Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • About
    • About CBM
    • Editorial Board
    • Announcement
  • Articles
    • Ahead of print
    • Current Issue
    • Archive
    • Collections
    • Cover Story
  • For Authors
    • Instructions for Authors
    • Resources
    • Submit a Manuscript
  • For Reviewers
    • Become a Reviewer
    • Instructions for Reviewers
    • Resources
    • Outstanding Reviewer
  • Subscription
  • Alerts
    • Email Alerts
    • RSS Feeds
    • Table of Contents
  • Contact us
  • Other Publications
    • cbm

User menu

  • My alerts

Search

  • Advanced search
Cancer Biology & Medicine
  • Other Publications
    • cbm
  • My alerts
Cancer Biology & Medicine

Advanced Search

 

  • Home
  • About
    • About CBM
    • Editorial Board
    • Announcement
  • Articles
    • Ahead of print
    • Current Issue
    • Archive
    • Collections
    • Cover Story
  • For Authors
    • Instructions for Authors
    • Resources
    • Submit a Manuscript
  • For Reviewers
    • Become a Reviewer
    • Instructions for Reviewers
    • Resources
    • Outstanding Reviewer
  • Subscription
  • Alerts
    • Email Alerts
    • RSS Feeds
    • Table of Contents
  • Contact us
  • Follow cbm on Twitter
  • Visit cbm on Facebook
Review ArticleReview

Magnetic resonance imaging-guided and targeted theranostics of colorectal cancer

Yanan Li, Jingqi Xin, Yongbing Sun, Tao Han, Hui Zhang and Feifei An
Cancer Biology & Medicine May 2020, 17 (2) 307-327; DOI: https://doi.org/10.20892/j.issn.2095-3941.2020.0072
Yanan Li
1Department of Radiology, First Hospital of Shanxi Medical University, Taiyuan 030001, China
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jingqi Xin
2Institute of Medical Engineering, Department of Biophysics, School of Basic Medical Science, Health Science Center, Xi’an Jiaotong University, Xi’an 710061, China
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Yongbing Sun
3Division of Pharmaceutics, National Pharmaceutical Engineering Center for Solid Preparation in Chinese Herbal Medicine, Jiangxi University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Nanchang 330006, China
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Yongbing Sun
  • For correspondence: [email protected] [email protected]
Tao Han
4College of Chemistry and Life Science, Institute of Functional Molecules, Chengdu Normal University, Chengdu 611130, China
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Hui Zhang
1Department of Radiology, First Hospital of Shanxi Medical University, Taiyuan 030001, China
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Feifei An
2Institute of Medical Engineering, Department of Biophysics, School of Basic Medical Science, Health Science Center, Xi’an Jiaotong University, Xi’an 710061, China
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Feifei An
  • For correspondence: [email protected] [email protected]
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the most common gastrointestinal tract cancer worldwide and is associated with high morbidity and mortality. The development of nanosized drug delivery systems has provided a new direction in CRC treatment. Among these systems, magnetic nanoparticle (MNP)-based multifunctional platforms provide a novel strategy for magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-related cancer theranostics. At the beginning of this original review, the carcinogenesis and treatment status of CRC are summarized. Then, diversified preparation and functionalization methods of MNPs are systematically analyzed, followed by MRI-involved theranostic strategies. The latest progress in MRI-mediated multimode diagnosis and image-guided targeted therapy in CRC management is the main focus. Finally, the major challenges in promoting MRI-induced precise theranostics of CRC in clinical practice are discussed.

keywords

  • Carcinogenesis
  • colorectal cancer
  • magnetic resonance imaging
  • multimodal diagnosis
  • targeted theranostics

Introduction

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the third most commonly diagnosed malignancy (following lung cancer and breast cancer) and the fourth leading cause of oncological mortality worldwide1. It represents a significant health issue with over 1.4 million new diagnoses and more than 35%–50% deaths each year since 20122. The incidence and mortality of CRC is correlated with human development and its ranges, predicting that its burden will increase by 60% to more than 2.2 million new cases and 1.1 million deaths by 20303. This status shows that CRC is a significant global problem, which requires intensive study to improve early detection and precise treatments.

Accurate and minimally invasive diagnoses are essential for cancer prevention and the management of affected individuals4. Clinically popular diagnostic techniques for CRC include colonoscopy5, computed tomography colonography (CT or CTC)6,7, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)8,9, positron emission tomography (PET)10,11, endorectal ultrasound (ERUS)12,13, fluorescence imaging (FI)14–16, and genetic detection17. Among these techniques, magnetic nanoparticle (MNP)-based MRI has been frequently used in targeted cancer theranostics because of its high magnetic susceptibility, biocompatibility, stability, economy, and diversity of preparation methods18.

Surgery represents the mainstay of CRC treatment in early stage cases, which have a more favorable prognosis. Unfortunately, most patients are usually diagnosed in advanced or metastatic disease stages4. Neoadjuvant therapy is therefore needed to delay disease progression, prolong survival, and maintain the quality of life. Precise diagnosis derived from MRI and mediated targeted therapy is therefore essential to overcome chemoresistance and accelerate tumor ablation19.

In the present review, MRI-mediated targeted diagnosis and therapy for CRC are comprehensively described from the following four perspectives: (1) carcinogenesis, diagnosis and therapy of CRC; (2) MNP-based MRI and theranostic strategies; (3) MRI-mediated targeted theranostics of CRC; and (4) critical challenges concerning successful clinical translation of the multifunctional platforms.

CRC carcinogenesis, diagnosis, and therapy

CRC is a major public health problem and the leading cause of mortality and morbidity worldwide. Elucidation of pathogenesis is a prerequisite for its early diagnosis, personalized therapy, and reasonable prognosis. In this section, the carcinogenesis of CRC is characterized by identifying the cancer-associated mutations, followed by current diagnoses and treatment approaches using a multidisciplinary model.

Carcinogenesis of CRC

CRC is divided into three main types: sporadic, familial, and hereditary CRC. Sporadic CRC arises from somatic mutations and accounts for approximately 70% of all CRCs. Familial CRC makes up 10%–30% of the cases, in which familial predisposition, rather than Mendelian inheritance, is the only disease cause. Genetically, familial CRC is associated with germline minor variants and single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) of oncogene or tumor suppressor genes. In contrast, inactivating mutations in the same genes cause hereditary CRC, which mainly includes hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer and adenomatous polyposis syndrome, accounting for 5%–7% of all CRCs20.

Tumorigenesis of CRC begins with transition of the normal gastrointestinal epithelium to a hyperplasia state, along with increased cell proliferation. Physiologically, a pool of colon stem and progenitor cells is located at the bottom of the crypt. They migrate along the crypt-villus axis and simultaneously differentiate in all epithelial colon lineages, such as Paneth, goblet, enterocyte and enteroendocrine cells, following programmed apoptosis upon arrival at the top of the villus21. Under hyperplasia, the epithelium loses its characteristic architecture and organization, becomes dysplastic, and develops into an innocuous adenoma, which is usually a polyp that stems from the hyperproliferative epithelium and protrudes into the colonic lumen. When adenomas encounter the tumoral genetic and immunological microenvironment changes, they will invade into the submucosa and become cancerous. With the aggravation of malignancy, the tumor will spread throughout the body22. This process depends on a series of genetic and inflammatory-immunological factors, such as wingless/integrated (Wnt), bone morphogenetic protein (BMP), and transforming growth factor-β (TGF-β), and extracellular matrix and stromal cells, to enable and shape a tumorigenic state following specific mechanisms23.

Mechanistically, CRC is a highly heterogeneous disease because of genetic mutations and imperfections. CRCs arise from single or a combination of three different mechanisms, namely, chromosomal instability (CIN), CpG island methylator phenotype (CIMP), and microsatellite instability (MSI)24. The CIN pathway begins with mutations in adenomatous polyposis coli (APC), followed by mutational activation of the Kirsten rat sarcoma viral oncogene (KRAS) and inactivation of the tumor suppressor gene tumor protein, p53 (TP53)25. The CIMP pathway is important in promoting hypermethylation of various tumor suppressor genes, mainly methylated-DNA-protein-cysteine methyltransferase and DNA mismatch repair protein, together with mutations of the V-raf murine sarcoma viral oncogene homolog B1 (BRAF) and MSI26. The MSI pathway is associated with genetic inactivation in short repeated sequences, specifically in DNA mismatch repair genes. The MSI process is often associated with the CIMP pathway, dominating familial Lynch syndrome (LS) and ~15% of the sporadic CRC cases27. It symbolizes proximal colon and poor differentiation but has a better prognosis28. It is worth stressing that the three mechanisms often coexist and work together in CRC by orchestrating relevant signaling pathways and molecular connections.

The key signaling pathways and mechanisms involved in CRC include but are not limited to Wnt/APC/β-catenin, phosphoinositide 3-kinase (PI3K)/AKT/glycogen synthase kinase-3β (GSK-3β), Ras/Raf, NF-κB, transforming growth factor-β (TGF)-β/Smad, epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition (EMT), and mismatch repair genes. It is assumed that Wnt signaling promotes tumor cell proliferation, inhibits differentiation, and mediates endothelial function by connecting GSK-3β, β-catenin, E-cadherin, APC, and Norrin29. The PI3K/AKT/PTEN pathway is often functionally disordered in sporadic and hereditary CRC, activates cell growth, and inhibits apoptosis under extracellular stimulation, such as in the presence of growth factors, cytokines, hormones, heat, oxidative stress, hypoxia, and hypoglycemia30. Ras/Raf is a carcinogenic pathway that activates transcriptional regulation and cell cycle progression in response to several types of extracellular stimulations via the MEK, ERK, Myc, and cyclin-D/CDK cascades31. The NF-κB pathway consists of five subunits that act as transcription factors (RelA/p65, c-Rel, RelB, p50/NF-κB1, and p52/NF-κB2), which participate in cell proliferation and inflammation by dimerization or are sequestered in the cytoplasm by Iκb proteins32. GSK-3β is a tumor promoter, and protein crosstalk between Wnt and NF-κB positively regulates NF-κB activity and confers selective growth of CRC cells33. The EMT is a common process, in which a group of transcription factors and the tumor microenvironment (TME) are involved through diverse signals, such as Snail, Slug, ZEB1, Twist, TGF-β, EGF, Wnt, and Notch34. The reversible EMT is regulated by the TGF-β/Smad pathway and plays a critical role in the early invasion and metastasis of CRC35.

These alterations of signal connections confer individual susceptibilities to cancers, and also represent biomarkers for cancer diagnosis and therapeutic intervention.

Diagnosis of CRC

Accurate diagnosis is a prerequisite to the selection of a correct treatment strategy and the manipulation of surgical, adjuvant, and palliative therapies36. Diagnostic protocols for CRC that have been widely used include colonoscopy, CT or CTC, MRI, PET, ERUS, FI, and genetic detection, among others.

A complete colonoscopy coupled with a histopathological biopsy is considered the gold standard of CRC detection, based on its high diagnostic performance to locate tumors and simultaneously guide the endoscopic excision of polyps37. However, the best results are found for lesions > 6 mm, because a complete colonoscopy due to poor bowel condition and tolerance, obstruction, or other technical difficulties, cannot be detected in a substantial number of patients38. As a potential alternative to endoscopy, CT or CTC has been shown to be a highly sensitive and specific diagnostic modality for lesions > 10 mm, especially for stenotic tumors, which are difficult to obtain a complete colonoscopy39. When lesions are detected by CTC, the next logical step is to use imaging techniques for cancer staging and confirmation, and to return to a colonoscopy for biopsies and immediate polypectomy. The recognized imaging modalities for CRC staging are chest/abdomen/pelvis CT, FI, PET, and MRI. Typically, indocyanine green-based fluorescence imaging has emerged as a potential imaging modality for detecting hepatic, lymph node, and peritoneal metastases of CRC. It has played a vital role in locating metastatic deposits, allowing better staging, orientating complete surgical resection with a prognostic benefit, and reducing the anastomotic leakage (AL) rate after colorectal surgery40. PET, as a noninvasive functional imaging method, has unique superiority in providing the spatial information and biological characteristics of tumorigenesis, progression, and metastasis41. In recent years, PET alone or in conjunction with CT scanning (PET/CT), possesses excellent sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy, and has played a crucial role in the preclinical and clinical management of CRC, including diagnosis, initial staging, restaging or recurrence, treatment optimization, efficacy monitoring, metastasis evaluation, and prognosis42. ERUS is another effective tool for evaluating the integrity of the rectal wall layers, differentiating CRC staging, and detecting regional adenopathy43. In contrast, a lower accuracy in identifying nodal involvement has emerged when compared with CT and MRI, and thus the combination of MRI with ERUS provides improved diagnosis44.

