Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Breast cancer imaging with glucosamine CEST (chemical exchange saturation transfer) MRI: first human experience

  • Molecular Imaging
  • Published:
European Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objectives

This study aims to evaluate the feasibility of imaging breast cancer with glucosamine (GlcN) chemical exchange saturation transfer (CEST) MRI technique to distinguish between tumor and surrounding tissue, compared to the conventional MRI method.

Methods

Twelve patients with newly diagnosed breast tumors (median age, 53 years) were recruited in this prospective IRB-approved study, between August 2019 and March 2020. Informed consent was obtained from all patients. All MRI measurements were performed on a 3-T clinical MRI scanner. For CEST imaging, a fat-suppressed 3D RF-spoiled gradient echo sequence with saturation pulse train was applied. CEST signals were quantified in the tumor and in the surrounding tissue based on magnetization transfer ratio asymmetry (MTRasym) and a multi-Gaussian fitting.

Results

GlcN CEST MRI revealed higher signal intensities in the tumor tissue compared to the surrounding breast tissue (MTRasym effect of 8.12 ± 4.09%, N = 12, p = 2.2 E−03) with the incremental increase due to GlcN uptake of 3.41 ± 0.79% (N = 12, p = 2.2 E−03), which is in line with tumor location as demonstrated by T1W and T2W MRI. GlcN CEST spectra comprise distinct peaks corresponding to proton exchange between free water and hydroxyl and amide/amine groups, and relayed nuclear Overhauser enhancement (NOE) from aliphatic groups, all yielded larger CEST integrals in the tumor tissue after GlcN uptake by an averaged factor of 2.2 ± 1.2 (p = 3.38 E−03), 1.4 ± 0.4 (p =9.88 E−03), and 1.6 ± 0.6 (p = 2.09 E−02), respectively.

Conclusion

The results of this initial feasibility study indicate the potential of GlcN CEST MRI to diagnose breast cancer in a clinical setup.

Key Points

• GlcN CEST MRI method is demonstrated for its the ability to differentiate between breast tumor lesions and the surrounding tissue, based on the differential accumulation of the GlcN in the tumors.

• GlcN CEST imaging may be used to identify metabolic active malignant breast tumors without using a Gd contrast agent.

• The GlcN CEST MRI method may be considered for use in a clinical setup for breast cancer detection and should be tested as a complementary method to conventional clinical MRI methods.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

CEST:

Chemical exchange saturation transfer

Gd:

Gadolinium

GlcN:

Glucosamine

MRI:

Magnetic resonance imaging

MT:

Magnetization transfer

MTRasym:

Magnetization transfer ratio asymmetry

NOE:

Nuclear Overhauser enhancement

ROI:

Region of interest

T1W:

T1-weighted

T2W:

T2-weighted

References

  1. Ward KM, Aletras AH, Balaban RS (2000) A new class of contrast agents for MRI based on proton chemical exchange dependent saturation transfer (CEST). J Magn Reson 143:79–87

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Vinogradov E, Sherry AD, Lenkinski RE (2013) CEST: from basic principles to applications, challenges and opportunities. J Magn Reson 229:155–172

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Wu B, Warnock G, Zaiss M et al (2016) An overview of CEST MRI for non-MR physicists. EJNMMI Phys 3:016–0155

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Togao O, Yoshiura T, Keupp J et al (2014) Amide proton transfer imaging of adult diffuse gliomas: correlation with histopathological grades. Neuro Oncol 16:441–448

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Takayama Y, Nishie A, Togao O et al (2018) Amide proton transfer MR imaging of endometrioid endometrial adenocarcinoma: association with histologic grade. Radiology 286:909–917

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Meissner J-E, Korzowski A, Regnery S et al (2019) Early response assessment of glioma patients to definitive chemoradiotherapy using chemical exchange saturation transfer imaging at 7 T. J Magn Reson Imaging 50:1268–1277

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Chan KW, Jiang L, Cheng M et al (2016) CEST-MRI detects metabolite levels altered by breast cancer cell aggressiveness and chemotherapy response. NMR Biomed 29:806–816

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Krikken E, van der Kemp WJM, Khlebnikov V et al (2019) Contradiction between amide-CEST signal and pH in breast cancer explained with metabolic MRI. NMR Biomed 32:e4110

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Zhang S, Seiler S, Wang X et al (2018) CEST-Dixon for human breast lesion characterization at 3 T: a preliminary study. Magn Reson Med 80:895–903

