Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • About
    • About CBM
    • Editorial Board
  • Articles
    • Ahead of print
    • Current Issue
    • Archive
    • Collections
    • Cover Story
  • For Authors
    • Instructions for Authors
    • Resources
    • Submit a Manuscript
  • For Reviewers
    • Become a Reviewer
    • Instructions for Reviewers
    • Resources
    • Outstanding Reviewer
  • Subscription
  • Alerts
    • Email Alerts
    • RSS Feeds
    • Table of Contents
  • Contact us
  • Other Publications
    • cbm

User menu

  • My alerts

Search

  • Advanced search
Cancer Biology & Medicine
  • Other Publications
    • cbm
  • My alerts
Cancer Biology & Medicine

Advanced Search

 

  • Home
  • About
    • About CBM
    • Editorial Board
  • Articles
    • Ahead of print
    • Current Issue
    • Archive
    • Collections
    • Cover Story
  • For Authors
    • Instructions for Authors
    • Resources
    • Submit a Manuscript
  • For Reviewers
    • Become a Reviewer
    • Instructions for Reviewers
    • Resources
    • Outstanding Reviewer
  • Subscription
  • Alerts
    • Email Alerts
    • RSS Feeds
    • Table of Contents
  • Contact us
  • Follow cbm on Twitter
  • Visit cbm on Facebook
Research ArticleOriginal Article

TNFa inhibitor C87 sensitizes EGFRvIII transfected glioblastoma cells to gefitinib by a concurrent blockade of TNFa signaling

Li Ma, Chunhua She, Qian Shi, Qiang Yin, Xinxin Ji, Yongrong Wang, Yulong Fan, Xinyao Kong, Peng Li, Zengfeng Sun, Xiaohui Zhang, Zhen Zhang, Jian Wang, Tong Wang, Yuanfu Xu and Wenliang Li
Cancer Biology & Medicine August 2019, 16 (3) 606-617; DOI: https://doi.org/10.20892/j.issn.2095-3941.2019.0011
Li Ma
1Department of Neuro-Oncology and Neurosurgery, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute & Hospital, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer; Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Tianjin; Key Laboratory of Cancer Immunology and Biotherapy, Tianjin's Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin 300060, China
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Chunhua She
1Department of Neuro-Oncology and Neurosurgery, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute & Hospital, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer; Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Tianjin; Key Laboratory of Cancer Immunology and Biotherapy, Tianjin's Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin 300060, China
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Qian Shi
1Department of Neuro-Oncology and Neurosurgery, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute & Hospital, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer; Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Tianjin; Key Laboratory of Cancer Immunology and Biotherapy, Tianjin's Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin 300060, China
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Qiang Yin
1Department of Neuro-Oncology and Neurosurgery, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute & Hospital, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer; Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Tianjin; Key Laboratory of Cancer Immunology and Biotherapy, Tianjin's Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin 300060, China
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Xinxin Ji
1Department of Neuro-Oncology and Neurosurgery, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute & Hospital, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer; Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Tianjin; Key Laboratory of Cancer Immunology and Biotherapy, Tianjin's Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin 300060, China
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Yongrong Wang
2State Key Laboratory of Experimental Hematology, CAMS Key Laboratory for Prevention and Control of Hematological Disease Treatment Related Infection, National Clinical Research Center for Hematological Disorders, Institute of Hematology and Blood Diseases Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Tianjin 300020, China
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Yulong Fan
2State Key Laboratory of Experimental Hematology, CAMS Key Laboratory for Prevention and Control of Hematological Disease Treatment Related Infection, National Clinical Research Center for Hematological Disorders, Institute of Hematology and Blood Diseases Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Tianjin 300020, China
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Xinyao Kong
2State Key Laboratory of Experimental Hematology, CAMS Key Laboratory for Prevention and Control of Hematological Disease Treatment Related Infection, National Clinical Research Center for Hematological Disorders, Institute of Hematology and Blood Diseases Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Tianjin 300020, China
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Peng Li
1Department of Neuro-Oncology and Neurosurgery, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute & Hospital, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer; Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Tianjin; Key Laboratory of Cancer Immunology and Biotherapy, Tianjin's Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin 300060, China
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Zengfeng Sun
1Department of Neuro-Oncology and Neurosurgery, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute & Hospital, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer; Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Tianjin; Key Laboratory of Cancer Immunology and Biotherapy, Tianjin's Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin 300060, China
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Xiaohui Zhang
1Department of Neuro-Oncology and Neurosurgery, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute & Hospital, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer; Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Tianjin; Key Laboratory of Cancer Immunology and Biotherapy, Tianjin's Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin 300060, China
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Zhen Zhang
1Department of Neuro-Oncology and Neurosurgery, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute & Hospital, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer; Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Tianjin; Key Laboratory of Cancer Immunology and Biotherapy, Tianjin's Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin 300060, China
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jian Wang
3Department of Immunology, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute & Hospital, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer; Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Tianjin; Key Laboratory of Cancer Immunology and Biotherapy, Tianjin’s Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin 300060, China
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Tong Wang
2State Key Laboratory of Experimental Hematology, CAMS Key Laboratory for Prevention and Control of Hematological Disease Treatment Related Infection, National Clinical Research Center for Hematological Disorders, Institute of Hematology and Blood Diseases Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Tianjin 300020, China
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Yuanfu Xu
2State Key Laboratory of Experimental Hematology, CAMS Key Laboratory for Prevention and Control of Hematological Disease Treatment Related Infection, National Clinical Research Center for Hematological Disorders, Institute of Hematology and Blood Diseases Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Tianjin 300020, China
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: [email protected] [email protected]
Wenliang Li
1Department of Neuro-Oncology and Neurosurgery, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute & Hospital, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer; Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Tianjin; Key Laboratory of Cancer Immunology and Biotherapy, Tianjin's Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin 300060, China
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: [email protected] [email protected]
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • 1
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    1