In short, every modern imaging modality has both strengths and weaknesses, and no technology is considered universally superior. Furthermore, in clinical practice, the selection of diagnostic and therapeutic programs should comply with the international tumor theranostic standards and guidelines such as the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN)45,46 as well as the American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons (ASCRS)47,48. Typically, both guidelines recommend routine preoperative CT scans of the chest, abdomen, and pelvis for radiographic staging of CRC. They also recommend routine preoperative staging using either ERUS or high resolution pelvic MRI. If the lesion is diagnosed as locally progressive, the patient should be treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy and radiotherapy46. Once the resection has been performed, the chest, abdomen, and pelvis should be scanned by CT annually for the first 5 years45–47. At present, there is no specific regulation for routine PET/CT, MRI, or ultrasonography after radical resection, but they can be selectively adopted depending on the disease situation.

Among various diagnostic techniques, MRI is superior for imaging and image-guided drug delivery due to its outstanding magnetism, biocompatibility, biodegradability, targeting modifiability, and the chemical stability of MNP-loaded drug delivery systems (DDS)49,50.

Therapy for CRC

For very early primary CRC without systemic disease and for malignant polyps, surgery is the usual treatment, involving complete mesocolic excision using a traditional transanal procedure or a video-assisted technique, after adequate staging by ERUS, MRI, and CT51. As CRC progresses to the intermediate and locally advanced stages, an adjuvant and neoadjuvant approach is desirable to reduce the local recurrence rate from 30%–40% down to 5%–10% or even lower52. Neoadjuvant chemoradiation between long-course chemoradiation and short-course radiation was the standard choice in a German trial53.

Chemotherapy coupled with surgery is the usual treatment of metastatic CRC treatment and the only means of enhanced survival. After decades of development, however, the antimetabolite, 5-fluorouracil (5-FU), is the only chemotherapeutic agent used, and represents the foundation of therapeutic regimens from a singular drug to targeted and multiple cytotoxic agents54. Trends in treatments for metastatic CRC can be systematically categorized into several eras based on the introduction of new chemotherapeutics and novel combinations. They include 5-FU55, leucovorin56, capecitabine57, cisplatin58, oxaliplatin59, irinotecan60, FOLFOX [folinic acid (leucovorin) + 5-FU + oxaliplatin (elotaxin)]61, FOLFIRI [folinic acid (leucovorin) + 5-FU + irinotecan (CPT-11)]62, FOLFOXIRI [folinic acid (leucovorin) + 5-FU + oxaliplatin (elotaxin) + irinotecan (CPT-11)]63, XELOX [capecitabine (xeloda) + oxaliplatin (elotaxin)]64, and XELIRI [capecitabine (xeloda) + irinotecan (CPT-11)]65. Importantly, with the incorporation of platinum agents, plant alkaloids, and antibiotics in adjuvant and neoadjuvant chemotherapy, combination prescription clearly enhanced the 5 and 10 year survival rates for CRC patients.

Although progress has been made in the chemotherapeutic treatment of CRC, clinical application of chemotherapeutics is hindered because of toxicity and a lack of specificity. Targeting the specific elements of cancer signaling pathways will provide a new solution and generate an innovative option to improve therapeutic efficacy and specificity. Previous studies have shown that receptor tyrosine kinases (RTKs) play an essential role in processing tumor growth and progression by regulating cell proliferation, apoptosis, and angiogenesis66. This important role of RTK, the action site of molecular targeted agents, may be divided into three categories according to the drug-signal mechanism: (1) monoclonal antibodies against vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR); (2) recombinant fusion proteins against angiogenesis; and (3) molecules that inhibit RTK.

Due to the overexpression of EGF and VEGF in CRC, considerable research has been undertaken to develop inhibitory treatments against them for anticancer treatments. Considering the most typical examples corresponding to the above classification, bevacizumab is a humanized monoclonal antibody that binds to soluble VEGF, prevents receptor binding, and inhibits endothelial cell proliferation and vessel formation. Cetuximab is a recombinant human/mouse chimeric monoclonal antibody that binds to the extracellular domain of human EGFR, competitively inhibits the binding of EGF and other ligands to EGFR, blocks receptor phosphorylation and activation of receptor-associated kinases, and consequently inhibits the signaling cascade67. Panitumumab is a recombinant human monoclonal antibody that binds to EGFR, blocks the binding of EGFR ligands to cancer cells, and inhibits EGF dependent tumor cell activation68. Aflibercept is a recombinant fusion protein that contains VEGF-binding portions fused to human immunoglobulin IgG1, and acts as a high affinity ligand trap, to block the activity of VEGF primarily involved in angiogenesis, vasculogenesis, vascular permeability, and placental growth factor by preventing ligand binding to their endogenous receptors69. Regorafenib is an oral multikinase inhibitor that targets angiogenic, and stromal and oncogenic RTKs70. It is the first small molecule multikinase inhibitor to improve survival in metastatic CRC that has been refractory to all standard therapies, but it only provides benefit to patients with a good physical condition and organ function, due to its serious side effects including specific hand-foot-skin reactions, fatigue, and elevated liver enzymes.

In addition, an increasing number of molecular targeted drugs and miscellaneous therapeutic schedules have been reviewed in a previous report, providing guidance for synergistic therapy and imaging-mediated CRC management.

MNP-based diagnostic and therapeutic potentials

Preparation and functionalization of magnetic nanoparticles (MNPs)

MNPs have generated great interest in the field of cancer nanotheranostics because of their intrinsic physical properties, magnetic susceptibility, biocompatibility, stability, and other related positive characteristics. MNPs are usually composed of three components: a magnetic core, polymer coating, and functional moieties. Their magnetic property enables their use as contrast agents in MRI and as a therapeutic system in hyperthermia. Their physicochemical features and biocompatibility endow them with the potential to deliver bioactive cargos and specific ligands for targeted therapeutic regimes.

The magnetic properties of MNPs are strongly related to their composition, morphology, size distribution, and surface chemistry, which depend on the selection of preparative methods. MNPs can be synthesized via mechanical attrition (top-down) or chemical processes (bottom-up). Compared with the physical approach, chemical methods are more effective for the synthesis and property control of monodispersed MNPs. Chemical protocols include coprecipitation71, thermal decomposition72, hydrothermal synthesis73, microemulsification74,75, sol-gel reactions76,77, polyol synthesis78, and electrochemical79 and sonolysis80 methods. The implementation process and advantages and disadvantages of each method are summarized in Table 1.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 1

Description of chemical preparation methods of MNPs and their strength and weaknesses

The biodegradable Fe core of MNPs can be synthesized to be superparamagnetic. A polymer coating is generally placed around the Fe core, to protect it from agglomeration and oxidation and to serve as a template for targeting agents, imaging tags, and delivering therapeutic payloads. Surface modification has become an integral part of the MNP design. These can modify the functionalities through different techniques including functionalization, coating, and encapsulation. Several commonly used polymer-based MNP encapsulation techniques include nanoprecipitation from preformed polymers such as polyethylene glycol (PEG) and its derivatives81, simple emulsion evaporation (SEE)82, double emulsion evaporation (DEE)83, and layer-by-layer (LBL) assembly84. They are detailed in Table 2.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 2

Polymer-based encapsulation techniques of MNPs

Diagnostic potency of MNPs

The excellent magnetism of MNPs permits their detection by MRI, which is one of the most powerful noninvasive techniques currently applied clinically. The MRI principle is based on the hydrogen protons present in the body, which become excited and align themselves along the magnetic field when they interact with a transverse radiofrequency pulse and are subsequently relaxed and return to their original state. During the process, the local variation in proton density of the tissue results in the production of highly detailed MRI images. As contrast agents, MNPs that have accumulated in the tissue provide MR contrast enhancement by shortening both the longitudinal (T1) and transverse (T2) relaxation of the surrounding protons.

The size, composition, surface properties, and polymer stabilizers of MNPs can influence the relaxation of water molecules and resulting MRI efficiency. In this regard, although several Fe3O4 NP contrast agents, such as Abdoscan®, GastroMARK®, Lumiren®, Resovist®, Cliavist™, Feridex® and Endorem™ have been commercialized to improve cancer detection, diagnosis, and therapeutic management of solid tumors, an increasing number of studies have focused on the surface modifications of MNPs to enhance their biocompatibility and targeting85.

The imaging capability of MNPs by MRI has also prompted the development of MR-based biosensors. In the presence of specific enzymes or chemical compounds, the reversible assembly and disassembly of sensors results in a change in transverse magnetic relaxivity. This discovery stimulated the emergence of numerous biosensors to detect proteases, oligonucleotides, enantiomeric impurities, and active pharmaceutical ingredients.

The imaging-synergized therapeutic potency of MNPs

Theranostics has emerged as an efficient strategy for precision or personalized medicine. It involves “NP-based drugs” and improves the diagnosis and treatment efficacies of cancers with limited systemic toxicity, while the therapeutic outcome can be rapidly reviewed to plan subsequent options. The unique physicochemical properties of MNPs endow them with great promise for building various theranostic systems to facilitate MRI detection and accurate treatments, thus providing a significant advance in personalized therapy.

In clinical practice, a single molecular diagnostic modality cannot provide complete structural and functional information concerning the object simultaneously, and consequently, multimodal diagnosis combining two or more imaging techniques has emerged to accurately assess tumor information. Coincidentally, MNPs represent a powerful multifunctional probe for MRI-based multiple imaging applications by integration with other diagnostic schemes, such as FI86, upconversion luminescence (UCL)87, CT, PET88, focused ultrasound89, photoacoustic (PA) imaging, and Raman imaging90.

Nanotheranostics is the combination of diagnosis and therapy in a single nanoplatform. It emphasizes the MRI-mediated versatile nanoformulations by combining with chemotherapy91, phototherapy92,93, targeted therapy94, gene therapy, chelation therapy95, or magnetic hyperthermia (MHT).

Another significant application of MNPs is to exploit their therapeutic response via hyperthermia. To induce MHT, the tissue is exposed to an abnormally high temperature (41–47 °C) generated by hysteresis loss when MNPs are exposed to a magnetic field with an alternating current. Cancer cells can be damaged and killed by heat for remedial purposes. In comparison to surgery, radiotherapy (RT), and chemotherapy, and MHT provide a new therapeutic approach based on the following advantages: (1) the nanosize effect of MNPs guarantees their capacity for passive targeting and minimally invasive injection; (2) the stimulus responsiveness and active targeting can be modulated by chemical modification of MNPs with specific elements in the preparation process; (3) the MRI function is acquired simultaneously with MHT; and (4) MHT has negligible systemic toxicity, selectively attacking tumor cells and evading normal cells under heat diffusion96.

Driven by the aforementioned principle, hyperthermia-derived applications of MNPs utilize three approaches: MHT, MRI-cooperated MHT, and magnetothermal-responsive drug release from MNPs. In hyperthermia-based DDS, thermoresponsive polymers are introduced to modify the surface of MNPs, and they simultaneously act as carriers for drug loading via covalent conjugation or physical adsorption. When exposed to magnetic heat, the thermosensitive linkers are broken, enhancing the permeability of polymeric carriers, and releasing their cargos via a bond-breaking mechanism. Recently, Fe3+-containing hardystonite (Fe-HT) scaffolds have been prepared, which possess highly specific surface areas for the regeneration of large bone defects caused by malignant bone tumors, through a combination of hyperthermia, local drug delivery and osteoconductivity97. Thermo-responsive magnetic ammonium bicarbonate (MagABC) liposomes are designed to conduct magnetic targeting and thermoresponsive-controlled release of doxorubicin (DOX) for hyperthermia-triggered local drug delivery98. Furthermore, Zamora-Mora et al.99 crosslinked chitosan NPs ionically with tripolyphosphate salts, to obtain core-shell multipurpose nanocarriers for combined 5-FU delivery and improved MHT.

MRI-guided theranostic applications in CRC

The potential use of nanotechnology in cancer theranostics has stimulated great interest among researchers in recent years. In particular, MNPs have emerged as a promising platform for MRI-based multimode imaging, theranostics, and efficacy monitoring of malignant tumor treatments. Among numerous achievements, the latest representative progress in MNP-based theranostic applications in CRC are discussed below.

MRI-based multimode imaging in CRC

In a previous report, several commonly used imaging techniques, such as colonography, CT, CTC, MRI, and PET/CT, were systematically introduced100,101. Soon thereafter, Saing et al.102 developed an analytical model to balance the diagnostic accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, and cost-effectiveness between MRI and CT in patients with liver metastatic CRC. The clinical results supported the superior sensitivity (0.943 vs. 0.768) and cost advantage of MRI vs. CT, and MRI/CT was recommended as a complementary technical combination to improve the diagnostic accuracy for earlier, curative, and disease management of metastatic CRC102. The ability of MRI to discriminate local staging of CRC was then integrated with PET for higher diagnostic performance, liver metastasis evaluation, as well as to provide additional information about the disease phenotype and the biology of CRC. Whole body PET/MRI will provide a technical option to improve the clinical diagnosis of both primary and metastatic CRCs103. Similar results were verified by Brendle et al.104 in a successive pilot study of metastatic CRC.

