Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • About
    • About CBM
    • Editorial Board
    • Announcement
  • Articles
    • Ahead of print
    • Current Issue
    • Archive
    • Collections
    • Cover Story
  • For Authors
    • Instructions for Authors
    • Resources
    • Submit a Manuscript
  • For Reviewers
    • Become a Reviewer
    • Instructions for Reviewers
    • Resources
    • Outstanding Reviewer
  • Subscription
  • Alerts
    • Email Alerts
    • RSS Feeds
    • Table of Contents
  • Contact us
  • Other Publications
    • cbm

User menu

  • My alerts

Search

  • Advanced search
Cancer Biology & Medicine
  • Other Publications
    • cbm
  • My alerts
Cancer Biology & Medicine

Advanced Search

 

  • Home
  • About
    • About CBM
    • Editorial Board
    • Announcement
  • Articles
    • Ahead of print
    • Current Issue
    • Archive
    • Collections
    • Cover Story
  • For Authors
    • Instructions for Authors
    • Resources
    • Submit a Manuscript
  • For Reviewers
    • Become a Reviewer
    • Instructions for Reviewers
    • Resources
    • Outstanding Reviewer
  • Subscription
  • Alerts
    • Email Alerts
    • RSS Feeds
    • Table of Contents
  • Contact us
  • Follow cbm on Twitter
  • Visit cbm on Facebook
Research ArticleOriginal Article

Simultaneous inhibition of PI3Kα and CDK4/6 synergistically suppresses KRAS-mutated non-small cell lung cancer

Yuxiang Wang, Xian Li, Xueling Liu, Yi Chen, Chunhao Yang, Cun Tan, Bobo Wang, Yiming Sun, Xi Zhang, Yinglei Gao, Jian Ding and Linghua Meng
Cancer Biology & Medicine February 2019, 16 (1) 66-83; DOI: https://doi.org/10.20892/j.issn.2095-3941.2018.0361
Yuxiang Wang
1Division of Anti-Tumor Pharmacology, Shanghai Institute of Materia Medica, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai 201203, China
2University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Xian Li
1Division of Anti-Tumor Pharmacology, Shanghai Institute of Materia Medica, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai 201203, China
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Xueling Liu
1Division of Anti-Tumor Pharmacology, Shanghai Institute of Materia Medica, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai 201203, China
2University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Yi Chen
2University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China
3Division of Anti-Tumor Pharmacology, State Key Laboratory of Drug Research, Shanghai Institute of Materia Medica, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai 201203, China
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Chunhao Yang
4Department of Medicinal Chemistry, Shanghai Institute of Materia Medica, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai 200120, China
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Cun Tan
4Department of Medicinal Chemistry, Shanghai Institute of Materia Medica, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai 200120, China
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Bobo Wang
1Division of Anti-Tumor Pharmacology, Shanghai Institute of Materia Medica, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai 201203, China
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Yiming Sun
2University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China
3Division of Anti-Tumor Pharmacology, State Key Laboratory of Drug Research, Shanghai Institute of Materia Medica, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai 201203, China
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Xi Zhang
1Division of Anti-Tumor Pharmacology, Shanghai Institute of Materia Medica, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai 201203, China
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Yinglei Gao
2University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China
3Division of Anti-Tumor Pharmacology, State Key Laboratory of Drug Research, Shanghai Institute of Materia Medica, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai 201203, China
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jian Ding
2University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China
3Division of Anti-Tumor Pharmacology, State Key Laboratory of Drug Research, Shanghai Institute of Materia Medica, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai 201203, China
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: [email protected] [email protected]
Linghua Meng
1Division of Anti-Tumor Pharmacology, Shanghai Institute of Materia Medica, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai 201203, China
2University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: [email protected] [email protected]
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • 1
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    1

    CYH33 induced G1 arrest and suppression of Rb phosphorylation in sensitive KRAS-mutated NSCLC cells. (A) The half-maximal inhibitory concentration against cell growth (GI50) values of CYH33 against the proliferation of seven KRAS-mutated NSCLC cell lines. Bars: mean ± SD. Boxes below the chart indicate mutations in EGFR, KRAS, PIK3CA, TP53, or LKB1. (B) NSCLC cells were treated with CYH33 at the indicated concentrations for 1 h. Cell lysates were subjected to Western blot with the indicated antibodies. (C) NSCLC cells were treated with CYH33 for 72 h and cell cycle distribution was analyzed by flow cytometry. The cell population in G0/G1 phase is presented as mean + SD. Differences between control (0) and CYH33 treatment groups were analyzed using a two-tailed Student’s t test. *P < 0.05; **P < 0.01; ***P < 0.001. (D) Cells were treated with CYH33 at indicated concentrations and cell lysates were subjected to Western blot with indicated antibodies.

