵
- 84.↵
- 85.↵
- 86.↵
- 87.↵
- 88.↵
- 89.↵
- 90.↵
- 91.↵
- 92.↵
- 93.↵
- 94.↵
- 95.↵
- 96.↵
- 97.↵
- 98.↵
- 99.↵
- 100.↵
- 101.↵
- 102.↵
- 103.↵
- 104.↵
- 105.↵
- 106.↵
- 107.↵
- 108.↵
- 109.↵
- 110.↵
- 111.↵
- 112.↵
- 113.↵
- 114.↵
- 115.↵
- 116.↵
- 117.↵
- 118.↵
- 119.↵