CTC with multiplanar reconstruction (MPR) and MRI has been used to evaluate the accuracy of preoperative T staging of 45 consecutive patients with very low rectal adenocarcinoma. Higher accuracy (89% vs. 71%) and better sensitivity (82% vs. 53%) were acquired from CTC with MPR than with MRI, indicating more precise preoperative T staging of lower CRCs for selecting intersphincteric resections, abdominoperineal resections (APRs), and neoadjuvant therapy105. However, MR colonography (MRC) was introduced as a minimally invasively screening tool to detect CRC and its precursors, reduce morbidity and mortality, and improve patient acceptance and participation106. In a clinical study including 99 CRC patients, no patients experienced severe or extreme MRC bowel preparation burden compared with 31.5% of the patients with colonoscopy bowel preparations. Subsequently, lower overall burden was encountered in the process of MRC (5.2%, limited carbon dioxide insufflation) than conventional colonoscopy (25.6%, P < 0.0001), and a larger proportion of patients (61.4%) preferred MRC to colonoscopy (29.5%) immediately after the examinations and 5 weeks later (57.0% vs. 39.5%)107,108. More desirable diagnostic value was also achieved with MRC when compared with CTC via preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses (PRISMA) of 23 studies on the diagnosis of CRC, focused on the sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio, negative likelihood ratio, and receiver operating characteristic curve109. Ileva et al.110 also developed a reliable noninvasive method, called MRI virtual colonography, to monitor CRC and mucosal inflammation in a mouse model. After intravenous injection of gadolinium-based contrast agent, the inflamed colonic wall, tumor vascularity, and developmental stage of CRC were clearly distinguished and visualized for monitoring the prevention and treatment of tumors within 1.5 h110. A novel MRC technique was developed by designing multifunctional solid lipid NP-loaded gadolinium diethylenetriamine pentaacetic acid and octadecylamine fluorescein isothiocyanate simultaneously as a tumor-absorbable NP contrast agent, so that both human (HT-29) and mouse (CT-26) colon carcinoma could be enhanced and evaluated in a mouse model via direct absorption or uptake of the NP contrast agent111.

In brief, MRI has been developed as a valuable tool and is the core of multifunctional theranostics for preoperative evaluation, multidimensional diagnosis, and image-guided therapy of patients with CRC.

MRI-guided targeted theranostics in CRC

Nanotheranostics that incorporate therapeutic agents, targeting groups, and diagnostic probes are emerging as the next generation of precision components to improve the localization of lesions and the therapeutic outcome of cancer. To achieve this goal, MNP-based MRI technology has been incorporated within multifunctional systems. The latest developments in MRI-guided targeted theranostics in CRC by integrating MRI with chemotherapy, photothermal therapy (PTT), photodynamic therapy (PDT), gene therapy, and combination therapy are discussed and are summarized in Table 3112–130.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 3

The theranostic applications of MNPs-based DDS in colorectal cancer treatment

MRI-guided chemotherapy in CRC

The main drawbacks of chemotherapy involve nonspecific action, rapid clearance from the system, and side effects affecting healthy tissues. To overcome these shortcomings, MNPs have served as a support for drug loading by covalently attaching or mechanically encapsulating therapeutic agents onto or within a polymer-magnetic nanocomposite. The nanosize effect, magnetic targeting, and site-specific delivery of cargos protect the active pharmaceutical until it reaches the target cancer cells.

In 1976, Zimmermann and Pilwat used magnetic erythrocytes to deliver cytotoxic drugs, thus facilitating chemotherapeutics carried by MNPs131. The first application of MNP-drug (epirubicin) in an animal model was reported by Lubbe et al.132, who targeted pancreatic cancer. In addition, using a porcine model of hepatocellular carcinoma, Goodwin et al.133 achieved external magnetic field-driven accumulation of DOX-loaded MNPs at the tumor location without any off-target toxicity. Since then, a variety of MRI-guided chemotherapeutic approaches have been used in targeted the theranostics of CRC.

A strategic report was focused on recent advances and the emerging possibility of MNP technology in enhanced therapeutic applications against CRC. Subsequently, pH-sensitive triblock copolymer-based nanomicelles (PEALCa) were synthesized from PEG, poly[N-(N′,N′-diisopropylaminoethyl) aspartamide] [P(Asp-DIP)], and poly (lysine-cholic acid) [P(Lys-Ca)]. These micelles self-assembled into stable vesicles of ~50–60 nm in a neutral environment to encapsulate the anticancer drug paclitaxel (PTX) and hydrophilic superparamagnetic iron oxide (SPIO), to avoid uptake by the reticuloendothelial system (RES). In vitro studies had shown that after internalization by a human CRC cell line (LoVo cells), PTX-SPIO-PEALCa micelles became lodged inside lysosomal compartments (pH ~ 5.0) and rapidly released PTX. The drug delivery effect was verified by MRI and histology analyses in a CRC xenograft model (LoVo cells). Moreover, effective suppression of CRC tumor growth was achieved by the PTX-SPIO-PEALCa group, with an average tumor volume of 65.0 ± 8.4 mm3 at day 30, which indicated a negligible tumor growth when compared to the generic Taxol® group of 598.7 ± 77.4 mm3 and the phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) group of 1050.7 ± 54.4 mm3 (P < 0.001). These results supported PTX-SPION-PEALCa pH-sensitive micelles as a promising MRI-visible DDS for CRC therapy112.

In another study, Boissenot et al.113 encapsulated a core of perfluorooctyl bromide (PFOB) into a shell of poly(lactide-co-glycolide)-PEG with PTX loading by a modified emulsion-evaporation method into nanocapsules of 120 nm in diameter. The nanocapsules appeared similar at an in vitro half-maximal inhibitory concentration (IC50) with a generic Taxol® formulation (5 × 10−5 mg/mL) in CT-26 CRC cells. However, in CT-26 xenograft tumors, 19F-MRI showed that the PTX-loaded nanocapsules passively accumulated at tumor sites and led to a promising and statistically significant two-fold reduction of tumor growth compared to the negative control and Taxol® group113. In a similar manner, 5-FU-loaded poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid) magnetic nanocapsules were synthesized with a diameter of ~67.2 nm. A sustained in vivo release profile and prolonged lifetime were found in rabbit plasma. MRI revealed the increased tissue affinity and tumor enrichment of nanocapsules, which resulted in more efficient tumor volume inhibition (100 mm3 at day 21) than 5-FU alone (1,500 mm3, P < 0.01)114. These results supported drug-loaded nanocapsules as a potential theranostic platform for effective CRC inhibition.

Voulgari et al.115 prepared core-shell magnetic nano-assemblies by hydrolytic alkaline precipitation of a single iron molecular precursor in the presence of poly[(methacrylic acid)-g-poly(ethylene glycol methacrylate) P(MAA-g-EGMA)] as an in situ coating agent. By encapsulation of cisplatin as a cytotoxic drug, the magnetic DDS displayed excellent MRI and anticancer properties in a cisplatin-resistant HT-29 human colon adenocarcinoma cell culture model. The tumor volume of the magnetic DDS group at the end of the study period (day 38) was 400 mm3, which was more effective than free cisplatin (900 mm3), and was particularly enhanced by the external magnetic field (300 mm3)115. To further prevent the biotoxicity of platinum drugs, PEGylated multiwalled carbon nanotubes (MWNTs) decorated with SPIO were developed to encapsulate oxaliplatin for sustained drug release and MRI analyses, with only 36.25% of oxaliplatin leakage within 12 h and 55.48% over 144 h. The optimal cytotoxicity was observed at 96 h due to the internalization peak of oxaliplatin in HCT-116 human CRC cells. In HCT-116 tumor-bearing mice, Oxa/MagMWNT-PEG showed more effective tumor inhibition compared with the Oxalip group (10 mg/kg), with only trivial weight loss (6.25%) and organ toxicity. Importantly, the tumor boundary could be enhanced by MRI to manage the therapeutic effect and treatment option116.

For structural innovation, a SPIO nanorod (SIONR) core was conjugated to a pluronic F127 shell, which was prepared using a hydrothermal method. After loading PTX through hydrophobic interactions, the obtained PTX-F127-SIONR nanocarriers elicited a more effective concentration-dependent inhibition of CT-26 cell proliferation than PTX, with a cell viability after 24 h of incubation of 23.2% and > 58.6% (P < 0.05), respectively. In CT-26 xenograft tumor mice, the PTX-F127-SIONR group showed a higher therapeutic response and survival rate with reduced tumor growth than the PTX group, resulting in a shorter survival time and comparable tumor size as the control group, and 100% death at day 34 after injection. Moreover, the lesion localization and state change of small tumors could also be visualized by enhanced MRI117.

In addition, the drug loading method and magnetic material type were also important factors determining the drug cytotoxicity and imaging results. Augustin et al.118 adopted a promising strategy to conjugate Fe3O4 MNPs to DOX to investigate the cytotoxic effects and cell death processes in HT-29 cells. DOX-NPs showed higher cytotoxicity (IC50 = 0.245 μmol/L) than free DOX (IC50 = 0.757 μmol/L), which resulted in G2/M arrest followed by late apoptosis and necrosis at the IC50 concentration118. Other kinds of contrast agents, such as Mn2+, were selected as examples to explore their theranostic applications in CRC. Meng et al.119 initially deposited manganese dioxide on the surface of albumin-bound PTX NPs (ANPs-PTX) to obtain MnO2-functioned ANPs-PTX (MANPs-PTX) with a diameter of 140 nm. MANPs-PTX exhibited improved chemoradiation therapy in the CT-26 cell line, with MANPs-PTX+RT, chemotherapy alone (ANPs-PTX), and RT alone cell viabilities of 23.4%, 44.9%, and 52.5%, respectively. In mice bearing CT-26 tumors, MANPs-PTX could consume excess hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) to improve chemoradiation therapy, exhibiting a maximal tumor growth inhibition of 96.57%, compared with the other treatments with insufficient efficacy. Moreover, the released Mn2+ from MANPs-PTX showed excellent T1 MRI performance for tumor detection and treatment monitoring. Taken together with the maintenance of body weights, MANPs-PTX appeared to be a potential theranostic agent with clinical prospects119.

MRI-guided PTT in CRC

Image-guided photothermal ablation (PTA) has been one of the principal tools in the management of primary CRC or colorectal liver metastases (CRLM). At present, PTT represents a widely used therapeutic option with a superior capacity to treat cancer rather than damage normal tissues. In this model, photothermal agents absorb near-infrared (NIR) light to generate localized hyperthermia through nonradiative transition at the tumor site under laser irradiation. A desired PTT agent should exhibit strong absorbance in the NIR region and low fluorescence emission, typically similar to nanoarchitectures of carbon (C), gold (Au), tungsten (W), copper (Cu), and molybdenum (Mo)-based compounds134. However, current PTA techniques mainly apply to tumors less than 4–5 cm in diameter and result in an indistinct tumor boundary and incomplete ablation135. As a consequence, MNPs can be integrated into the MRI-PTT system to observe the tumor outline and therapeutic process.

The strong localized surface plasmon resonance absorption of Au nanostructures in the NIR region make them mainstream candidates for PTT136. Directed by a systematic overview examining the scientific and practical significance of Au-loaded nanomaterials in the enhancement of PTT137, various MNPs-Au nanohybrids were constructed to achieve MRI-guided PTT in CRC. For example, White et al.120 prepared monoclonal antibody (anti-MG1)-conjugated magnetic Au hybrid NPs and determined their temperature variation and therapeutic efficacy following irradiation with an 808 nm diode laser in 19 Wistar rats. The mean temperature ± standard deviation in the anti-MG1-coated HNPs, HNPs, and control groups were 50.2 ± 7.8 °C, 51 ± 4.4 °C, and 39.5 ± 2.0 °C, respectively. The corresponding tumor inhibition rates were 38% ± 29%, 14% ± 17%, and 7% ± 8%, respectively (P = 0.043). These findings indicated that monoclonal antibody-targeted HNPs provided an effective catalyst for PTA of CRC by increasing the ablation zone120.

Aptamer-targeted theranostic agents were engineered by microemulsion preparation of SPIONs, coated with Au NPs and then conjugated to thiol-modified oligonucleotide MUC-1 aptamers. The obtained aptamer-Au@SPIONs (~19 nm) produced significant contrast enhancement in HT-29 cells and an 80% cell inhibition rate at a system concentration of 500 μg/mL and exposure of 820 nm NIR121. Another immuno-targeted Au-Fe3O4 hybrid NP, HNPs-scFv (single-chain variable fragment), was developed to perform MRI-based laser-assisted therapy in a human CRC cell SW1222-bearing xenograft model. Under 808 nm NIR irradiation, > 65% SW1222 cell death suggested effective PTT. The theranostic effectiveness was verified by high contrast T2 MRI and tumor suppression in SW1222 xenografts, manifesting as a difference in tumor volume. The HNPs-scFv treatment group displayed the smallest tumor size of 72 ± 7 mm3 compared with the control group (untreated: 193 ± 18 mm3), laser only group (161 ± 15 mm3), and nontargeted HNPs plus laser group (195 ± 10 mm3)122. Upon introducing A33 antigen-targeted scFv, the A33scFv-HNPs exhibited an excellent magnetization value of 44 emu/g for MRI potential and a strong optical absorbance at 800 nm. After a 6 min treatment with an 808 nm laser, > 53% of the A33-expressing cells (SW1222) were involved in apoptosis-related cell death compared with < 5% in A33-nonexpressing cells (HT-29). These results supported bioconjugated HNPs as an effective MRI-based antigen-targeted PTT agent123.

