Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • About
    • About CBM
    • Editorial Board
    • Announcement
  • Articles
    • Ahead of print
    • Current Issue
    • Archive
    • Collections
    • Cover Story
  • For Authors
    • Instructions for Authors
    • Resources
    • Submit a Manuscript
  • For Reviewers
    • Become a Reviewer
    • Instructions for Reviewers
    • Resources
    • Outstanding Reviewer
  • Subscription
  • Alerts
    • Email Alerts
    • RSS Feeds
    • Table of Contents
  • Contact us
  • Other Publications
    • cbm

User menu

  • My alerts

Search

  • Advanced search
Cancer Biology & Medicine
  • Other Publications
    • cbm
  • My alerts
Cancer Biology & Medicine

Advanced Search

 

  • Home
  • About
    • About CBM
    • Editorial Board
    • Announcement
  • Articles
    • Ahead of print
    • Current Issue
    • Archive
    • Collections
    • Cover Story
  • For Authors
    • Instructions for Authors
    • Resources
    • Submit a Manuscript
  • For Reviewers
    • Become a Reviewer
    • Instructions for Reviewers
    • Resources
    • Outstanding Reviewer
  • Subscription
  • Alerts
    • Email Alerts
    • RSS Feeds
    • Table of Contents
  • Contact us
  • Follow cbm on Twitter
  • Visit cbm on Facebook
Research ArticleOriginal Article

Factors associated with upstaging in patients preoperatively diagnosed with ductal carcinoma in situ by core needle biopsy

Jing Si, Benlong Yang, Rong Guo, Naisi Huang, Chenlian Quan, Linxiaoxi Ma, Bingqiu Xiu, Yun Cao, Yue Tang, Linxiao Shen, Jiajian Chen and Jiong Wu
Cancer Biology & Medicine May 2019, 16 (2) 312-318; DOI: https://doi.org/10.20892/j.issn.2095-3941.2018.0159
Jing Si
1Department of Breast Surgery, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai 200032, China
2Department of Oncology, Fudan University, Shanghai Medical College, Shanghai 200032, China
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Benlong Yang
1Department of Breast Surgery, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai 200032, China
2Department of Oncology, Fudan University, Shanghai Medical College, Shanghai 200032, China
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Rong Guo
1Department of Breast Surgery, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai 200032, China
2Department of Oncology, Fudan University, Shanghai Medical College, Shanghai 200032, China
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Naisi Huang
1Department of Breast Surgery, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai 200032, China
2Department of Oncology, Fudan University, Shanghai Medical College, Shanghai 200032, China
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Chenlian Quan
1Department of Breast Surgery, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai 200032, China
2Department of Oncology, Fudan University, Shanghai Medical College, Shanghai 200032, China
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Linxiaoxi Ma
1Department of Breast Surgery, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai 200032, China
2Department of Oncology, Fudan University, Shanghai Medical College, Shanghai 200032, China
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Bingqiu Xiu
1Department of Breast Surgery, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai 200032, China
2Department of Oncology, Fudan University, Shanghai Medical College, Shanghai 200032, China
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Yun Cao
2Department of Oncology, Fudan University, Shanghai Medical College, Shanghai 200032, China
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Yue Tang
2Department of Oncology, Fudan University, Shanghai Medical College, Shanghai 200032, China
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Linxiao Shen
2Department of Oncology, Fudan University, Shanghai Medical College, Shanghai 200032, China
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jiajian Chen
1Department of Breast Surgery, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai 200032, China
2Department of Oncology, Fudan University, Shanghai Medical College, Shanghai 200032, China
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jiong Wu
1Department of Breast Surgery, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai 200032, China
2Department of Oncology, Fudan University, Shanghai Medical College, Shanghai 200032, China
3Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Shanghai 200032, China
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: [email protected]
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF
Loading