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Klomp DWJ, Dula AN, Arlinghaus LR et al (2013) Amide proton transfer imaging of the human breast at 7T: development and reproducibility. NMR Biomed 26:1271–1277

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Chan KWY, McMahon MT, Kato Y et al (2012) Natural D-glucose as a biodegradable MRI contrast agent for detecting cancer. Magn Reson Med 68:1764–1773

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Longo DL, Moustaghfir FZ, Zerbo A et al (2017) EXCI-CEST: exploiting pharmaceutical excipients as MRI-CEST contrast agents for tumor imaging. Intern J Pharma 525:275–281

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Anderson JW, Nicolosi RJ, Borzelleca JF (2005) Glucosamine effects in humans: a review of effects on glucose metabolism, side effects, safety considerations and efficacy. Food Chem Toxicol 43:187–201

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Barron CC, Bilan PJ, Tsakiridis T, Tsiani E (2016) Facilitative glucose transporters: implications for cancer detection, prognosis and treatment. Metabolism 65:124–139

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Rivlin M, Navon G (2016) Glucosamine and N-acetyl glucosamine as new CEST MRI agents for molecular imaging of tumors. Sci Rep 6:32648–32648

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Rivlin M, Navon G (2021) Molecular imaging of cancer by glucosamine chemical exchange saturation transfer MRI: a preclinical study. NMR Biomed 34:e4431

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Rivlin M, Barazany D, Navon G (2018) Chemical exchange saturation transfer (CEST) MRI of glucosamine at 3T. Proc Intl Soc Mag Reson Med 26:2275

    Google Scholar 

  18. Poblador Rodriguez E, Moser P, Dymerska B et al (2019) A comparison of static and dynamic ∆B(0) mapping methods for correction of CEST MRI in the presence of temporal B(0) field variations. Magn Reson Med 82:633–646

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Stancanello J, Terreno E, Castelli DD, Cabella C, Uggeri F, Aime S (2008) Development and validation of a smoothing-splines-based correction method for improving the analysis of CEST-MR images. Contrast Media Mol Imaging 3:136–149

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Zaiss M, Schmitt B, Bachert P (2011) Quantitative separation of CEST effect from magnetization transfer and spillover effects by Lorentzian-line-fit analysis of z-spectra. J Magn Reson 211:149–155

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Zhang L, Zhao Y, Chen Y et al (2019) Voxel-wise Optimization of Pseudo Voigt Profile (VOPVP) for Z-spectra fitting in chemical exchange saturation transfer (CEST) MRI. Quant Imaging Med Surg 9(10):1714–1730

  22. Rivlin M, Navon G (2018) CEST MRI of 3-O-methyl-D-glucose on different breast cancer models. Magn Reson Med 79:1061–1069

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Zhou IY, Wang E, Cheung JS, Zhang X, Fulci G, Sun PZ (2017) Quantitative chemical exchange saturation transfer (CEST) MRI of glioma using Image Downsampling Expedited Adaptive Least-squares (IDEAL) fitting. Sci Rep 7:017–00167

    Google Scholar 

  24. Jackson CG, Plaas AH, Sandy JD et al (2010) The human pharmacokinetics of oral ingestion of glucosamine and chondroitin sulfate taken separately or in combination. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 18:297–302

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Sherry AD, Caravan P, Lenkinski RE (2009) Primer on gadolinium chemistry. J Magn Reson Imaging 30:1240–1248

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We are indebted to the patients who participated in this research and we gratefully acknowledge Dr. Ilana Haas and Dr. Ravit Agassi for assisting in their recruitment.

Funding

The authors gratefully acknowledge the support of this research by the Earlier.org - Friends For an Earlier Breast Cancer Test foundation and the Israel Science Foundation.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gil Navon.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval

Institutional Review Board approval was obtained.

Informed consent

Written informed consent was obtained from all subjects (patients) in this study.

Conflict of interest

The authors of this manuscript declare no relationships with any companies, whose products or services may be related to the subject matter of the article.

Guarantor

The scientific guarantor of this publication is Prof. Gil Navon.

Statistics and biometry

No complex statistical methods were necessary for this paper.

Methodology

• prospective

• diagnostic or prognostic study

• performed at one institution

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

ESM 1

(DOCX 176 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Rivlin, M., Anaby, D., Nissan, N. et al. Breast cancer imaging with glucosamine CEST (chemical exchange saturation transfer) MRI: first human experience. Eur Radiol 32, 7365–7373 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-022-08772-w

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-022-08772-w

Keywords

Navigation