  • S1
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    S1

    H23 cells progressed into S phase in the presence of CYH33. A549 and H23 cells were synchronized at G2/M phase by incubation with nocodazole (0.3 μM) for 24 h. Cells were further incubated in fresh medium in the absence or presence of CYH33 (1 μM) for indicated times and cell cycle distribution was analyzed with flow cytometry.

  • 2
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    2

    Combined treatment of CYH33 and PD0332991 is synergistic against KRAS-mutated NSCLC cells. KRAS-mutated NSCLC cells were treated with CYH33, PD0332991, or both CYH33 and PD0332991 for 72 h and cell proliferation was detected by SRB assay. (A) Inhibitory curves from three independent experiments are presented. (B) CI values at the GI50 of seven NSCLC cancer cell lines were determined by the Chou-Talalay method. Gray bar: CI values indicating additive effect. R: CYH33-resistant cell lines; S: CYH33-sensitive cell lines. (C) GI50 values for CYH33, PD0332991, or the combination of CYH33 and PD03329917 against KRAS-mutated NSCLC cells. Data are shown as mean ± SD.

  • S2
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    S2

    Co-treatment with PI3K pathway inhibitor and CDK4/6 inhibitor synergistically suppress proliferation of Kras-mutated NSCLC cells. Combination Index (CI) values at GI50 of Kras-mutated NSCLC cell lines were determined by Chou-Talalay method. Cell proliferation was detected by SRB assay after cells were treated with each single agent or indicated combination. (A) CI values of PI3Kα inhibitor CYH33 or BYL719 and CDK4/6 inhibitor PD0332991 or LEE011 in H1355 cells. CYH: CYH33, BYL: BYL719, PD: PD0332991, LEE: LEE011. Data shown are the mean + SD. (B) CI values of PD0332991 and PI3K pathway inhibitor AZD8055, BEZ235 or GDC0941 in Kras-mutated NSCLC A549, H460, H358 and H23 cells. Data shown are the mean.

  • 3
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    3

    Combined CYH33 and PD0332991 treatment induces significant G1 phase arrest in KRAS-mutated NSCLC cells. KRAS-mutated NSCLC cells were treated with vehicle, CYH33 (1 μM), PD0332991 (1 μM), or both CYH33 and PD0332991 for 72 h. (A) Cell cycle distribution was analyzed by flow cytometry. The cell population in G0/G1 phase is presented as the mean ± SD. Differences between the indicated groups were analyzed using a two-tailed Student’s t test. *P < 0.05; **P < 0.01; ***P < 0.001. (B) Cell lysates were subjected to Western blot with the indicated antibodies. Induction of apoptosis of A549 (C) and H23 (D) cells was determined by annexin-V-PI dual staining. Annexin-V positive cells were determined with flow cytometry. Data are shown as the mean ± SD from three independent experiments. (E) Lysates of A549 and H23 cells were subjected to Western blot with the indicated antibodies.

  • S3
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    S3

    Co-treatment with CYH33 and PD0332991 failed to induce apoptosis in NSCLC cells. Kras-mutated NSCLC cells were treated with CYH33 (1 μM), PD0332991 (1 μM), or both for 72 h and apoptosis was determined by Annexin-V assay with flow cytometry. Data shown are mean + SD from three independent experiments.