References

  1. 1.↵
    1. Ozkan-Gurdal S,
    2. Cabioglu N,
    3. Ozcinar B,
    4. Muslumanoglu M,
    5. Ozmen V,
    6. Kecer M, et al.
    Factors predicting microinvasion in ductal Carcinoma in situ. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2014;15:55–60.
    OpenUrl
  2. 2.↵
    1. Van Zee KJ.
    Use of axillary staging in the management of ductal carcinoma in situ. JAMA Oncol. 2015;1:332–3.
    OpenUrl
  3. 3.↵
    1. Zetterlund L,
    2. Stemme S,
    3. Arnrup H, et al.
    Incidence of and risk factors for sentinel lymph node metastasis in patients with a postoperative diagnosis of ductal carcinoma in situ. Br J Surg. 2014;101:488–94.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  4. 4.↵
    1. Sakr R,
    2. Barranger E,
    3. Antoine M,
    4. Prugnolle H,
    5. Daraï E,
    6. Uzan S.
    Ductal carcinoma in situ: value of sentinel lymph node biopsy. J Surg Oncol. 2006;94:426–30.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  5. 5.↵
    1. Ernster VL,
    2. Barclay J,
    3. Kerlikowske K,
    4. Wilkie H,
    5. Ballard-Barbash R.
    Mortality among women with ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast in the population-based surveillance, epidemiology and end results program. Arch Intern Med. 2000;160:953–8.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  6. 6.↵
    1. Brennan ME,
    2. Turner RM,
    3. Ciatto S,
    4. Marinovich ML,
    5. French JR,
    6. Macaskill P, et al.
    Ductal carcinoma in situ at core-needle biopsy: meta-analysis of underestimation and predictors of invasive breast cancer. Radiology. 2011;260:119–28.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  7. 7.↵
    1. Lyman GH,
    2. Temin S,
    3. Edge SB,
    4. Newman LA,
    5. Turner RR,
    6. Weaver DL, et al.
    Sentinel lymph node biopsy for patients with early-stage breast cancer: American society of clinical oncology clinical practice guideline update. J Clin Oncol. 2016;32:1365–83.
    OpenUrl
  8. 8.↵
    1. Kim J,
    2. Han W,
    3. Lee JW,
    4. You JM,
    5. Shin HC,
    6. Ahn SK, et al.
    Factors associated with upstaging from ductal carcinoma in situ following core needle biopsy to invasive cancer in subsequent surgical excision. Breast. 2012;21:641–5.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  9. 9.↵
    1. Kondo T,
    2. Hayashi N,
    3. Ohde S,
    4. Suzuki K,
    5. Yoshida A,
    6. Yagata H, et al.
    A model to predict upstaging to invasive carcinoma in patients preoperatively diagnosed with ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast. J Surg Oncol. 2015;112:476–80.
    OpenUrl
  10. 10.↵
    1. Sun X,
    2. Li H,
    3. Liu YB,
    4. Zhou ZB,
    5. Chen P,
    6. Zhao T, et al.
    Sentinel lymph node biopsy in patients with breast ductal carcinoma in situ: Chinese experiences. Oncol Lett. 2015;10:1932–8.
    OpenUrl
  11. 11.↵
    1. Houssami N,
    2. Ciatto S,
    3. Ellis I,
    4. Ambrogetti D.
    Underestimation of malignancy of breast core-needle biopsy: concepts and precise overall and category-specific estimates. Cancer. 2007;109:487–95.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  12. 12.
    1. Ciatto S,
    2. Houssami N,
    3. Ambrogetti D,
    4. Bianchi S,
    5. Bonardi R,
    6. Brancato B, et al.
    Accuracy and underestimation of malignancy of breast core needle biopsy: the Florence experience of over 4000 consecutive biopsies. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2007;101:291–7.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  13. 13.↵
    1. Lee SK,
    2. Yang JH,
    3. Woo SY,
    4. Lee JE,
    5. Nam SJ.
    Nomogram for predicting invasion in patients with a preoperative diagnosis of ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast. Br J Surg. 2013;100:1756–63.
    OpenUrl
  14. 14.
    1. Miyake T,
    2. Shimazu K,
    3. Ohashi H,
    4. Taguchi T,
    5. Ueda S,
    6. Nakayama T, et al.
    Indication for sentinel lymph node biopsy for breast cancer when core biopsy shows ductal carcinoma in situ. Am J Surg. 2011;202:59–65.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  15. 15.
    1. Chan MYP,
    2. Lim S.
    Predictors of invasive breast cancer in ductal carcinoma in situ initially diagnosed by core biopsy. Asian J Surg. 2010;33:76–82.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  16. 16.↵
    1. Sue GR,
    2. Lannin DR,
    3. Killelea B,
    4. Chagpar AB.
    Predictors of microinvasion and its prognostic role in ductal carcinoma in situ. Am J Surg. 2013;206:478–81.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  17. 17.↵
    1. Walters LL,
    2. Pang JC,
    3. Zhao LL,
    4. Jorns JM.
    Ductal carcinoma in situ with distorting sclerosis on core biopsy may be predictive of upstaging on excision. Histopathology. 2015;66:577–86.
    OpenUrl
  18. 18.↵
    1. Rakovitch E,
    2. Nofech-Mozes S,
    3. Hanna W,
    4. Narod S,
    5. Thiruchelvam D,
    6. Saskin R, et al.
    HER2/neu and Ki-67 expression predict non-invasive recurrence following breast-conserving therapy for ductal carcinoma in situ. Br J Cancer. 2012;106:1160–5.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  19. 19.↵
    1. Davis JE,
    2. Nemesure B,
    3. Mehmood S,
    4. Nayi V,
    5. Burke S,
    6. Brzostek SR, et al.
    Her2 and Ki67 Biomarkers Predict Recurrence of Ductal Carcinoma in situ. Appl Immunohistochem Mol Morphol. 2016;24:20–5.
    OpenUrl
  20. 20.↵
    1. Al-Ameer AY,
    2. Al Nefaie S,
    3. Al Johani B,
    4. Anwar I,
    5. Al Tweigeri T,
    6. Tulbah A, et al.
    Sentinel lymph node biopsy in clinically detected ductal carcinoma in situ. World J Clin Oncol. 2016;7:258–64.
    OpenUrl
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Cancer Biology and Medicine: 16 (2)
Cancer Biology & Medicine
Vol. 16, Issue 2
1 May 2019
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Print
Download PDF
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Cancer Biology & Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Factors associated with upstaging in patients preoperatively diagnosed with ductal carcinoma in situ by core needle biopsy
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Cancer Biology & Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Cancer Biology & Medicine web site.
Citation Tools
Factors associated with upstaging in patients preoperatively diagnosed with ductal carcinoma in situ by core needle biopsy
Jing Si, Benlong Yang, Rong Guo, Naisi Huang, Chenlian Quan, Linxiaoxi Ma, Bingqiu Xiu, Yun Cao, Yue Tang, Linxiao Shen, Jiajian Chen, Jiong Wu
Cancer Biology & Medicine May 2019, 16 (2) 312-318; DOI: 10.20892/j.issn.2095-3941.2018.0159

