Review ArticleReview

MiR-135a biogenesis and regulation in malignancy: a new hope for cancer research and therapy

Zhe Cao, Jiangdong Qiu, Gang Yang, Yueze Liu, Wenhao Luo, Lei You, Lianfang Zheng and Taiping Zhang
Cancer Biology & Medicine August 2020, 17 (3) 569-582; DOI: https://doi.org/10.20892/j.issn.2095-3941.2020.0033

Abstract

MicroRNAs (miRNAs) are evolutionarily conserved small non-coding RNAs that affect posttranscriptional regulation by binding to the 3′-untranslated region of target messenger RNAs. MiR-135a is a critical miRNA that regulates gene expression, and many studies have focused on its function in cancer research. MiR-135a is dysregulated in various cancers and regulates cancer cell proliferation and invasion via several signaling pathways, such as the MAPK and JAK2/STAT3 pathways. MiR-135a has also been found to promote or inhibit the epithelial-mesenchymal transition and chemoresistance in different cancers. Several studies have discovered the value of miR-135a as a novel biomarker for cancer diagnosis and prognosis. These studies have suggested the potential of therapeutically manipulating miR-135a to improve the outcome of cancer patients. Although these findings have demonstrated the role of miR-135a in cancer progression and clinical applications, a number of questions remain to be answered, such as the dual functional roles of miR-135a in cancer. In this review, we summarize the available studies regarding miR-135a and cancer, including background on the biogenesis and expression of miR-135a in cancer and relevant signaling pathways involved in miR-135a-mediated tumor progression. We also focus on the clinical application of miR-135a as a biomarker in diagnosis and as a therapeutic agent or target in cancer treatment, which will provide a greater level of insight into the translational value of miR-135a.

keywords

Introduction

MicroRNAs (miRNAs) are a group of short non-coding RNAs approximately 22 nucleotides in length1. Since the first discovery of miRNAs in 19932, miRNAs have been highlighted as critical regulators of gene expression that act by binding to complementary target messenger RNAs (mRNAs)3. Mature miRNAs are incorporated into the RNA-induced silencing complex (RISC) after miRNA duplexes are processed by the proteins of the Argonaute (AGO) family4,5. The combination of mature miRNAs with the RISC enables miRNAs to target mRNAs with complementary sequences, leading to translational inhibition or mRNA degradation at the posttranscriptional level6. Accumulating studies have shown that miRNAs are involved in almost all physiological or pathological processes, including cellular proliferation and tumorigenesis7,8. MiR-135a is a member of the miR-135 family (which includes miR-135a and miR-135b) and is dysregulated in various cancers. MiRNAs can act as either oncogenes or tumor suppressors9, and recent studies have shown that miR-135a plays important but contradictory roles in cancer progression. MiR-135a acts as a promoter or inhibitor of cancer cell proliferation and invasion by regulating specific signal pathways and mRNAs. MiR-135a also modulates the epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) and chemoresistance of cancer cells, which influences the outcomes of cancer patients. Therefore, miR-135a may be a promising molecule in cancer diagnosis and treatment. In this review, we focus on recent advances in studies of miR-135a effects on tumor progression and its potential applications in clinical practice as a novel approach in cancer therapy.

Biogenesis and expression of miR-135a in cancer

The miR-135 family includes miR-135a and miR-135b. MiR-135a is encoded by the MIR135A1 gene (Gene ID: 406925), located on human chromosome 3p21.2, and MIR135A2 (Gene ID: 406926), located on human chromosome 12q23.1; miR-135b is encoded by the MIR135B gene (Gene ID: 442891), which is located on human chromosome 1q32.1. Figure 1 shows the gene expressions of the miR-135 family.

Figure 1
Figure 1

The gene expression of the miR-135 family in humans. Two genes, MIR-135A1 and MIR-135A2, were located at different chromosomes in humans, and they could be transcribed and translated into miR-135a. Only one gene, MIR-135B, was responsible for the expression of miR-135b in humans.

Genes encoding miR-135a are transcribed into primary microRNAs (pri-miRNAs) via RNA polymerase II, and pri-miRNAs are then cleaved by Drosha, a ribonuclease III enzyme, and its cofactor DGCR8 to produce stem-loop precursor miRNAs (pre-miRNAs) that contain approximately 70 nucleotides10. Exportin-5 is then responsible for transporting the pre-miRNAs from the nucleus into the cytoplasm, where the terminal loop of pre-miRNA is cleaved by the RNase III Dicer and TAR RNA binding protein, resulting in miRNA duplexes10–12. The miRNA duplexes are incorporated into RISC and processed by AGO protein into mature miRNAs3. Mature miR-135a can also be transported to the intercellular space or circulation to exert regulatory effects on nearby or remote cells. Mature miRNAs can be transported in a free form or by transportation mediators such as exosomes, which carry biological contents from donor to recipient cells and release biological contents via cell membrane fusion13. A previous study showed that circulating exosomal miR-135a served as a biomarker for disease diagnosis14.

MiRNA dysregulation has been reported in various diseases, especially in cancer8,15, and is possibly attributed to genetic and epigenetic alterations, dysregulated transcription factors, or mutations in genes encoding miRNA-biogenesis enzymes16–18. The aberrant expression of miR-135a in cancer was first reported in colorectal adenoma and adenocarcinoma tissues19. Compared with normal colon epithelium, colorectal adenomas showed a 3.2-fold increased expression of miR-135a (P < 0.001) and colorectal adenocarcinomas showed a 6.7-fold increase (P < 0.001)19. Similar results were obtained in both colorectal cancer cell lines and patient serum20,21. Upregulation of miR-135a was also found in ependymoma22, breast cancer23, bladder cancer24, melanoma25, and hepatocellular carcinoma26, indicating that miR-135a may serve as a tumor promoter in these cancers.

In contrast, other studies reported that miR-135a was downregulated in several cancer types. MiRNA profiling by miRNA arrays in prostate cancer, ovarian cancer, and pancreatic cancer showed a dramatic decrease in miR-135a expression in serum or cell lines compared to that in controls27–29. Lung cancer clinical specimens, serum, and cells all contained decreased levels of miR-135a30–33. MiR-135a was also significantly decreased in thyroid carcinoma34, renal cell carcinoma35, gall bladder cancer36, osteosarcoma37, and glioma38. In addition, decreased miR-135a was one of the miRNA changes that correlated with familial papillary thyroid carcinoma39.

Even within the same cancer type, the expression of miR-135a can differ dramatically. Although two independent studies using RT-PCR reported that miR-135a was decreased in both tissues and cell lines of gastric cancer40,41, Yan et al.42 found that miR-135a was upregulated in gastric cancer using 280 paired clinical samples. We speculate that the discrepancy regarding the expression of miR-135a may be attributed to the dramatic difference in sample volumes or patient states (with or without chemotherapy before surgery), but the underlying mechanisms remain to be further explored.

Mechanisms of miR-135a dysregulation in cancer

The studies discussed above indicate that miR-135a expression varies among cancers, and therefore, exploring the mechanisms regulating miR-135a expression is fundamental to clarifying its functions in cancer. Current studies regarding the regulation of miR-135a expression have mainly focused on its transcription from coding genes, which is affected by several transcription factors. For example, androgen receptor (AR) activates the transcription of miR-135a by directly binding to androgen response elements (AREs) in the promoter region of the MIR135A2 gene in prostate cancer cell lines; the ARE sequence, CAAGTACAGCTTGTTCTCC, is located -5,605 bp upstream of pre-miR-135a243. Another study revealed that the transcription of miR-135a was activated by signal transducer and activator of transcription 5a (STAT5a), a member of the STAT family, which binds to both promoter elements of miR-135a-1 and miR-135a-2 genes in 3T3-L1 cell lines44. The binding sites for STAT5a are at -874/-856 and -2020/-2002 in the miR-135a-1 and miR-135a-2 genes, respectively44. A similar mechanism exists in the regulation of miR-135a expression by p5345.