    Gefitinib treatment led to increased TNFa levels that triggered an adaptive pro-survival signaling pathway in glioblastoma cells. (A) Immunoblotting of EGFRwt, EGFRvIII, and phospho-EGFR in glioblastoma cell lines stably transfected with EGFRvIII mutation. GAPDH was used as loading control. EGFRwt, EGFR wide-type. (B) U87vIII and LN229vIII cells were treated with indicated concentrations of gefitinib for 48 hours, and thereafter cell viability was tested by MTT assay. Data were mean ± SEM, n = 3 independent experiments. (C) U87vIII and LN229vIII cells were treated with 2 µM gefitinib for the indicated time intervals, and total EGFR, phospho-EGFR, total Axl, phospho-Axl, total JNK and phospho-JNK were detected by immunoblotting. (D) After U87vIII or LN229vIII cells were treated with 2 µM or 12 µM gefitinib for indicated time points, ELISA was introduced to detect the TNFa concentration in cell culture supernatant. U87vIII cells (E) or LN229vIII cells (F) were treated with 2 µM gefitinib for the indicated time intervals, and TNFa mRNA level was evaluated by qRT-PCR assay. In (D), (E) and (F), data were mean ± SEM, n = 3 independent experiments. Student’s t-test, *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01.

  • S1
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    S1

    Gefitinib inhibition triggers an adaptive response in glioblastoma cells. (A) The band intensity of immunoblots in Figure 1C were quantified (mean ± s.d., n = 3 independent experiments, Student’s t-test). (B) U87vIII cells were treated with 2 µM gefitinib for the indicated time intervals, and total Akt, phospho-Akt, total STAT3, phospho-STAT3, total p38 MAPK and phospho-p38 MAPK were detected by immunoblotting.

  • 2
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    2

    High levels of TNFa in the glioblastoma microenvironment contributed to the primary resistance to EGFR inhibition. After TNFa (1 ng/mL) alone, or gefitinib (25 µM) alone, or combination of the two treated U87vIII (A) or LN229vIII (B) cells for 48 hours, cell viability was tested by MTT assay. (C) The relative expression of TNFa mRNA in 15 low grade astrocytoma (WHO II-III) tissues and 16 glioblastoma tissues were detected with qRT-PCR method. In (A), (B), and (C), data were mean ± SEM, n = 3 independent experiments, Student’s t-test, *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001. (D) Top: Immunoblotting analysis of protein levels of TNFa in the 15 low grade astrocytoma tissues (WHO II-III, serial number 1#-15#) and 16 glioblastoma tissues (serial number 16#-31#). Bottom: Western blot band intensity of TNFa was quantified and normalized to the internal control (mean ± SD, n = 3 independent experiments).