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Factors associated with upstaging in patients preoperatively diagnosed with ductal carcinoma in situ by core needle biopsy
Jing Si, Benlong Yang, Rong Guo, Naisi Huang, Chenlian Quan, Linxiaoxi Ma, Bingqiu Xiu, Yun Cao, Yue Tang, Linxiao Shen, Jiajian Chen, Jiong Wu
Cancer Biology & Medicine May 2019, 16 (2) 312-318; DOI: 10.20892/j.issn.2095-3941.2018.0159
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Introduction
    • Materials and methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Conclusions
    • Acknowledgements
    • Conflict of interest statement
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • The Effect of Smoking on Progression from Ductal Carcinoma In Situ to Invasive Ductal Breast Carcinoma: A Retrospective Study
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Comprehensive strategies for management of postoperative hyper-progression recurrence (HPR) of hepatocellular carcinoma: a 12-year large sample multi-center study
  • Cancer cell-derived migrasomes harboring ATF6 promote breast cancer brain metastasis via endoplasmic reticulum stress-mediated disruption of the blood-brain barrier
  • Mitochondrial transplantation sensitizes chemotherapy to inhibit tumor development by enhancing anti-tumor immunity
Show more Original Article

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • Ductal carcinoma in situ
  • core needle biopsy
  • axillary staging

Navigate

  • Home
  • Current Issue

More Information

  • About CBM
  • About CACA
  • About TMUCIH
  • Editorial Board
  • Subscription

For Authors

  • Instructions for authors
  • Journal Policies
  • Submit a Manuscript

Journal Services

  • Email Alerts
  • Facebook
  • RSS Feeds
  • Twitter

 

© 2025 Cancer Biology & Medicine

Powered by HighWire