Other studies have shown that miR-135a is also regulated by interactions with long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs), such as urothelial carcinoma associated 1 (UCA1)46, gastric cancer associated transcript 3 (GACAT3)47, FOXD3 antisense RNA 1 (FOXD3-AS1)48, differentiation antagonizing nonprotein coding RNA (DANCR)49, muscleblind-like 1 antisense RNA 1 (MBNL1-AS1)50, and the small nucleolar RNA host gene 16 (SNHG16)51. These lncRNAs act as competing endogenous RNAs (ceRNAs) by binding to miRNAs via miRNA response elements52. Bioinformatics analysis revealed two complementary sites of miR-135a in UCA1, and a luciferase activity assay confirmed that miR-135a was a target of UCA1 and was decreased by UCA146. Similarly, GACAT3 decreased miR-135a expression by acting as a ceRNA47, similar to FOXD3-AS1 and MBNL1-AS148,50. MiR-135a is also sponged by SNHG16, and this process is promoted by activation of the JAK2/STAT3 pathway51. The inhibition of miR-135a by DANCR was also reported in pancreatic cancer and tongue squamous cell carcinoma cells, which resulted in promoted cancer cell proliferation and invasion49,53. MiR-135a was also predicted to interact with lncRNA KIAA0125 and may participate in the development of ameloblastoma54,55. The circular RNA-like Cdr1as was also shown to sponge and inhibit miR-135a activity by directly binding to miR-135a56.

Epigenetic alterations have emerged as another important cause of miR-135a dysregulation. Promoter hypermethylation of miR-135a was detected in microsatellite-unstable colorectal cancer cell lines and decreased the expression of miR-135a57. Increased methylation at or near miR-135a-associated CpG islands was also discovered in multiple myeloma, and the demethylating agent, 5-azacytidine, rescued the expression of miR-135a58.

Hepatitis B X-interacting protein (HBXIP) has been shown to upregulate miR-135a59, and the PI3K/AKT/mTOR signaling pathway has been shown to decrease miR-135a expression60, but the exact mechanisms remain unknown.

Above all, the regulation of miR-135a expression involves transcription, interactions with lncRNAs. and epigenetic alterations. Figure 2 summarizes the mechanisms of biogenesis and dysregulation of miR-135a in cancer.

Figure 2
Figure 2

The mechanisms of biogenesis and dysregulation of miR-135a in cancer. The gene encoding miR-135a was transcribed into primary microRNAs (pri-miRNA), which was affected by transcription factors and promoter hypermethylation. The pri-miRNA was processed into precursor miRNAs by Drosha and DGCR8. The mature miRNA could be sponged by circular RNA and long non-coding RNA, to inhibit the degradation of target mRNA. The mature miRNA could also be transported into the circulation by exosomes.

Biological function of miR-135a in cancer and the relevant signaling pathways

Studies on the biological function of miR-135a in cancer have shown conflicting results. The varying dysregulations of miR-135a among different cancers indicate that miR-135a has both oncogenic and anti-oncogenic effects, which have been verified by studies on cellular proliferation, tumor progression, and chemoresistance. Here, we discuss the dual role of miR-135a in cancer and its downstream targets, and summarize the relevant signaling pathways involved in this process.

The miR-135a modulates cell proliferation and cancer progression

MiR-135a plays different roles in cellular proliferation and cancer progression, depending on the cancer type. Thus far, most studies have indicated that miR-135a has positive effects on cellular proliferation and cancer progression, while a few studies have reported opposite conclusions.

The antitumor effects of miR-135a are mediated by its targeting of various oncogenes, and the associated pathways include the p38 MAPK and JAK2/STAT3 pathways. MiR-135a causes G0/G1 arrest and inhibits the proliferation and invasion of thyroid carcinoma cells by binding to the 3′-untranslated region (3′-UTR) of Versican, and in vivo experiments revealed that miR-135a decreased the size of tumors34. A similar inhibitory effect of miR-135a was revealed in pancreatic cancer by its targeting of Bmi-128 and in gallbladder cancer by its targeting of very low density lipoprotein receptor (VLDLR); the p38 MAPK pathway is the downstream signaling pathway of miR-135a-VLDLR36. MiR-135a suppressed cell proliferation and tumor growth in an ovarian cancer mouse xenograft model27, and this effect may be attributed to the regulation of C-C chemokine receptor type 2 (CCR2) by miR-135a61. The role of miR-135a in urological cancers has been intensively investigated. In renal cell carcinoma, miR-135a reduced cell viability by targeting C-Myc and JAK2, thus blocking the JAK2/STAT3 pathway35,62. A similar mechanism was discovered in classic Hodgkin’s lymphoma, in which JAK2 was decreased by miR-135a, leading to downregulation of the Bcl-xl anti-apoptotic gene63. In prostate cancer, miR-135a repressed cell migration and proliferation by downregulating matrix metallopeptidase 11 (MMP11), rho associated coiled-coil containing protein kinase 1 (ROCK1), ROCK2, RB associated KRAB zinc finger (RBAK) and STAT643,60,64. In metastatic prostate cancer, miR-135a inhibited tumor progression by decreasing epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)29, and its silencing resulted in increased AR axis activity, thus contributing to disease progression65. In the genesis of glioma, miR-135a caused G1 arrest and reduced cell proliferation by targeting tumor necrosis factor receptor-associated factor 5 (TRAF5) and subsequently blocking AKT phosphorylation and the expression of c-Myc and cyclin D166. In addition, the migratory capacity of glioblastoma cells was decreased by miR-135a mediated by downregulation of the Na+/H+ exchanger isoform 9 (NHE9), which acidified the endosomes that transport EGFR to the cell membrane, thus decreasing the activity of EGFR67. The antitumor effect of miR-135a in breast cancer was shown by its targeting of estrogen-related receptor α (ERRα), ETS transcription factor 1 (ELK1), and ELK368,69. Other targets involved in miR-135a-induced tumor suppression include IL-17 in nasopharyngeal carcinoma and homeobox A10 (HOXA10) in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma70,71.

However, in other cancers, miR-135a acts as a tumor promoter via the following mechanisms: upregulating oncogene expression, blocking cancer suppresser genes, and serving as the target of oncoproteins. In hepatocellular carcinoma, for example, miR-135a increases the expression of oncogenes and the phosphorylation of AKT to promote the migration and invasion of HCC cells26, but it suppresses the forkhead box O1 (FOXO1) tumor suppressor, which results in a decrease in phosphoenolpyruvate carboxykinase 1 (PCK1), a key enzyme in gluconeogenesis26,59. A similar relationship between miR-135a and FOXO1 was discovered in malignant melanoma72. MiR-135a is also increased by oncoprotein hepatitis B X-interacting protein (HBXIP) and forkhead box M1, thus blocking the expression of the metastasis suppressor 1 (MTSS1)59,73. MiR-135a is involved in hepatitis C virus-mediated hepatocarcinogenesis with its decreasing protein tyrosine phosphatase receptor delta expression to promote the activity of STAT374. Similarly, the inhibition of MTSS1 by miR-135a has also been observed in colorectal cancer20, and tumorigenesis may be partly attributed to the targeting of adenomatous polyposis coli (APC) by miR-135a, which induces the activation of the Wnt pathway19. In bladder cancer, miR-135a promotes cell proliferation by targeting pleckstrin homology domain leucine-rich repeat protein phosphatase (PHLPP2) and FOXO1, with downregulation of p21 and p27 and upregulation of cyclin D124. In addition, it accelerates the migration and invasion of bladder cancer cells by downregulating glycogen synthase kinase 3 beta (GSK3β) to activate the Wnt/β-catenin pathway75. In cervical cancer, miR-135a induces malignant transformation in HPV-infected cells and the progression of tumors by targeting seven in absentia homologue 1 (SIAH1), contributing to the activation of the β-catenin/T cell factor signaling pathway76.

