Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • About
    • About CBM
    • Editorial Board
    • Announcement
  • Articles
    • Ahead of print
    • Current Issue
    • Archive
    • Collections
    • Cover Story
  • For Authors
    • Instructions for Authors
    • Resources
    • Submit a Manuscript
  • For Reviewers
    • Become a Reviewer
    • Instructions for Reviewers
    • Resources
    • Outstanding Reviewer
  • Subscription
  • Alerts
    • Email Alerts
    • RSS Feeds
    • Table of Contents
  • Contact us
  • Other Publications
    • cbm

User menu

  • My alerts

Search

  • Advanced search
Cancer Biology & Medicine
  • Other Publications
    • cbm
  • My alerts
Cancer Biology & Medicine

Advanced Search

 

  • Home
  • About
    • About CBM
    • Editorial Board
    • Announcement
  • Articles
    • Ahead of print
    • Current Issue
    • Archive
    • Collections
    • Cover Story
  • For Authors
    • Instructions for Authors
    • Resources
    • Submit a Manuscript
  • For Reviewers
    • Become a Reviewer
    • Instructions for Reviewers
    • Resources
    • Outstanding Reviewer
  • Subscription
  • Alerts
    • Email Alerts
    • RSS Feeds
    • Table of Contents
  • Contact us
  • Follow cbm on Twitter
  • Visit cbm on Facebook
Research ArticleOriginal Article

Clinical study of apatinib in the treatment of stage IV osteogenic sarcoma after failure of chemotherapy

Zhichao Liao, Ting Li, Chao Zhang, Xinyue Liu, Ruwei Xing, Sheng Teng, Yun Yang, Gang Zhao, Xu Bai, Jun Zhao and Jilong Yang
Cancer Biology & Medicine May 2020, 17 (2) 501-512; DOI: https://doi.org/10.20892/j.issn.2095-3941.2019.0397
Zhichao Liao
1Department of Bone and Soft Tissue Tumor, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital; National Clinical Research Center for Cancer; Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Tianjin; Tianjin’s Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin 300060, China
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Ting Li
1Department of Bone and Soft Tissue Tumor, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital; National Clinical Research Center for Cancer; Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Tianjin; Tianjin’s Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin 300060, China
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Chao Zhang
1Department of Bone and Soft Tissue Tumor, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital; National Clinical Research Center for Cancer; Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Tianjin; Tianjin’s Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin 300060, China
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Xinyue Liu
1Department of Bone and Soft Tissue Tumor, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital; National Clinical Research Center for Cancer; Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Tianjin; Tianjin’s Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin 300060, China
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Ruwei Xing
1Department of Bone and Soft Tissue Tumor, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital; National Clinical Research Center for Cancer; Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Tianjin; Tianjin’s Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin 300060, China
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Sheng Teng
1Department of Bone and Soft Tissue Tumor, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital; National Clinical Research Center for Cancer; Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Tianjin; Tianjin’s Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin 300060, China
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Yun Yang
1Department of Bone and Soft Tissue Tumor, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital; National Clinical Research Center for Cancer; Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Tianjin; Tianjin’s Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin 300060, China
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Gang Zhao
2Department of Pathology, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital; National Clinical Research Center for Cancer; Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Tianjin; Tianjin’s Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin 300060, China
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Xu Bai
3Department of Radiology, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital; National Clinical Research Center for Cancer; Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Tianjin; Tianjin’s Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin 300060, China
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jun Zhao
1Department of Bone and Soft Tissue Tumor, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital; National Clinical Research Center for Cancer; Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Tianjin; Tianjin’s Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin 300060, China
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Jun Zhao
  • For correspondence: [email protected] [email protected]
Jilong Yang
1Department of Bone and Soft Tissue Tumor, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital; National Clinical Research Center for Cancer; Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Tianjin; Tianjin’s Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin 300060, China
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Jilong Yang
  • For correspondence: [email protected] [email protected]
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • Figure 1
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 1

    Patient inclusion and exclusion flow chart.

  • Figure 2
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 2

    Maximum and whole-course changes in sizes of target lesions vs. baseline after apatinib treatment of stage IV osteogenic sarcoma that did not respond to chemotherapy. (A) Maximum changes in sizes of target lesions vs. baseline after apatinib treatment of stage IV osteogenic sarcoma that did not respond to chemotherapy. (B) Whole-course changes in sizes of target lesions vs. baseline after apatinib treatment for stage IV osteogenic sarcoma that did not respond to chemotherapy.