  • 3
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    3

    TNFa inhibition with C87 sensitized glioblastoma cells to EGFR inhibition. After C87 (2.5 µM), or TNFa antibody (1 µg/mL), or gefitinib (2 µM) alone, or combination treated U87vIII (A) or LN229vIII (B) cells for 48 hours, cell viability was tested by MTT assay. (C) Apoptotic assay of U87vIII cells with the above-mentioned treatments. In (A), (B) and (C), data were mean ± SEM, n = 3 independent experiments, Student’s t-test, *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01. (D) Representative morphology of U87vIII cells with the above-mentioned treatments, scale bar, 100 µm. (E) After U87vIII cells were treated with gefitinib combined with C87 or TNFa antibody for 48 h, expression of total Axl, phospho-Axl, total JNK, phospho-JNK, total EGFR and phospho-EGFR were detected by immunoblotting.

  • S2
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    S2

    C87 failed to work synergistically with TMZ in the cytotoxic assay of glioblastoma cells. (A) In U87vIII cells (left) or LN229vIII cells (right), TMZ treatment didn’t increase the TNFa mRNA expression. (B) 2 µM C87 had no effect on the sensitivity of U87vIII cells (left) or LN229vIII cells (right) to TMZ. In (A) and (B), data were mean ± SEM, n = 3 independent experiments.

  • S3
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    S3

    Inhibition of Axl and JNK renders glioblastoma cells sensitive to gefitinib. After Axl inhibitor R428(2 µM), or JNK inhibitor SP600125 Add a space (2 µM), or gefitinib (2 µM) alone, or combination treated U87vIII (A) or LN229vIII (B) cells for 48 hours, cell viability was tested by MTT assay. In (A) and (B), data were mean ± SEM, n = 3 independent experiments, Student’s t-test, *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01.

  • 4
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    4

    C87 sensitized mouse xenograft tumors to gefitinib treatment. (A) U87vIII subcutaneous xenograft tumors were once a day treated with C87 (10 mg/kg) intraperitoneally or gefitinib (50 mg/kg) by oral gavage, or combination of the two. (B) LN229vIII subcutaneous xenograft tumors were treated daily with the same doses as in (A). In (A) and (B), tumor volumes were calculated as indicated in the Method. Values are mean ± SD, n = 6 mice for each group, Student’s t-test, ***P < 0.001 g (gefitinib group vs. gefitinib + C87 group). Inserts were representative tumor photos of gefitinib group or gefitinib + C87 group. (C) U87vIII (top) or LN229vIII (bottom) subcutaneous xenograft tumors of each group were resected, fixed in formalin, and stained for Ki67. Scale bar, 100 µm.

  • 5
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    5

    A diagrammatic sketch illustrates how C87 overcomes the resistance of glioblastoma cells to gefitinib. (A) In glioblastoma cells treated with gefitinib alone, the pro-survival TNFa signaling pathway, either derived from the irritated tumor cells themselves, or tumor environment, enables the cells to bypass cell death induced by EGFR inhibition. (B) C87, as a novel inhibitor which competitively and specifically interrupts the binding between TNFa and its receptor and thus blocks the TNFa downstream signaling, induces glioblastoma cell death together with gefitinib.

Tables

  • Figures
    • View popup
    S1

    Antibodies used in this study

    AntigenCatalog number ManufacturerApplicationDilution
    EGFR4267Cell signaling WB1:1,000
    EGFRvIII10627RBioss antibodies WB1:200
    pEGFR2236Cell signalingWB1:1,000
    Axl8661Cell signaling WB1:1,000
    pAxl44463Cell signaling WB1:1,000
    JNK9252Cell signaling WB1:1,000
    pJNK4668Cell signaling WB1:1,000
    Akt9271Cell signaling WB1:1,000
    pAkt9272Cell signaling WB1:1,000
    STAT39139Cell signaling WB1:1,000
    pSTAT39131Cell signaling WB1:1,000
    p38 MAPK9212Cell signaling WB1:1,000
    phospho-p38 MAPK9216Cell signaling WB1:1,000
    GAPDH2118Cell signalingWB1:2,000
    TNFa6945Cell signaling WB1:1,000
    Ki679449Cell signaling IHC1:200
    TNFaAF-210-NA R&DCytotoxicity assay1:1,000
    • View popup
    S2