Several studies also reported that miR-135a exhibits both pro- and antitumor effects in some specific cancer types, such as gastric cancer and lung cancer. In gastric cancer, the proliferation of cancer cells is inhibited by miR-135a via inactivation of JAK2/STAT3 and targeting cyclin D1, Bcl-xl40, kinesin family member C141 and the focal adhesion kinase (FAK) pathway45. In addition, the migration of gastric cancer can be inhibited by miR-135a via its targeting of TRAF5, which subsequently blocks the NF-κB pathway77. However, Yan et al.42 found that a high level of miR-135a was related to poor survival and shorter time to recurrence. It promotes oxaliplatin-resistant gastric cancer cell invasion and proliferation by decreasing E2F transcription factor 1 (E2F1) and death-associated protein kinase 2 (DAPK2) expression. In lung cancer, miR-135a induces apoptosis and inhibits invasion and angiogenesis by binding to the 3′-UTR of insulin-like growth factor 1 (IGF-1) mRNA and inactivating the IGF-1/PI3K/AKT signaling pathway78. It can also regulate EMT-related markers, such as E-cadherin and vimentin, by targeting Kruppel-like factor 8 (KLF8)31. However, several studies found that miR-135a contributed to lung cancer progression by targeting lysyl oxidase-like 4 (LOXL4)79 and promoting the chemoresistance of lung cancer80,81. Figure 3 summarizes the effects of miR-135a on cancer progression.

Figure 3
Figure 3

The effects of miR-135a on cancer progression and relevant targets and signaling pathways. (A) The miR-135a could inhibit the progression of cancer by targeting various mRNAs, which led to the inactivation of several pathways, including the PI3K/AKT pathway, JAK2/STAT3 pathway, and NF-κB pathway, as well as the activation of the p38 MAPK pathway and the p53 cancer suppressor gene. (B) The miR-135a can also promote cancer development via the activation of the Wnt/β-catenin pathway and STAT3, and the inactivation of phosphoenolpyruvate carboxykinase.

The EMT, another important hallmark of cancer cells, is the process by which cell morphology, biological behavior changes, and cancer cells acquire the ability for invasion and metastasis82–84; this process is also regulated by miR-135a. The EMT is characterized by the repression of epithelial genes, and loss of E-cadherin is a crucial step of the EMT85. The regulation of the EMT by miR-135a mainly relies on EMT-related transcriptional factors and pathways, and most of the present studies have indicated that miR-135a plays a suppressive role in the EMT. MiR-135a inhibits the EMT in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) cells by directly binding to the 3′-UTR of KLF831. Overexpression of miR-135a in ovarian cancer was also reported to inhibit EMT by reducing the level of N-cadherin and increasing the expression of E-cadherin, resulting in suppressed metastasis in vivo61. In contrast, miR-135a was found to accelerate the EMT and invasion in bladder cancer by targeting GSK3β and activating the Wnt/β-catenin pathway75. The relationship between the EMT and miR-135a remains to be further investigated, and these results should increase our understanding of the mechanisms of cancer progression. Figure 4 summarizes the role of miR-135a in the EMT.

Figure 4
Figure 4

The effect of miR-135a on the epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT). The role of miR-135a on the EMT was contradictory. The miR-135a inhibited the EMT by decreasing KLF8 and N-cadherin, and increased the epithelial marker, E-cadherin. In contrast, miR-135a promoted the EMT via upregulating Snail and activating the Wnt/β-catenin pathway.

In summary, the present studies revealed the oncogenic and antitumor roles of miR-135a in different cancer types. Notably, conflicting roles and expression levels of miR-135a have also been observed, even in the same cancer type, as in gastric cancer. Considering that cancer cells from different organs may have completely different biological features and genetic contexts, it seems explainable by the unique role of miR-135a, because the expression levels of miR-135a target genes vary among these cancer cells. However, the conflicting roles of miR-135a in the same cancer type might be attributed to the different origins of cell types within the organ, and different clinical stages may also have an impact. The sample sizes of the present studies were relatively small, and further studies are therefore needed to evaluate the effects of miR-135a on cancer because the conflicting roles will present a challenge for the design of therapies that target miR-135a.

The miR-135a and chemosensitivity

Chemotherapy is currently an essential treatment for cancer, and includes neoadjuvant chemotherapy and adjuvant chemotherapy. However, chemoresistance remains the main obstacle limiting the therapeutic effect of chemotherapy, especially in pancreatic cancer and ovarian cancer13,86–88. The process of chemoresistance includes several biological processes, such as cellular apoptosis, cell cycle progression, the EMT, and drug efflux, involving changes in multiple genes89. The mechanisms underlying chemoresistance have been intensively investigated, and miRNAs have been found to play an important role via the regulation of relevant genes90,91. MiR-135a has both anti- and pro-chemoresistance effects in cancer, depending on the specific cancer cell lines and target genes. In vitro studies reported that ovarian cancer cells transfected with the miR-135a vector showed decreased viability when compared with controls transfected with blank vector, and the IC50 of paclitaxel was lower in ovarian cancer cells transfected with miR-135a, which may be explained by the direct regulation of protein phosphatase 2 regulatory subunit B beta expression and indirect regulation of baculoviral IAP repeat containing 3, gamma-aminobutyric acid receptor subunit α3 or sperm protein associated with the nucleus on the X chromosome B1/2 expressions by miR-135a27. In lung cancer, miR-135a was shown to increase the sensitivity of cancer cells to cisplatin by directly targeting MCL1 and reducing the expression of MCL132. However, studies have also shown that miR-135a contributes to chemoresistance in cancer cell lines42,81. MiR-135a was upregulated in oxaliplatin-resistant gastric cancer samples and was related to advanced pathological stage, vascular invasion, lymphatic vessel metastasis, and early recurrence42. The overexpression of miR-135a enhanced resistance to oxaliplatin both in vivo and in vitro by inhibiting E2F transcription factor 1 (E2F1) expression and the Sp1/death associated protein kinase 2 (DAPK2) signaling pathway42. Overexpression of miR-135a was also observed in drug resistant NSCLC, breast cancer, and prostate cancer cell lines compared with parental cell lines81. The chemoresistance of these cancers was enhanced by miR-135a, which was in part attributed to reduced APC expression81.

Recent studies have found that miRNAs also act as predictors of chemosensitivity and targets for overcoming chemoresistance in the treatment of cancer92–94. In breast cancer, miR-135a was shown to be a potential indicator of drug sensitivity95. The delivery of miRNA mimics or inhibitors to restore the normal gene network may sensitize cancer cells to chemotherapy93,94. Therefore, chemotherapeutic drugs combined with miRNA mimics or antagomirs may be a novel strategy for cancer treatment. However, studies on miR-135a in chemoresistance are still at an early stage, and the application of miR-135a to inhibit chemoresistance still remains to be explored. Further studies are therefore needed.

The clinical applications of miR-135a

The abnormal expressions of miR-135a in various cancers indicate that it may be a potential biomarker for cancer diagnosis. In addition, several studies have shown that miR-135a expression is related to tumor node metastasis (TNM) stage, recurrence, and survival. Based on the regulatory effects of miR-135a on cancer cell proliferation, apoptosis, and chemoresistance, miR-135a may also be a promising therapeutic target in cancer treatment.

The miR-135a as a biomarker for cancer diagnosis and prognosis

The present methods for cancer screening, including serum tumor markers and ordinary imaging examinations, lack high sensitivity and specificity. The final diagnosis of cancer relies on pathology or cytology, which is invasive and costly. Compared with these methods, miRNAs have some advantages as biomarkers for cancer96. First, miRNAs are easily accessible in body fluids, such as serum and urine, providing a noninvasive and economical method for diagnosis97. Second, miRNAs show high stability and resistance to degradation in circulation, even in paraffin-embedded tissues98. In addition, different cancers have distinctive miRNA profiles that differentiate cancer from benign diseases99. As previously mentioned, distinguishable abnormalities in miR-135a expression have been identified in numerous cancer types, thus providing strong rationale for its application as a diagnostic or prognostic biomarker.