  • 4
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    4

    Down-regulation of cyclin D1 sensitizes A549 and H23 cells to CYH33. A549 and H23 cells transfected with siRNAs targeting cyclin D1 or a negative control (NC) siRNA were treated with serially diluted CYH33 (A, B) or CYH33 at 1 μM for 72 h (C, F). (A, B) The effect of CYH33 on cell proliferation was determined by SRB assay. GI50 values obtained from A549 (A) and H23 (B) cells are presented. (C, D) The cell cycle distribution of A549 (C) and H23 (D) cells was analyzed by flow cytometry. The cell population in G0/G1 phase is presented. (E, F) Lysates of A549 (E) and H23 (F) cells were subjected to Western blot with the indicated antibodies. Data are shown as the mean + SD or representatives from at least three independent experiments. Differences between cells transfected with an NC siRNA and siRNAs targeting cyclin D1 were analyzed using a two-tailed Student’s t test. *P < 0.05; **P < 0.01; ***P < 0.001.

  • S4
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    S4

    Down-regulation of cyclin D1 had no effect on CYH33-induced apoptosis or the anti-proliferative activity of PD0332991. A549 and H23 cells transfected with siRNAs targeting cyclin D1 or negative control were treated with CYH33 (1 μM) for 72 h (A–D). Induction of apoptosis in A549 (A) and H23 (B) cells was determined by Aneexin-V-PI dual staining. Annexin-V positive cells were measured with flow cytometry. Data shown are mean + SD from three independent experiments. (C–D) Cell lysates of A549 (C) and H23 (D) cells were subjected to Western blot with indicated antibodies. A549 (E) and H23 (F) cells transfected with SiRNA targeting cyclin D1 or negative control were treated with PD0332991 (1 μM) for 72 h, and inhibition of cell proliferation by PD0332991 was calculated. Data shown are mean + SD. Differences between cells transfected with siRNAs targeting cyclin D1 and negative control were analyzed using two-tailed Student’s t test. *: P < 0.05.

  • 5
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    5

    CYH33 abrogates PD0332991-induced AKT phosphorylation and cyclin D1 expression. (A, B) A549 cells were treated with vehicle or PD0332991 (1 μM) for 72 h and total RNA were extracted. Genome-wide gene expression profiling was performed by microarray analysis. (A) GSEA enrichment plot of differentially expressed genes in the gene set of Hallmark of E2F targets (HALLMARK_E2F_TARGETS) after treatment with PD0332991. (B) Heatmap of the mRNA levels of genes involved in the PI3K-AKT signaling pathway. The fold change (log 2) in the expression of the listed genes after treatment with 1 μM PD0332991 is shown. (C) A549 cells were treated with 1 μM PD0332991 for the indicated times and cell lysates were subjected to Western blot with the indicated antibodies. (D) A549 cells were treated with PD0332991 (0, 1 or 5 μM) alone or in combination with CYH33 (1 μM) for 72 h and cell lysates were subjected to Western blot with the indicated antibodies. Data are shown as representatives from at least three independent experiments.

  • S5
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    S5

    Genome-wide gene expression profiling in A549 cells after PD0332991 treatment. A549 cells were treated with vehicle or PD0332991 (1 μM) for 72 h and total RNA was extracted. Genome-wide gene expression profiling was performed with microarray. (A) The genome-wide gene expression profile of A549 cells treated with vehicle control or PD0332991. Three biological replicates were employed in each group. (B) GSEA enrichment plot of differentially expressed genes in the gene set of hallmark of G2/M checkpoint (HALLMARK_G2/M_Checkpoints) and hallmark of mitotic spindle (HALLMARK_MITOTIC_SPINDLE) upon PD0332991 treatment.

  • 6
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    6

    Combined inhibition of PI3Kα and CDK4/6 displays synergistic activity against A549 and H23 xenografts. Randomly grouped nude mice bearing A549 (A) or H23 (B) xenografts were administrated orally with a vehicle control, CYH33 (5 mg/kg), PD0332991 (50 mg/kg for mice bearing A549 xenografts, 100 mg/kg for mice bearing H23 xenografts), or a combination of CYH33 and PD0332991, once a day for the indicated times. Tumor volume and body weight were measured twice a week. Data are depicted as the mean + SD (n = 6). Differences between the indicated groups were analyzed by Student’s t test. *P < 0.05; **P < 0.01; ***P < 0.001. (C) The combination ratios of CYH33 and PD0332991 against A549 and H23 xenografts were calculated using the fractional product method. FTV (fractional tumor volume) = mean final tumor volume of treated group/mean final tumor volume of control group. Expected FTV = (FTV of PD0332991) * (FTV of CYH33). Observed FTV = mean final tumor volume of combinatorial treatment/mean final tumor volume of control group. Combination ratio = expected FTV/observed FTV. (D) Tumor sections from A549 xenografts after treatment for 21 d were stained with Ki-67 (tawny) or phosphorylated Rb (Ser780, tawny). Cell nuclei were stained with hematoxylin (calamine blue, 40 ×). Representative images are shown for each group.

