Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • About
    • About CBM
    • Editorial Board
  • Articles
    • Ahead of print
    • Current Issue
    • Archive
    • Collections
    • Cover Story
  • For Authors
    • Instructions for Authors
    • Resources
    • Submit a Manuscript
  • For Reviewers
    • Become a Reviewer
    • Instructions for Reviewers
    • Resources
    • Outstanding Reviewer
  • Subscription
  • Alerts
    • Email Alerts
    • RSS Feeds
    • Table of Contents
  • Contact us
  • Other Publications
    • cbm

User menu

  • My alerts

Search

  • Advanced search
Cancer Biology & Medicine
  • Other Publications
    • cbm
  • My alerts
Cancer Biology & Medicine

Advanced Search

 

  • Home
  • About
    • About CBM
    • Editorial Board
  • Articles
    • Ahead of print
    • Current Issue
    • Archive
    • Collections
    • Cover Story
  • For Authors
    • Instructions for Authors
    • Resources
    • Submit a Manuscript
  • For Reviewers
    • Become a Reviewer
    • Instructions for Reviewers
    • Resources
    • Outstanding Reviewer
  • Subscription
  • Alerts
    • Email Alerts
    • RSS Feeds
    • Table of Contents
  • Contact us
  • Follow cbm on Twitter
  • Visit cbm on Facebook
Research ArticleOriginal Article

Efficacy of the new therapeutic approach in curing malignant neoplasms on the model of human glioblastoma

Evgeniya V. Dolgova, Oleg M. Andrushkevich, Polina E. Kisaretova, Anastasia S. Proskurina, Genrikh S. Ritter, Tatyana D. Dubatolova, Margarita V. Romanenko, Oleg S. Taranov, Yaroslav R. Efremov, Evgeniy L. Zavyalov, Alexandr V. Romaschenko, Sergey V. Mishinov, Svetlana S. Kirikovich, Evgeniy V. Levites, Ekaterina A. Potter, Alexandr A. Ostanin, Elena R. Chernykh, Stanislav Yu. Roshchin, Anatoliy V. Bervitskiy, Galina I. Moysak, Jamil A. Rzaev and Sergey S. Bogachev
Cancer Biology & Medicine August 2021, 18 (3) 910-930; DOI: https://doi.org/10.20892/j.issn.2095-3941.2020.0511
Evgeniya V. Dolgova
1Institute of Cytology and Genetics SB RAS, Novosibirsk 630090, Russia
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Oleg M. Andrushkevich
2A.I. Evdokimov Moscow State University of Medicine and Dentistry, Moscow 127473, Russia
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Polina E. Kisaretova
1Institute of Cytology and Genetics SB RAS, Novosibirsk 630090, Russia
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Anastasia S. Proskurina
1Institute of Cytology and Genetics SB RAS, Novosibirsk 630090, Russia
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Genrikh S. Ritter
1Institute of Cytology and Genetics SB RAS, Novosibirsk 630090, Russia
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Tatyana D. Dubatolova
3Institute of Molecular and Cellular Biology, Novosibirsk 630090, Russia
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Margarita V. Romanenko
4Novosibirsk State University, Novosibirsk 630090, Russia
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Oleg S. Taranov
5The State Research Center of Virology and Biotechnology “Vector”, Koltsovo, Novosibirsk 630559, Russia
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Yaroslav R. Efremov
1Institute of Cytology and Genetics SB RAS, Novosibirsk 630090, Russia
4Novosibirsk State University, Novosibirsk 630090, Russia
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Evgeniy L. Zavyalov
1Institute of Cytology and Genetics SB RAS, Novosibirsk 630090, Russia
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Alexandr V. Romaschenko
1Institute of Cytology and Genetics SB RAS, Novosibirsk 630090, Russia
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Sergey V. Mishinov
6First Department of Neurosurgery, Ya. L. Tsivian Novosibirsk Research Institute of Traumatology and Orthopaedics, Novosibirsk 630091, Russia
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Svetlana S. Kirikovich
1Institute of Cytology and Genetics SB RAS, Novosibirsk 630090, Russia
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Evgeniy V. Levites
1Institute of Cytology and Genetics SB RAS, Novosibirsk 630090, Russia
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Ekaterina A. Potter
1Institute of Cytology and Genetics SB RAS, Novosibirsk 630090, Russia
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Alexandr A. Ostanin
7Institute of Fundamental and Clinical immunology, Novosibirsk 630099, Russia
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Elena R. Chernykh
7Institute of Fundamental and Clinical immunology, Novosibirsk 630099, Russia
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Stanislav Yu. Roshchin
8Sklifosovsky Research Institute of Emergency Medicine, Moscow 129010, Russia
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Anatoliy V. Bervitskiy
9Federal Center of Neurosurgery, Novosibirsk 630048, Russia
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Galina I. Moysak
4Novosibirsk State University, Novosibirsk 630090, Russia
9Federal Center of Neurosurgery, Novosibirsk 630048, Russia
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jamil A. Rzaev
4Novosibirsk State University, Novosibirsk 630090, Russia
9Federal Center of Neurosurgery, Novosibirsk 630048, Russia
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Sergey S. Bogachev
1Institute of Cytology and Genetics SB RAS, Novosibirsk 630090, Russia
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Sergey S. Bogachev
  • For correspondence: [email protected]
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • Supplementary Materials
  • Figure 1
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 1