Previous studies showed that the levels of miR-135a in serum, tissue samples, and peritoneal fluid of ovarian cancer patients were decreased significantly compared with those in ovarian cysts and normal ovaries, indicating that miR-135a may be a biomarker for ovarian cancer diagnosis27. In the diagnosis of colorectal cancer, serum miR-135a has the ability to distinguish colorectal cancer from colorectal polyps, with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.832, and from healthy tissue, with an AUC of 0.87521. The combination of miR-21, miR-135a, miR-335, miR-206, and let-7a detected the presence of metastasis with a specificity of 87% and sensitivity of 76%100. A miRNA signature including miR-135a in serum exosomes was also able to distinguish between very high risk prostate cancer and low risk prostate cancer or healthy individuals, with an accuracy of at least 89%101. The low expression of miR-135a could also discriminate between metastatic and primary prostate cancers, with an AUC of 0.877 and was related to a high Gleason score29. Aside from serum miRNAs, a urinary miRNA signature including miR-135a was shown to accurately predict bladder cancer102. In the training set of the study, 14 miRNAs were selected as potential biomarkers from 16 urine samples (including four low grade bladder cancers, four high grade bladder cancers, and eight normal controls), but the validation set including 202 urine samples (115 bladder cancers and 87 normal controls) identified a subset of six urinary miRNAs (downregulated: let-7c, miR-148a, and miR-204; upregulated: miR-135a, miR-135b, and miR-345) that correctly differentiated bladder cancer from normal controls with an AUC of 0.883. The miRNA signature also distinguished between different subgroups and normal controls102. Table 1 summarizes the studies on miR-135a as a biomarker for cancer diagnosis.

View this table:
Table 1

The miR-135a as a biomarker for cancer diagnosis

In addition to its value in cancer diagnosis, miR-135a has potential application in predicting the prognosis. Most of the current studies have indicated that miR-135a expression is positively correlated with the prognosis. For example, ovarian cancer patients with high serum miR-135a levels had a favorable prognosis, and low levels of miR-135a were correlated with poor survival and progression-free survival in ovarian cancer27,103. Decreased expression of miR-135a was also associated with poor survival in gastric cancer45. Nevertheless, another study found that higher expression of miR-135a in tumor tissues of gastric cancer was correlated with shorter survival and shorter time to recurrence42. In NSCLC, the serum miR-135a level was closely related to distant metastasis, lymphatic metastasis, TNM stage, and pathological stage. Patients with low miR-135a levels had significantly shorter survival than those with high miR-135a levels, and miR-135a was an independent risk factor for NSCLC prognosis30. In classic Hodgkin lymphoma, patients with low miR-135a expression had a higher incidence of recurrence and a shorter disease-free survival63. In hepatocellular carcinoma, however, high tumor expression of miR-135a was correlated with a high risk of recurrence within 12 months after resection104.

Although intensive studies have discovered the relationship between miR-135a expression and cancer diagnosis and prognosis, some limitations still exist; the concentration of circulating miRNA is very low, making it difficult to accurately detect in clinical practice, and the expressions of miR-135a in serum and tissues are not always consistent. In addition, the changes in miR-135a expressions are not the same in different cancers. Therefore, further studies are needed before miR-135a can be used as a biomarker in the clinic.

Perspectives about the potential application of miR-135a in cancer treatment

The tumor suppressive or oncogenic function of miRNAs in cancer indicates that they may serve as therapeutic agents or targets in cancer treatment105. As previously discussed, most preclinical studies showed an increased or decreased expression of miR-135a via miRNA mimics or inhibitors of miRNA (also known as antagomirs) through systemic or local injection. However, the application of miR-135a in cancer treatment is still faced with challenges. First, the choice of miR-135a mimics or inhibitors is difficult because the expression levels and biological functions of miR-135a vary greatly among different cancers, and changes in the tumor microenvironment also affect miRNA expression106,107. To overcome this obstacle, a biopsy (multiple biopsies at different times are better) of the tumor may be necessary to obtain miRNA profiles3. Second, the transportation of miR-135a mimics or inhibitors to candidate organs remains a challenge because of their potential degradation by RNases in the serum or endocytic compartment of cells. To address this obstacle, two strategies have been investigated. One is to modify nucleotides or the RNA backbone through chemical modifications, and the other is to develop effective delivery systems, including nanoparticle systems and extracellular vehicles3,108. In addition, the targets of miR-135a involve many genes, including oncogenes and tumor suppressor genes. It is difficult to ensure that target oncogenes can be blocked by miRNAs and avoid off-target effects109,110. If the systemic use of miRNA mimics or inhibitors changes the expression of genes not involved in cancer, adverse events may occur111. Therefore, the targets of miR-135a should be fully investigated before clinical application to ensure the safety of patients.

In addition to miR-135a mimics or inhibitors, miRNA biogenesis enzymes may also be therapeutic targets. Studies have found that dysregulations of miRNA biogenesis enzymes can lead to the abnormal expression of miRNAs and is associated with poor outcomes112–114. Restoring these enzymes may inhibit the progression of cancer and improve the prognosis.

It is important to note that although comprehensive preclinical studies have been conducted on miRNAs, few of them have progressed into clinical trials. At present, no clinical trial has explored the application of miR-135a in clinical settings, and the following main problems remain to be solved: identifying the best miRNA targets, designing delivery systems for specific organs, and preventing potential toxicities. However, with the development of genomic engineering and novel delivery platforms, miR-135a therapeutics may become a long-term clinical reality.

Conclusions

MiR-135a plays dual roles in cancer progression and chemoresistance, and has great potential in cancer diagnosis and treatment. The findings regarding the role of miR-135a in cancer development have been conflicting, and the underlying mechanisms remain to be further explored. Although basic studies have shown that miR-135a is a potential biomarker and therapeutic target for cancer treatment, there are still challenges to be faced in its clinical applications. Therefore, further investigations are required to explore the potential clinical applications of miR-135a, which may facilitate a new era for cancer treatment.

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by grants from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 81772639, 81802475, 81972258, and 81974376); the Natural Science Foundation of Beijing (Grant No. 7192157); CAMS Innovation Fund for Medical Sciences (CIFMS) (Grant No. 2016-I2M-1-001); China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (Grant No. 198831); and the National Key R&D Program of China (Grant No. 2018YFE0118600).

Footnotes

  • ↵*These authors contributed equally to this work.

  • Conflict of interest statement No potential conflicts of interest are disclosed.

  • Received January 29, 2020.
  • Accepted May 27, 2020.
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY) 4.0, which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