  • Figure 3
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 3

    Efficacy and toxicity of apatinib in stage IV oesteogenic sarcoma. (A) Overall responses of 33 patients with stage IV osteogenic sarcoma treated with apatinib. Among 33 patients, 31 had measurable lesions, and 2 patients had unmeasurable lesions. Responses at 12 weeks were PR in 2 (6.06%, 2/33), SD in 24 (72.73%, 24/33), and PD in 7 (21.21%, 7/33). (B) PFS after apatinib treatment of stage IV osteogenic sarcoma that did not respond to chemotherapy (mPFS: 7.89 months). (C) OS after apatinib treatment of stage IV osteogenic sarcoma that did not respond to chemotherapy (mOS: 17.61 months). (D) Frequencies and grades of adverse events to apatinib.

  • Figure 4
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 4

    Comparison of imaging findings between 2 patients treated with apatinib for stage IV osteogenic sarcoma that did not respond to chemotherapy. (A-F) Efficacy in patients who were diagnosed with stage IV osteosarcoma at the first visit and received apatinib after they did not respond to first-line chemotherapy. (A, C, E) Imaging findings before treatment with apatinib (January 23, 2017). (B, D, F) Positron emission tomography-CT showed significant decreases in the sizes and metabolic activity of the tumors after treatment with apatinib (April 10, 2017). (G-H) Effects of apatinib in patients with metastatic Ewing’s sarcoma in the lungs who did not respond to first-line chemotherapy. (G) CT images of the chest before treatment with apatinib (May 25, 2017). (H) The lesions in the lungs remained stable from initiation of oral use of apatinib on May 25, 2017 to re-examination on November 24, 2017.

Tables

  • Figures
    • View popup
    Table 1

    Recent clinical trial for advanced osteosarcoma or bone sarcoma

    YearCasesmPFS (month)mOS (month)ORRDCR
    Pazopanib10201918––027.8% (7/18)
    Regorafenib112019223.611.113.6% (3/22)–
    Apatinib122019374.59.943.2% (16/37)–
    Lenvatinib132018263.4–7.7% (2/26)–
    Cabozantinib142018426.2–11.9% (5/42)–
    Apatinib152018107.51420.0% (2/10)70.0% (7/10)
    Sorafenib16201235478.6% (3/35)48.6% (17/35)

    mPFS, median progression-free survival; mOS, median overall survival; ORR, objective response rate; DCR, disease control rate.

      • View popup
      Table 2

      Clinical characteristics of stage IV osteogenic sarcoma patients who did not respond to chemotherapy and were treated with apatinib

      CharacteristicsValue
      Gender
       Male23/34 (67.6%)
       Female11/34 (32.4%)
      Age, years
       Average35.24
       Range11–73
      Distribution
       ≤ 4221/34 (61.8%)
       > 4213/34 (38.2%)
      ECOG score
       02/34 (5.9%)
       117/34 (50%)
       214/34 (41.2%)
       31/34 (2.9%)
      Subtype (%)
       Osteosarcoma18/34 (52.9%)
       EWS/PNET7/34 (20.6%)
       Bone UPS4/34 (11.8%)
       Chondrosarcoma3/34 (8.8%)
       Chordoma2/34 (5.9%)
      Metastatic site
       Lung34/34 (100%)
       Lung and others8/34 (23.5%)

      ECOG, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group; EWS/PNET, Ewing’s sarcoma/primitive neuroectodermal tumor; UPS, undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcoma.

        • View popup
        Table 3

        Efficacy of apatinib for stage IV osteogenic sarcoma that did not respond to chemotherapy

        Outcome12-week efficacy analysis*Final efficacy analysis**
        CR00
        PR20
         Osteosarcoma10
         Bone UPS10
        SD246
         Osteosarcoma143
         EWS/PNET51
         Bone UPS22
         Chondrosarcoma10
         Chordoma20
        PD727
         Osteosarcoma315
         EWS/PNET26
         Bone UPS12
         Chondrosarcoma12
         Chordoma02
        Excluded case1 (chondrosarcoma)1 (chondrosarcoma)
        ORR6.06% (2/33)0
        DCR78.79% (26/33)18.18% (6/33)
        PFR12W = 82%mPFS = 7.89 m
        OSR12W = 100%mOS = 17.61 m

        CR, complete response; PR, partial response; SD, stable disease; PD, progressive disease; ORR, objective response rate; DCR, disease control rate; PFR, progression free survival rate; mPFS, median progression-free survival; OSR, overall survival rate; mOS, median overall survival. *Fisher’s exact test = 0.761, **Fisher’s exact test = 0.589.