    The basic Karanahan approach parameters and treatment schedule. (A) TAMRA+ cells in in vitro U87 cell culture. (B) Cross-examination of U87 cells with regard to their ability both to bind antibodies to the surface marker CD133 and to internalize the TAMRA-DNA probe. Arrows indicate TAMRA+ cells, arrowheads indicate CD133+ cells. (C) Combined fluorescence profile along the vector crossing the single U87 cell [result of processing the image obtained with LSM 780 NLO confocal microscope (Zeiss) in Zen software package]. Arrow indicates the site of colocalization of TAMRA-DNA and anti-CD133 antibodies signals. (D) FACS assay of the content of TAMRA+/CD133+ cells in in vitro U87 cell culture. DAPI, chromatin staining; TAMRA, fluorescence of the TAMRA-labeled DNA probe; APC, anti-CD133 antibodies. (E) Profile of DNA DSB occurrence in U87 cells exposed to MMC. The number of DSBs was determined as the “tail moment” during the comet assay. The average value ± 99% confidence intervals are given; confidence was estimated relative to the “zero point” using the Student’s criterion in the Statistica 10 software package, **P < 0.01, #P < 0.001. (F) Schedule for MMC treatments (three rounds every 36 h) as well as for the cell cycle assays.

  • Figure 2
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 2

    Basic Karanahan approach parameters and treatment schedule. (A) Results of the cell cycle assays in U87 cells prior to the treatment with MMC, 18, 54 and 90 h later as well as on days 6–9 after the first treatment. G1, S, and G2/M, phases of the cell cycle; subG1, apoptotic (presumably) cells. (B) Principle therapeutic scheme for treating U87 glioblastoma cells in vitro. Arrows indicate the appropriate timings for administration of cytostatic agent and composite DNAmix preparation. The dashed line displays the concomitant number of DSBs induced by the exposure of U87 cells to a cytostatic agent. (C) Percentage of TAMRA+ cells in U87 cell culture after treatments with MMC and DNAmix preparation according to the Karanahan approach. The average value ± 99% CI are given; confidence was estimated relative to the control using the Mann–Whitney criterion in the Statistica 10 software package, *P < 0.05. (D) Cytological preparations of U87 cells before (control) and on days 3, 7, and 15 since the start of therapy. The figure represents the merged image of DAPI (chromatin) and TAMRA (exogenous DNA) staining. For the control and MMC + DNAmix groups, images of cells in transmitting light are also given. MMC, group treated with cytostatic only; MMC + DNAmix, group treated with cytostatic in combination with DNA-based preparation.