References

  1. 1.↵
    2. Bartel DP.
    Micrornas: genomics, biogenesis, mechanism, and function. Cell. 2004; 116: 281–97.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  2. 2.↵
    2. Lee RC,
    3. Feinbaum RL,
    4. Ambros V.
    The C. elegans heterochronic gene lin-4 encodes small RNAS with antisense complementarity to lin-14. Cell. 1993; 75: 843–54.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  3. 3.↵
    2. Rupaimoole R,
    3. Slack FJ.
    Microrna therapeutics: towards a new era for the management of cancer and other diseases. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2017; 16: 203–22.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  4. 4.↵
    2. Winter J,
    3. Jung S,
    4. Keller S,
    5. Gregory RI,
    6. Diederichs S.
    Many roads to maturity: microrna biogenesis pathways and their regulation. Nat Cell Biol. 2009; 11: 228–34.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  5. 5.↵
    2. Ha M,
    3. Kim VN.
    Regulation of microrna biogenesis. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2014; 15: 509–24.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  6. 6.↵
    2. Gregory RI,
    3. Chendrimada TP,
    4. Cooch N,
    5. Shiekhattar R.
    Human RISC couples microrna biogenesis and posttranscriptional gene silencing. Cell. 2005; 123: 631–40.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  7. 7.↵
    2. Gebert LFR,
    3. MacRae IJ.
    Regulation of microrna function in animals. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2019; 20: 21–37.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  8. 8.↵
    2. Lin S,
    3. Gregory RI.
    Microrna biogenesis pathways in cancer. Nat Rev Cancer. 2015; 15: 321–33.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  9. 9.↵
    2. Garzon R,
    3. Calin GA,
    4. Croce CM.
    Micrornas in cancer. Annu Rev Med. 2009; 60: 167–79.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  10. 10.↵
    2. Lee Y,
    3. Ahn C,
    4. Han J,
    5. Choi H,
    6. Kim J,
    7. Yim J, et al.
    The nuclear RNase III Drosha initiates microrna processing. Nature. 2003; 425: 415–9.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  11. 11.
    2. Bohnsack MT,
    3. Czaplinski K,
    4. Gorlich D.
    Exportin 5 is a RanGTP-dependent dsRNA-binding protein that mediates nuclear export of pre-miRNAS. RNA. 2004; 10: 185–91.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  12. 12.↵
    2. Hutvagner G,
    3. McLachlan J,
    4. Pasquinelli AE,
    5. Balint E,
    6. Tuschl T,
    7. Zamore PD.
    A cellular function for the RNA-interference enzyme DICER in the maturation of the let-7 small temporal RNA. Science. 2001; 293: 834–8.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  13. 13.↵
    2. Qiu J,
    3. Yang G,
    4. Feng M,
    5. Zheng S,
    6. Cao Z,
    7. You L, et al.
    Extracellular vesicles as mediators of the progression and chemoresistance of pancreatic cancer and their potential clinical applications. Mol Cancer. 2018; 17: 2.
    OpenUrl
  14. 14.↵
    2. Yang TT,
    3. Liu CG,
    4. Gao SC,
    5. Zhang Y,
    6. Wang PC.
    The serum exosome derived microrna-135a, -193b, and -384 were potential Alzheimer’s disease biomarkers. Biomed Environ Sci. 2018; 31: 87–96.
    OpenUrl
  15. 15.↵
    2. Ruan K,
    3. Fang X,
    4. Ouyang G.
    Micrornas: novel regulators in the hallmarks of human cancer. Cancer Lett. 2009; 285: 116–26.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  16. 16.↵
    2. Yang G,
    3. Xiong G,
    4. Cao Z,
    5. Zheng S,
    6. You L,
    7. Zhang T, et al.
    MiR-497 expression, function and clinical application in cancer. Oncotarget. 2016; 7: 55900–11.
    OpenUrl
  17. 17.
    2. Heravi-Moussavi A,
    3. Anglesio MS,
    4. Cheng SW,
    5. Senz J,
    6. Yang W,
    7. Prentice L, et al.
    Recurrent somatic DICER1 mutations in nonepithelial ovarian cancers. N Engl J Med. 2012; 366: 234–42.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  18. 18.↵
    2. Wallace JA,
    3. O’Connell RM.
    Micrornas and acute myeloid leukemia: therapeutic implications and emerging concepts. Blood. 2017; 130: 1290–301.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  19. 19.↵
    2. Nagel R,
    3. le Sage C,
    4. Diosdado B,
    5. van der Waal M,
    6. Oude Vrielink JA,
    7. Bolijn A, et al.
    Regulation of the adenomatous polyposis coli gene by the MiR-135 family in colorectal cancer. Cancer Res. 2008; 68: 5795–802.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  20. 20.↵
    2. Zhou W,
    3. Li X,
    4. Liu F,
    5. Xiao Z,
    6. He M,
    7. Shen S, et al.
    MiR-135a promotes growth and invasion of colorectal cancer via metastasis suppressor 1 in vitro. Acta Biochim Biophys Sin (Shanghai). 2012; 44: 838–46.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  21. 21.↵
    2. Wang Q,
    3. Zhang H,
    4. Shen X,
    5. Ju S.
    Serum microrna-135a-5p as an auxiliary diagnostic biomarker for colorectal cancer. Ann Clin Biochem. 2017; 54: 76–85.
    OpenUrl
  22. 22.↵
    2. Costa FF,
    3. Bischof JM,
    4. Vanin EF,
    5. Lulla RR,
    6. Wang M,
    7. Sredni ST, et al.
    Identification of micrornas as potential prognostic markers in ependymoma. PLoS One. 2011; 6: e25114.
  23. 23.↵
    2. Chen Y,
    3. Zhang J,
    4. Wang H,
    5. Zhao J,
    6. Xu C,
    7. Du Y, et al.
    miRNA-135a promotes breast cancer cell migration and invasion by targeting HOXA10. BMC Cancer. 2012; 12: 111.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  24. 24.↵
    2. Mao XP,
    3. Zhang LS,
    4. Huang B,
    5. Zhou SY,
    6. Liao J,
    7. Chen LW, et al.
    ­ MiR-135a enhances cellular proliferation through post-transcriptionally regulating PHLPP2 and FOXO1 in human bladder cancer. J Transl Med. 2015; 13: 86.
    OpenUrl
  25. 25.↵
    2. Ren J,
    3. Li Z,
    4. Tu C.
    MiR-135 post-transcriptionally regulates FOXO1 expression and promotes cell proliferation in human malignant melanoma cells. Int J Clin Exp Pathol. 2015; 8: 6356–66.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  26. 26.↵
    2. Zeng YB,
    3. Liang XH,
    4. Zhang GX,
    5. Jiang N,
    6. Zhang T,
    7. Huang JY, et al.
    miRNA-135a promotes hepatocellular carcinoma cell migration and invasion by targeting forkhead box O1. Cancer Cell Int. 2016; 16: 63.
    OpenUrl
  27. 27.↵
    2. Fukagawa S,
    3. Miyata K,
    4. Yotsumoto F,
    5. Kiyoshima C,
    6. Nam SO,
    7. Anan H, et al.
    Microrna-135a-3p as a promising biomarker and nucleic acid therapeutic agent for ovarian cancer. Cancer Sci. 2017; 108: 886–96.
    OpenUrl
  28. 28.↵
    2. Dang Z,
    3. Xu WH,
    4. Lu P,
    5. Wu N,
    6. Liu J,
    7. Ruan B, et al.
    Microrna-135a inhibits cell proliferation by targeting BMI1 in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Int J Biol Sci. 2014; 10: 733–45.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  29. 29.↵
    2. Xu B,
    3. Tao T,
    4. Wang Y,
    5. Fang F,
    6. Huang Y,
    7. Chen S, et al.
    HSA-MiR-135a-1 inhibits prostate cancer cell growth and migration by targeting EGFR. Tumour Biol. 2016; 37: 14141–51.
    OpenUrl
  30. 30.↵
    2. Zhang YK,
    3. Sun B,
    4. Sui G.
    Serum microrna-135a downregulation as a prognostic marker of non-small cell lung cancer. Genet Mol Res. 2016; 15: gmr.15038252.
  31. 31.↵
    2. Shi H,
    3. Ji Y,
    4. Zhang D,
    5. Liu Y,
    6. Fang P.