By using multiple diagnostic modes, an interventional image-guided PTT agent, sub-100 nm of Au@Gd2O3: Ln [Ln (lanthanide) = Yb/Er (ytterbium/erbium)], was used for optical/MR/X-ray imaging. The site-selective hepatic image doubled the tumor-to-liver contrast of CC-531 rat CRLM. Under 808 nm NIR light irradiation for 5 min, the temperature of the tumor site increased by ~7.5 °C in the saline group, whereas it increased by ~19.5 °C in the NP group, indicating a stronger PTT effect (Figure 1)124. Based on this approach, Zhang et al.125 developed hybrid anisotropic nanoparticles (HANs) for integration in MRI and photoacoustic imaging (PAI)-directed chemotherapy and thermotherapy. At 24 h after injection of HANs into HT-29-bearing tumor mice, strong MRI and PA signals tracked the distribution of HANs in the whole tumor, guaranteeing the maximum therapeutic effect. Following irradiation with an 808 nm NIR laser, the tumor temperature in the HANs group increased by 25 °C, while it increased only 4 °C in the PBS group. During the drug treatment period, the tumor volume in the HANs + laser group remained ~0 without relapse, with a slightly reduced tumor size in the HANs alone group, while it grew rapidly in the laser without HANs and PBS groups125.

Figure 1
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 1

The site-selective delivery of TNPs via the hepatic portal vein and photothermal therapy under a catheter-based 808 nm near infrared laser. Reprinted with permission from Ref. 124, Parchur AK, Sharma G, Jagtap JM, Gogineni VR, LaViolette PS, Flister MJ, et al. Vascular interventional radiology-guided photothermal therapy of colorectal cancer liver metastasis with theranostic gold nanorods. ACS Nano. 2018; 12: 6597-611. Copyright@ American Chemical Society.

The unique structure and NIR absorption properties of graphene make it a very effective option as a PTT component, particularly in MRI-directed CRC theranostics138. As an example, Lu et al.126 prepared magnetic graphene oxide (MGO) by depositing Fe3O4 NPs on GO using chemical co-precipitation, modified with PEG and cetuximab (CET, an EGFR monoclonal antibody). The resulting MGO-PEG-CET had a high drug-loading capacity of 6.35 mg/mg for DOX and pH-dependent release behavior. In vitro, MGO-PEG-CET/DOX showed a lower IC50 toward CT-26 cells at 1.48 μg/mL compared with MGO-PEG/DOX (2.64 μg/mL), and an NIR laser exposure-enhanced cytotoxicity of MGO-PEG-CET/DOX of 1.17 μg/mL due to the combination with PTT. In CT-26 BALB/c mice, the relative tumor volumes in the control (PBS), DOX, MGO-PEG-CET/DOX, MGO-PEG-CET/DOX + magnet, and MGO-PEG-CET/DOX + magnet + laser groups were 12.1, 10.1, 9.5, 5.8, and 0.42, respectively. The prominent MRI and therapeutic efficacy promoted the dual-targeted MGO-PEG-CET/DOX to the forefront of image-combined chemotherapy and PTT of CRC126.

Moreover, ultrasmall (5.3 nm) and electrically neutral coordination polymer nanodots (Fe-CPNDs) were scaled-up for pH-activated MRI at the minimum dose of 0.8 mg/kg. Furthermore, the strong absorption of Fe-CPNDs in the visible to NIR region endowed them with PTT potential. Upon 808 nm NIR laser irradiation, the Fe-CPNDs were highly cytotoxic to SW620 human CRC cells in a dose-dependent manner, whereas they showed excellent biocompatibility (> 90% cell viability) with both normal (HL-7702) and tumor cells (SW620), even up to a Fe concentration of 200 μg/mL without illumination. The MRI-guided PTT efficacy was manifested as complete tumor ablation in SW620 mice on day 20. These findings revealed a new class of renal-clearable nanomedicines for MRI-triggered PTT in CRC127.

MRI-guided PDT in CRC

PDT is an alternative treatment for nonmalignant tumors. During the course of PDT, the photosensitizer (PS) is excited by light with lower optical power densities than the PTT process, which generates cytotoxic reactive oxygen species and causes irreversible cell apoptosis and tissue destruction in a moderate manner, but with minimal toxicity to normal tissues139. The vast majority of efficient PSs are hydrophobic, allowing for the introduction of nanocarriers and emphasizing use of MNPs for the development of MRI-based PDT therapeutic platforms for cancer treatment140. Among these, a typical case is used to explain the application of the MRI-PDT system in CRC treatment.

In a recent study, Mühleisen et al.128 loaded hypericin on SPIONs and guided them to the desired location using an external magnetic field. The toxicity and hypericin-mediated effects on HT-29 cells were characterized and this confirmed that cell proliferation was significantly reduced and even completely abolished at a high hypericin concentration (2 μmol/L) over a long illumination time (60 h). Driven by the double targeting strategy involving magnetic and laser-induced accumulation and photoactivation, the therapeutic efficiency and specificity were improved, thus attenuating toxic side effects in clinical practice128.

MRI-guided gene therapy in CRC

During the course of effective gene therapy, DNA or RNA is transferred into targeted cells via transfection methods for disease therapy. To avoid enzymatic degradation of DNA and RNA and their poor diffusion across cell membranes, magnetofection is used to direct nucleic acid-bound MNPs to target cells under an external magnetic field. Generally, the MNP-containing gene delivery systems are functionalized with a positively charged polymer or targeting group to promote drug release and lesion imaging141.

Huang et al.129 applied magnetic Au NPs as a nonviral gene carrier to mediate plasmid silencing of Bcl-2-associated athanogene 1 (Bag-1), an anti-apoptotic gene that is highly expressed in CRC, for magnetofection-induced cancer treatment. In vitro tests using human CRC LoVo cells revealed cell apoptotic rates in the nanocarrier, plasmid, and nanoplasmid groups of 14.65 ± 0.018, 19.56 ± 0.050, and 47.55 ± 0.022, respectively, and apoptotic/necrotic ratios of 1.016 ± 0.132, 1.415 ± 0.315, and 3.573 ± 0.369, respectively. In LoVo-bearing nude mice, the Bag-1 protein level was silenced to 60% of the control group, which caused a debasement of Wnt pathway molecules, such as C-myc and β-catenin. These findings confirmed the important role of magnetic Au NPs in delivering siRNA plasmid silencing of Bag-1 for magnetism-guided gene therapy of CRC129.

Importantly, a multifunctional theranostic micellar DDS was constructed utilizing cationic poly[2-(dimethylamino)ethyl methacrylate]-block-poly(ɛ-caprolactone) to load with SN-38 (7-ethyl-10-hydroxycamptothecin), ultrasmall SPIO (USPIO), and PEG-conjugated VEGF small interfering RNA (siRNA). The SN-38/USPIO/siRNA nanoparticles could target to tumor sites of LS174T-bearing nude mice and significantly inhibit tumor growth. Additionally, the nanoparticles acted as a T2-weighted MRI contrast agent for diagnosis and tracking the therapeutic outcomes130.

MRI-guided combined therapy in CRC

The multimodality theranostic system involving more than one therapeutic modality has been integrated with multimodal imaging agents to produce a nanoentity, which has shown very promising prospects for cancer treatment. To meet this requirement, MNPs show an ideal capacity as labels for MRI-directed therapeutic synergy. In this section, only representative theranostic schemes are mentioned without detailed and extensive descriptions.

In a previous report, the core-shell-shell NaYbF4:Tm@CaF2@NaDyF4 (Yb: ytterbium, Tm: thulium, Dy: dysprosium, CaF2: calcium fluoride) nanocomposite was designed for MRI-enhanced upconversion/CT lymphatic imaging87. Novel HANs were then initially utilized for MRI and PAI-induced chemotherapy and thermotherapy125. Another research hotspot based on MNPs has been MRI-oriented hyperthermia combined with other therapies, which mainly consist of chemotherapeutics such as DOX, 5-FU, cisplatin, methotrexate, and others142,143. In addition, other multipurpose systems, including but not limited to MRI-integrated multidrug chemotherapy, chemo-gene therapy, and stem cell therapy, are constantly emerging for CRC management144.

Clinical applications of MRI-guided theranostics in CRC

The clinical application of MRI is presently still focused on the diagnostic motif based on commercial contrast agents and additional functional imaging modules such as diffusion-weighted imaging. This model has been applied comprehensively and thoroughly to patient screening, tumor staging, pathological characterization, surgical planning, treatment decision, response evaluation, liver/peritoneal metastasis detection, neoplasms/implants, metastases/benign focal liver lesions distinction, and surveillance of CRC and its relapses within fibrotic changes145,146. The application of MNP-based multifunctional platforms in the theranostics of CRC emphasizes the preclinical stage due to hybrid system-associated multiple performance matching, complex evaluation processing, and potential biocompatibility considerations. Nevertheless, some prescient research achievements have predicted the successful clinical transformation of magnetic nanocomposites.

With the first clinical realization of online MRI-mediated adaptive tumor radiotherapy147, this approach overcame the limitations of frequently-used CT-based radiotherapy such as poor soft tissue definition and unfriendly administration, to result in considerable clinical benefits regarding MRI-guided daily adjustment of treatment regimens148. Furthermore, hybridization of MRI contrast agents and radiotherapy sensitizers is a treatment strategy that will soon move into clinical trials. Comprehensive consideration of sensitive diagnosis, effective treatment, tissue penetration and biocompatibility, and iron oxide (IO) nanocrystals with MRI and NIR photothermal effects are potential candidates for clinical transformation. In a preclinical study, monodisperse IO NPs with a diameter of 150 nm were synthesized by ligand-assisted co-precipitation and optimized by adjusting the amount of ligand. The NIR-IO NPs exhibited high photothermal conversion efficiency (21.2%) and T2-weighted MRI capability. They were not effective against CRC cells without irradiation, whereas significant cell killing and apoptosis induced by the changes of protein secondary structure and membrane permeability were demonstrated under 808 nm laser irradiation. Magnetic field-enhanced tumor accumulation greatly improves the T2-weighted MR signal (3-fold higher than a commercial MR contrast agent, Resovist®) and photothermal efficacy (~53 °C) for cancer treatment. The novel NIR-IO nanocrystals have great potential for MRI-coordinated targeted therapy of CRC149.

In brief, MRI-associated diagnostic and therapeutic protocols have been or are being developed with promising clinical value, and will eventually provide the theoretical and technical foundation for the accurate diagnosis and effective treatment of CRC.

Concluding remarks and future perspectives

In this comprehensive review, recent advances in MNP-based multifunctional platforms for MRI-guided multimodal diagnosis and treatment of CRC are discussed. Continuously clarified carcinogenesis combined with universal preparation methods and modification strategies allow more rational and effective theranostic applications of MNPs in CRC treatments. The excellent physicochemical and biological properties of MNPs have shown that the next generation of molecular probes will focus on MRI-directed, MHT-enhanced cancer therapy and MNP-integrated multimode imaging, especially the PET/MRI diagnostic modality. The combined system integrates the complementary strengths of these two approaches (high sensitive anatomic resolution of MRI and excellent functional imaging of PET) into a single examination with reduced ionizing radiation, thereby increasing patient convenience and reducing medical costs. With the introduction of a clinical PET/MRI system, the hybrid pattern offers multiple diagnostic benefits to CRC patients, such as identifying the characteristics of liver lesions by introducing a hepatocyte-specific MRI contrast agent (gadoxetic acid), excluding extrahepatic disease, detecting additional liver metastases, and evaluating the treatment efficiency with multiple parameters, all of which cannot be achieved using a single PET, MRI, or conventional PET/CT combination150.

Despite encouraging achievements, some concepts remain theoretical, and certain internal logical mechanisms are vague. To achieve the clinical application of MNP-based theranostics, intensive efforts should be devoted to overcome the following challenges.

  1. Mass preparation of monodispersed and reproductive MNPs. The in vivo biological effects of MNPs depend on their physicochemical characteristics (size, morphology, composition, and surface chemistry), which are vital and are determined by the synthetic process. Several strategies, such as separating the nucleation and growth stage, optimizing process parameters, and assisting the process with a polymer or surfactant, are under investigation to obtain high-performance MNPs151.

  2. The nanotoxicity of MNPs. The off-target toxicity of MNPs is derived from the Fenton reaction of Fe particles to produce reactive oxygen species in biological systems and oxidation reactions of magnetite to form maghemite152. Surface coating with polymers, organic surfactants, and inorganic metals are effective ways to mask the oxidative sites, passivate MNPs, and reduce toxicity and the risk of DNA damage153.

  3. Exploration and translation of new clinically relevant biomarkers. Cross-talk between signaling pathways and the emergence of resistance targets are reasons leading to drug failure. Thorough investigation and characterization of CRC-associated mutations will provide valuable information to treat CRC patients to enhance their diagnostic, prognostic, and therapeutic responses154.