          • View popup
          Table 4

          Adverse events of apatinib in the treatment of stage IV osteogenic sarcoma that did not respond to chemotherapy

          Adverse event*Grade 1Grade 2Grade 3Total
          Hand-foot syndrome84012 (35.29%)
          Proteinuria91111 (32.35%)
          Hypertension83011 (32.35%)
          Mucositis3104 (11.76%)
          Fatigue3104 (11.76%)
          Anemia4004 (11.76%)
          Transaminase increase4004 (11.76%)
          Hiccups4004 (11.76%)
          Pain0303 (8.82%)
          Diarrhea3003 (8.82%)
          Skin pigmentation3003 (8.82%)
          Periodontal disease3003 (8.82%)
          Rash3003 (8.82%)
          Bilirubin increase3003 (8.82%)
          Pneumothorax2002 (5.88%)
          Dysgeusia0011 (2.94%)
          Apositia0101 (2.94%)
          Hematuria1001 (2.94%)
          Dyspnea1001 (2.94%)
          Total6214278

          *According to CTCAE5.0.

          PreviousNext
          Back to top

          In this issue

          Cancer Biology and Medicine: 17 (2)
          Cancer Biology & Medicine
          Vol. 17, Issue 2
          15 May 2020
          • Table of Contents
          • Index by author
          Print
          Download PDF
          Email Article

          Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Cancer Biology & Medicine.

          NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

          Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
          Clinical study of apatinib in the treatment of stage IV osteogenic sarcoma after failure of chemotherapy
          (Your Name) has sent you a message from Cancer Biology & Medicine
          (Your Name) thought you would like to see the Cancer Biology & Medicine web site.
          Citation Tools
          Clinical study of apatinib in the treatment of stage IV osteogenic sarcoma after failure of chemotherapy
          Zhichao Liao, Ting Li, Chao Zhang, Xinyue Liu, Ruwei Xing, Sheng Teng, Yun Yang, Gang Zhao, Xu Bai, Jun Zhao, Jilong Yang
          Cancer Biology & Medicine May 2020, 17 (2) 501-512; DOI: 10.20892/j.issn.2095-3941.2019.0397

          Citation Manager Formats

          • BibTeX
          • Bookends
          • EasyBib
          • EndNote (tagged)
          • EndNote 8 (xml)
          • Medlars
          • Mendeley
          • Papers
          • RefWorks Tagged
          • Ref Manager
          • RIS
          • Zotero
          Share
          Clinical study of apatinib in the treatment of stage IV osteogenic sarcoma after failure of chemotherapy
          Zhichao Liao, Ting Li, Chao Zhang, Xinyue Liu, Ruwei Xing, Sheng Teng, Yun Yang, Gang Zhao, Xu Bai, Jun Zhao, Jilong Yang
          Cancer Biology & Medicine May 2020, 17 (2) 501-512; DOI: 10.20892/j.issn.2095-3941.2019.0397
          Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
          • Tweet Widget
          • Facebook Like
          • Google Plus One

          Jump to section

          • Article
            • Abstract
            • Introduction
            • Materials and methods
            • Results
            • Discussion
            • Conclusions
            • Acknowledgments
            • Footnotes
            • References
          • Figures & Data
          • Info & Metrics
          • References
          • PDF

          Related Articles

          • No related articles found.
          • Google Scholar

          Cited By...

          • No citing articles found.
          • Google Scholar

          More in this TOC Section

          • High-precision immune-related plasma proteomics profiling predicts response to immunotherapy in patients with triple-negative breast cancer
          • Beyond gold: the chemoenhancing mechanism and therapeutic potential of auranofin in melanoma
          • Plasma L-aspartic acid predicts the risk of gastric cancer and modifies the primary prevention effect: a multistage metabolomic profiling and Mendelian randomization study
          Show more Original Article

          Similar Articles

          Keywords

          • Apatinib
          • osteogenic sarcoma
          • progression-free survival
          • safety

          Navigate

          • Home
          • Current Issue

          More Information

          • About CBM
          • About CACA
          • About TMUCIH
          • Editorial Board
          • Subscription

          For Authors

          • Instructions for authors
          • Journal Policies
          • Submit a Manuscript

          Journal Services

          • Email Alerts
          • Facebook
          • RSS Feeds
          • Twitter

           

          © 2025 Cancer Biology & Medicine

          Powered by HighWire