    MiR-135a inhibits migration and invasion and regulates EMT-related marker genes by targeting KLF8 in lung cancer cells. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2015; 465: 125–30.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  32. 32.↵
    2. Zhou L,
    3. Qiu T,
    4. Xu J,
    5. Wang T,
    6. Wang J,
    7. Zhou X, et al.
    MiR-135a/b modulate cisplatin resistance of human lung cancer cell line by targeting MCL1. Pathol Oncol Res. 2013; 19: 677–83.
    OpenUrl
  33. 33.↵
    2. He Q,
    3. Fang Y,
    4. Lu F,
    5. Pan J,
    6. Wang L,
    7. Gong W, et al.
    Analysis of differential expression profile of miRNA in peripheral blood of patients with lung cancer. J Clin Lab Anal. 2019; 33: e23003.
  34. 34.↵
    2. Zhao X,
    3. Sun Z,
    4. Li H,
    5. Jiang F,
    6. Zhou J,
    7. Zhang L.
    MiR-135a-5p modulates biological functions of thyroid carcinoma cells via targeting VCAN 3’-UTR. Cancer Biomark. 2017; 20: 207–16.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  35. 35.↵
    2. Zhou W,
    3. Bi X,
    4. Gao G,
    5. Sun L.
    miRNA-133b and miRNA-135a induce apoptosis via the JAK2/STAT3 signaling pathway in human renal carcinoma cells. Biomed Pharmacother. 2016; 84: 722–9.
    OpenUrl
  36. 36.↵
    2. Zhou H,
    3. Guo W,
    4. Zhao Y,
    5. Wang Y,
    6. Zha R,
    7. Ding J, et al.
    ­ Microrna-135a acts as a putative tumor suppressor by directly targeting very low density lipoprotein receptor in human gallbladder cancer. Cancer Sci. 2014; 105: 956–65.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  37. 37.↵
    2. Zhao Z,
    3. Lin X,
    4. Tong Y,
    5. Li W.
    Silencing lncRNA ZFAS1 or elevated microrna-135a represses proliferation, migration, invasion and resistance to apoptosis of osteosarcoma cells. Cancer Cell Int. 2019; 19: 326.
    OpenUrl
  38. 38.↵
    2. Wu S,
    3. Lin Y,
    4. Xu D,
    5. Chen J,
    6. Shu M,
    7. Zhou Y, et al.
    MiR-135a functions as a selective killer of malignant glioma. Oncogene. 2012; 31: 3866–74.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  39. 39.↵
    2. Tomsic J,
    3. Fultz R,
    4. Liyanarachchi S,
    5. Genutis LK,
    6. Wang Y,
    7. Li W, et al.
    Variants in microrna genes in familial papillary thyroid carcinoma. Oncotarget. 2017; 8: 6475–82.
    OpenUrl
  40. 40.↵
    2. Wu H,
    3. Huang M,
    4. Cao P,
    5. Wang T,
    6. Shu Y,
    7. Liu P.
    MiR-135a targets JAK2 and inhibits gastric cancer cell proliferation. Cancer Biol Ther. 2012; 13: 281–8.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  41. 41.↵
    2. Zhang C,
    3. Chen X,
    4. Chen X,
    5. Wang X,
    6. Ji A,
    7. Jiang L, et al.
    MiR-135a acts as a tumor suppressor in gastric cancer in part by targeting KIFC1. Onco Targets Ther. 2016; 9: 3555–63.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  42. 42.↵
    2. Yan LH,
    3. Chen ZN,
    4. Li L,
    5. Chen J,
    6. Wei WE,
    7. Mo XW, et al.
    MiR-135a promotes gastric cancer progression and resistance to oxaliplatin. Oncotarget. 2016; 7: 70699–714.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  43. 43.↵
    2. Kroiss A,
    3. Vincent S,
    4. Decaussin-Petrucci M,
    5. Meugnier E,
    6. Viallet J,
    7. Ruffion A, et al.
    Androgen-regulated microrna-135a decreases prostate cancer cell migration and invasion through downregulating ROCK1 and ROCK2. Oncogene. 2015; 34: 2846–55.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  44. 44.↵
    2. Wei X,
    3. Cheng X,
    4. Peng Y,
    5. Zheng R,
    6. Chai J,
    7. Jiang S.
    STAT5a promotes the transcription of mature Mmu-MiR-135a in 3t3-l1 cells by binding to both MiR-135a-1 and MiR-135a-2 promoter elements. Int J Biochem Cell Biol. 2016; 77: 109–19.
    OpenUrl
  45. 45.↵
    2. Cheng Z,
    3. Liu F,
    4. Zhang H,
    5. Li X,
    6. Li Y,
    7. Li J, et al.
    MiR-135a inhibits tumor metastasis and angiogenesis by targeting FAK pathway. Oncotarget. 2017; 8: 31153–68.
    OpenUrl
  46. 46.↵
    2. Zhang X,
    3. Gao F,
    4. Zhou L,
    5. Wang H,
    6. Shi G,
    7. Tan X.
    UCA1 regulates the growth and metastasis of pancreatic cancer by sponging MiR-135a. Oncol Res. 2017; 25: 1529–41.
    OpenUrl
  47. 47.↵
    2. Wang J,
    3. Zhang M,
    4. Lu W.
    Long noncoding RNA GACAT3 promotes glioma progression by sponging MiR-135a. J Cell Physiol. 2019; 234: 10877–87.
    OpenUrl
  48. 48.↵
    2. Wu Q,
    3. Shi M,
    4. Meng W,
    5. Wang Y,
    6. Hui P,
    7. Ma J.
    Long noncoding RNA FOXD3-as1 promotes colon adenocarcinoma progression and functions as a competing endogenous RNA to regulate sirt1 by sponging MiR-135a-5p. J Cell Physiol. 2019; 234: 21889–902.
    OpenUrl
  49. 49.↵
    2. Tang Y,
    3. Cao G,
    4. Zhao G,
    5. Wang C,
    6. Qin Q.
    lncRNA differentiation antagonizing non-protein coding RNA promotes proliferation and invasion through regulating MiR-135a/NLRP37 axis in pancreatic cancer. Invest New Drugs. 2020; 38: 714–21.
    OpenUrl
  50. 50.↵
    2. Wei X,
    3. Yang X,
    4. Wang B,
    5. Yang Y,
    6. Fang Z,
    7. Yi C, et al.
    lncRNA MBNL1-AS1 represses cell proliferation and enhances cell apoptosis via targeting MiR-135a-5p/PHLPP2/FOXO1 axis in bladder cancer. Cancer Med. 2020; 9: 724–36.
    OpenUrl
  51. 51.↵
    2. Wang X,
    3. Kan J,
    4. Han J,
    5. Zhang W,
    6. Bai L,
    7. Wu H.
    lncRNA SNHG16 functions as an oncogene by sponging MiR-135a and promotes JAK2/STAT3 signal pathway in gastric cancer. J Cancer. 2019; 10: 1013–22.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  52. 52.↵
    2. Klinge CM.
    Non-coding RNAS: long non-coding RNAS and micrornas in endocrine-related cancers. Endocr Relat Cancer. 2018; 25: R259–82.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  53. 53.↵
    2. Zheng Y,
    3. Zheng B,
    4. Meng X,
    5. Yan Y,
    6. He J,
    7. Liu Y.
    lncRNA DANCR promotes the proliferation, migration, and invasion of tongue squamous cell carcinoma cells through MiR-135a-5p/KLF8 axis. Cancer Cell Int. 2019; 19: 302.
    OpenUrl
  54. 54.↵
    2. Setien-Olarra A,
    3. Marichalar-Mendia X,
    4. Bediaga NG,
    5. Aguirre-Echebarria P,
    6. Aguirre-Urizar JM,
    7. Mosqueda-Taylor A.
    Micrornas expression profile in solid and unicystic ameloblastomas. PLoS One. 2017; 12: e0186841.
  55. 55.↵
    2. Diniz MG,
    3. Franca JA,
    4. Vilas-Boas FAS,
    5. de Souza FTA,
    6. Calin GA,
    7. Gomez RS, et al.
    The long noncoding RNA KIAA0125 is upregulated in ameloblastomas. Pathol Res Pract. 2019; 215: 466–9.
    OpenUrl
  56. 56.↵
    2. Li P,
    3. Yang X,
    4. Yuan W,
    5. Yang C,
    6. Zhang X,
    7. Han J, et al.
    Circrna-Cdr1as exerts anti-oncogenic functions in bladder cancer by sponging microrna-135a. Cell Physiol Biochem. 2018; 46: 1606–16.
    OpenUrl
  57. 57.↵
    2. Shi L,
    3. Li X,
    4. Wu Z,
    5. Li X,
    6. Nie J,
    7. Guo M, et al.
    DNA methylation-mediated repression of MiR-181a/135a/302c expression promotes the microsatellite-unstable colorectal cancer development and 5-fu resistance via targeting PLAG1. J Genet Genomics. 2018; 45: 205–14.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  58. 58.↵
    2. Bi C,
    3. Chung TH,
    4. Huang G,
    5. Zhou J,
    6. Yan J,
    7. Ahmann GJ, et al.
    Genome-wide pharmacologic unmasking identifies tumor suppressive micrornas in multiple myeloma. Oncotarget. 2015; 6: 26508–18.