  4. Standardization of the methodology to study the long-term effects of MNPs on CRC biological systems. Similar to silver NPs, the exposure duration of cancer cells to MNPs determines the difference in biological effects. Therefore, the development of standardized methods to define the long-term interaction between magnetic DDS and the living body is urgent155.

Once these obstacles are overcome, multifunctional MNP-based DDS should show excellent capabilities in the accurate diagnosis and personalized therapy of malignant tumors.

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 81903662, 81860630, and 81560577), China Postdoctoral Science Foundation Grant (Grant No. 2019M661057), the Applied Basic Research Programs of Shanxi Province (Grant No. 201901D211347), the Scientific and Technological Innovation Programs of Higher Education Institutions in Shanxi (Grant No. 2019L0428), the Startup Foundation for Doctors of Shanxi Province (Grant No. SD1827), and the Startup Foundation for Doctors of Shanxi Medical University (Grant No. XD1824).

Footnotes

  • Conflict of interest statement No potential conflicts of interest are disclosed.

  • Received February 20, 2020.
  • Accepted April 22, 2020.
  • Copyright: © 2020, Cancer Biology & Medicine
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY) 4.0, which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

References

  1. 1.↵
    1. Favoriti P,
    2. Carbone G,
    3. Greco M,
    4. Pirozzi F,
    5. Pirozzi RE,
    6. Corcione F.
    Worldwide burden of colorectal cancer: a review. Updates Surg. 2016; 68: 7–11.
    OpenUrl
  2. 2.↵
    1. Miller KD,
    2. Nogueira L,
    3. Mariotto AB,
    4. Rowland JH,
    5. Yabroff KR,
    6. Alfano CM, et al.
    Cancer treatment and survivorship statistics, 2019. CA Cancer J Clin. 2019; 69: 363–85.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  3. 3.↵
    1. Arnold M,
    2. Sierra MS,
    3. Laversanne M,
    4. Soerjomataram I,
    5. Jemal A,
    6. Bray F.
    Global patterns and trends in colorectal cancer incidence and mortality. Gut. 2017; 66: 683–91.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  4. 4.↵
    1. De Rosa M,
    2. Pace U,
    3. Rega D,
    4. Costabile V,
    5. Duraturo F,
    6. Izzo P, et al.
    Genetics, diagnosis and management of colorectal cancer (Review). Oncol Rep. 2015; 34: 1087–96.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  5. 5.↵
    1. Yang C,
    2. Sriranjan V,
    3. Abou-Setta AM,
    4. Poluha W,
    5. Walker JR,
    6. Singh H.
    Anxiety associated with colonoscopy and flexible sigmoidoscopy: a systematic review. Am J Gastroenterol. 2018; 113: 1810–8.
    OpenUrl
  6. 6.↵
    1. Obaro AE,
    2. Burling DN,
    3. Plumb AA.
    Colon cancer screening with CT colonography: logistics, cost-effectiveness, efficiency and progress. Br J Radiol. 2018; 91: 20180307–17.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  7. 7.↵
    1. Zhang J,
    2. Li C,
    3. Zhang X,
    4. Huo S,
    5. Jin S,
    6. An FF, et al.
    In vivo tumortargeted dual-modal fluorescence/CT imaging using a nanoprobe co-loaded with an aggregation-induced emission dye and gold nanoparticles. Biomaterials. 2015; 42: 103–11.
    OpenUrl
  8. 8.↵
    1. Zhang M,
    2. Li J,
    3. Ma X,
    4. Wang B,
    5. Wu J,
    6. Gao Y, et al.
    The value of magnetic resonance imaging to diagnose pathological complete response of rectal cancer after therapy: a protocol for meta-analysis. Medicine (Baltimore). 2018; 97: e12901–3.
  9. 9.↵
    1. Chen Z,
    2. Wu C,
    3. Zhang Z,
    4. Wu W,
    5. Wang X,
    6. Yu Z.
    Synthesis, functionalization, and nanomedical applications of functional magnetic nanoparticles. Chin Chem Lett. 2018; 29: 1601–8.
    OpenUrl
  10. 10.↵
    1. An FF,
    2. Chan M,
    3. Kommidi H,
    4. Ting R.
    Dual PET and Near-infrared fluorescence imaging probes as tools for imaging in oncology. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2016; 207: 266–73.
    OpenUrl
  11. 11.↵
    1. Chan K,
    2. Welch S,
    3. Walker-Dilks C,
    4. Raifu A.
    Evidence-based guideline recommendations on the use of positron emission tomography imaging in colorectal cancer. Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol). 2012; 24: 232–49.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  12. 12.↵
    1. Serra-Aracil X,
    2. Galvez A,
    3. Mora-Lopez L,
    4. Rebasa P,
    5. Serra-Pla S,
    6. Pallisera-Lloveras A, et al.
    Endorectal ultrasound in the identification of rectal tumors for transanal endoscopic surgery: factors influencing its accuracy. Surg Endosc. 2018; 32: 2831–8.
    OpenUrl
  13. 13.↵
    1. Wu D,
    2. Duan X,
    3. Guan Q,
    4. Liu J,
    5. Yang X,
    6. Zhang F, et al.
    Mesoporous polydopamine carrying manganese carbonyl responds to tumor microenvironment for multimodal imaging-guided cancer therapy. Adv Funct Mater. 2019; 19: 1900095.
    OpenUrl
  14. 14.↵
    1. Emile SH,
    2. Elfeki H,
    3. Shalaby M,
    4. Sakr A,
    5. Sileri P,
    6. Laurberg S, et al.
    Sensitivity and specificity of indocyanine green near-infrared fluorescence imaging in detection of metastatic lymph nodes in colorectal cancer: systematic review and meta-analysis. J Surg Oncol. 2017; 116: 730–40.
    OpenUrl
  15. 15.
    1. Xiao YF,
    2. An FF,
    3. Chen JX,
    4. Yu J,
    5. Tao WW,
    6. Yu Z, et al.
    The nanoassembly of an intrinsically cytotoxic near-infrared dye for multifunctionally synergistic theranostics. Small. 2019; 15: 1903121.
    OpenUrl
  16. 16.↵
    1. An F,
    2. Chen N,
    3. Conlon WJ,
    4. Hachey JS,
    5. Xin J,
    6. Aras O, et al.
    Small ultra-red fluorescent protein nanoparticles as exogenous probes for noninvasive tumor imaging in vivo. Int J Biol Macromol. 2020; 153: 100–6.
    OpenUrl
  17. 17.↵
    1. Kanth P,
    2. Grimmett J,
    3. Champine M,
    4. Burt R,
    5. Samadder NJ.
    Hereditary colorectal polyposis and cancer syndromes: a primer on diagnosis and management. Am J Gastroenterol. 2017; 112: 1509–25.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  18. 18.↵
    1. Li Y,
    2. Zhang H.
    Fe3O4-based nanotheranostics for magnetic resonance imaging-synergized multifunctional cancer management. Nanomedicine (Lond). 2019; 14: 1493–512.
    OpenUrl
  19. 19.↵
    1. Kannan P,
    2. Kretzschmar WW,
    3. Winter H,
    4. Warren D,
    5. Bates R,
    6. Allen PD, et al.
    Functional parameters derived from magnetic resonance imaging reflect vascular morphology in preclinical tumors and in human liver metastases. Clin Cancer Res. 2018; 24: 4694–704.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  20. 20.↵
    1. Issa IA,
    2. Noureddine M.
    Colorectal cancer screening: an updated review of the available options. World J Gastroenterol. 2017; 23: 5086–96.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  21. 21.↵
    1. Peifer M.
    Developmental biology: colon construction. Nature. 2002; 420: 274–5, 277.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  22. 22.↵
    1. Kosinski C,
    2. Li VS,
    3. Chan AS,
    4. Zhang J,
    5. Ho C,
    6. Tsui WY, et al.
    Gene expression patterns of human colon tops and basal crypts and BMP antagonists as intestinal stem cell niche factors. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007; 104: 15418–23.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  23. 23.↵
    1. Medema JP,
    2. Vermeulen L.
    Microenvironmental regulation of stem cells in intestinal homeostasis and cancer. Nature. 2011; 474: 318–26.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  24. 24.↵
    1. Sideris M,
    2. Papagrigoriadis S.
    Molecular biomarkers and classification models in the evaluation of the prognosis of colorectal cancer. Anticancer Res. 2014; 34: 2061–8.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  25. 25.↵
    1. Fearon ER,
    2. Vogelstein B.
    A genetic model for colorectal tumorigenesis. Cell. 1990; 61: 759–67.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  26. 26.↵
    1. Weisenberger DJ,
    2. Siegmund KD,
    3. Campan M,
    4. Young J,
    5. Long TI,
    6. Faasse MA, et al.
    CpG island methylator phenotype underlies sporadic microsatellite instability and is tightly associated with BRAF mutation in colorectal cancer. Nat Genet. 2006; 38: 787–93.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  27. 27.↵
    1. East JE,
    2. Saunders BP,
    3. Jass JR.
    Sporadic and syndromic hyperplastic polyps and serrated adenomas of the colon: classification, molecular genetics, natural history, and clinical management. Gastroenterol Clin North Am. 2008; 37: 25–46.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  28. 28.↵
    1. Sameer AS,
    2. Nissar S,
    3. Fatima K.
    Mismatch repair pathway: molecules, functions, and role in colorectal carcinogenesis. Eur J Cancer Prev. 2014; 23: 246–57.
    OpenUrl
  29. 29.↵
    1. Planutis K,
    2. Planutiene M,
    3. Holcombe RF.
    A novel signaling pathway regulates colon cancer angiogenesis through norrin. Sci Rep. 2014; 4: 5630–4.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  30. 30.↵
    1. Martini M,
    2. De Santis MC,
    3. Braccini L,
    4. Gulluni F,
    5. Hirsch E.
    PI3K/ AKT signaling pathway and cancer: an updated review. Ann Med. 2014; 46: 372–83.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  31. 31.↵
    1. Shao DD,
    2. Xue W,
    3. Krall EB,
    4. Bhutkar A,
    5. Piccioni F,
    6. Wang X, et al.
    KRAS and YAP1 converge to regulate EMT and tumor survival. Cell. 2014; 158: 171–84.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  32. 32.↵
    1. Xia Y,
    2. Shen S,
    3. Verma IM.
    NF-κB, an active player in human cancers. Cancer Immunol Res. 2014; 2: 823–30.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  33. 33.↵
    1. Li H,
    2. Huang K,
    3. Liu X,
    4. Liu J,
    5. Lu X,
    6. Tao K, et al.
    Lithium chloride suppresses colorectal cancer cell survival and proliferation through ROS/GSK-3β/NF-κB signaling pathway. Oxid Med Cell Longev. 2014; 2014: 241864–71.
    OpenUrl
  34. 34.↵
    1. De Craene B,
    2. Berx G.
    Regulatory networks defining EMT during cancer initiation and progression. Nat Rev Cancer. 2013; 13: 97–110.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  35. 35.↵
    1. Giannelli G,
    2. Villa E,
    3. Lahn M.
    Transforming growth factor-β as a therapeutic target in hepatocellular carcinoma. Cancer Res. 2014; 74: 1890–4.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  36. 36.↵
    1. Kekelidze M,
    2. D’Errico L,
    3. Pansini M,
    4. Tyndall A,
    5. Hohmann J.
    Colorectal cancer: current imaging methods and future perspectives for the diagnosis, staging and therapeutic response evaluation. World J Gastroenterol. 2013; 19: 8502–14.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  37. 37.↵
    1. McDougall JA,
    2. Banegas MP,
    3. Wiggins CL,
    4. Chiu VK,
    5. Rajput A,
    6. Kinney AY.
    Rural disparities in treatment-related financial hardship and adherence to surveillance colonoscopy in diverse colorectal cancer survivors. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2018; 27: 1275–82.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  38. 38.↵
    1. Graser A,
    2. Stieber P,
    3. Nagel D,
    4. Schafer C,
    5. Horst D,
    6. Becker CR, et al.
    Comparison of CT colonography, colonoscopy, sigmoidoscopy and faecal occult blood tests for the detection of advanced adenoma in an average risk population. Gut. 2009; 58: 241–8.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  39. 39.↵
    1. Atkin W,
    2. Dadswell E,
    3. Wooldrage K,
    4. Kralj-Hans I,
    5. von Wagner C,
    6. Edwards R, et al.