  • S6
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    S6

    Combined inhibition of PI3Kα and CDK4/6 displays synergistic activity against A549 and H23 xenografts. Randomly grouped nude mice bearing A549 xenografts or H23 xenografts were administrated orally with vehicle control, CYH33, PD0332991 or their combination once a day for 21d (A549) or 14 d (H23). Tumors were collected and weighed at the end of treatment. (A) Image of tumors collected at the end of treatment. (B) Tumor weight of each group was presented as mean + SD. Differences between indicated groups were analyzed using a two-tailed Student’s t test. *: P < 0.05; **: P < 0.01; ***: P < 0.001.

PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Cancer Biology and Medicine: 16 (1)
Cancer Biology & Medicine
Vol. 16, Issue 1
1 Feb 2019
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Print
Download PDF
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Cancer Biology & Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Simultaneous inhibition of PI3Kα and CDK4/6 synergistically suppresses KRAS-mutated non-small cell lung cancer
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Cancer Biology & Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Cancer Biology & Medicine web site.
Citation Tools
Simultaneous inhibition of PI3Kα and CDK4/6 synergistically suppresses KRAS-mutated non-small cell lung cancer
Yuxiang Wang, Xian Li, Xueling Liu, Yi Chen, Chunhao Yang, Cun Tan, Bobo Wang, Yiming Sun, Xi Zhang, Yinglei Gao, Jian Ding, Linghua Meng
Cancer Biology & Medicine Feb 2019, 16 (1) 66-83; DOI: 10.20892/j.issn.2095-3941.2018.0361

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Simultaneous inhibition of PI3Kα and CDK4/6 synergistically suppresses KRAS-mutated non-small cell lung cancer
Yuxiang Wang, Xian Li, Xueling Liu, Yi Chen, Chunhao Yang, Cun Tan, Bobo Wang, Yiming Sun, Xi Zhang, Yinglei Gao, Jian Ding, Linghua Meng
Cancer Biology & Medicine Feb 2019, 16 (1) 66-83; DOI: 10.20892/j.issn.2095-3941.2018.0361
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Introduction
    • Materials and methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Acknowledgements
    • Conflict of interest statement
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • CDK4/6 inhibitors in lung cancer: current practice and future directions
  • Synergistic Antitumor Effect of Taxanes and CDK4/6 Inhibitor in Lung Cancer Cells and Mice Harboring KRAS Mutations
  • PI3K{alpha} inhibitor CYH33 triggers antitumor immunity in murine breast cancer by activating CD8+T cells and promoting fatty acid metabolism
  • Erratum to Simultaneous inhibition of PI3Ka and CDK4/6 synergistically suppresses KRAS-mutated non-small cell lung cancer
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Cancer cell-derived migrasomes harboring ATF6 promote breast cancer brain metastasis via endoplasmic reticulum stress-mediated disruption of the blood-brain barrier
  • Nuclear PHGDH regulates macrophage polarization through transcriptional repression of GLUD1 and GLS2 in breast cancer
  • IL-33/ST2 signalling promotes tumor growth by regulating polarization of alternatively activated macrophages
Show more Original Article

Similar Articles

Subjects

  • Lung Cancer

Keywords

  • PI3Kα
  • CDK4/6
  • KRAS
  • NSCLC
  • CYH33

Navigate

  • Home
  • Current Issue

More Information

  • About CBM
  • About CACA
  • About TMUCIH
  • Editorial Board
  • Subscription

For Authors

  • Instructions for authors
  • Journal Policies
  • Submit a Manuscript

Journal Services

  • Email Alerts
  • Facebook
  • RSS Feeds
  • Twitter

 

© 2025 Cancer Biology & Medicine

Powered by HighWire