    OpenUrl
  59. 59.↵
    2. Shi H,
    3. Fang R,
    4. Li Y,
    5. Li L,
    6. Zhang W,
    7. Wang H, et al.
    The oncoprotein HBXIP suppresses gluconeogenesis through modulating pck1 to enhance the growth of hepatoma cells. Cancer Lett. 2016; 382: 147–56.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  60. 60.↵
    2. Wan X,
    3. Pu H,
    4. Huang W,
    5. Yang S,
    6. Zhang Y,
    7. Kong Z, et al.
    Androgen-induced MiR-135a acts as a tumor suppressor through downregulating RBAK and MMP11, and mediates resistance to androgen deprivation therapy. Oncotarget. 2016; 7: 51284–300.
    OpenUrl
  61. 61.↵
    2. Duan S,
    3. Dong X,
    4. Hai J,
    5. Jiang J,
    6. Wang W,
    7. Yang J, et al.
    Microrna-135a-3p is downregulated and serves as a tumour suppressor in ovarian cancer by targeting CCR2. Biomed Pharmacother. 2018; 107: 712–20.
    OpenUrl
  62. 62.↵
    2. Yamada Y,
    3. Hidaka H,
    4. Seki N,
    5. Yoshino H,
    6. Yamasaki T,
    7. Itesako T, et al.
    Tumor-suppressive microrna-135a inhibits cancer cell proliferation by targeting the c-MYC oncogene in renal cell carcinoma. Cancer Sci. 2013; 104: 304–12.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  63. 63.↵
    2. Navarro A,
    3. Diaz T,
    4. Martinez A,
    5. Gaya A,
    6. Pons A,
    7. Gel B, et al.
    Regulation of JAK2 by MiR-135a: prognostic impact in classic Hodgkin lymphoma. Blood. 2009; 114: 2945–51.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  64. 64.↵
    2. Xu B,
    3. Lu X,
    4. Zhao Y,
    5. Liu C,
    6. Huang X,
    7. Chen S, et al.
    Microrna-135a induces prostate cancer cell apoptosis via inhibition of STAT6. Oncol Lett. 2019; 17: 1889–95.
    OpenUrl
  65. 65.↵
    2. Coarfa C,
    3. Fiskus W,
    4. Eedunuri VK,
    5. Rajapakshe K,
    6. Foley C,
    7. Chew SA, et al.
    Comprehensive proteomic profiling identifies the androgen receptor axis and other signaling pathways as targets of micrornas suppressed in metastatic prostate cancer. Oncogene. 2016; 35: 2345–56.
    OpenUrl
  66. 66.↵
    2. Luo W,
    3. Sun C,
    4. Zhou J,
    5. Wang Q,
    6. Yu L,
    7. Bian XW, et al.
    MiR-135a-5p functions as a glioma proliferation suppressor by targeting tumor necrosis factor receptor-associated factor 5 and predicts patients’ prognosis. Am J Pathol. 2019; 189: 162–76.
    OpenUrl
  67. 67.↵
    2. Gomez Zubieta DM,
    3. Hamood MA,
    4. Beydoun R,
    5. Pall AE,
    6. Kondapalli KC.
    Microrna-135a regulates nhe9 to inhibit proliferation and migration of glioblastoma cells. Cell Commun Signal. 2017; 15: 55.
    OpenUrl
  68. 68.↵
    2. Ahmad A,
    3. Zhang W,
    4. Wu M,
    5. Tan S,
    6. Zhu T.
    Tumor-suppressive miRNA-135a inhibits breast cancer cell proliferation by targeting ELK1 and ELK3 oncogenes. Genes Genomics. 2018; 40: 243–51.
    OpenUrl
  69. 69.↵
    2. Tribollet V,
    3. Barenton B,
    4. Kroiss A,
    5. Vincent S,
    6. Zhang L,
    7. Forcet C, et al.
    MiR-135a inhibits the invasion of cancer cells via suppression of ERRalpha. PLoS One. 2016; 11: e0156445.
  70. 70.↵
    2. Guo LM,
    3. Ding GF,
    4. Xu W,
    5. Ge H,
    6. Jiang Y,
    7. Chen XJ, et al.
    MiR-135a-5p represses proliferation of HNSCC by targeting HOXA10. Cancer Biol Ther. 2018; 19: 973–83.
    OpenUrl
  71. 71.↵
    2. Wang LX,
    3. Kang ZP,
    4. Yang ZC,
    5. Ma RX,
    6. Tan Y,
    7. Peng XB, et al.
    Microrna-135a inhibits nasopharyngeal carcinoma cell proliferation through targeting interleukin-17. Cell Physiol Biochem. 2018; 46: 2232–8.
    OpenUrl
  72. 72.↵
    2. Ren JW,
    3. Li ZJ,
    4. Tu C.
    MiR-135 post-transcriptionally regulates FOXO1 expression and promotes cell proliferation in human malignant melanoma cells. Int J Clin Exp Pathol. 2015; 8: 6356–66.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  73. 73.↵
    2. Liu S,
    3. Guo W,
    4. Shi J,
    5. Li N,
    6. Yu X,
    7. Xue J, et al.
    Microrna-135a contributes to the development of portal vein tumor thrombus by promoting metastasis in hepatocellular carcinoma. J Hepatol. 2012; 56: 389–96.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  74. 74.↵
    2. Van Renne N,
    3. Roca Suarez AA,
    4. Duong FHT,
    5. Gondeau C,
    6. Calabrese D,
    7. Fontaine N, et al.
    MiR-135a-5p-mediated downregulation of protein tyrosine phosphatase receptor delta is a candidate driver of HCV-associated hepatocarcinogenesis. Gut. 2018; 67: 953–62.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  75. 75.↵
    2. Mao XW,
    3. Xiao JQ,
    4. Li ZY,
    5. Zheng YC,
    6. Zhang N.
    Effects of ­ microrna-135a on the epithelial-mesenchymal transition, migration and invasion of bladder cancer cells by targeting GSK3beta through the Wnt/beta-catenin signaling pathway. Exp Mol Med. 2018; 50: e429.
  76. 76.↵
    2. Leung CO,
    3. Deng W,
    4. Ye TM,
    5. Ngan HY,
    6. Tsao SW,
    7. Cheung AN, et al.
    MiR-135a leads to cervical cancer cell transformation through regulation of beta-catenin via a SIAH1-dependent ubiquitin proteosomal pathway. Carcinogenesis. 2014; 35: 1931–40.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  77. 77.↵
    2. Xie Y,
    3. Li F,
    4. Li Z,
    5. Shi Z.
    MiR-135a suppresses migration of gastric cancer cells by targeting TRAF5-mediated NF-kappaB activation. Onco Targets Ther. 2019; 12: 975–84.
    OpenUrl
  78. 78.↵
    2. Zhou Y,
    3. Li S,
    4. Li J,
    5. Wang D,
    6. Li Q.
    Effect of microrna-135a on cell proliferation, migration, invasion, apoptosis and tumor angiogenesis through the IGF-1/PI3K/AKT signaling pathway in non-small cell lung cancer. Cell Physiol Biochem. 2017; 42: 1431–46.
    OpenUrl
  79. 79.↵
    2. Zhang Y,
    3. Jiang WL,
    4. Yang JY,
    5. Huang J,
    6. Kang G,
    7. Hu HB, et al.
    Downregulation of lysyl oxidase-like 4 LOXL4 by MiR-135a-5p promotes lung cancer progression in vitro and in vivo. J Cell Physiol. 2019; 234: 18679–87.
    OpenUrl
  80. 80.↵
    2. Zhang T,
    3. Wang N.
    MiR-135a confers resistance to gefitinib in non-small cell lung cancer cells by upregulation of RAC1. Oncol Res. 2018; 26: 1191–200.
    OpenUrl
  81. 81.↵
    2. Holleman A,
    3. Chung I,
    4. Olsen RR,
    5. Kwak B,
    6. Mizokami A,
    7. Saijo N, et al.
    MiR-135a contributes to paclitaxel resistance in tumor cells both in vitro and in vivo. Oncogene. 2011; 30: 4386–98.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  82. 82.↵
    2. Puisieux A,
    3. Brabletz T,
    4. Caramel J.
    Oncogenic roles of EMT-inducing transcription factors. Nat Cell Biol. 2014; 16: 488–94.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  83. 83.
    2. De Craene B,
    3. Berx G.
    Regulatory networks defining EMT during cancer initiation and progression. Nat Rev Cancer. 2013; 13: 97–110.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  84. 84.↵
    2. Diepenbruck M,
    3. Christofori G.
    Epithelial–mesenchymal transition (EMT) and metastasis: yes, no, maybe? Curr Opin Cell Biol. 2016; 43: 7–13.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  85. 85.↵
    2. Batlle E,
    3. Sancho E,
    4. Franci C,
    5. Dominguez D,
    6. Monfar M,
    7. Baulida J, et al.
    The transcription factor snail is a repressor of e-cadherin gene expression in epithelial tumour cells. Nat Cell Biol. 2000; 2: 84–9.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  86. 86.↵