    Computed tomographic colonography vs. colonoscopy for investigation of patients with symptoms suggestive of colorectal cancer (SIGGAR): a multicentre randomised trial. Lancet. 2013; 381: 1194–202.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  40. 40.↵
    1. Blanco-Colino R,
    2. Espin-Basany E.
    Intraoperative use of ICG fluorescence imaging to reduce the risk of anastomotic leakage in colorectal surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Tech Coloproctol. 2018; 22: 15–23.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  41. 41.↵
    1. Witney TH,
    2. Lewis DY.
    Imaging cancer metabolism with positron emission tomography (PET). Methods Mol Biol. 2019; 1928: 29–44. 42.
    OpenUrl
  42. 42.↵
    1. Watanabe A,
    2. Harimoto N,
    3. Araki K,
    4. Yoshizumi T,
    5. Arima K,
    6. Yamashita Y, et al.
    A new strategy based on fluorodeoxyglucosepositron emission tomography for managing liver metastasis from colorectal cancer. J Surg Oncol. 2018; 118: 1088–95.
    OpenUrl
  43. 43.↵
    1. Wang X,
    2. Gao Y,
    3. Li J,
    4. Wu J,
    5. Wang B,
    6. Ma X, et al.
    Diagnostic accuracy of endoscopic ultrasound, computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, and endorectal ultrasonography for detecting lymph node involvement in patients with rectal cancer: a protocol for an overview of systematic reviews. Medicine (Baltimore). 2018; 97: e12899–902.
  44. 44.↵
    1. Tsai C,
    2. Hague C,
    3. Xiong W,
    4. Raval M,
    5. Karimuddin A,
    6. Brown C, et al.
    Evaluation of endorectal ultrasound (ERUS) and MRI for prediction of circumferential resection margin (CRM) for rectal cancer. Am J Surg. 2017; 213: 936–42.
    OpenUrl
  45. 45.↵
    Available at: https://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/pdf/colon.pdf. Accessed October 1, 2016.
  46. 46.↵
    Available at: https://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/pdf/rectal.pdf. Accessed October 1, 2016.
  47. 47.↵
    1. Steele SR,
    2. Chang GJ,
    3. Hendren S,
    4. Weiser M,
    5. Irani J,
    6. Buie WD, et al.
    Practice guideline for the surveillance of patients after curative treatment of colon and rectal cancer. Dis Colon Rectum. 2015; 58: 713–25.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  48. 48.↵
    1. Chang GJ,
    2. Kaiser AM,
    3. Mills S,
    4. Rafferty JF,
    5. Buie WD.
    Practice parameters for the management of colon cancer. Dis Colon Rectum. 2012; 55: 831–43.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  49. 49.↵
    1. Wang L,
    2. Chen S,
    3. Zhu Y,
    4. Zhang M,
    5. Tang S,
    6. Li J, et al.
    Triple-modal imaging-guided chemo-photothermal synergistic therapy for breast cancer with magnetically targeted phase-shifted nanoparticles. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2018; 10: 42102–14.
    OpenUrl
  50. 50.↵
    1. Liao J,
    2. Wei X,
    3. Ran B,
    4. Peng J,
    5. Qu Y,
    6. Qian Z.
    Polymer hybrid magnetic nanocapsules encapsulating IR820 and PTX for external magnetic field-guided tumor targeting and multifunctional theranostics. Nanoscale. 2017; 9: 2479–91.
    OpenUrl
  51. 51.↵
    1. Sehgal R,
    2. Coffey JC.
    Historical development of mesenteric anatomy provides a universally applicable anatomic paradigm for complete/ total mesocolic excision. Gastroenterol Rep (Oxf). 2014; 2: 245–50. 52.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  52. 52.↵
    1. Valentini V,
    2. Aristei C,
    3. Glimelius B,
    4. Minsky BD,
    5. Beets-Tan R,
    6. Borras JM, et al.
    Multidisciplinary rectal cancer management: 2nd European Rectal Cancer Consensus Conference (EURECA-CC2). Radiother Oncol. 2009; 92: 148–63.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  53. 53.↵
    1. Sauer R,
    2. Liersch T,
    3. Merkel S,
    4. Fietkau R,
    5. Hohenberger W,
    6. Hess C, et al.
    Preoperative versus postoperative chemoradiotherapy for locally advanced rectal cancer: results of the German CAO/ARO/ AIO-94 randomized phase III trial after a median follow-up of 11 years. J Clin Oncol. 2012; 30: 1926–33.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  54. 54.↵
    1. Haller DG,
    2. Tabernero J,
    3. Maroun J,
    4. de Braud F,
    5. Price T,
    6. Van Cutsem E, et al.
    Capecitabine plus oxaliplatin compared with fluorouracil and folinic acid as adjuvant therapy for stage III colon cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2011; 29: 1465–71.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  55. 55.↵
    1. Petrelli N,
    2. Herrera L,
    3. Rustum Y,
    4. Burke P,
    5. Creaven P,
    6. Stulc J, et al.
    A prospective randomized trial of 5-fluorouracil versus 5-fluorouracil and high-dose leucovorin versus 5-fluorouracil and methotrexate in previously untreated patients with advanced colorectal carcinoma. J Clin Oncol. 1987; 5: 1559–65.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  56. 56.↵
    1. Poon MA,
    2. O’Connell MJ,
    3. Moertel CG,
    4. Wieand HS,
    5. Cullinan SA,
    6. Everson LK, et al.
    Biochemical modulation of fluorouracil: evidence of significant improvement of survival and quality of life in patients with advanced colorectal carcinoma. J Clin Oncol. 1989; 7: 1407–18.
    OpenUrlAbstract
  57. 57.↵
    1. Twelves C,
    2. Wong A,
    3. Nowacki MP,
    4. Abt M,
    5. Burris 3rd H,
    6. Carrato A, et al.
    Capecitabine as adjuvant treatment for stage III colon cancer. N Engl J Med. 2005; 352: 2696–704.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  58. 58.↵
    1. Kelland L.
    The resurgence of platinum-based cancer chemotherapy. Nat Rev Cancer. 2007; 7: 573–84.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  59. 59.↵
    1. Petrioli R,
    2. Pascucci A,
    3. Francini E,
    4. Marsili S,
    5. Sciandivasci A,
    6. Tassi R, et al.
    Neurotoxicity of FOLFOX-4 as adjuvant treatment for patients with colon and gastric cancer: a randomized study of two different schedules of oxaliplatin. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 2008; 61: 105–11.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  60. 60.↵
    1. Xu Y,
    2. Villalona-Calero MA.
    Irinotecan: mechanisms of tumor resistance and novel strategies for modulating its activity. Ann Oncol. 2002; 13: 1841–51.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  61. 61.↵
    1. Andre T,
    2. Boni C,
    3. Navarro M,
    4. Tabernero J,
    5. Hickish T,
    6. Topham C, et al.
    Improved overall survival with oxaliplatin, fluorouracil, and leucovorin as adjuvant treatment in stage II or III colon cancer in the mosaic trial. J Clin Oncol. 2009; 27: 3109–16.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  62. 62.↵
    1. Saltz LB,
    2. Niedzwiecki D,
    3. Hollis D,
    4. Goldberg RM,
    5. Hantel A,
    6. Thomas JP, et al.
    Irinotecan fluorouracil plus leucovorin is not superior to fluorouracil plus leucovorin alone as adjuvant treatment for stage III colon cancer: results of CALGB 89803. J Clin Oncol. 2007; 25: 3456–61.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  63. 63.↵
    1. Falcone A,
    2. Masi G,
    3. Allegrini G,
    4. Danesi R,
    5. Pfanner E,
    6. Brunetti IM, et al.
    Biweekly chemotherapy with oxaliplatin, irinotecan, infusional fluorouracil, and leucovorin: a pilot study in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2002; 20: 4006–14.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  64. 64.↵
    1. Cassidy J,
    2. Clarke S,
    3. Diaz-Rubio E,
    4. Scheithauer W,
    5. Figer A,
    6. Wong R, et al.
    Randomized phase III study of capecitabine plus oxaliplatin compared with fluorouracil/folinic acid plus oxaliplatin as first-line therapy for metastatic colorectal cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2008; 26: 2006–12.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  65. 65.↵
    1. Degirmenci M,
    2. Karaca B,
    3. Gorumlu G,
    4. Durusoy R,
    5. Demir Piskin G,
    6. Bozkurt MT, et al.
    Efficacy and safety of bevacizumab plus capecitabine and irinotecan regimen for metastatic colorectal cancer. Med Oncol. 2010; 27: 585–91.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  66. 66.↵
    1. Li Y,
    2. Dong Q,
    3. Cui Y.
    Synergistic inhibition of MEK and reciprocal feedback networks for targeted intervention in malignancy. Cancer Biol Med. 2019; 16: 415–34.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  67. 67.↵
    1. Baselga J.
    The EGFR as a target for anticancer therapy-focus on cetuximab. Eur J Cancer. 2001; 37(Suppl 4): S16–22.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  68. 68.↵
    1. Yang XD,
    2. Jia XC,
    3. Corvalan JR,
    4. Wang P,
    5. Davis CG.
    Development of ABX-EGF, a fully human anti-EGF receptor monoclonal antibody, for cancer therapy. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol. 2001; 38: 17–23.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  69. 69.↵
    1. Macarulla T,
    2. Sauri T,
    3. Tabernero J.
    Evaluation of aflibercept in the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer. Expert Opin Biol Ther. 2014; 14: 1493–505.
    OpenUrl
  70. 70.↵
    1. Wilhelm SM,
    2. Dumas J,
    3. Adnane L,
    4. Lynch M,
    5. Carter CA,
    6. Schutz G, et al.
    Regorafenib (BAY 73-4506): a new oral multikinase inhibitor of angiogenic, stromal and oncogenic receptor tyrosine kinases with potent preclinical antitumor activity. Int J Cancer. 2011; 129: 245–55.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  71. 71.↵
    1. Lu AH,
    2. Salabas EL,
    3. Schuth F.
    Magnetic nanoparticles: synthesis, protection, functionalization, and application. Angew Chem Int Ed. 2007; 46: 1222–44.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  72. 72.↵
    1. Shokrollahi H.
    Structure, synthetic methods, magnetic properties and biomedical applications of ferrofluids. Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl. 2013; 33: 2476–87.
    OpenUrl
  73. 73.↵
    1. Wang X,
    2. Zhuang J,
    3. Peng Q,
    4. Li Y.
    A general strategy for nanocrystal synthesis. Nature. 2005; 437: 121–4.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  74. 74.↵
    1. Zhang J,
    2. Han B,
    3. Chen J,
    4. Li Z,
    5. Liu Z,
    6. Wu W.
    Synthesis of Ag/BSA composite nanospheres from water-in-oil microemulsion using compressed CO2 as antisolvent. Biotechnol Bioeng. 2005; 89: 274–9.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  75. 75.↵
    1. Sharifi I,
    2. Shokrollahi H,
    3. Amiri S.
    Ferrite-based magnetic nanofluids used in hyperthermia applications. J Magn Magn Mater. 2012; 324: 903–15.
    OpenUrl
  76. 76.↵
    1. Kalia S,
    2. Kango S,
    3. Kumar A,
    4. Haldorai Y,
    5. Kumari B,
    6. Kumar R.
    Magnetic polymer nanocomposites for environmental and biomedical applications. Colloid Polym Sci. 2014; 292: 2025–52. 77.
    OpenUrl
  77. 77.↵
    1. Sanchez J,
    2. Cortes-Hernandez DA,
    3. Escobedo-Bocardo JC,
    4. JassoTeran RA,
    5. Zugasti-Cruz A.
    Bioactive magnetic nanoparticles of Fe-Ga synthesized by sol-gel for their potential use in hyperthermia treatment. J Mater Sci Mater Med. 2014; 25: 2237–42.
    OpenUrl
  78. 78.↵
    1. Hemery G,
    2. Keyes AC,
    3. Garaio E,
    4. Rodrigo I,
    5. Garcia JA,
    6. Plazaola F, et al.
    Tuning sizes, morphologies, and magnetic properties of monocore versus multicore iron oxide nanoparticles through the controlled addition of water in the polyol synthesis. Inorg Chem. 2017; 56: 8232–43.
    OpenUrl
  79. 79.↵
    1. Kim DH,
    2. Park JS,
    3. Kang MS.
    Continuous preparation of waterdispersible magnetite nanoparticles by electrochemical synthesis. J Nanosci Nanotechnol. 2018; 18: 5721–5.