    Clinical characteristics of glioma patients

    VariableValue
    Age (years), mean (range)49 (11–76)
    Gender
    Male16
    Female15
    Histological grade
    WHO II6
    WHO III9
    WHO IV16
    Tumor size (cm)3.9±1.7
    Family history
    Yes1
    No30
    KPS score, mean (range)90 (70–100)
    Surgery
    Partial5
    Complete26
    Radiotherapy (pre-operation)
    Yes0
    No31
    Chemotherapy (pre-operation)
    Yes0
    No31
    Biotherapy or other targeted therapies
    (pre-operation)
    Yes0
    No31
    EGFRvIII
    Yes3
    No29
    • View popup
    S3

    Ki67 positive percentage of mouse xenograft tumors

    VehicleC87GefitinibGefitinib+C87
    U87vIII19.3±6.3%20.2±8.5%18.4±5.2%9.0±4.6%
    LN229vIII37.8±9.1%33.2±7.2%29.5±5.4%12.6±3.9%
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Cancer Biology and Medicine: 16 (3)
Cancer Biology & Medicine
Vol. 16, Issue 3
1 Aug 2019
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Print
Download PDF
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Cancer Biology & Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
TNFa inhibitor C87 sensitizes EGFRvIII transfected glioblastoma cells to gefitinib by a concurrent blockade of TNFa signaling
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Cancer Biology & Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Cancer Biology & Medicine web site.
Citation Tools
TNFa inhibitor C87 sensitizes EGFRvIII transfected glioblastoma cells to gefitinib by a concurrent blockade of TNFa signaling
Li Ma, Chunhua She, Qian Shi, Qiang Yin, Xinxin Ji, Yongrong Wang, Yulong Fan, Xinyao Kong, Peng Li, Zengfeng Sun, Xiaohui Zhang, Zhen Zhang, Jian Wang, Tong Wang, Yuanfu Xu, Wenliang Li
Cancer Biology & Medicine Aug 2019, 16 (3) 606-617; DOI: 10.20892/j.issn.2095-3941.2019.0011

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
TNFa inhibitor C87 sensitizes EGFRvIII transfected glioblastoma cells to gefitinib by a concurrent blockade of TNFa signaling
Li Ma, Chunhua She, Qian Shi, Qiang Yin, Xinxin Ji, Yongrong Wang, Yulong Fan, Xinyao Kong, Peng Li, Zengfeng Sun, Xiaohui Zhang, Zhen Zhang, Jian Wang, Tong Wang, Yuanfu Xu, Wenliang Li
Cancer Biology & Medicine Aug 2019, 16 (3) 606-617; DOI: 10.20892/j.issn.2095-3941.2019.0011
Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Introduction
    • Materials and methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Conclusions
    • Acknowledgments
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Neutrophils as key regulators of tumor immunity that restrict immune checkpoint blockade in liver cancer
  • Genetic polymorphisms in genes regulating cell death and prognosis of patients with rectal cancer receiving postoperative chemoradiotherapy
  • Combined chemo-endocrine therapy as a potential new option for HR+/HER2− advanced breast cancer: a prospective study of fulvestrant plus oral vinorelbine
Show more Original Article

Similar Articles

Subjects

  • Brain Tumor

Keywords

  • glioblastoma
  • EGFR
  • TNFa
  • inhibitor
  • drug resistance

Navigate

  • Home
  • Current Issue

More Information

  • About CBM
  • About CACA
  • About TMUCIH
  • Editorial Board
  • Subscription

For Authors

  • Instructions for authors
  • Journal Policies
  • Submit a Manuscript

Journal Services

  • Email Alerts
  • Facebook
  • RSS Feeds
  • Twitter

 

© 2023 Cancer Biology & Medicine

Powered by HighWire