    2. Pieterse Z,
    3. Amaya-Padilla MA,
    4. Singomat T,
    5. Binju M,
    6. Madjid BD,
    7. Yu Y, et al.
    Ovarian cancer stem cells and their role in drug resistance. Int J Biochem Cell Biol. 2019; 106: 117–26.
    OpenUrl
  87. 87.
    2. Li Q,
    3. Yang G,
    4. Feng M,
    5. Zheng S,
    6. Cao Z,
    7. Qiu J, et al.
    Nf-kappaB in pancreatic cancer: its key role in chemoresistance. Cancer Lett. 2018; 421: 127–34.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  88. 88.↵
    2. Xiong G,
    3. Feng M,
    4. Yang G,
    5. Zheng S,
    6. Song X,
    7. Cao Z, et al.
    The underlying mechanisms of non-coding RNAS in the chemoresistance of pancreatic cancer. Cancer Lett. 2017; 397: 94–102.
    OpenUrl
  89. 89.↵
    2. Wang J,
    3. Yang M,
    4. Li Y,
    5. Han B.
    The role of micrornas in the chemoresistance of breast cancer. Drug Dev Res. 2015; 76: 368–74.
    OpenUrl
  90. 90.↵
    2. Caliskan M,
    3. Guler H,
    4. Bozok Cetintas V.
    Current updates on micrornas as regulators of chemoresistance. Biomed Pharmacother. 2017; 95: 1000–12.
    OpenUrl
  91. 91.↵
    2. Leonetti A,
    3. Assaraf YG,
    4. Veltsista PD,
    5. El Hassouni B,
    6. Tiseo M,
    7. Giovannetti E.
    Micrornas as a drug resistance mechanism to targeted therapies in EGFR-mutated NSCLC: current implications and future directions. Drug Resist Updat. 2019; 42: 1–11.
    OpenUrl
  92. 92.↵
    2. Madurantakam Royam M,
    3. Ramesh R,
    4. Shanker R,
    5. Sabarimurugan S,
    6. Kumarasamy C,
    7. Ramesh N, et al.
    miRNA predictors of pancreatic cancer chemotherapeutic response: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Cancers (Basel). 2019; 11: 900.
    OpenUrl
  93. 93.↵
    2. Garofalo M,
    3. Croce CM.
    Micrornas as therapeutic targets in chemoresistance. Drug Resist Updat. 2013; 16: 47–59.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  94. 94.↵
    2. Matuszcak C,
    3. Haier J,
    4. Hummel R,
    5. Lindner K.
    Micrornas: promising chemoresistance biomarkers in gastric cancer with diagnostic and therapeutic potential. World J Gastroenterol. 2014; 20: 13658–66.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  95. 95.↵
    2. Deb S,
    3. Uhr K,
    4. Prager-van der Smissen WJC,
    5. Heine AAJ,
    6. Ozturk B,
    7. van Jaarsveld MTM, et al.
    Micrornas as possible indicators of drug sensitivity in breast cancer cell lines. PLoS One. 2019; 14: e0216400.
  96. 96.↵
    2. Li J,
    3. Tan S,
    4. Kooger R,
    5. Zhang C,
    6. Zhang Y.
    Micrornas as novel biological targets for detection and regulation. Chem Soc Rev. 2014; 43: 506–17.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  97. 97.↵
    2. Berindan-Neagoe I,
    3. Monroig Pdel C,
    4. Pasculli B,
    5. Calin GA.
    MicroRNAome genome: a treasure for cancer diagnosis and therapy. CA Cancer J Clin. 2014; 64: 311–36.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  98. 98.↵
    2. Gao Y,
    3. Lin L,
    4. Li T,
    5. Yang J,
    6. Wei Y.
    The role of miRNA-223 in cancer: function, diagnosis and therapy. Gene. 2017; 616: 1–7.
    OpenUrl
  99. 99.↵
    2. Shen K,
    3. Cao Z,
    4. Zhu R,
    5. You L,
    6. Zhang T.
    The dual functional role of microrna-18a (MiR-18a) in cancer development. Clin Transl Med. 2019; 8: 32.
    OpenUrl
  100. 100.↵
    2. Vickers MM,
    3. Bar J,
    4. Gorn-Hondermann I,
    5. Yarom N,
    6. Daneshmand M,
    7. Hanson JE, et al.
    Stage-dependent differential expression of micrornas in colorectal cancer: potential role as markers of metastatic disease. Clin Exp Metastasis. 2012; 29: 123–32.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  101. 101.↵
    2. Alhasan AH,
    3. Scott AW,
    4. Wu JJ,
    5. Feng G,
    6. Meeks JJ,
    7. Thaxton CS, et al.
    Circulating microrna signature for the diagnosis of very high-risk prostate cancer. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2016; 113: 10655–60.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  102. 102.↵
    2. Hofbauer SL,
    3. de Martino M,
    4. Lucca I,
    5. Haitel A,
    6. Susani M,
    7. Shariat SF, et al.
    A urinary microrna (MiR) signature for diagnosis of bladder cancer. Urol Oncol. 2018; 36: 531.e1-8.
    OpenUrl
  103. 103.↵
    2. Tang W,
    3. Jiang Y,
    4. Mu X,
    5. Xu L,
    6. Cheng W,
    7. Wang X.
    MiR-135a functions as a tumor suppressor in epithelial ovarian cancer and regulates HOXA10 expression. Cell Signal. 2014; 26: 1420–6.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  104. 104.↵
    2. von Felden J,
    3. Heim D,
    4. Schulze K,
    5. Krech T,
    6. Ewald F,
    7. Nashan B, et al.
    High expression of micro RNA-135a in hepatocellular carcinoma is associated with recurrence within 12 months after resection. BMC Cancer. 2017; 17: 60.
    OpenUrl
  105. 105.↵
    2. Ling H,
    3. Fabbri M,
    4. Calin GA.
    Micrornas and other non-coding RNAS as targets for anticancer drug development. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2013; 12: 847–65.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  106. 106.↵
    2. Rupaimoole R,
    3. Calin GA,
    4. Lopez-Berestein G,
    5. Sood AK.
    miRNA deregulation in cancer cells and the tumor microenvironment. Cancer Discov. 2016; 6: 235–46.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  107. 107.↵
    2. Rupaimoole R,
    3. Ivan C,
    4. Yang D,
    5. Gharpure KM,
    6. Wu SY,
    7. Pecot CV, et al.
    Hypoxia-upregulated microrna-630 targets DICER, leading to increased tumor progression. Oncogene. 2016; 35: 4312–20.
    OpenUrl
  108. 108.↵
    2. Gilligan KE,
    3. Dwyer RM.
    Engineering exosomes for cancer therapy. Int J Mol Sci. 2017; 18: 1122.
    OpenUrl
  109. 109.↵
    2. Cheng CJ,
    3. Slack FJ.
    The duality of oncomir addiction in the maintenance and treatment of cancer. Cancer J. 2012; 18: 232–7.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  110. 110.↵
    2. Rupaimoole R,
    3. Han HD,
    4. Lopez-Berestein G,
    5. Sood AK.
    Microrna therapeutics: principles, expectations, and challenges. Chin J Cancer. 2011; 30: 368–70.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  111. 111.↵
    2. Li Z,
    3. Rana TM.
    Therapeutic targeting of micrornas: current status and future challenges. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2014; 13: 622–38.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  112. 112.↵
    2. Merritt WM,
    3. Lin YG,
    4. Han LY,
    5. Kamat AA,
    6. Spannuth WA,
    7. Schmandt R, et al.
    DICER, DROSHA, and outcomes in patients with ovarian cancer. N Engl J Med. 2008; 359: 2641–50.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  113. 113.
    2. Allegra D,
    3. Bilan V,
    4. Garding A,
    5. Dohner H,
    6. Stilgenbauer S,
    7. Kuchenbauer F, et al.
    Defective DROSHA processing contributes to downregulation of MiR-15/-16 in chronic lymphocytic leukemia. Leukemia. 2014; 28: 98–107.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  114. 114.↵
    2. Karube Y,
    3. Tanaka H,
    4. Osada H,
    5. Tomida S,
    6. Tatematsu Y,
    7. Yanagisawa K, et al.
    Reduced expression of DICER associated with poor prognosis in lung cancer patients. Cancer Sci. 2005; 96: 111–5.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
Back to top

In this issue

Print
Download PDF
Email Article
Citation Tools

Jump to section

Keywords