    OpenUrl
  80. 80.↵
    1. Lungu II,
    2. Radulescu M,
    3. Mogosanu GD,
    4. Grumezescu AM.
    pH sensitive core-shell magnetic nanoparticles for targeted drug delivery in cancer therapy. Rom J Morphol Embryol. 2016; 57: 23–32.
    OpenUrl
  81. 81.↵
    1. Medeiros SF,
    2. Lara BR,
    3. Oliveira PFM,
    4. Moraes RM,
    5. Alves GM,
    6. Elaissari A, et al.
    Stimuli-responsive and biocompatible poly(nvinylcaprolactam-co-acrylic acid)-coated iron oxide nanoparticles by nanoprecipitation technique. J Colloid Sci Biotechnol. 2013; 2: 180–94.
    OpenUrl
  82. 82.↵
    1. Miladi K,
    2. Ibraheem D,
    3. Iqbal M,
    4. Sfar S,
    5. Fessi H,
    6. Elaissari A.
    Particles from preformed polymers as carriers for drug delivery. EXCLI J. 2014; 13: 28–57.
    OpenUrl
  83. 83.↵
    1. Sun Y,
    2. Zheng Y,
    3. Li P,
    4. Wang D,
    5. Niu C,
    6. Gong Y, et al.
    Evaluation of superparamagnetic iron oxide-polymer composite microcapsules for magnetic resonance-guided high-intensity focused ultrasound cancer surgery. BMC Cancer. 2014; 14: 800–10.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  84. 84.↵
    1. Yoon HJ,
    2. Lim TG,
    3. Kim JH,
    4. Cho YM,
    5. Kim YS,
    6. Chung US, et al.
    Fabrication of multifunctional layer-by-layer nanocapsules toward the design of theragnostic nanoplatform. Biomacromolecules. 2014; 15: 1382–9.
    OpenUrl
  85. 85.↵
    1. Erdal E,
    2. Demirbilek M,
    3. Yeh Y,
    4. Akbal O,
    5. Ruff L,
    6. Bozkurt D, et al.
    A comparative study of receptor-targeted magnetosome and HSAcoated iron oxide nanoparticles as MRI contrast-enhancing agent in animal cancer model. Appl Biochem Biotechnol. 2018; 185: 91–113.
    OpenUrl
  86. 86.↵
    1. Du Y,
    2. Qian M,
    3. Li C,
    4. Jiang H,
    5. Yang Y,
    6. Huang R.
    Facile marriage of Gd3+ to polymer-coated carbon nanodots with enhanced biocompatibility for targeted MR/fluorescence imaging of glioma. Int J Pharm. 2018; 552: 84–90.
    OpenUrl
  87. 87.↵
    1. Li Y,
    2. Gu Y,
    3. Yuan W,
    4. Cao T,
    5. Li K,
    6. Yang S, et al.
    Core-shell-shell NaYbF4:Tm@CaF2@NaDyF4 nanocomposites for upconversion/ T2-weighted MRI/computed tomography lymphatic imaging. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2016; 8: 19208–16.
    OpenUrl
  88. 88.↵
    1. Sekine T,
    2. Barbosa FG,
    3. Delso G,
    4. Burger IA,
    5. Stolzmann P,
    6. Ter Voert EE, et al.
    Local resectability assessment of head and neck cancer: positron emission tomography/MRI versus positron emission tomography/CT. Head Neck. 2017; 39: 1550–8.
    OpenUrl
  89. 89.↵
    1. Yiannakou M,
    2. Menikou G,
    3. Yiallouras C,
    4. Ioannides C,
    5. Damianou C.
    MRI guided focused ultrasound robotic system for animal experiments. Int J Med Robot. 2017; 13: e1804–12.
  90. 90.↵
    1. Kircher MF,
    2. de la Zerda A,
    3. Jokerst JV,
    4. Zavaleta CL,
    5. Kempen PJ,
    6. Mittra E, et al.
    A brain tumor molecular imaging strategy using a new triple-modality MRI-photoacoustic-Raman nanoparticle. Nat Med. 2012; 18: 829–34.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  91. 91.↵
    1. Dave RV,
    2. Millican-Slater R,
    3. Dodwell D,
    4. Horgan K,
    5. Sharma N.
    Neoadjuvant chemotherapy with MRI monitoring for breast cancer. Br J Surg. 2017; 104: 1177–87.
    OpenUrl
  92. 92.↵
    1. Mu X,
    2. Zhang F,
    3. Kong C,
    4. Zhang H,
    5. Zhang W,
    6. Ge R, et al.
    EGFR-targeted delivery of DOX-loaded Fe3O4@polydopamine multifunctional nanocomposites for MRI and antitumor chemophotothermal therapy. Int J Nanomed. 2017; 12: 2899–911.
    OpenUrl
  93. 93.↵
    1. Wu B,
    2. Li XQ,
    3. Huang T,
    4. Lu ST,
    5. Wan B,
    6. Liao RF, et al.
    MRI-guided tumor chemo-photodynamic therapy with Gd/Pt bifunctionalized porphyrin. Biomater Sci. 2017; 5: 1746–50.
    OpenUrl
  94. 94.↵
    1. Eichler F,
    2. Duncan C,
    3. Musolino PL,
    4. Orchard PJ,
    5. De Oliveira S,
    6. Thrasher AJ, et al.
    Hematopoietic stem-cell gene therapy for cerebral adrenoleukodystrophy. N Engl J Med. 2017; 377: 1630–8. 95.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  95. 95.↵
    1. Karakas Z,
    2. Yilmaz Y,
    3. Bayramoglu Z,
    4. Karaman S,
    5. Aydogdu S,
    6. Karagenc AO, et al.
    Magnetic resonance imaging during management of patients with transfusion-dependent thalassemia: a single-center experience. Radiol Med. 2018; 123: 572–6.
    OpenUrl
  96. 96.↵
    1. Hervault A,
    2. Thanh NT.
    Magnetic nanoparticle-based therapeutic agents for thermo-chemotherapy treatment of cancer. Nanoscale. 2014; 6: 11553–73.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  97. 97.↵
    1. Farzin A,
    2. Fathi M,
    3. Emadi R.
    Multifunctional magnetic nanostructured hardystonite scaffold for hyperthermia, drug delivery and tissue engineering applications. Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl. 2017; 70: 21–31.
    OpenUrl
  98. 98.↵
    1. Dai M,
    2. Wu C,
    3. Fang HM,
    4. Li L,
    5. Yan JB,
    6. Zeng DL, et al.
    Thermoresponsive magnetic liposomes for hyperthermia-triggered local drug delivery. J Microencapsul. 2017; 34: 408–15.
    OpenUrl
  99. 99.↵
    1. Zamora-Mora V,
    2. Fernandez-Gutierrez M,
    3. Gonzalez-Gomez A,
    4. Sanz B,
    5. Roman JS,
    6. Goya GF, et al.
    Chitosan nanoparticles for combined drug delivery and magnetic hyperthermia: from preparation to in vitro studies. Carbohydr Polym. 2017; 157: 361–70.
    OpenUrl
  100. 100.↵
    1. Kijima S,
    2. Sasaki T,
    3. Nagata K,
    4. Utano K,
    5. Lefor AT,
    6. Sugimoto H.
    Preoperative evaluation of colorectal cancer using CT colonography, MRI, and PET/CT. World J Gastroenterol. 2014; 20: 16964–75.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  101. 101.↵
    1. An FF,
    2. Yang YL,
    3. Liu J,
    4. Ye J,
    5. Zhang JF,
    6. Zhou MJ, et al.
    A reticuloendothelial system-stealthy dye-albumin nanocomplex as a highly biocompatible and highly luminescent nanoprobe for targeted in vivo tumor imaging. RSC Adv. 2014; 4: 6120–6.
    OpenUrl
  102. 102.↵
    1. Saing S,
    2. Haywood P,
    3. Duncan JK,
    4. Ma N,
    5. Cameron AL,
    6. Goodall S.
    Cost-effective imaging for resectability of liver lesions in colorectal cancer: an economic decision model. ANZ J Surg. 2018; 88: E507–11.
    OpenUrl
  103. 103.↵
    1. Lee DH,
    2. Lee JM.
    Whole-body PET/MRI for colorectal cancer staging: is it the way forward? J Magn Reson Imaging. 2017; 45: 21–35.
    OpenUrl
  104. 104.↵
    1. Brendle C,
    2. Schwenzer NF,
    3. Rempp H,
    4. Schmidt H,
    5. Pfannenberg C,
    6. la Fougere C, et al.
    Assessment of metastatic colorectal cancer with hybrid imaging: comparison of reading performance using different combinations of anatomical and functional imaging techniques in PET/MRI and PET/CT in a short case series. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2016; 43: 123–32.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  105. 105.↵
    1. Shida D,
    2. Iinuma G,
    3. Komono A,
    4. Ochiai H,
    5. Tsukamoto S,
    6. Miyake M, et al.
    Preoperative T staging using CT colonography with multiplanar reconstruction for very low rectal cancer. BMC Cancer. 2017; 17: 764–70.
    OpenUrl
  106. 106.↵
    1. van der Paardt MP,
    2. Stoker J.
    Current status of magnetic resonance colonography for screening and diagnosis of colorectal cancer. Radiol Clin North Am. 2018; 56: 737–49.
    OpenUrl
  107. 107.↵
    1. Achiam MP,
    2. Logager V,
    3. Lund Rasmussen V,
    4. Okholm C,
    5. Mollerup T,
    6. Thomsen HS, et al.
    Perioperative colonic evaluation in patients with rectal cancer; MR colonography versus standard care. Acad Radiol. 2015; 22: 1522–8.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  108. 108.↵
    1. van der Paardt MP,
    2. Boellaard TN,
    3. Zijta FM,
    4. Baak LC,
    5. Depla A,
    6. Dekker E, et al.
    Magnetic resonance colonography with a limited bowel preparation and automated carbon dioxide insufflation in comparison to conventional colonoscopy: patient burden and preferences. Eur J Radiol. 2015; 84: 19–25.
    OpenUrl
  109. 109.↵
    1. Sun S,
    2. Yang C,
    3. Huang Z,
    4. Jiang W,
    5. Liu Y,
    6. Wu H, et al.
    Diagnostic value of magnetic resonance versus computed tomography colonography for colorectal cancer: a PRISMA-compliant systematic review and meta-analysis. Medicine (Baltimore). 2018; 97: e10883–91.
  110. 110.↵
    1. Ileva LV,
    2. Bernardo M,
    3. Young MR,
    4. Riffle LA,
    5. Tatum JL,
    6. Kalen JD, et al.
    In vivo MRI virtual colonography in a mouse model of colon cancer. Nat Protoc. 2014; 9: 2682–92.
    OpenUrl
  111. 111.↵
    1. Sun J,
    2. Zhang S,
    3. Jiang S,
    4. Bai W,
    5. Liu F,
    6. Yuan H, et al.
    Gadoliniumloaded solid lipid nanoparticles as a tumor-absorbable contrast agent for early diagnosis of colorectal tumors using magnetic resonance colonography. J Biomed Nanotechnol. 2016; 12: 1709–23.
    OpenUrl
  112. 112.↵
    1. Feng ST,
    2. Li J,
    3. Luo Y,
    4. Yin T,
    5. Cai H,
    6. Wang Y, et al.
    pH-sensitive nanomicelles for controlled and efficient drug delivery to human colorectal carcinoma LoVo cells. PLoS One. 2014; 9: e100732–40.
  113. 113.↵
    1. Boissenot T,
    2. Fattal E,
    3. Bordat A,
    4. Houvenagel S,
    5. Valette J,
    6. Chacun H, et al.
    Paclitaxel-loaded PEGylated nanocapsules of perfluorooctyl bromide as theranostic agents. Eur J Pharm Biopharm. 2016; 108: 136–44.
    OpenUrl
  114. 114.↵
    1. Shakeri-Zadeh A,
    2. Shiran MB,
    3. Khoee S,
    4. Sharifi AM,
    5. Ghaznavi H,
    6. Khoei S.
    A new magnetic nanocapsule containing 5-fluorouracil: in vivo drug release, anti-tumor, and pro-apoptotic effects on CT26 cells allograft model. J Biomater Appl. 2014; 29: 548–56.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  115. 115.↵
    1. Voulgari E,
    2. Bakandritsos A,
    3. Galtsidis S,
    4. Zoumpourlis V,
    5. Burke BP,
    6. Clemente GS, et al.
    Synthesis, characterization and in vivo evaluation of a magnetic cisplatin delivery nanosystem based on PMAA-graft-PEG copolymers. J Control Release. 2016; 243: 342–56.
    OpenUrl
  116. 116.↵
    1. Lee PC,
    2. Lin CY,
    3. Peng CL,
    4. Shieh MJ.
    Development of a controlledrelease drug delivery system by encapsulating oxaliplatin into SPIO/MWNT nanoparticles for effective colon cancer therapy and magnetic resonance imaging. Biomater Sci. 2016; 4: 1742–53.
    OpenUrl
  117. 117.↵
    1. Dehvari K,
    2. Chen Y,
    3. Tsai YH,
    4. Tseng SH,
    5. Lin KS.
    Superparamagnetic iron oxide nanorod carriers for paclitaxel delivery in the treatment and imaging of colon cancer in mice. J Biomed Nanotechnol. 2016; 12: 1734–45.
    OpenUrl
  118. 118.↵
    1. Augustin E,
    2. Czubek B,
    3. Nowicka AM,
    4. Kowalczyk A,
    5. Stojek Z,
    6. Mazerska Z.
    Improved cytotoxicity and preserved level of cell death induced in colon cancer cells by doxorubicin after its conjugation with iron-oxide magnetic nanoparticles. Toxicol In Vitro. 2016; 33: 45–53.
    OpenUrl
  119. 119.↵
    1. Meng L,
    2. Cheng Y,
    3. Gan S,
    4. Zhang Z,
    5. Tong X,
    6. Xu L, et al.
    Facile deposition of manganese dioxide to albumin-bound paclitaxel nanoparticles for modulation of hypoxic tumor microenvironment to improve chemoradiation therapy. Mol Pharm. 2018; 15: 447–57.
    OpenUrl
  120. 120.↵
    1. White SB,
    2. Kim DH,
    3. Guo Y,
    4. Li W,
    5. Yang Y,
    6. Chen J, et al.