  • Figure 3
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 3

    Intracerebral grafting of pretreated in vitro U87 glioblastoma cells into SCID mice. (A) Treatment schematic. (B) NMR tomography of the brain of SCID mice on day 24 after intracerebral inoculation of U87 human glioblastoma cells. Control, mice inoculated with untreated U87 cells; DNA, mice inoculated with U87 cells pretreated with DNAmix only; MMC, mice inoculated with U87 cells pretreated with MMC only; MMC + DNAmix, mice inoculated with U87 cells pretreated with MMC in combination with the composite dsDNA preparation.

  • Figure 4
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 4

    Therapeutic treatment of experimental mice with developed subcutaneous xenografts of U87 human glioblastoma. (A) Graft growth rates in mice with an average initial tumor size of 15 mm3 (n = 7 per group). (B) Graft growth rates in mice with the average initial tumor size of 92 mm3 (n = 6 per group). The median ± standard error of the mean are given; confidence was estimated using the Mann–Whitney criterion in the Statistica 10 software package, *P < 0.05. (C) Treated animals. (D) Animals from the CP + DNAmix group with a characteristic symptom complex manifestation: 1) animal with severe anorexia; 2) animal with hind limb paralysis (indicated by the arrow).

  • Figure 5
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 5

    Magnetic resonance images (MRIs) of tumor nodes and survival rates of mice. (A) Schematic Karanahan approach with the schedule and dosages of CP and DNAmix administration. (B) Pictures of four sequential MRIs taken during the experiment. Preoperative MRIs indicate the presence of individual neoplastic formations with clear boundaries localized subcortically in the projection of parietal lobes (marked with white arrows) in all three groups. Postoperative MRIs indicate the total tumor resection (100% removal of tumor bulk) achieved in all the cases presented (areas of surgical intervention are marked with red arrows). On day 17 after the therapy is finished, MRIs indicate a dissemination of tumors through the cerebrospinal liquor paths to the brain basal zones (encircled with white dotted lines) in the CP and control groups. Thirty days since the end of therapy, a noticeable increase in tumor volume associated with infiltrative growth was observed in the CP and control groups, whereas the CP + DNAmix group displayed no signs of relapse. (C) Mice survival rates (Kaplan–Meier curves) during the experiment. Preoperative MRI is considered the start of the experiment. (D) Growth rates of tumors in individual animals by the experimental groups: control, CP, and CP + DNAmix. (E) Histological examination of the relapsing tumor from a mouse in the CP + DNAmix group.

Tables

  • Figures
  • Supplementary Materials
    • View popup
    Table 1

    Preoperative and postoperative volumetry of tumors in mice

    GroupAnimal numberPreoperative tumor volumetry (mm3)Postoperative tumor volumetry (mm3)Radicality of tumor resection (%)
    Cyclophosphamide + DNAmix1_14.6920100*
    1_23.1030100*
    1_35.6222.22261†
    1_42.4460100*
    Cyclophosphamide2_15.6620100*
    2_22.8182.718–
    2_31.9740100*
    2_463.36416.25175†
    Control3_13.4340100*
    3_241.73616.54861†
    3_30.1340.239–
    3_55.1060100*

    *Total resection. †Partial resection. BBB, blood–brain barrier; CNS, central nervous system; CP, cyclophosphamide; CSC, cancer stem cell; DC, dendritic cell; dsDNA, double-stranded DNA; HR, homologous repair; ICL, interstrand cross-link; MDSC, myeloid-derived suppressor cell; MMC, mitomycin C; MOF, multiple organ failure; MTIC, monomethyl triazen imidazole carboxamide; NER, nucleotide excision repair; TM, tail moment; TMZ, temozolomide.

    Supplementary Materials

    • Figures
    • Tables
    • [cbm-18-910-s001.pdf]
    PreviousNext
    Back to top

    In this issue

    Cancer Biology and Medicine: 18 (3)
    Cancer Biology & Medicine
    Vol. 18, Issue 3
    1 Aug 2021
    • Table of Contents
    • Index by author
    Print
    Download PDF
    Email Article

    Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Cancer Biology & Medicine.

    NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

    Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
    Efficacy of the new therapeutic approach in curing malignant neoplasms on the model of human glioblastoma
    (Your Name) has sent you a message from Cancer Biology & Medicine
    (Your Name) thought you would like to see the Cancer Biology & Medicine web site.
    Citation Tools
    Efficacy of the new therapeutic approach in curing malignant neoplasms on the model of human glioblastoma
    Evgeniya V. Dolgova, Oleg M. Andrushkevich, Polina E. Kisaretova, Anastasia S. Proskurina, Genrikh S. Ritter, Tatyana D. Dubatolova, Margarita V. Romanenko, Oleg S. Taranov, Yaroslav R. Efremov, Evgeniy L. Zavyalov, Alexandr V. Romaschenko, Sergey V. Mishinov, Svetlana S. Kirikovich, Evgeniy V. Levites, Ekaterina A. Potter, Alexandr A. Ostanin, Elena R. Chernykh, Stanislav Yu. Roshchin, Anatoliy V. Bervitskiy, Galina I. Moysak, Jamil A. Rzaev, Sergey S. Bogachev
    Cancer Biology & Medicine Aug 2021, 18 (3) 910-930; DOI: 10.20892/j.issn.2095-3941.2020.0511

    Citation Manager Formats

    • BibTeX
    • Bookends
    • EasyBib
    • EndNote (tagged)
    • EndNote 8 (xml)
    • Medlars
    • Mendeley
    • Papers
    • RefWorks Tagged
    • Ref Manager
    • RIS
    • Zotero
    Share
    Efficacy of the new therapeutic approach in curing malignant neoplasms on the model of human glioblastoma
    Evgeniya V. Dolgova, Oleg M. Andrushkevich, Polina E. Kisaretova, Anastasia S. Proskurina, Genrikh S. Ritter, Tatyana D. Dubatolova, Margarita V. Romanenko, Oleg S. Taranov, Yaroslav R. Efremov, Evgeniy L. Zavyalov, Alexandr V. Romaschenko, Sergey V. Mishinov, Svetlana S. Kirikovich, Evgeniy V. Levites, Ekaterina A. Potter, Alexandr A. Ostanin, Elena R. Chernykh, Stanislav Yu. Roshchin, Anatoliy V. Bervitskiy, Galina I. Moysak, Jamil A. Rzaev, Sergey S. Bogachev
    Cancer Biology & Medicine Aug 2021, 18 (3) 910-930; DOI: 10.20892/j.issn.2095-3941.2020.0511
    Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
    • Tweet Widget
    • Facebook Like
    • Google Plus One

    Jump to section

    • Article
      • Abstract
      • Introduction
      • Materials and methods
      • Results
      • Discussion
      • Conclusions
      • Supporting Information
      • Grant support
      • Acknowledgements
      • Footnotes
      • References
    • Figures & Data
    • Info & Metrics
    • References
    • PDF

    Related Articles

    • No related articles found.
    • Google Scholar

    Cited By...

    • No citing articles found.
    • Google Scholar

    More in this TOC Section

    • Neutrophils as key regulators of tumor immunity that restrict immune checkpoint blockade in liver cancer
    • Genetic polymorphisms in genes regulating cell death and prognosis of patients with rectal cancer receiving postoperative chemoradiotherapy
    • Combined chemo-endocrine therapy as a potential new option for HR+/HER2− advanced breast cancer: a prospective study of fulvestrant plus oral vinorelbine
    Show more Original Article

    Similar Articles

    Keywords

    • glioblastoma
    • U87 cell line
    • mytomycin C
    • cancer stem cells
    • TAMRA

    Navigate

    • Home
    • Current Issue

    More Information

    • About CBM
    • About CACA
    • About TMUCIH
    • Editorial Board
    • Subscription

    For Authors

    • Instructions for authors
    • Journal Policies
    • Submit a Manuscript

    Journal Services

    • Email Alerts
    • Facebook
    • RSS Feeds
    • Twitter

     

    © 2023 Cancer Biology & Medicine

    Powered by HighWire