    Biofunctionalized hybrid magnetic gold nanoparticles as catalysts for photothermal ablation of colorectal liver metastases. Radiology. 2017; 285: 809–19.
    OpenUrl
  121. 121.↵
    1. Azhdarzadeh M,
    2. Atyabi F,
    3. Saei AA,
    4. Varnamkhasti BS,
    5. Omidi Y,
    6. Fateh M, et al.
    Theranostic MUC-1 aptamer targeted gold coated superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticles for magnetic resonance imaging and photothermal therapy of colon cancer. Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces. 2016; 143: 224–32.
    OpenUrl
  122. 122.↵
    1. Kirui DK,
    2. Khalidov I,
    3. Wang Y,
    4. Batt CA.
    Targeted near-IR hybrid magnetic nanoparticles for in vivo cancer therapy and imaging. Nanomedicine. 2013; 9: 702–11.
    OpenUrl
  123. 123.↵
    1. Kirui DK,
    2. Rey DA,
    3. Batt CA.
    Gold hybrid nanoparticles for targeted phototherapy and cancer imaging. Nanotechnology. 2010; 21: 105105–14.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  124. 124.↵
    1. Parchur AK,
    2. Sharma G,
    3. Jagtap JM,
    4. Gogineni VR,
    5. LaViolette PS,
    6. Flister MJ, et al.
    Vascular interventional radiology-guided photothermal therapy of colorectal cancer liver metastasis with theranostic gold nanorods. ACS Nano. 2018; 12: 6597–611.
    OpenUrl
  125. 125.↵
    1. Zhang R,
    2. Cheng K,
    3. Antaris AL,
    4. Ma X,
    5. Yang M,
    6. Ramakrishnan S, et al.
    Hybrid anisotropic nanostructures for dual-modal cancer imaging and image-guided chemo-thermo therapies. Biomaterials. 2016; 103: 265–77.
    OpenUrl
  126. 126.↵
    1. Lu YJ,
    2. Lin P-Y,
    3. Huang P-H,
    4. Kuo C-Y,
    5. Shalumon KT,
    6. Chen M-Y, et al.
    Magnetic graphene oxide for dual targeted delivery of doxorubicin and photothermal therapy. Nanomaterials. 2018; 8: 193–212.
    OpenUrl
  127. 127.↵
    1. Liu F,
    2. He X,
    3. Chen H,
    4. Zhang J,
    5. Zhang H,
    6. Wang Z.
    Gram-scale synthesis of coordination polymer nanodots with renal clearance properties for cancer theranostic applications. Nat Commun. 2015; 6: 8003–11.
    OpenUrl
  128. 128.↵
    1. Muhleisen L,
    2. Alev M,
    3. Unterweger H,
    4. Subatzus D,
    5. Pottler M,
    6. Friedrich RP, et al.
    Analysis of hypericin-mediated effects and implications for targeted photodynamic therapy. Int J Mol Sci. 2017; 18: E1388–402.
    OpenUrl
  129. 129.↵
    1. Huang W,
    2. Liu Z,
    3. Zhou G,
    4. Ling J,
    5. Tian A,
    6. Sun N.
    Silencing Bag-1 gene via magnetic gold nanoparticle-delivered siRNA plasmid for colorectal cancer therapy in vivo and in vitro. Tumour Biol. 2016; 37: 10365–74.
    OpenUrl
  130. 130.↵
    1. Lee SY,
    2. Yang CY,
    3. Peng CL,
    4. Wei MF,
    5. Chen KC,
    6. Yao CJ, et al.
    A theranostic micelleplex co-delivering SN-38 and VEGF siRNA for colorectal cancer therapy. Biomaterials. 2016; 86: 92–105.
    OpenUrl
  131. 131.↵
    1. Zimmermann U,
    2. Pilwat G.
    [Organ specific application of drugs by means of cellular capsule systems (author’s transl)]. Z Naturforsch C Biosci. 1976; 31: 732–6.
    OpenUrl
  132. 132.↵
    1. Lubbe AS,
    2. Bergemann C,
    3. Huhnt W,
    4. Fricke T,
    5. Riess H,
    6. Brock JW, et al.
    Preclinical experiences with magnetic drug targeting: tolerance and efficacy. Cancer Res. 1996; 56: 4694–701.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  133. 133.↵
    1. Goodwin SC,
    2. Bittner CA,
    3. Peterson CL,
    4. Wong G.
    Single-dose toxicity study of hepatic intra-arterial infusion of doxorubicin coupled to a novel magnetically targeted drug carrier. Toxicol Sci. 2001; 60: 177–83.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  134. 134.↵
    1. Wang X,
    2. Wang C,
    3. Cheng L,
    4. Lee ST,
    5. Liu Z.
    Noble metal coated single-walled carbon nanotubes for applications in surface enhanced Raman scattering imaging and photothermal therapy. J Am Chem Soc. 2012; 134: 7414–22.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  135. 135.↵
    1. Kunzli BM,
    2. Abitabile P,
    3. Maurer CA.
    Radiofrequency ablation of liver tumors: actual limitations and potential solutions in the future. World J Hepatol. 2011; 3: 8–14.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  136. 136.↵
    1. Gao L,
    2. Fei J,
    3. Zhao J,
    4. Li H,
    5. Cui Y,
    6. Li J.
    Hypocrellin-loaded gold nanocages with high two-photon efficiency for photothermal/ photodynamic cancer therapy in vitro. ACS Nano. 2012; 6: 8030–40.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  137. 137.↵
    1. Yang X.
    Science to practice: enhancing photothermal ablation of colorectal liver metastases with targeted hybrid nanoparticles. Radiology. 2017; 285: 699–701.
    OpenUrl
  138. 138.↵
    1. Chou SS,
    2. Kaehr B,
    3. Kim J,
    4. Foley BM,
    5. De M,
    6. Hopkins PE, et al.
    Chemically exfoliated MoS2 as near-infrared photothermal agents. Angew Chem Int Ed. 2013; 52: 4160–4.
    OpenUrl
  139. 139.↵
    1. Dolmans DE,
    2. Fukumura D,
    3. Jain RK.
    Photodynamic therapy for cancer. Nat Rev Cancer. 2003; 3: 380–7.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  140. 140.↵
    1. Ni D,
    2. Ferreira CA,
    3. Barnhart TE,
    4. Quach V,
    5. Yu B,
    6. Jiang D, et al.
    Magnetic targeting of nanotheranostics enhances cerenkov radiation-induced photodynamic therapy. J Am Chem Soc. 2018; 140: 14971–9.
    OpenUrl
  141. 141.↵
    1. Lee SJ,
    2. Lee HJ,
    3. Moon MJ,
    4. Vu-Quang H,
    5. Lee HJ,
    6. Muthiah M, et al.
    Superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticles-loaded polymersomemediated gene delivery guided by enhanced magnetic resonance signal. J Nanosci Nanotechnol. 2011; 11: 7057–60.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  142. 142.↵
    1. Kuo CY,
    2. Liu TY,
    3. Chan TY,
    4. Tsai SC,
    5. Hardiansyah A,
    6. Huang LY, et al.
    Magnetically triggered nanovehicles for controlled drug release as a colorectal cancer therapy. Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces. 2016; 140: 567–73.
    OpenUrl
  143. 143.↵
    1. Xiao Y,
    2. An FF,
    3. Chen J,
    4. Xiong S,
    5. Zhang X.
    The impact of light irradiation timing on the efficacy of nanoformula-based photo/ chemo combination therapy. J Mater Chem B. 2018; 6: 3692–702.
    OpenUrl
  144. 144.↵
    1. Li Y,
    2. Dong Q,
    3. Mei T,
    4. Zheng M,
    5. Kumar RR,
    6. Yu B, et al.
    Nanosized modification strategies for improving the antitumor efficacy of MEK inhibitors. Curr Drug Targets. 2020; 21: 228–51.
    OpenUrl
  145. 145.↵
    1. Schurink NW,
    2. Lambregts DMJ,
    3. Beets-Tan RGH.
    Diffusionweighted imaging in rectal cancer: Current applications and future perspectives. Br J Radiol. 2019; 92: 20180655–71.
    OpenUrl
  146. 146.↵
    1. Barral M,
    2. Eveno C,
    3. Hoeffel C,
    4. Boudiaf M,
    5. Bazeries P,
    6. Foucher R, et al.
    Diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging in colorectal cancer. J Visc Surg. 2016; 153: 361–9.
    OpenUrl
  147. 147.↵
    1. Acharya S,
    2. Fischer-Valuck BW,
    3. Kashani R,
    4. Parikh P,
    5. Yang D,
    6. Zhao T, et al.
    Online magnetic resonance image guided adaptive radiation therapy: First clinical applications. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2016; 94: 394–403.
    OpenUrl
  148. 148.↵
    1. White IM,
    2. Scurr E,
    3. Wetscherek A,
    4. Brown G,
    5. Sohaib A,
    6. Nill S, et al.
    Realizing the potential of magnetic resonance image guided radiotherapy in gynaecological and rectal cancer. Br J Radiol. 2019; 92: 20180670–87.
    OpenUrl
  149. 149.↵
    1. Syu WJ,
    2. Huang CC,
    3. Hsiao JK,
    4. Lee YC,
    5. Huang YT,
    6. Venkatesan P, et al.
    Co-precipitation synthesis of near-infrared iron oxide nanocrystals on magnetically targeted imaging and photothermal cancer therapy via photoablative protein denature. Nanotheranostics. 2019; 3: 236–54.
    OpenUrl
  150. 150.↵
    1. Yeoh E,
    2. Miles K.
    Simultaneous positron emission tomography and magnetic resonance imaging for the detection and characterisation of liver lesions in patients with colorectal cancer: A pictorial review. J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol. 2019; 63: 624–9.
    OpenUrl
  151. 151.↵
    1. Bitar A,
    2. Kaewsaneha C,
    3. Eissa MM,
    4. Jamshaid T,
    5. Elaissari A.
    Ferrofluids: from preparation to biomedical applications. J Colloid Sci Biotechnol. 2014; 3: 3–18.
    OpenUrl
  152. 152.↵
    1. Nel A,
    2. Xia T,
    3. Madler L,
    4. Li N.
    Toxic potential of materials at the nanolevel. Science. 2006; 311: 622–7.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  153. 153.↵
    1. Nandwana V,
    2. Ryoo SR,
    3. Kanthala S,
    4. De M,
    5. Chou SS,
    6. Prasad PV, et al.
    Engineered theranostic magnetic nanostructures: role of composition and surface coating on magnetic resonance imaging contrast and thermal activation. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2016; 8: 6953–61.
    OpenUrl
  154. 154.↵
    1. Johnston PG.
    Identification of clinically relevant molecular subtypes in colorectal cancer: the dawning of a new era. Oncologist. 2014; 19: 568–73.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  155. 155.↵
    1. Arami H,
    2. Khandhar A,
    3. Liggitt D,
    4. Krishnan KM.
    In vivo delivery, pharmacokinetics, biodistribution and toxicity of iron oxide nanoparticles. Chem Soc Rev. 2015; 44: 8576–607.
    OpenUrl
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Cancer Biology and Medicine: 17 (2)
Cancer Biology & Medicine
Vol. 17, Issue 2
15 May 2020
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Print
Download PDF
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Cancer Biology & Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Magnetic resonance imaging-guided and targeted theranostics of colorectal cancer
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Cancer Biology & Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Cancer Biology & Medicine web site.
Citation Tools
Magnetic resonance imaging-guided and targeted theranostics of colorectal cancer
Yanan Li, Jingqi Xin, Yongbing Sun, Tao Han, Hui Zhang, Feifei An
Cancer Biology & Medicine May 2020, 17 (2) 307-327; DOI: 10.20892/j.issn.2095-3941.2020.0072

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Magnetic resonance imaging-guided and targeted theranostics of colorectal cancer
Yanan Li, Jingqi Xin, Yongbing Sun, Tao Han, Hui Zhang, Feifei An
Cancer Biology & Medicine May 2020, 17 (2) 307-327; DOI: 10.20892/j.issn.2095-3941.2020.0072
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Introduction
    • Concluding remarks and future perspectives
    • Acknowledgements
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Mechanisms underlying prostate cancer sensitivity to reactive oxygen species: overcoming radiotherapy resistance and recent clinical advances
  • Target identification of natural products in cancer with chemical proteomics and artificial intelligence approaches
  • Multi-omics in colorectal cancer liver metastasis: applications and research advances
Show more Review

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • carcinogenesis
  • Colorectal cancer
  • magnetic resonance imaging
  • multimodal diagnosis
  • targeted theranostics

Navigate

  • Home
  • Current Issue

More Information

  • About CBM
  • About CACA
  • About TMUCIH
  • Editorial Board
  • Subscription

For Authors

  • Instructions for authors
  • Journal Policies
  • Submit a Manuscript

Journal Services

  • Email Alerts
  • Facebook
  • RSS Feeds
  • Twitter

 

© 2025 Cancer Biology & Medicine

Powered by HighWire